60 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Stephen H. Daniel [60]Stephen Hartley Daniel [1]
See also:
Profile: Stephen H. Daniel (Texas A&M University)
  1. Stephen H. Daniel (unknown). John Toland: His Methods, Manners, and Mind. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    This study is the first sympathetic philosophical treatment in English of the complete works of John Toland . Professor Daniel presents Toland as a champion of religious toleration and civil liberty whose writing is important because it brings together many of the ideas, themes, and controversies that dominated the early modern period in Europe. Best known for his call for common-sense thinking in the deist manifesto Christianity Not Mysterious, Toland gained notoriety as editor and biographer of Milton, Harrington, and Ludlow; (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephen H. Daniel (2013). Berkeley's Doctrine of Mind and the “Black List Hypothesis”: A Dialogue. Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):24-41.
    Clues about what Berkeley was planning to say about mind in his now-lost second volume of the Principles seem to abound in his Notebooks. However, commentators have been reluctant to use his unpublished entries to explicate his remarks about spiritual substances in the Principles and Dialogues for three reasons. First, it has proven difficult to reconcile the seemingly Humean bundle theory of the self in the Notebooks with Berkeley's published characterization of spirits as “active beings or principles.” Second, the fact (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen H. Daniel, Fringes And Transitive States In William James' Concept Of The Stream Of Thought.
  4. Stephen H. Daniel, The Origins Of Certainty.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen H. Daniel, Wittgenstein on Field and Stream.
  6. Stephen H. Daniel (2011). Berkeley's 'Alciphron': English Text and Essays in Interpretation. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (3):563 - 566.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen H. Daniel (2011). Berkeley's Rejection of Divine Analogy. Science Et Esprit 63 (2):149-161.
    Berkeley argues that claims about divine predication (e.g., God is wise or exists) should be understood literally rather than analogically, because like all spirits (i.e., causes), God is intelligible only in terms of the extent of his effects. By focusing on the harmony and order of nature, Berkeley thus unites his view of God with his doctrines of mind, force, grace, and power, and avoids challenges to religious claims that are raised by appeals to analogy. The essay concludes by showing (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephen H. Daniel (2010). Berkeley and Spinoza. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 200 (1):123 - 134.
    There is a widespread assumption that Berkeley and Spinoza have little in common, even though early Jesuit critics in France often linked them. Later commentators (C. S. Peirce, H. Bergson, G. Brykman) have also recognized their similarities. My essay focuses on how (1) Berkeley's comments on the Arnauld-Malebranche debate regarding objective and formal reality and (2) his treatment of god's creation of finite minds within the order of nature relate his theory of knowledge to his doctrine in a way similar (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen H. Daniel (2010). Edwards' Occasionalism. In Don Schweitzer (ed.), Jonathan Edwards as Contemporary. Peter Lang. 1-14.
  10. Stephen H. Daniel (2010). How Berkeley's Works Are Interpreted. In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Science and Religion in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen H. Daniel (2009). Review of Desmond M. Clarke (Ed.), Berkeley: Philosophical Writings. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (7).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephen H. Daniel (2008). Berkeley's Stoic Notion of Spiritual Substance. In New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought. Humanity Books.
    For Berkeley, minds are not Cartesian spiritual substances because they cannot be said to exist (even if only conceptually) abstracted from their activities. Similarly, Berkeley's notion of mind differs from Locke's in that, for Berkeley, minds are not abstract substrata in which ideas inhere. Instead, Berkeley redefines what it means for the mind to be a substance in a way consistent with the Stoic logic of 17th century Ramists on which Leibniz and Jonathan Edwards draw. This view of mind, I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Stephen H. Daniel (2008). Berkeley's Semantic Treatment of Representation. History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (1):41 - 55.
  14. Stephen H. Daniel (ed.) (2008). New Interpretations of Berkeley's Thought. Humanity Books.
    In this set of previously unpublished essays, noted scholars from North America and Europe describe how the Irish philosopher George Berkeley (1684-1753) continues to inspire debates about his views on knowledge, reality, God, freedom, mathematics, and religion. Here discussions about Berkeley's account of physical objects, minds, and God's role in human experience are resolved within explicitly ethical and theological contexts. This collection uses debates about Berkeley's immaterialism and theory of ideas to open up a discussion of how divine activity and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Stephen H. Daniel (2008). Review of Pierre Gassendi and the Birth of Early Modern Philosophy. [REVIEW] International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):410-412.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen H. Daniel (2007). Edwards as Philosopher. In Stephen J. Stein (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Jonathan Edwards. Cambridge University Press. 162-80.
  17. Stephen H. Daniel (2007). Introduction. In Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stephen H. Daniel (2007). The Harmony of the Leibniz-Berkeley Juxtaposition. In P. Phemister & S. Brown (eds.), Leibniz and the English-Speaking World. Springer. 163--180.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stephen H. Daniel (ed.) (2005). Current Continental Theory and Modern Philosophy. Northwestern University Press.
    For decades Continental theorists from Derrida to Deleuze have engaged in provocative, penetrating, and often extensive examinations of modern philosophers-studies that have opened up new ways to think about figures such as Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Hume, Rousseau, and Kant. This volume, for the first time, gives this work its due. A systematic rereading of early modern philosophers in the light of recent Continental philosophy, it exposes overlooked but critical aspects of sixteenth- through eighteenth-century philosophy even as it brings to (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jonathan E. Adler, Martin Benjamin, James P. Cadello, Steven M. Cahn, Joan C. Callahan, Jo A. Chern, Stephen H. Daniel, Juli Eflin, Carrie Figdor, Newton Garver, Theodore A. Gracyk, Lawrence H. Hinman, Eugene Kelly, David Martens, Michael Martin, John McCumber, John J. McDermott, Marshall Missner, Kathleen Dean Moore, Ronald Moore, Louis P. Pojman, Anthony Weston, Merold Westphal, V. Alan White & Celia Wolf-Devine (2004). Teaching Philosophy: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Suggestions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Here, two dozen distinguished philosophers share their insights and practical suggestions on a diverse range of pedagogic issues with essays on how to motivate students, constructing syllabi for particular courses, teaching particularly complex concepts, and constructing creative examinations.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen H. Daniel (2001). Berkeley's Christian Neoplatonism, Archetypes, and Divine Ideas. Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):239-258.
    Berkeley's doctrine of archetypes explains how God perceives and can have the same ideas as finite minds. His appeal of Christian neo-Platonism opens up a way to understand how the relation of mind, ideas, and their union is modeled on the Cappadocian church fathers' account of the persons of the trinity. This way of understanding Berkeley indicates why he, in contrast to Descartes or Locke, thinks that mind (spiritual substance) and ideas (the object of mind) cannot exist or be thought (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Stephen H. Daniel (2001). Berkeley's Pantheistic Discourse. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 49 (3):179-194.
    Berkeley's immaterialism has more in common with views developed by Henry More, the mathematician Joseph Raphson, John Toland, and Jonathan Edwards than those of thinkers with whom he is commonly associated (e.g., Malebranche and Locke). The key for recognizing their similarities lies in appreciating how they understand St. Paul's remark that in God "we live and move and have our being" as an invitation to think to God as the space of discourse in which minds and ideas are identified. This (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Stephen H. Daniel (2001). CJ McCracken and IC Tipton, Eds., Berkeley's Principles and Dialogues: Background Source Materials Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (5):362-364.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stephen H. Daniel (2001). Edwards, Berkeley, and Ramist Logic. Idealistic Studies 31 (1):55-72.
    I will suggest that we can begin to see why Edwards and Berkeley sound so much alike by considering how both think of minds or spiritual substances notas things modeled on material bodies but as the acts by which things are identified. Those acts cannot be described using the Aristotelian subject-predicatelogic on which the metaphysics of substance, properties, attributes, or modes is based because subjects, substances, etc. are themselves initially distinguishedthrough such acts. To think of mind as opposed to matter, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stephen H. Daniel (2001). The Ramist Context of Berkeley's Philosophy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (3):487 – 505.
    Berkeley's doctrines about mind, the language of nature, substance, minima sensibilia, notions, abstract ideas, inference, and freedom appropriate principles developed by the 16th-century logician Peter Ramus and his 17th-century followers (e.g., Alexander Richardson, William Ames, John Milton). Even though Berkeley expresses himself in Cartesian or Lockean terms, he relies on a Ramist way of thinking that is not a form of mere rhetoric or pedagogy but a logic and ontology grounded in Stoicism. This article summarizes the central features of Ramism, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen H. Daniel (2000). Berkeley, Suárez, and the Esse-Existere Distinction. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 74 (4):621-636.
    For Berkeley, a thing's existence 'esse' is nothing more than its being perceived 'as that thing'. It makes no sense to ask (with Samuel Johnson) about the 'esse' of the mind or the specific act of perception, for that would be like asking what it means for existence to exist. Berkeley's "existere is percipi or percipere" (NB 429) thus carefully adopts the scholastic distinction between 'esse' and 'existere' ignored by Locke and others committed to a substantialist notion of mind. Following (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephen H. Daniel (1995). Postmodernity, Poststructuralism, and the Historiography of Modern Philosophy. International Philosophical Quarterly 35 (3):255-267.
    Well-known for its criticism of totalizing accounts of reason and truth, postmodern thought also makes positive contributions to our understanding of the sensual, ideological, and linguistic contingencies that inform modernist representations of self, history, and the world. The positive side of postmodernity includes structuralism and poststructuralism, particularly as expressed by theorists concerned with practices of the body (Lacan, Foucault, Deleuze), commodity differences (Adorno, Althusser), language (Derrida), and gender (Kristeva, Irigaray). Though these challenges to modernity do not privilege subjectivity, they suggest (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Stephen H. Daniel (1995). Vico's Historicism and the Ontology of Arguments. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):431-446.
  29. Stephen H. Daniel (1994). The Philosophy of Jonathan Edwards: A Study in Divine Semiotics. Indiana University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Stephen H. Daniel (1994). The Semiotic Ontology of Jonathan Edwards. Modern Schoolman 71 (4):285-304.
    Jonathan Edwards' marginalization in modern philosophy stems from his refusal to endorse the predicational logic and substantialist ontology of the rationalist-empiricist debate. Instead, he appeals to a communicative, semiotic logic of propositions grounded in Stoic thought and thematized by Peter Ramus and his Puritan followers. That alternative logic displays an "ontology of supposition" that guarantees God's existence, justifies typological, magical, and even astrological inferences, undermines modernist dichotomies (e.g., between mind and matter), and invalidates efforts to speak of Edwards' thought in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Stephen H. Daniel (1992). Some Conflicting Assumptions of Journalistic Ethics. In Elliot D. Cohen (ed.), Philosophical Issues in Journalism. Oxford University Press. 50--58.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stephen H. Daniel (1991). Lawrence J. Hatab, Myth and Philosophy: A Contest of Truths Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 11 (5):324-326.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Stephen H. Daniel (1990). Myth and Modern Philosophy. Temple University Press.
  34. Stephen H. Daniel (1990). Transforming the Hermeneutic Context. New Vico Studies 8:127-129.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Stephen H. Daniel (1988). Gerald E. Myers. "William James: His Life and Thought". [REVIEW] New Vico Studies 6:181.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Stephen H. Daniel (1988). The Narrative Character of Myth and Philosophy in Vico. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):1-9.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stephen H. Daniel (1988). William James. New Vico Studies 6:181-182.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Stephen H. Daniel (1986). Myth and Rationality in Mandeville. Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (4):595.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen H. Daniel (1986). Metaphor in the Hitoriography of Philosophy. Clio 15 (2):191-210.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Stephen H. Daniel (1986). Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi, Editors. "Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected Works". Vol. 5: "Poetry and Experience". [REVIEW] New Vico Studies 4:175.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stephen H. Daniel (1986). Wilhelm Dilthey. New Vico Studies 4:175-178.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephen H. Daniel (1986). Wilhelm Dilthey: Selected Works. [REVIEW] New Vico Studies 4:175-178.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Stephen H. Daniel (1985). Descartes on Myth and Ingenuity/Ingenium. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):157-170.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephen H. Daniel (1985). The Philosophy of Ingenuity: Vico on Proto-Philosophy. Philosophy and Rhetoric 18 (4):236 - 243.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Stephen H. Daniel (1985). Vico on Mythic Figuration as Prerequisite for Philosophic Literacy. New Vico Studies 3:61-72.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Stephen H. Daniel (1985). The Deconstructive Turn: Essays in the Rhetoric of Philosophy (Review). Philosophy and Literature 9 (1):117-119.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stephen H. Daniel (1983). Hobbes and America. Review of Metaphysics 36 (3):698-700.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Stephen H. Daniel (1982). Ethical Theory and Journalistic Ethics. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 1 (1):19-25.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stephen H. Daniel (1982). Myth and the Grammar of Discovery in Francis Bacon. Philosophy and Rhetoric 15 (4):219 - 237.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Stephen H. Daniel (1981). Objective-Format Testing in Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 12 (1):96–112.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 60