21 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Stephen Wilkinson (Lancaster University)
  1. Stephen Wilkinson (forthcoming). Selective Reproduction, Eugenics, and Public Health. Public Health Ethics.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sheelagh Mcguinness, Tom Walker & Stephen Wilkinson (2013). Guest Editorial. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (01):4-7.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen Wilkinson (2010). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction. OUP Oxford.
    To what extent should parents be allowed to use reproductive technologies to determine the characteristics of their future children? And is there something morally wrong with parents who wish to do this? Choosing Tomorrow's Children provides answers to these (and related) questions. In particular, the book looks at issues raised by selective reproduction, the practice of choosing between different possible future persons by selecting or deselecting (for example) embryos, eggs, and sperm. -/- Wilkinson offers answers to questions including the following. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen Wilkinson (2010). On the Distinction Between Positive and Negative Eugenics. In Matti Häyry (ed.), Arguments and Analysis in Bioethics. Rodopi.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen Wilkinson (2007). Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409 - 418.
    This article provides a critical assessment of some aspects of Ann Kerr and Tom Shakespeare's Genetic Politics: from eugenics to genome. In particular, I evaluate their claims: (a) that bioethics is too ‘top down’, involving normative prescriptions, whereas it should instead be ‘bottom up’ and grounded in social science; and (b) that contemporary bioethics has not dealt particularly well with people's moral concerns about eugenics. I conclude that several of Kerr and Shakespeare's criticisms are well-founded and serve as valuable reminders (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephen Wilkinson (2007). Review: Eugenics and the Criticism of Bioethics. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):409 - 418.
    This article provides a critical assessment of some aspects of Ann Kerr and Tom Shakespeare's Genetic Politics: from eugenics to genome. In particular, I evaluate their claims: (a) that bioethics is too ‘top down’, involving normative prescriptions, whereas it should instead be ‘bottom up’ and grounded in social science; and (b) that contemporary bioethics has not dealt particularly well with people's moral concerns about eugenics. I conclude that several of Kerr and Shakespeare's criticisms are well-founded and serve as valuable reminders (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Michael Benatar, Leslie Cannold, Dena Davis, Merle Spriggs, Julian Savulescu, Heather Draper, Neil Evans, Richard Hull, Stephen Wilkinson, David Wasserman, Donna Dickenson, Guy Widdershoven, Françoise Baylis, Stephen Coleman, Rosemarie Tong, Hilde Lindemann, David Neil & Alex John London (2006). Cutting to the Core: Exploring the Ethics of Contested Surgeries. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Eve Garrard & Stephen Wilkinson (2006). Selecting Disability and the Welfare of the Child. The Monist 89 (4):482-504.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen Wilkinson (2006). Eugenics, Embryo Selection, and the Equal Value Principle. Clinical Ethics 1 (1):46-51.
    Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and some prenatal screening programmes have been criticized for being 'eugenic'. This paper aims to analyse this criticism and to evaluate one of the main ethical arguments lying behind it. It starts with a discussion of the meaning of the term 'eugenics' and of some relevant distinctions: for example, that between objections to eugenic ends and objections to certain means of achieving them. Next, a particular argument against using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to 'screen out' disability is considered, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stephen Wilkinson (2006). Selecting Disability and the Welfare of the Child. The Monist 89 (4):482-504.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen Wilkinson (2005). Designer Babies', Instrumentalisation and the Child's Right to an Open Future. In Nafsika Athanassoulis (ed.), Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephen Wilkinson (2005). Separating Conjoined Twins: The Case of Laden and Laleh Bijani. In Jennifer Gunning & Søren Holm (eds.), Ethics, Law, and Society. Ashgate. 1--257.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Stephen Wilkinson (2003). Bodies for Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body Trade. Routledge.
    Stephen Wilkinson asks what is it that makes some commercial uses of the body controversial, whether such arguments stand up, and whether legislation outlawing ...
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Stephen Wilkinson (2003). Book Review: Sue Eckstein, Manual for Research Ethics Committees (Centre of Medical Law and Ethics, King's College London). [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (4):459-460.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Stephen Wilkinson (2003). The Exploitation Argument Against Commercial Surrogacy. Bioethics 17 (2):169–187.
    It is argued that there are good reasons for believing that commercial surrogacy is often exploitative. However, even if we accept this, the exploitation argument for prohibiting (or otherwise legislatively discouraging) commercial surrogacy remains quite weak. One reason for this is that prohibition may well 'backfire' and lead to potential surrogates having to do other things that are more exploitative and/or more harmful than paid surrogacy. It is concluded, therefore, that those who oppose exploitation should concentrate on: (a) improving the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen Wilkinson (2001). Rationing Health Care: Individuals and the Broader Public. Philosophy Today 14 (36):10-11.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Stephen Wilkinson (2000). Commodification Arguments for the Legal Prohibition of Organ Sale. Health Care Analysis 8 (2):189-201.
    The commercial trading of human organs, along withvarious related activities (for example, advertising)was criminalised throughout Great Britain under theHuman Organ Transplants Act 1989.This paper critically assesses one type of argumentfor this, and similar, legal prohibitions:commodification arguments.Firstly, the term `commodification' is analysed. Thiscan be used to refer to either social practices or toattitudes. Commodification arguments rely on thesecond sense and are based on the idea that having acommodifying attitude to certain classes of thing(e.g. bodies or persons) is wrong. The commodifyingattitude consists (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stephen Wilkinson (2000). Why Lying is Worse Than Merely Misleading. Philosophy Today 13 (34):6-7.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stephen Wilkinson (1999). Smokers' Rights to Health Care: Why the 'Restoration Argument' is a Moralising Wolf in a Liberal Sheep's Clothing. Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (3):255–269.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Stephen Wilkinson (1999). Using Some “New” Political Ideas: Feminism and “Green Ideology”. Res Publica 5 (1):103-108.
  21. Sally Sheldon & Stephen Wilkinson (1998). Female Genital Mutilation and Cosmetic Surgery: Regulating Non-Therapeutic Body Modification. Bioethics 12 (4):263–285.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation