15 found
Sort by:
  1. Stephen J. Ceci, Dan M. Kahan & Donald Braman (2010). The WEIRD Are Even Weirder Than You Think: Diversifying Contexts is as Important as Diversifying Samples. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):87-88.
    We argue that Henrich et al. do not go far enough in their critique: Sample diversification, while important, will not lead to the detection of generalizable principles. For that it will be necessary to broaden the range of contexts in which data are gathered. We demonstrate the power of contexts to alter results even in the presence of sample diversification.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephen J. Ceci, Wendy M. Williams & Katrin Mueller-Johnson (2006). Is Tenure Justified? An Experimental Study of Faculty Beliefs About Tenure, Promotion, and Academic Freedom. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):553-569.
    The behavioral sciences have come under attack for writings and speech that affront sensitivities. At such times, academic freedom and tenure are invoked to forestall efforts to censure and terminate jobs. We review the history and controversy surrounding academic freedom and tenure, and explore their meaning across different fields, at different institutions, and at different ranks. In a multifactoral experimental survey, 1,004 randomly selected faculty members from top-ranked institutions were asked how colleagues would typically respond when confronted with dilemmas concerning (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen J. Ceci, Wendy M. Williams & Katrin Mueller-Johnson (2006). Tenure and Academic Freedom: Prospects and Constraints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (6):586-592.
    In our target article, we took the position that tenure conveys many important benefits but that its original justification – fostering academic freedom – is not one of them. Here we respond to various criticisms of our study as well as to proposals to remedy the current state of affairs. Undoubtedly, more research is needed to confirm and extend our findings, but the most reasonable conclusion remains the one we offered – that the original rationale for tenure is poorly served (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Allen Esterson & Stephen J. Ceci (2006). Freud Did Not Anticipate Modern Reconstructive Memory Processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):517-518.
    In this commentary, we challenge the claim that Freud's thinking anticipated Bartlettian reconstructive theories of remembering. Erdelyi has ignored important divergences that demonstrate it is not the case that “The constructions and reconstructions of Freud and Bartlett are the same but for motive” (target article, sect. 5).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen J. Ceci, Matthew Scullin & Tomoe Kanaya (2003). The Difficulty of Basing Death Penalty Eligibility on Iq Cutoff Scores for Mental Retardation. Ethics and Behavior 13 (1):11 – 17.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Maggie Bruck, Stephen J. Ceci & Emmett Francoeur (1999). The Accuracy of Mothers' Memories of Conversations with Their Preschool Children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 5 (1):89.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Urie Bronfenbrenner & Stephen J. Ceci (1998). Could the Answer Be Talent? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):409-410.
    We present a theoretical model and corresponding research design (Bronfenbrenner & Ceci 1994) that could yield stronger evidence for (or perhaps against) Howe et al.'s conclusions. The model assesses levels of heritability (h²) under different amounts of training and practice, thus providing estimates of the independent contribution of “innate talent” to the quality of development outcomes. The design can also reveal the extent to which this independent contribution varies systematically as a function of other influential factors identified by Howe et (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mary Lyn Huffman, Angela M. Crossman & Stephen J. Ceci (1997). “Are False Memories Permanent?”: An Investigation of the Long-Term Effects of Source Misattributions. Consciousness and Cognition 6 (4):482-490.
  9. Maggie Bruck, Stephen J. Ceci, Emmett Francouer & Ashley Renick (1995). Anatomically Detailed Dolls Do Not Facilitate Preschoolers' Reports of a Pediatric Examination Involving Genital Touching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1 (2):95.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Helene Hembrooke & Stephen J. Ceci (1995). Traumatic Memories: Do We Need to Invoke Special Mechanisms? Consciousness and Cognition 4 (1):75-82.
  11. Stephen J. Ceci, Mary Lyndia Crotteau Huffman, Elliott Smith & Elizabeth F. Loftus (1994). Repeatedly Thinking About a Non-Event: Source Misattributions Among Preschoolers. Consciousness and Cognition 3 (3-4):388-407.
  12. Michael P. Toglia, David G. Payne, Narina L. Nightingale & Stephen J. Ceci (1989). Event Memory Under Naturalistically Induced Stress. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (5):405-408.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1985). Peer Review: Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):747.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1982). Peer-Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1982). Peer-Review Research: Objections and Obligations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation