Search results for 'Steven Augello' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  99
    Mark Greene & Steven Augello (2011). Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability? Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.
    In this paper we challenge the moral consensus against selection for disability. Our discussion will concern only those disabilities that are compatible with a life worth living from the point of view of the disabled individual. We will argue that an influential, impersonal argument against selection for disability falls to a counterexample. We will then show how the reach of the counterexample can be broadened to make trouble for anyone who objects to selection for disability. If we are right about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  2
    Robert B. Talisse, Maureen Eckert, Norman Bowie, Steven M. Cahn, Randall Curren, Alan Goldman, Tziporah Kasachkoff, Peter Markie, John O'Connor, David Rosenthal, Robert Simon, David Shatz, George Sher, Douglas Stalker & Christine Vitrano (2009). A Teacher's Life: Essays for Steven M. Cahn. Lexington Books.
    This is a collection of 13 essays honoring Steven Cahn, presented to him on the occasion of his 25th year as Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York. The essays address issues concerning the teaching of philosophy, the responsibilities of professors, and the good life.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  46
    Gary Hatfield (1995). In the Eye's Mind: Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy by R. Steven Turner. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 86:664-665.
    Review of: R. Steven Turner, In the Eye's Mind: Vision and the Helmholtz-Hering Controversy. xiv + 338 pp., frontis., illus., figs., tables, bibl., index. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  99
    David Goodman (1995). Reviews : Zygmunt Bauman, Intimations of Postmodernity (Routledge, 1992); Steven Seidman and David G. Wagner (Eds), Postmodernism and Social Theory (Blackwell, 1992); Stephen Crook, Jan Pakulski and Malcolm Wa Ters, Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society (Sage Publica Tions, 1992); Gianni Vattimo, The End of Modernity—Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-Modern Culture (Polity Press, 1988). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 40 (1):138-146.
    Reviews : Zygmunt Bauman, Intimations of Postmodernity ; Steven Seidman and David G. Wagner , Postmodernism and Social Theory ; Stephen Crook, Jan Pakulski and Malcolm Wa ters, Postmodernization: Change in Advanced Society ; Gianni Vattimo, The End of Modernity—Nihilism and Hermeneutics in Post-modern Culture.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  43
    Howard Sankey (2014). On Relativism and Pluralism: Response to Steven Bland. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:98-103.
    This paper responds to criticism presented by Steven Bland of my naturalistic approach to epistemic relativism. In my view, the central argument for epistemic relativism derives from the Pyrrhonian problem of the criterion. This opens relativism to an anti-sceptical response. I combine Roderick Chisholm’s particularist response to the problem of the criterion with a reliabilist conception of epistemic warrant. A distinction is made between epistemic norms which provide genuine warrant and those which do not. On the basis of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  28
    Steven Pinker (2002). Steven Pinker. Cognitive Science 1991 (1996).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    Inga Römer (2014). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Husserl Studies 30 (3):283-291.
    In seinem neuen Buch vertieft Steven Crowell seine Auffassung der Phänomenologie als Transzendentalphilosophie, die es mit dem normativen Raum des Sinnes (space of meaning) zu tun habe (vgl. Crowell 2001). Sowohl Husserl als auch Heidegger führen aus seiner Sicht innerhalb der Phänomenologie die kantische Tradition der Transzendentalphilosophie weiter, indem sie der Frage nach den „transzendentalen Bedingungen der Konstitution oder Enthüllung des Sinnes“ (S. 1) nachgehen.Vgl. auch den von Steven Crowell mit herausgegebenen Band Transcendental Heidegger (2007). Da der Sinn (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  13
    Arne Rasmusson (2012). Science as Salvation: George Lakoff and Steven Pinker as Secular Political Theologians. Modern Theology 28 (2):197-228.
    This article critically analyzes two leading cognitive scientists, George Lakoff and Steven Pinker, as competing secular political “theologians”. The idea of Science as savior is at the heart of the set of stories modernity tells about itself. The modern world, it is assumed, has left the age of religion and reached the age of Science. Lakoff and Pinker, who advocate opposing moral and political worldviews, make their claims on the basis of their scientific work, but it is implicit narratives (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  44
    Timothy Krahn, Andrew Fenton & Letitia Meynell (2010). Novel Neurotechnologies in Film—a Reading of Steven Spielberg's Minority Report. Neuroethics 3 (1):73-88.
    The portrayal of novel neurotechnologies in Steven Spielberg’s Minority Report serves to inoculate viewers from important moral considerations that are displaced by the film’s somewhat singular emphasis on the question of how to reintroduce freedom of choice into an otherwise technology driven world. This sets up a crisis mentality and presents a false dilemma regarding the appropriate use, and regulation, of neurotechnologies. On the one hand, it seems that centralized power is required to both control and effectively implement such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  14
    Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  63
    Don Howard, Are Elementary Particles Individuals? A Critical Appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis.
    Steven French and Décio Krause have written what bids fair to be, for years to come, the definitive philosophical treatment of the problem of the individuality of elementary particles in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. The book begins with a long and dense argument for the view that elementary particles are most helpfully regarded as non-individuals, and it concludes with an earnest attempt to develop a formal apparatus for describing such non-individual entities better suited to the task (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  14
    Steven Mulhall (1998). The Givenness of Grammar: A Reply to Steven Affeltd. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):32–44.
    The article contests Affeldt's critique of Mulhall's "Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary," by asking how deep the conflict between what Affeldt proposes as Cavell's account of Wittgenstein's notion of grammar and that of Baker and Hacker really goes. It argues that Affeldt's critique is successful against one interpretation of the claims that grammar consists of a framework of rules and that criteria function as a basis for judgment, but that other interpretations of these claims are available and appear (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  10
    Jacob Rump (2014). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review 47 (3-4):479-485.
    Steven Crowell’s book is a welcome addition to the literature in phenomenology as well as a demonstration of the importance of phenomenology for those working in other areas of contemporary philosophy, especially those areas of Anglo-American philosophy concerned with normativity, meaning and the philosophy of action. Through a series of thirteen independent but thematically linked essays, he offers a novel account of the importance of normativity to phenomenology, a carefully argued re-thinking of the Husserlian and early Heideggerian accounts (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  21
    Selmer Bringsjord (2001). Are We Evolved Computers?: A Critical Review of Steven Pinker's How the Mind Works. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):227 – 243.
    Steven Pinker's How the mind works (HTMW) marks in my opinion an historic point in the history of humankind's attempt to understand itself. Socrates delivered his "know thyself" imperative rather long ago, and now, finally, in this behemoth of a book, published at the dawn of a new millennium, Pinker steps up to have psychology tell us what we are: computers crafted by evolution - end of story; mystery solved; and the poor philosophers, having never managed to obey (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  11
    Steven Bartlett (1977). "Philosophy and Language," by Steven Davis. Modern Schoolman 54 (4):406-406.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Donald Evans (1989). Can Philosophers Limit What Mystics Can Do? A Critique of Steven Katz: Donald Evans. Religious Studies 25 (1):53-60.
    Some philosophers such as Ninian Smart have claimed that mystics from different religious traditions may sometimes have the same experience , while nevertheless giving different and tradition-bound descriptive reports of that experience. In two important essays, Steven Katz has challenged such a claim. Mystics from different religious traditions do not have the same experience.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  15
    John Sarnecki & Matthew Sponheimer (2002). Why Neanderthals Hate Poetry: A Critical Notice of Steven Mithen's the Prehistory of Mind. Philosophical Psychology 15 (2):173 – 184.
    The significance of historical advances in human development has been widely debated within cognitive science. Steven Mithen's recent book, The prehistory of mind (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996), presents an archeologist's attempt to explain the details of cognitive development within the framework of modern anthropology and cognitive psychology. We argue that Mithen's attempt fails for a number of different reasons. The relationship between the archeological evidence he considers and his conclusions is problematic. We maintain that it is difficult to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Steven Pinker, There Will Always Be an English by Steven Pinker.
    CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- What will English be like a hundred years from now? No one has ever observed what happens when a language is used for a century in a global village. Will MTV and CNN infiltrate every yurt and houseboat and drive out all other languages? Will regional accents go extinct, leaving everyone sounding like a Midwestern newscaster? Some language lovers worry that e-mail and chat rooms will influence writing & F2F (face-to-face) lang. & leadd it 2 loose it's (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  18
    Steven Gross, Steven Gross.
    Should a theory of meaning state what sentences mean, and can a Davidsonian theory of meaning in particular do so? Max Ko¨lbel answers both questions affirmatively. I argue, however, that the phenomena of non-homophony, non-truth-conditional aspects of meaning, semantic mood, and context-sensitivity provide prima facie obstacles for extending Davidsonian truth-theories to yield meaning-stating theorems. Assessing some natural moves in reply requires a more fully developed conception of the task of such theories than Ko¨lbel provides. A more developed conception is also (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Steven Jensen (2003). A Long Discussion Regarding Steven A. Long's Interpretation of the Moral Species. The Thomist 67 (4):623-643.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  28
    Steven Gerrard (1999). How Old Are These Bones? Putnam, Wittgenstein and Verification: Steven Gerrard. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):135–150.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  22
    Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch & Jeffrey R. Botkin (2009). Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch, and Jeffrey R. Botkin Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):7-8.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Steven C. Patten (1977). Milgram's Shocking Experiments: Steven C. Patten. Philosophy 52 (202):425-440.
    After more than a decade of reflection on obedience experiments based on a laboratory model of his own design, the social psychologist Stanley Milgram is clearly confident that the experimental results make a substantial and striking contribution towards understanding human nature: Something … dangerous is revealed: the capacity for man to abandon his humanity, indeed, the inevitability that he does so, as he merges his unique personality into larger institutional structures.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  7
    Christoph Classen (2009). Balanced Truth: Steven Spielberg's Schindler's List Among History, Memory, and Popular Culture1. History and Theory 48 (2):77-102.
    Looking at the public reaction to it, one might say that Steven Spielberg’s Schindler’s List is undoubtedly the most successful film about the Holocaust. The film’s success in the U.S. and other Western countries can be traced back mainly to the fact that it creates the impression of telling a true, apparently authentic, story.This essay investigates how this impression of historical truth and authenticity emerges in a fiction film. For this purpose the essay reverts to a concept developed by (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  24
    Keith Gunderson (2003). Steven Lehar's Gestalt Bubble Model of Visual Experience: The Embodied Percipient, Emergent Holism, and the Ultimate Question of Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):413-414.
    Aspects of an example of simulated shared subjectivity can be used both to support Steven Lehar's remarks on embodied percipients and to triangulate in a novel way the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness which Lehar wishes to “sidestep,” but which, given his other contentions regarding emergent holism, raises questions about whether he has been able or willing to do so.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  5
    Irene Comins Mingol (2013). PINKER, Steven, Los ángeles que llevamos dentro. El declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones, Barcelona: Paidós, 2012. Daimon: Revista de Filosofia 59:209-210.
    Reseña del libro: Steven Pinker (2012): Los ángeles que llevamos dentro, el declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones , Barcelona, Paidós.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Steven B. Cowan (1996). A Reductio Ad Absurdum of Divine Temporality: STEVEN B. COWAN. Religious Studies 32 (3):371-378.
    Theists believe that God is eternal, but they differ as to just what God's eternality means . The traditional, historic view of most Christian philosophers is that eternality means that God is timeless. He is ‘outside’ of time and not subject to any kind of temporal change. Indeed, God is the creator of time. Lets call this view divine timelessness.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  10
    Vlastimil Zuska (2011). Steven Shaviro, Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Estetika 48 (2):254-261.
    A review of Steven Shaviro´s Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009, xvi + 174 pp. ISBN 978-0-262-19576-8).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  3
    Steven Rybin (2011). Frederick Wasser (2010) Steven Spielberg's America. Film-Philosophy 15 (1):247-254.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Otasio Bueno, Henry Jackman, Jonathan M. Weinberg & Steven D. Hales (2008). Book Symposium: Steven D. Hales, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy (MIT Press, 2006). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  6
    Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Stephen C. Maxson (1999). Some Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations About Sociobiology and Behavior Genetics in Lifelines by Steven Rose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):898-899.
    Lifelines by Steven Rose is supposed to present a new perspective on biology replacing an emphasis on genes with one on organisms. However, much of the book is a highly biased critique of sociobiology and behavior genetics. Some of the flaws in Rose's description and depiction of these fields are presented and refuted. Also, it would appear that these aspects of the book and many others are, in fact, related more to Rose's perennial concern for the ideology, social (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  1
    Edward P. Schwartz (1995). A Comment on “The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction,” by Steven Shavell. Legal Theory 1 (3):361.
    In his most recent article, “The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction,” Steven Shavell asks a very important question: Why do we use a hierarchical court structure? The flip side of this inquiry is whether we might not be better off simply making our trial courts more efficient . Although I certainly applaud the recent efforts of Shavell and other law and economics scholars to examine issues of institutional design, this particular attempt suffers from two major (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  4
    Michael Cournoyea (2010). Steven Shapin. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):273-275.
    In The Scientific Life, Steven Shapin argues that people and their virtues matter in late modern science. While scientists struggle to remain objective and impersonal, it is the personal, familiar, and charismatic—the traits once swept aside as vices by the scientifically virtuous—that have come to embody the “truth-speakers” of late modernity. With an enormous and sometimes daunting wealth of primary sources (from technical commentaries to his own sociological fieldwork), Steven Shapin breathes life back into these quotidian virtues. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Steven M Cahn. Analysis 48.
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Steven E. Hyman (2012). Interview with Steven E. Hyman. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):3-5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Steven M. Emmanuel (1989). Kierkegaard On Doctrine: A Post–Modern Interpretation: STEVEN M. EMMANUEL. Religious Studies 25 (3):363-378.
    Though Kierkegaard never explicitly formulated a theory of religious doctrine, he did have a clear position on the role that Christian doctrine ought to play in the lives of believers. Briefly stated, he maintained that Christianity, as a human activity, involves more than merely believing certain propositions about matters of fact. The doctrines of Christianity take on a true religious significance only when they are given the power to transform the lives of those who accept them; only when they are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. A. Reply to Steven Rappaport (1997). Relativism and Truth: A Reply to Steven Rappaport Michael P. Lynch. Philosophia 25:417.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Martin Rhonheimer (2013). The Perspective of Morality Revisited: A Response to Steven J. Jensen. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):165-196.
    In this response to Steven Jensen’s ACPQ review essay of Martin Rhonheimer’s The Perspective of Morality, its author argues that Jensen failed to understand the proper subject matter, the inner logic, and the methodology of the book. As a result, he misread key passages while passing over others, with the result that his criticisms miss the mark. Correcting these misreadings provides the occasion to explain some key features of the book, namely its idea of integrating in a single ethical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Frank A. Tillman & Steven M. Cahn (1969). Philosophy of Art and Aesthetics, From Plato to Wittgenstein [by] Frank A. Tillman [and] Steven M. Cahn. --. Harper & Row.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Indian Logic, A. Reader & Surrey Richmond (2002). The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. By Michael Puett. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001. Pp. Viii+ 299. Hardcover $55.00. Ancestors in Post-Contact Religion: Roots, Ruptures, and Modernity's Memory. Edited by Steven J. Friesen. Cambridge: Harvard University Press for the Center. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 52 (4):501-503.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Denise Russell (1988). Reviews : Steven Rose, Molecules and Minds: Essays on Biology and the Social Order (Open University Press, 1987). Thesis Eleven 21 (1):158-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  91
    Michael Gardiner (1993). Reviews : Steven Connor, Theory and Cultural Value. Oxford: Blackwell Pub Lishers, 1992. £35.00, Paper £12.95, X + 275 Pp. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 6 (2):135-138.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  94
    H. M. Collins (1992). Epistemological Chicken HM Collins and Steven Yearley. In Andrew Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. University of Chicago Press 301.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  45.  37
    Alyssa Ney (2014). Review of Steven French * The Structure of the World. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2014.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Jerry A. Fodor (2005). Reply to Steven Pinker So How Does the Mind Work?. Mind and Language 20 (1):25-32.
  47.  43
    John Corcoran (1991). REVIEW OF Alfred Tarski, Collected Papers, Vols. 1-4 (1986) Edited by Steven Givant and Ralph McKenzie. [REVIEW] MATHEMATICAL REVIEWS 91 (h):01101-4.
    Alfred Tarski (1901--1983) is widely regarded as one of the two giants of twentieth-century logic and also as one of the four greatest logicians of all time (Aristotle, Frege and Gödel being the other three). Of the four, Tarski was the most prolific as a logician. The four volumes of his collected papers, which exclude most of his 19 monographs, span over 2500 pages. Aristotle's writings are comparable in volume, but most of the Aristotelian corpus is not about (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  12
    Michael Esfeld (2015). The Structure of the World: Metaphysics and Representation, by Steven French. Mind 124 (493):334-338.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. Gaverick Matheny (2003). Least Harm: A Defense of Vegetarianism From Steven Davis's Omnivorous Proposal. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):505-511.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  50.  17
    Eric Schliesser, Review of Steven Shaviro The Universe of Things – On Speculative Realism. [REVIEW]
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000