8 found
Steven B. Most [6]Steve Most [2]
  1.  75
    Steve Most, Brian J. Scholl, E. Clifford & Daniel J. Simons (2005). What You See is What You Set: Sustained Inattentional Blindness and the Capture of Awareness. Psychological Review 112 (1):217-242.
  2.  8
    Steven B. Most, Stephen D. Smith, Amy B. Cooter, Bethany N. Levy & David H. Zald (2007). The Naked Truth: Positive, Arousing Distractors Impair Rapid Target Perception. Cognition and Emotion 21 (5):964-981.
  3.  71
    Steve Most, Daniel J. Simons, Brian J. Scholl & Christopher Chabris (2000). Sustained Inattentional Blindness: The Role of Location in the Detection of Unexpected Dynamic Events. Psyche 6 (14).
    Attempts to understand visual attention have produced models based on location, in which attention selects particular regions of space, and models based on other visual attributes . Previous studies of inattentional blindness have contributed to our understanding of attention by suggesting that the detection of an unexpected object depends on the distance of that object from the spatial focus of attention. When the distance of a briefly flashed object from both fixation and the focus of attention is systematically varied, detection (...)
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  4.  16
    Steven B. Most (2010). What's “Inattentional” About Inattentional Blindness? Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1102-1104.
    In a recent commentary, Memmert critiqued claims that attentional misdirection is directly analogous to inattentional blindness and cautioned against assuming too close a similarity between the two phenomena. One important difference highlighted in his analysis is that most lab-based inductions of IB rely on the taxing of attention through a demanding primary task, whereas attentional misdirection typically involves simply the orchestration of spatial attention. The present commentary argues that, rather than reflecting a complete dissociation between IB and attentional misdirection, this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  5
    Jeremy R. Gray, Alexandre Schaefer, Todd S. Braver & Steven B. Most (2005). Affect and the Resolution of Cognitive Control Dilemmas. In Barr (ed.), Emotion and Consciousness. Guilford Press
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  6.  3
    Carroll E. Izard, Paul C. Quinn & Steven B. Most (2007). Many Ways to Awareness: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Access. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):506-507.
    Block's target article makes a significant contribution toward sorting the neural bases of phenomenal consciousness from the neural systems that underlie cognitive access to it. However, data from developmental science suggest that cognitive access may be only one of several ways to access phenomenology. These data may also have implications for the visual-cognitive phenomena that Block uses to support his case.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  7. Keith Bredemeier, Howard Berenbaum, Steven B. Most & Daniel J. Simons (2011). Links Between Neuroticism, Emotional Distress, and Disengaging Attention: Evidence From a Single-Target RSVP Task. Cognition and Emotion 25 (8):1510-1519.
  8. Steven B. Most & Daniel J. Simons (2001). Attention Capture, Orienting, and Awareness. In Charles L. Folk & Bradley S. Gibson (eds.), Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology. Elsevier 151-173.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography