Search results for 'Steven Augello' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Mark Greene & Steven Augello (2011). Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability? Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.score: 240.0
    In this paper we challenge the moral consensus against selection for disability. Our discussion will concern only those disabilities that are compatible with a life worth living from the point of view of the disabled individual. We will argue that an influential, impersonal argument against selection for disability falls to a counterexample. We will then show how the reach of the counterexample can be broadened to make trouble for anyone who objects to selection for disability. If we are right about (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Robert B. Talisse, Maureen Eckert, Norman Bowie, Steven M. Cahn, Randall Curren, Alan Goldman, Tziporah Kasachkoff, Peter Markie, John O'Connor, David Rosenthal, Robert Simon, David Shatz, George Sher, Douglas Stalker & Christine Vitrano (2009). A Teacher's Life: Essays for Steven M. Cahn. Lexington Books.score: 15.0
    This is a collection of 13 essays honoring Steven Cahn, presented to him on the occasion of his 25th year as Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Don Howard, Are Elementary Particles Individuals? A Critical Appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis.score: 12.0
    Steven French and Décio Krause have written what bids fair to be, for years to come, the definitive philosophical treatment of the problem of the individuality of elementary particles in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. The book begins with a long and dense argument for the view that elementary particles are most helpfully regarded as non-individuals, and it concludes with an earnest attempt to develop a formal apparatus for describing such non-individual entities better suited to the task than (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Timothy Krahn, Andrew Fenton & Letitia Meynell (2010). Novel Neurotechnologies in Film—a Reading of Steven Spielberg's Minority Report. Neuroethics 3 (1):73-88.score: 12.0
    The portrayal of novel neurotechnologies in Steven Spielberg’s Minority Report serves to inoculate viewers from important moral considerations that are displaced by the film’s somewhat singular emphasis on the question of how to reintroduce freedom of choice into an otherwise technology driven world. This sets up a crisis mentality and presents a false dilemma regarding the appropriate use, and regulation, of neurotechnologies. On the one hand, it seems that centralized power is required to both control and effectively implement such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Steven Gerrard (1999). How Old Are These Bones? Putnam, Wittgenstein and Verification: Steven Gerrard. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):135–150.score: 12.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Keith Gunderson (2003). Steven Lehar's Gestalt Bubble Model of Visual Experience: The Embodied Percipient, Emergent Holism, and the Ultimate Question of Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):413-414.score: 12.0
    Aspects of an example of simulated shared subjectivity can be used both to support Steven Lehar's remarks on embodied percipients and to triangulate in a novel way the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness which Lehar wishes to “sidestep,” but which, given his other contentions regarding emergent holism, raises questions about whether he has been able or willing to do so.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven Pinker, There Will Always Be an English by Steven Pinker.score: 12.0
    CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- What will English be like a hundred years from now? No one has ever observed what happens when a language is used for a century in a global village. Will MTV and CNN infiltrate every yurt and houseboat and drive out all other languages? Will regional accents go extinct, leaving everyone sounding like a Midwestern newscaster? Some language lovers worry that e-mail and chat rooms will influence writing & F2F (face-to-face) lang. & leadd it 2 loose it's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Selmer Bringsjord (2001). Are We Evolved Computers?: A Critical Review of Steven Pinker's How the Mind Works. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):227 – 243.score: 12.0
    Steven Pinker's How the mind works (HTMW) marks in my opinion an historic point in the history of humankind's attempt to understand itself. Socrates delivered his "know thyself" imperative rather long ago, and now, finally, in this behemoth of a book, published at the dawn of a new millennium, Pinker steps up to have psychology tell us what we are: computers crafted by evolution - end of story; mystery solved; and the poor philosophers, having never managed to obey Socrates' (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Steven Gross, Steven Gross.score: 12.0
    Should a theory of meaning state what sentences mean, and can a Davidsonian theory of meaning in particular do so? Max Ko¨lbel answers both questions affirmatively. I argue, however, that the phenomena of non-homophony, non-truth-conditional aspects of meaning, semantic mood, and context-sensitivity provide prima facie obstacles for extending Davidsonian truth-theories to yield meaning-stating theorems. Assessing some natural moves in reply requires a more fully developed conception of the task of such theories than Ko¨lbel provides. A more developed conception is also (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Sarnecki & Matthew Sponheimer (2002). Why Neanderthals Hate Poetry: A Critical Notice of Steven Mithen's the Prehistory of Mind. Philosophical Psychology 15 (2):173 – 184.score: 12.0
    The significance of historical advances in human development has been widely debated within cognitive science. Steven Mithen's recent book, The prehistory of mind (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996), presents an archeologist's attempt to explain the details of cognitive development within the framework of modern anthropology and cognitive psychology. We argue that Mithen's attempt fails for a number of different reasons. The relationship between the archeological evidence he considers and his conclusions is problematic. We maintain that it is difficult to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Steven Mulhall (1998). The Givenness of Grammar: A Reply to Steven Affeltd. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):32–44.score: 12.0
    The article contests Affeldt's critique of Mulhall's "Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary," by asking how deep the conflict between what Affeldt proposes as Cavell's account of Wittgenstein's notion of grammar and that of Baker and Hacker really goes. It argues that Affeldt's critique is successful against one interpretation of the claims that grammar consists of a framework of rules and that criteria function as a basis for judgment, but that other interpretations of these claims are available and appear (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch & Jeffrey R. Botkin (2009). Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch, and Jeffrey R. Botkin Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):7-8.score: 12.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Vlastimil Zuska (2011). Steven Shaviro, Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Estetika 48 (2):254-261.score: 12.0
    A review of Steven Shaviro´s Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009, xvi + 174 pp. ISBN 978-0-262-19576-8).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.score: 12.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Stephen C. Maxson (1999). Some Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations About Sociobiology and Behavior Genetics in Lifelines by Steven Rose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):898-899.score: 12.0
    Lifelines by Steven Rose is supposed to present a new perspective on biology replacing an emphasis on genes with one on organisms. However, much of the book is a highly biased critique of sociobiology and behavior genetics. Some of the flaws in Rose's description and depiction of these fields are presented and refuted. Also, it would appear that these aspects of the book and many others are, in fact, related more to Rose's perennial concern for the ideology, social origins (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Inga Römer (forthcoming). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Husserl Studies:1-9.score: 12.0
    In seinem neuen Buch vertieft Steven Crowell seine Auffassung der Phänomenologie als Transzendentalphilosophie, die es mit dem normativen Raum des Sinnes (space of meaning) zu tun habe (vgl. Crowell 2001). Sowohl Husserl als auch Heidegger führen aus seiner Sicht innerhalb der Phänomenologie die kantische Tradition der Transzendentalphilosophie weiter, indem sie der Frage nach den „transzendentalen Bedingungen der Konstitution oder Enthüllung des Sinnes“ (S. 1) nachgehen.Vgl. auch den von Steven Crowell mit herausgegebenen Band Transcendental Heidegger (2007). Da der Sinn (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Irene Comins Mingol (2013). PINKER, Steven, Los ángeles que llevamos dentro. El declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones, Barcelona: Paidós, 2012. Daímon 59:209-210.score: 12.0
    Reseña del libro: Steven Pinker (2012): Los ángeles que llevamos dentro, el declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones , Barcelona, Paidós.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Steven Rybin (2011). Frederick Wasser (2010) Steven Spielberg's America. Film-Philosophy 15 (1):247-254.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael Cournoyea (2010). Steven Shapin. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):273-275.score: 12.0
    In The Scientific Life, Steven Shapin argues that people and their virtues matter in late modern science. While scientists struggle to remain objective and impersonal, it is the personal, familiar, and charismatic—the traits once swept aside as vices by the scientifically virtuous—that have come to embody the “truth-speakers” of late modernity. With an enormous and sometimes daunting wealth of primary sources (from technical commentaries to his own sociological fieldwork), Steven Shapin breathes life back into these quotidian virtues. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Steven Bartlett (1977). "Philosophy and Language," by Steven Davis. The Modern Schoolman 54 (4):406-406.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Steven M Cahn. Analysis 48.score: 12.0
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Steven E. Hyman (2012). Interview with Steven E. Hyman. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):3-5.score: 12.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.score: 12.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Otasio Bueno, Henry Jackman, Jonathan M. Weinberg & Steven D. Hales (2008). Book Symposium: Steven D. Hales, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy (Mit Press, 2006). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2).score: 12.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Steven Jensen (2003). A Long Discussion Regarding Steven A. Long's Interpretation of the Moral Species. The Thomist 67 (4):623-643.score: 12.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Steven Pinker (2002). Steven Pinker. Cognitive Science 1991 (1996).score: 12.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. A. Reply to Steven Rappaport (1997). Relativism and Truth: A Reply to Steven Rappaport Michael P. Lynch. Philosophia 25:417.score: 12.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jerry A. Fodor (2005). Reply to Steven Pinker So How Does the Mind Work?. Mind and Language 20 (1):25-32.score: 9.0
  29. Steffen Borge (2012). Communication, Cooperation and Conflict. ProtoSociology 29.score: 9.0
    According to Steven Pinker and his associates the cooperative model of human communication fails, because evolutionary biology teaches us that most social relationships, including talk-exchange, involve combinations of cooperation and conflict. In particular, the phenomenon of the strategic speaker who uses indirect speech in order to be able to deny what he meant by a speech act (deniability of conversational implicatures) challenges the model. In reply I point out that interlocutors can aim at understanding each other (cooperation), while being (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Steffen Borge (2012). Communication, Conflict and Cooperation. ProtoSociology 29.score: 9.0
    According to Steven Pinker and his associates the cooperative model of human communication fails, because evolutionary biology teaches us that most social relationships, including talk-exchange, involve combinations of cooperation and conflict. In particular, the phenomenon of the strategic speaker who uses indirect speech in order to be able to deny what he meant by a speech act (deniability of conversational implicatures) challenges the model. In reply I point out that interlocutors can aim at understanding each other (cooperation), while being (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gaverick Matheny (2003). Least Harm: A Defense of Vegetarianism From Steven Davis's Omnivorous Proposal. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):505-511.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Desmond M. Clarke (1995). Malebranche and Occasionalism: A Reply to Steven Nadler. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):499-504.score: 9.0
    In Malebranche's account of occasional causality, God exercises his general will with respect to every event that merits a causal explanation. Nadler distinguishes two pictures of God's involvement; (1) there are as many distinct acts of God's will as there are causal events to be explained; (2) God's will is exercised once only, when the natural order of causes is created. I argue that Malebranche's concept of God is inconsistent with a real distinction between God and acts of his will, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Kevin Vallier (2013). Can Liberal Perfectionism Justify Religious Toleration? Wall on Promoting and Respecting. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):645-664.score: 9.0
    Toleration is perhaps the core commitment of liberalism, but this seemingly simple feature of liberal societies creates tension for liberal perfectionists, who are committed to justifying religious toleration primarily in terms of the goods and flourishing it promotes. Perfectionists, so it seems, should recommend restricting harmful religious practices when feasible. If such restrictions would promote liberal perfectionist values like autonomy, it is unclear how the perfectionist can object. A contemporary liberal perfectionist, Steven Wall, has advanced defense of religious toleration (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Taylor Carman (2002). Review of Steven Galt Crowell, Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcendental Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (2).score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Mary Clayton Coleman (2010). Sobel, David , and Wall, Steven , Eds. Reasons for Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 . Pp. 288. $90.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 120 (3):631-635.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jimmy Alfonso Licon (2011). No Suicide for Presentists. Logos and Episteme 2 (3):455-464.score: 9.0
    Steven Hales constructs a novel argument against the possibility of presentist time travel called the suicide machine argument. Hales argues that if presentism were true, then time travel would result in the annihilation of the time traveler. But such a consequence is not time travel, therefore presentism cannot allow for the possibility of time travel. This paper argues that in order for the suicide machine argument to succeed, it must make (at least) one of two assumptions, each of which (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Alfredo Pereira (2008). Steven Horst, Beyond Reduction: Philosophy of Mind and Post-Reductionist Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Mind Series. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 18 (3):421-423.score: 9.0
  38. Dan Zahavi (2003). Steven Galt Crowell: 'Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcendental Phenomenology'. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (3):325-334.score: 9.0
  39. Bart Streumer (2011). Review of David Sobel and Steven Wall, Reasons for Action. [REVIEW] Analysis 71 (1):200-202.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Joseph Carroll (1998). Steven Pinker's Cheesecake for the Mind. Philosophy and Literature 22 (2):478-485.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jonathan M. Weinberg (2008). Naturalism and Intuitions: Commentary on Steven Hales, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):263 – 270.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Thomas Hurka (2001). Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Steven Wall. Mind 110 (439):878-881.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Francis Cheneval (2000). Steven V. Hicks, International Law and the Possibility of a Just World Order. An Essay on Hegel's Universalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):457-459.score: 9.0
  44. Nate Zuckerman (2010). Steven Crowell and Jeff Malpas (Eds): Transcendental Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):575-578.score: 9.0
  45. Kevin Corrigan, Richard Patterson, Garth Tissol, Peter Wakefield & Jack Zupko (2010). Steven K. Strange 1950-2009. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):1-3.score: 9.0
  46. W. Glannon (2011). The Philosophy of Death * by Steven Luper. Analysis 71 (3):601-603.score: 9.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Kurt Smith (2012). Occasionalism: Causation Among the Cartesians. By Steven Nadler. (Oxford UP, 2011. Pp. Xii + 207. Price £37.00.). Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):643-643.score: 9.0
  48. P. T. Johnstone (1991). Review: Steven Vickers, Topology Via Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (3):1101-1102.score: 9.0
  49. Lorraine Code (1983). Rationality and Relativism Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes, Editors Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982. Pp. Viii, 312. Dialogue 22 (04):714-717.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Guy Lancaster (2010). Against Perfectionism: Defending Liberal Neutrality. By Steven Lecce. Heythrop Journal 51 (4):702-703.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000