12 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Stephen Harris
Profile: Stephen E. Harris (Leiden University)
  1. Stephen E. Harris (forthcoming). Suffering and the Shape of Well-Being in Buddhist Ethics. Asian Philosophy:1-18.
    This article explores the defense Indian Buddhist texts make in support of their conceptions of lives that are good for an individual. This defense occurs, largely, through their analysis of ordinary experience as being saturated by subtle forms of suffering (du?kha). I begin by explicating the most influential of the Buddhist taxonomies of suffering: the threefold division into explicit suffering (du?kha-du?khat?), the suffering of change (vipari??ma-du?khat?), and conditioned suffering (sa?sk?ra-du?khat?). Next, I sketch the three theories of welfare that have been (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephen Harris (2011). Does Anātman Rationally Entail Altruism? On Bodhicaryāvatāra 8: 101-103. Journal of Buddhist Ethics 18.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen Harris (2010). Antifoundationalism and the Commitment to Reducing Suffering in Rorty and Madhyamaka Buddhism. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):71-89.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen J. Harris (2010). John M. Hill, The Narrative Pulse of “Beowulf”: Arrivals and Departures. (Toronto Old English Series, 17.) Toronto; Buffalo, N.Y.; and London: University of Toronto Press, 2008. Pp. X, 119. [REVIEW] Speculum 85 (1):146.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen A. Harris & Peter R. Anstey (2009). John Locke's Seed Lists: A Case Study in Botanical Exchange. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 40 (4):256-264.
  6. Stephen J. Harris (2008). David Pratt, The Political Thought of King Alfred the Great.(Cambridge Studies in Medieval Life and Thought, 4th Ser., 67.) Cambridge, Eng., and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Pp. Xv, 413. $110. [REVIEW] Speculum 83 (3):736-738.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter R. Anstey & Stephen A. Harris (2006). Locke and Botany. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (2):151-171.
  8. Stephen E. Harris, Bruce K. Sawhill, Andrew Wuensche & Stuart Kauffman (2002). A Model of Transcriptional Regulatory Networks Based on Biases in the Observed Regulation Rules. Complexity 7 (4):23-40.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen Harris (1997). Berkeley's Argument From Perceptual Relativity. History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (1):99 - 120.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stephen Harris (1994). Gts and Interrogative Tableaux. Synthese 99 (3):329 - 343.
    A variant of the standard deductive tableau system is introduced, and interrogative rules are added, resulting in a so-called interrogative tableau system. A game-theoretical account of entailment is sketched, and the deductive tableau system is interpreted in these terms. Finally, it is shown how to extend this account of entailment into an account of interrogative entailment, thereby providing a semantics for the interrogative tableau system.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jaakko Hintikka & Stephen Harris (1988). On the Logic of Interrogative Inquiry. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:233 - 240.
    In Jaakko Hintikka's interrogative model of inquiry, the strategic principles governing empirical inquiry (interrogatively construed) turn out to be closely related to those governing deductive reasoning. Hence it is important to study the precise analogies which obtain between deductive logic and interrogative inquiry. The basic concept of the interrogative model is the relation of model consequence $\text{M}\colon \text{T}\vdash \text{C}$ . It is said to obtain iff C can be derived from T by means of an interrogative process in the model (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Alec J. Jeffreys & Stephen Harris (1984). Pseudogenes. Bioessays 1 (6):253-258.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation