140 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Stephen R.L. Clark (University of Liverpool, Bristol University)
  1. Stephen R. L. Clark (forthcoming). Feature Article Nations and Empires1. European Journal of Philosophy.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael Chase, Stephen R. L. Clark & Michael McGhee (eds.) (2013). Philosophy as a Way of Life: Ancients and Moderns - Essays in Honor of Pierre Hadot. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen R. L. Clark (2013). Ancient Mediterranean Philosophy. Continuum.
    In composing this study of 'Ancient Mediterranean Philosophy', I have chosen to draw attention to other philosophical traditions than the Classical Greek and Latin , although we know much less about them. My working assumption is that ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen R. L. Clark (2013). Dougherty Evidentialism and its Discontents . Pp. Xii + 335. £45.00 . ISBN 978 0 19 956350 0. Clark & VanArragon Evidence and Religious Belief . Pp. X + 214. £35.00 , £24.94 . ISBN 9780 19 960371 8. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 49 (1):134-139.
    Book Reviews STEPHEN R. L. CLARK, Religious Studies , FirstView Article.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen R. L. Clark (2012). Folly to the Greeks: Good Reasons to Give Up Reason. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4:93-113.
    A discussion of why a strong doctrine of 'reason' may not be worth sustaining in the face of modern scientific speculation, and the difficulties this poses for scientific rationality, together with comments on the social understanding of religion, and why we might wish to transcend common sense.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephen R. L. Clark (2012). Moments of Truth: The Marginal and the Real. The European Legacy 17 (6):769-778.
    Why is Plotinus relevant to a study of marginality? On the one hand, moderns have marginalized the Platonic tradition. On the other, it is our ?common sense? that?on Plotinus's account at least?distracts us from the real, and better, world. We could have learned the same lesson even from modern naturalistic science, which seems to show that we live on the margins, in a universe far older, grimmer and more mysterious than we can easily imagine, but from our ordinary point of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen R. L. Clark (2012). The Ethics of Taxonomy: A Neo-Aristotelian Synthesis. In Evangelos D. Protopapadakis (ed.), Animal Ethics: Past and Present Perspectives. Logos Verlag.
    How the 'Aristotelian' biological synthesis has been affected by modern accounts of biological evolution, and the relation of taxonomy to ethics.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephen R. L. Clark (2012). T.L.S. Sprigge, The Importance of Subjectivity: Selected Essays in Metaphysics and Ethics, Ed. B. McHenry Leemon. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2010, Xi + 356 Pp., £47. ISBN: 978-0-19-959154-1. [REVIEW] Philosophy 87 (02):310-315.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen R. L. Clark (2011). Animals in Classical and Late Antique Philosophy. In Tom Beauchamp & Raymond Frey (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    A description and analysis of attitudes to non-human animals in classical and late antique Mediterranean thought.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stephen R. L. Clark (2011). Philosophical Futures. Peter Lang.
    A collection of papers, revised for the volume, on likely and unlikely futures for humanity.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen R. L. Clark (2011). Plato's Philosophers: The Coherence of the Dialogues. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (4):811 - 815.
    British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Volume 19, Issue 4, Page 811-815, July 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephen R. L. Clark (2011). Religion and Law – Response to Michael Moxter. Ars Disputandi 5:57-71.
    A response to Michael Moxter's account of the need for 'religious feeling' for social order, suggesting that togetherness is currently promoted in overtly non-religious ways, and that true piety may often be at odds with social - and especially with state - order.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Stephen R. L. Clark (2010). How to Become Unconscious. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85 (67):21-44.
    Consistent materialists are almost bound to suggest that , if it exists at all, is no more than epiphenomenal. A correct understanding of the real requires that everything we do and say is no more than a product of whatever processes are best described by physics, without any privileged place, person, time or scale of action. Consciousness is a myth, or at least a figment. Plotinus was no materialist: for him, it is Soul and Intellect that are more real than (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Stephen R. L. Clark (2010). Plotinus on Number (S.) Slaveva-Griffin Plotinus on Number. Pp. Xii + 176. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009. Cased £39.99, US$74, ISBN: 978-0-19-537719-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (01):91-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Stephen R. L. Clark (2010). Review of Michael Ruse, Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (8).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen R. L. Clark (2010). Therapy and Theory Reconstructed: Plato and His Successors. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85 (66):83-.
  17. Stephen R. L. Clark (2009). Book Review: Stephen J. Pope, Human Evolution and Christian Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). Xiii + 359 Pp. £50/US$95 (Hb), ISBN 978-0-521-86340-7. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 22 (4):506-509.
  18. Stephen R. L. Clark (2009). Plotinus: Charms and Countercharms. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (65):215-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stephen R. L. Clark (2009). Plotinian Dualisms and the "Greek" Ideas of Self. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 36 (4):554-567.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Stephen R. L. Clark (2009). The Verge of Philosophy . By John Sallis. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 2007. 144 Pp. [REVIEW] Philosophy 84 (1):156-158.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen R. L. Clark (2009). What has Plotinus' One to Do with God? In John Cornwell & Michael McGhee (eds.), Philosophers and God: At the Frontiers of Faith and Reason. Continuum.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Panayiota Vassilopoulou & Stephen R. L. Clark (eds.) (2009). Late Antique Epistemology: Other Ways to Truth. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Stephen R. L. Clark (2008). Deconstructing the Laws of Logic. Philosophy 83 (1):25-53.
    I consider reasons for questioning 'the laws of logic' (identity, non-contradiction, excluded middle, and negation), and suggest that these laws do not accord with everyday reality. Either they are rhetorical tools rather than absolute truths, or else Plato and his successors were right to think that they identify a reality distinct from the ordinary world of experience, and also from the ultimate source of reality.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stephen R. L. Clark (2008). I Knew Him by His Voice. Philosophy Now 67:13-16.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stephen R. L. Clark (2006). G.K.Chesterton: Thinking Backward, Looking Forward. Templeton Foundation Press.
    Offering a detailed study of early 20th-century essayist, poet, novelist, political campaigner, and theologian G.K. Chesterton, author Stephen R.L. Clark ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen R. L. Clark (2006). Martian Chronicles. Metascience 15 (3):563-567.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephen R. L. Clark (2005). Berkeley on Religion. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press.
  28. Stephen R. L. Clark (2005). Deference, Degree and Selfhood. Philosophy 80 (2):249-260.
    The world we lost, and now barely understand, was one where everyone knew her place, and her attendant duties. Civilized groups were the likeliest to insist on a diversity of rôle and rule. Primitive societies are ones where there are rather fewer such distinctions. Slaves and merchants offered a way of being outside the orders, and from the older point of view, the life of slaves and merchants is exactly what the ‘liberal’ ideal entails. No one can count on her (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Stephen R. L. Clark (2004). Progress and the Argument From Evil. Religious Studies 40 (2):181-192.
    The argument from evil, though it is the most effective rhetorical argument against orthodox theism, fails to demonstrate its conclusion, since we are unavoidably ignorant whether there is more evil than could possibly be justified. That same ignorance infects any claims to discern a divine purpose in nature, as well as recent attempts at a broadly Irenaean theodicy. Evolution is not, on neo-Darwinian theory, intellectually, morally, or spiritually progressive in the way that some religious thinkers have supposed. To suppose so, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Minds and Persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Non-Personal Minds. In Minds and Persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 185-209.
    Persons are creatures with a range of personal capacities. Most known to us are also people, though nothing in observation or biological theory demands that all and only people are persons, nor even that persons, any more than people, constitute a natural kind. My aim is to consider what non-personal minds are like. Darwin's Earthworms are sensitive, passionate and, in their degree, intelligent. They may even construct maps, embedded in the world they perceive around them, so as to be able (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Review: The Wisdom of Aristotle. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (448):777-780.
  33. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Slaves, Servility and Noble Deeds. Philosophical Inquiry 25 (3-4):165-176.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). The Wisdom of Aristotle. Mind 112 (448):777-780.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Constructing Persons: The Psychopathology of Identity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 10 (2):157-159.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Tolstoy on Aesthetics: What is Art? By H. O. Mounce (Ashgate: Aldershot, 2001), Pp Viii + 115, £Xxxx, ISBN 0 7546 0488 8. [REVIEW] Philosophy 78 (2):289-307.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Stephen R. L. Clark (2002). Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation by Richard Sorabji, Clarendon Press: Oxford 2000. Pp. XII+499pp., £30.00, ISBN 019-8250053. [REVIEW] Philosophy 77 (1):125-141.
  38. Stephen R. L. Clark (2002). Feyerabend's Conquest of Abundance. Inquiry 45 (2):249 – 267.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen R. L. Clark (2002). Nothing Without Mind. In James H. Fetzer (ed.), Consciousness Evolving. John Benjamins.
  40. Stephen R. L. Clark (2002). Review: Religious Commitment and Secular Reason. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):639-643.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stephen R. L. Clark (2002). The Covenant with All Living Creatures. In Mark J. Cartledge & David Mills (eds.), Covenant Theology: Contemporary Approaches.
    Philosophers are usually expected to argue only from premises acceptable to a secular audience, in ways that require no special commitment beyond that to the value of argument itself. As a philosopher, I see no particular reason to deny myself the opportunity to argue from other, more `sectarian', premises, in ways now unfamiliar to an unbelieving nation. In so doing I may (as theistical philosophers often do) sound more traditional than many theologians.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephen R. L. Clark (2000). Biology and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
    This stimulating and wide-ranging book mounts a profound enquiry into some of the most pressing questions of our age, by examining the relationship between biological science and Christianity. The history of biological discovery is explored from the point of view of a leading philosopher and ethicist. What effect should modern biological theory and practice have on Christian understanding of ethics? How much of that theory and practice should Christians endorse? Can Christians, for example, agree that biological changes are not governed (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Stephen R. L. Clark (2000). Have Biologists Wrapped Up Philosophy? Inquiry 43 (2):143 – 165.
    An examination of the currently fashionable thesis that scientists, and especially biologists in the wake of the Darwinian Revolution, can now solve the problems that traditional philosophers have only talked about. Past philosophers, for example during the Enlightenment, have themselves made use of contemporary, scientific techniques and theories. The present claim may only be another such move, to be welcomed by philosophers who would distinguish themselves from rhetoricians. Others may prefer to stake out the merely human or subjective world as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Stephen R. L. Clark (2000). The Cosmic Priority of Value. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 62 (4):681 - 700.
    Adam Sedgwick's complaint that Darwin's rejection of final causes indicated a "demoralized understanding" cannot easily be dismissed: if nothing happens because it should, our opinions about what is morally beautiful are no more than projections. Darwin was carrying out an Enlightenment project — to exclude final causes or God's purposes from science because we could not expect to know what they were. That abandonment of final causes was an episode in religious history, a reaction against complacent idolatry, an attempt to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Stephen R. L. Clark (2000). The Evolution of Language: Truth and Lies. Philosophy 75 (3):401-421.
    There is both theoretical and experimental reason to suppose that no-one could ever have learned to speak without an environment of language-users. How then did the first language-users learn? Animal communication systems provide no help, since human languages aren't constituted as a natural system of signs, and are essentially recursive and syntactic. Such languages aren't demanded by evolution, since most creatures, even intelligent creatures, manage very well without them. I propose that representations, and even public representations like sculptures, precede full (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Stephen R. L. Clark (1999). A New Stoicism by Lawrence C. Becker. Princeton University Press: Princeton, New Jersey, 1998, 272pp; ISBN 0 691 01660 7 £22.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 74 (1):122-139.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stephen R. L. Clark (1999). Decent Conduct Toward Animals: A Traditional Approach. Teorema 18 (3):61-83.
    The Bishop of Questoriana has recently asked for a pontifical document ‘furnishing a doctrinal foundation of love and respect for life existing on the earth’. Mainstream moralists have urged, since the Axial Era, that it is human life that most demands love and respect. We realize and perfect our own humanity by recognizing humanity in every other, of whatever creed or race. Realizing that biological species are not natural kinds, more recent moralists have hoped to found moral decency either on (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Stephen R. L. Clark (1999). Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence by Peter Unger. Oxford University Press: New York & Oxford, 1996, 199pp; ISBN 0195075897 £35.00; 0195108590 £13.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy 74 (1):122-139.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Stephen R. L. Clark (1999). The Political Animal: Biology, Ethics, and Politics. Routledge.
    In The Political Animal Stephen Clark investigates the political nature of the human animal. Based on biological science and traditional ethics, he probes into areas of inquiry that are usually ignored by traditional political theory. He suggests that properly informed political philosophy must take the role of women and children more seriously, and must be prepared to face up to the ethnocentric and domineering tendencies of the human animal.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 140