42 found
Order:
  1.  83
    Stephen C. Levinson (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. MIT Press.
    When we speak, we mean more than we say. In this book Stephen C. Levinson explains some general processes that underlie presumptions in communication.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   122 citations  
  2.  87
    Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson (2009). The Myth of Language Universals: Language Diversity and its Importance for Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):429-448.
    Talk of linguistic universals has given cognitive scientists the impression that languages are all built to a common pattern. In fact, there are vanishingly few universals of language in the direct sense that all languages exhibit them. Instead, diversity can be found at almost every level of linguistic organization. This fundamentally changes the object of enquiry from a cognitive science perspective. This target article summarizes decades of cross-linguistic work by typologists and descriptive linguists, showing just how few and unprofound the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   67 citations  
  3. Connie de Vos, Francisco Torreira & Stephen C. Levinson (2015). Turn-Timing in Signed Conversations: Coordinating Stroke-to-Stroke Turn Boundaries. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Francisco Torreira, Sara Bã¶Gels & Stephen C. Levinson (2015). Breathing for Answering: The Time Course of Response Planning in Conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5. Stephen C. Levinson & Francisco Torreira (2015). Timing in Turn-Taking and its Implications for Processing Models of Language. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Asifa Majid, Melissa Bowerman, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Stephen C. Levinson (2004). Can Language Restructure Cognition? The Case for Space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):108-114.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  7. Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson (2009). With Diversity in Mind: Freeing the Language Sciences From Universal Grammar. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):472-492.
    Our response takes advantage of the wide-ranging commentary to clarify some aspects of our original proposal and augment others. We argue against the generative critics of our coevolutionary program for the language sciences, defend the use of close-to-surface models as minimizing cross-linguistic data distortion, and stress the growing role of stochastic simulations in making generalized historical accounts testable. These methods lead the search for general principles away from idealized representations and towards selective processes. Putting cultural evolution central in understanding language (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Stephen C. Levinson (1986). Pragmatics. Philosophical Review 95 (1):123-127.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   161 citations  
  9. Elma E. Hilbrink, Merideth Gattis & Stephen C. Levinson (2015). Early Developmental Changes in the Timing of Turn-Taking: A Longitudinal Study of Mother–Infant Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  61
    Stephen C. Levinson & Asifa Majid (2014). Differential Ineffability and the Senses. Mind and Language 29 (4):407-427.
    Ineffability, the degree to which percepts or concepts resist linguistic coding, is a fairly unexplored nook of cognitive science. Although philosophical preoccupations with qualia or nonconceptual content certainly touch upon the area, there has been little systematic thought and hardly any empirical work in recent years on the subject. We argue that ineffability is an important domain for the cognitive sciences. For examining differential ineffability across the senses may be able to tell us important things about how the mind works, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  39
    Stephen C. Levinson (2012). The Original Sin of Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):396-403.
    Classical cognitive science was launched on the premise that the architecture of human cognition is uniform and universal across the species. This premise is biologically impossible and is being actively undermined by, for example, imaging genomics. Anthropology (including archaeology, biological anthropology, linguistics, and cultural anthropology) is, in contrast, largely concerned with the diversification of human culture, language, and biology across time and space—it belongs fundamentally to the evolutionary sciences. The new cognitive sciences that will emerge from the interactions with the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  12.  12
    Daniel B. M. Haun, Christian J. Rapold, Gabriele Janzen & Stephen C. Levinson (2011). Plasticity of Human Spatial Cognition: Spatial Language and Cognition Covary Across Cultures. Cognition 119 (1):70-80.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  13.  53
    Paul Smolensky, Emmanuel Dupoux, Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson (2009). Universals in Cognitive Theories of Language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):468.
    Generative linguistics' search for linguistic universals (1) is not comparable to the vague explanatory suggestions of the article; (2) clearly merits a more central place than linguistic typology in cognitive science; (3) is fundamentally untouched by the article's empirical arguments; (4) best explains the important facts of linguistic diversity; and (5) illuminates the dominant component of language's nature: biology.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  25
    Stephen C. Levinson & Russell D. Gray (2012). Tools From Evolutionary Biology Shed New Light on the Diversification of Languages. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (3):167-173.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  15.  1
    Stephen C. Levinson (1996). Relativity in Spatial Conception and Description. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press 177--202.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  16.  15
    Stephen C. Levinson, Sotaro Kita, Daniel B. M. Haun & Björn H. Rasch (2002). Returning the Tables: Language Affects Spatial Reasoning. Cognition 84 (2):155-188.
  17.  28
    Jan Peter De Ruiter, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Sarah Newman-Norlund, Roger Newman-Norlund, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson & Ivan Toni (2010). Exploring the Cognitive Infrastructure of Communication. Interaction Studies 11 (1):51-77.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  8
    Stephen C. Levinson (2016). Turn-Taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20 (1):6-14.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  17
    Asifa Majid & Stephen C. Levinson (2010). WEIRD Languages Have Misled Us, Too. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):103-103.
    The linguistic and cognitive sciences have severely underestimated the degree of linguistic diversity in the world. Part of the reason for this is that we have projected assumptions based on English and familiar languages onto the rest. We focus on some distortions this has introduced, especially in the study of semantics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  10
    Stephen C. Levinson & Penelope Brown (1994). Immanuel Kant Among the Tenejapans: Anthropology as Empirical Philosophy. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 22 (1):3-41.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  21.  29
    Bjorn Merker, Nicholas Evans & Stephen C. Levinson (2009). Returning Language to Culture by Way of Biology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (5):460.
    Conflation of our unique human endowment for language with innate, so-called universal, grammar has banished language from its biological home. The facts reviewed by Evans & Levinson (E&L) fit the biology of cultural transmission. My commentary highlights our dedicated learning capacity for vocal production learning as the form of our language endowment compatible with those facts.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  7
    Stephen C. Levinson (1998). Studying Spatial Conceptualization Across Cultures: Anthropology and Cognitive Science. Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 26 (1):7-24.
  23.  8
    J. P. De Ruiter & Stephen C. Levinson (2008). Commentary/Christiansen & Chater: Language as Shaped A Biological Infrastructure for Communication Underlies the Cultural Evolution of Languages. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31:5.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (1996). Introduction: Linguistic Relativity Re-Examined. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press 1--18.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  19
    Asifa Majid & Stephen C. Levinson (2008). Language Does Provide Support for Basic Tastes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):86-87.
    Recurrent lexicalization patterns across widely different cultural contexts can provide a window onto common conceptualizations. The cross-linguistic data support the idea that sweet, salt, sour, and bitter are basic tastes. In addition, umami and fatty are likely basic tastes, as well.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Stephen C. Levinson (2007). Cut and Break Verbs in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan Language of Rossel Island. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27.  14
    J. P. de Ruiter & Stephen C. Levinson (2008). A Biological Infrastructure for Communication Underlies the Cultural Evolution of Languages. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):518-518.
    Universal Grammar (UG) is indeed evolutionarily implausible. But if languages are just to a large primate brain, it is hard to see why other primates do not have complex languages. The answer is that humans have evolved a specialized and uniquely human cognitive architecture, whose main function is to compute mappings between arbitrary signals and communicative intentions. This underlies the development of language in the human species.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Stephen C. Levinson (2006). On the Human ‘Interactional Engine. In N. J. Enfield and S. C. Levinson , Roots Of.
    My goal in this paper 1 is, first, to collect together a number of themes and observations that have usually been kept apart, locked up in their respective disciplines. When these are brought together, some general and far reaching implications become really rather clear. In particular, I want to make a case for the implicit coherence of these themes in the idea that.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  8
    Disa A. Sauter & Stephen C. Levinson (2010). What's Embodied in a Smile? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (6):457-458.
    Differentiation of the forms and functions of different smiles is needed, but they should be based on the empirical data on distinctions that senders and receivers make and on the physical cues that are employed. Such data would allow for a test of whether smiles can be differentiated using perceptual cues alone or whether mimicry or simulation are necessary.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  8
    Stephen C. Levinson (2011). Reciprocals in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan Language of Rossel Island. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), Reciprocals and Semantic Typology. John Benjamins Pub. Company 98--177.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (1996). Introduction to Part I. In J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press 21--36.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  4
    Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Implicature Explicated? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (4):722.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  4
    Stephen C. Levinson (2010). Advancing Our Grasp of Constrained Variation in a Crucial Cognitive Domain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):391-392.
    Jones's system of constraints promises interesting insights into the typology of kin term systems. Three problems arise: (1) the conflation of categories with algorithms that assign them threatens to weaken the typological predictions; (2) OT-type constraints have little psychological plausibility; (3) the conflation of kin-term systems and kinship systems may underplay the character of real kinship in action.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  4
    Stephen C. Levinson & Penelope Brown (2012). Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan Language of Rossel Island. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of "Putting" and "Taking": A Crosslinguistic Perspective. John Benjamins Pub. Co. 100--273.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Stephen C. Levinson (1998). Studying Spatial Conceptualization Across Cultures: Anthropology and Cognitive Science. Ethos 26 (1):7-24.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. Stephen C. Levinson (1995). Interactional Biases in Human Thinking. Social Intelligence and Interaction.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Stephen C. Levinson & Penelope Brown (1994). Immanuel Kant Among the Tenejapans: Anthropology as Empirical Philosophy. Ethos 22 (1):3-41.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  1
    Asifa Majid, Nicholas Evans, Alice Gaby & Stephen C. Levinson (2011). The Semantics of Reciprocal Constructions Across Languages. In Nicholas Evans (ed.), Reciprocals and Semantic Typology. John Benjamins Pub. Company 29.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    Stephen C. Levinson (2003). Spatial Language. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Jan Peter deRuiter, Matthijs L. Noordzij, Sarah Newman-Norlund, Roger Newman-Norlund, Peter Hagoort, Stephen C. Levinson & Ivan Toni (2010). Exploring the Cognitive Infrastructure of Communication. Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (1):51-77.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Judith Holler, Kobin H. Kendrick, Marisa Casillas & Stephen C. Levinson (2015). Editorial: Turn-Taking in Human Communicative Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Stephen C. Levinson & Penelope Brown (2007). Gesichtsbedrohende Akte. In Hannes Kuch, Sybille Krämer & Steffen K. Herrmann (eds.), Verletzende Worte: Die Grammatik Sprachlicher Missachtung. Transcript Verlag 59-88.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography