Search results for 'Steven Gravely' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Lawrence O. Gostin, Steven D. Gravely, Steve Shakman, Howard Markel & Marty Cetron (2004). Quarantine: Voluntary or Not? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (s4):83-86.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Cheryl H. Bullard, Rick D. Hogan, Matthew S. Penn, Janet Ferris, John Cleland, Daniel Stier, Ronald M. Davis, Susan Allan, Leticia van de Putte, Virginia Caine, Richard E. Besser & Steven Gravely (2008). Improving Cross-Sectoral and Cross-Jurisdictional Coordination for Public Health Emergency Legal Preparedness. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (s1):57-63.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert Boyle, James Childress, Steven D. Gravely, Lisa Kaplowitz, Alan Melnick, Mark Rothstein & Ruth Gaare Bernheim (2007). Health Departments, Hospitals, and Pandemic Flu: Overlapping Ethical and Legal Questions. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35:53-54.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Joseph S. Fulda (2012). Written for the Moment. Journal of Information Ethics 21 (1):21-26.score: 24.0
    This article argues that the disclosure, dissemination, sale, and publication of texts—such as text messages, e-mails, and letters—addressed to anyone other than the public at large are gravely and profoundly immoral. The argument has two strands, the first based on a conception of privacy largely due to Steven Davis (2009), and the second based on the concept of authorial autonomy and its reverse, authorial dilution.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert B. Talisse, Maureen Eckert, Norman Bowie, Steven M. Cahn, Randall Curren, Alan Goldman, Tziporah Kasachkoff, Peter Markie, John O'Connor, David Rosenthal, Robert Simon, David Shatz, George Sher, Douglas Stalker & Christine Vitrano (2009). A Teacher's Life: Essays for Steven M. Cahn. Lexington Books.score: 21.0
    This is a collection of 13 essays honoring Steven Cahn, presented to him on the occasion of his 25th year as Professor of Philosophy at the City University of New York.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Don Howard, Are Elementary Particles Individuals? A Critical Appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis.score: 18.0
    Steven French and Décio Krause have written what bids fair to be, for years to come, the definitive philosophical treatment of the problem of the individuality of elementary particles in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. The book begins with a long and dense argument for the view that elementary particles are most helpfully regarded as non-individuals, and it concludes with an earnest attempt to develop a formal apparatus for describing such non-individual entities better suited to the task than (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Timothy Krahn, Andrew Fenton & Letitia Meynell (2010). Novel Neurotechnologies in Film—a Reading of Steven Spielberg's Minority Report. Neuroethics 3 (1):73-88.score: 18.0
    The portrayal of novel neurotechnologies in Steven Spielberg’s Minority Report serves to inoculate viewers from important moral considerations that are displaced by the film’s somewhat singular emphasis on the question of how to reintroduce freedom of choice into an otherwise technology driven world. This sets up a crisis mentality and presents a false dilemma regarding the appropriate use, and regulation, of neurotechnologies. On the one hand, it seems that centralized power is required to both control and effectively implement such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Steven Gerrard (1999). How Old Are These Bones? Putnam, Wittgenstein and Verification: Steven Gerrard. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):135–150.score: 18.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Steven Pinker, There Will Always Be an English by Steven Pinker.score: 18.0
    CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- What will English be like a hundred years from now? No one has ever observed what happens when a language is used for a century in a global village. Will MTV and CNN infiltrate every yurt and houseboat and drive out all other languages? Will regional accents go extinct, leaving everyone sounding like a Midwestern newscaster? Some language lovers worry that e-mail and chat rooms will influence writing & F2F (face-to-face) lang. & leadd it 2 loose it's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Keith Gunderson (2003). Steven Lehar's Gestalt Bubble Model of Visual Experience: The Embodied Percipient, Emergent Holism, and the Ultimate Question of Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):413-414.score: 18.0
    Aspects of an example of simulated shared subjectivity can be used both to support Steven Lehar's remarks on embodied percipients and to triangulate in a novel way the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness which Lehar wishes to “sidestep,” but which, given his other contentions regarding emergent holism, raises questions about whether he has been able or willing to do so.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Selmer Bringsjord (2001). Are We Evolved Computers?: A Critical Review of Steven Pinker's How the Mind Works. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):227 – 243.score: 18.0
    Steven Pinker's How the mind works (HTMW) marks in my opinion an historic point in the history of humankind's attempt to understand itself. Socrates delivered his "know thyself" imperative rather long ago, and now, finally, in this behemoth of a book, published at the dawn of a new millennium, Pinker steps up to have psychology tell us what we are: computers crafted by evolution - end of story; mystery solved; and the poor philosophers, having never managed to obey Socrates' (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Steven Gross, Steven Gross.score: 18.0
    Should a theory of meaning state what sentences mean, and can a Davidsonian theory of meaning in particular do so? Max Ko¨lbel answers both questions affirmatively. I argue, however, that the phenomena of non-homophony, non-truth-conditional aspects of meaning, semantic mood, and context-sensitivity provide prima facie obstacles for extending Davidsonian truth-theories to yield meaning-stating theorems. Assessing some natural moves in reply requires a more fully developed conception of the task of such theories than Ko¨lbel provides. A more developed conception is also (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Howard Sankey (2014). On Relativism and Pluralism: Response to Steven Bland. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:98-103.score: 18.0
    This paper responds to criticism presented by Steven Bland of my naturalistic approach to epistemic relativism. In my view, the central argument for epistemic relativism derives from the Pyrrhonian problem of the criterion. This opens relativism to an anti-sceptical response. I combine Roderick Chisholm’s particularist response to the problem of the criterion with a reliabilist conception of epistemic warrant. A distinction is made between epistemic norms which provide genuine warrant and those which do not. On the basis of this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John Sarnecki & Matthew Sponheimer (2002). Why Neanderthals Hate Poetry: A Critical Notice of Steven Mithen's the Prehistory of Mind. Philosophical Psychology 15 (2):173 – 184.score: 18.0
    The significance of historical advances in human development has been widely debated within cognitive science. Steven Mithen's recent book, The prehistory of mind (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996), presents an archeologist's attempt to explain the details of cognitive development within the framework of modern anthropology and cognitive psychology. We argue that Mithen's attempt fails for a number of different reasons. The relationship between the archeological evidence he considers and his conclusions is problematic. We maintain that it is difficult to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch & Jeffrey R. Botkin (2009). Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch, and Jeffrey R. Botkin Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):7-8.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Steven Mulhall (1998). The Givenness of Grammar: A Reply to Steven Affeltd. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):32–44.score: 18.0
    The article contests Affeldt's critique of Mulhall's "Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary," by asking how deep the conflict between what Affeldt proposes as Cavell's account of Wittgenstein's notion of grammar and that of Baker and Hacker really goes. It argues that Affeldt's critique is successful against one interpretation of the claims that grammar consists of a framework of rules and that criteria function as a basis for judgment, but that other interpretations of these claims are available and appear (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Vlastimil Zuska (2011). Steven Shaviro, Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Estetika 48 (2):254-261.score: 18.0
    A review of Steven Shaviro´s Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009, xvi + 174 pp. ISBN 978-0-262-19576-8).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Stephen C. Maxson (1999). Some Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations About Sociobiology and Behavior Genetics in Lifelines by Steven Rose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):898-899.score: 18.0
    Lifelines by Steven Rose is supposed to present a new perspective on biology replacing an emphasis on genes with one on organisms. However, much of the book is a highly biased critique of sociobiology and behavior genetics. Some of the flaws in Rose's description and depiction of these fields are presented and refuted. Also, it would appear that these aspects of the book and many others are, in fact, related more to Rose's perennial concern for the ideology, social origins (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Inga Römer (2014). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Husserl Studies 30 (3):283-291.score: 18.0
    In seinem neuen Buch vertieft Steven Crowell seine Auffassung der Phänomenologie als Transzendentalphilosophie, die es mit dem normativen Raum des Sinnes (space of meaning) zu tun habe (vgl. Crowell 2001). Sowohl Husserl als auch Heidegger führen aus seiner Sicht innerhalb der Phänomenologie die kantische Tradition der Transzendentalphilosophie weiter, indem sie der Frage nach den „transzendentalen Bedingungen der Konstitution oder Enthüllung des Sinnes“ (S. 1) nachgehen.Vgl. auch den von Steven Crowell mit herausgegebenen Band Transcendental Heidegger (2007). Da der Sinn (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jacob Rump (forthcoming). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review:1-7.score: 18.0
    Steven Crowell’s book is a welcome addition to the literature in phenomenology as well as a demonstration of the importance of phenomenology for those working in other areas of contemporary philosophy, especially those areas of Anglo-American philosophy concerned with normativity, meaning and the philosophy of action. Through a series of thirteen independent but thematically linked essays, he offers a novel account of the importance of normativity to phenomenology, a carefully argued re-thinking of the Husserlian and early Heideggerian accounts of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Irene Comins Mingol (2013). PINKER, Steven, Los ángeles que llevamos dentro. El declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones, Barcelona: Paidós, 2012. Daimon 59:209-210.score: 18.0
    Reseña del libro: Steven Pinker (2012): Los ángeles que llevamos dentro, el declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones , Barcelona, Paidós.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Steven Rybin (2011). Frederick Wasser (2010) Steven Spielberg's America. Film-Philosophy 15 (1):247-254.score: 18.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Steven Bartlett (1977). "Philosophy and Language," by Steven Davis. Modern Schoolman 54 (4):406-406.score: 18.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Michael Cournoyea (2010). Steven Shapin. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):273-275.score: 18.0
    In The Scientific Life, Steven Shapin argues that people and their virtues matter in late modern science. While scientists struggle to remain objective and impersonal, it is the personal, familiar, and charismatic—the traits once swept aside as vices by the scientifically virtuous—that have come to embody the “truth-speakers” of late modernity. With an enormous and sometimes daunting wealth of primary sources (from technical commentaries to his own sociological fieldwork), Steven Shapin breathes life back into these quotidian virtues. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Steven M Cahn. Analysis 48.score: 18.0
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Steven E. Hyman (2012). Interview with Steven E. Hyman. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):3-5.score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Otasio Bueno, Henry Jackman, Jonathan M. Weinberg & Steven D. Hales (2008). Book Symposium: Steven D. Hales, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy (Mit Press, 2006). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2).score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Steven Jensen (2003). A Long Discussion Regarding Steven A. Long's Interpretation of the Moral Species. The Thomist 67 (4):623-643.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Steven Pinker (2002). Steven Pinker. Cognitive Science 1991 (1996).score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. A. Reply to Steven Rappaport (1997). Relativism and Truth: A Reply to Steven Rappaport Michael P. Lynch. Philosophia 25:417.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jerry A. Fodor (2005). Reply to Steven Pinker So How Does the Mind Work?. Mind and Language 20 (1):25-32.score: 15.0
  34. Gaverick Matheny (2003). Least Harm: A Defense of Vegetarianism From Steven Davis's Omnivorous Proposal. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):505-511.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Desmond M. Clarke (1995). Malebranche and Occasionalism: A Reply to Steven Nadler. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):499-504.score: 15.0
    In Malebranche's account of occasional causality, God exercises his general will with respect to every event that merits a causal explanation. Nadler distinguishes two pictures of God's involvement; (1) there are as many distinct acts of God's will as there are causal events to be explained; (2) God's will is exercised once only, when the natural order of causes is created. I argue that Malebranche's concept of God is inconsistent with a real distinction between God and acts of his will, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Taylor Carman (2002). Review of Steven Galt Crowell, Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcendental Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (2).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Mary Clayton Coleman (2010). Sobel, David , and Wall, Steven , Eds. Reasons for Action . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 . Pp. 288. $90.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 120 (3):631-635.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Alfredo Pereira (2008). Steven Horst, Beyond Reduction: Philosophy of Mind and Post-Reductionist Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Mind Series. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 18 (3):421-423.score: 15.0
  39. Dan Zahavi (2003). Steven Galt Crowell: 'Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning: Paths Toward Transcendental Phenomenology'. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 36 (3):325-334.score: 15.0
  40. Joseph Carroll (1998). Steven Pinker's Cheesecake for the Mind. Philosophy and Literature 22 (2):478-485.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Bart Streumer (2011). Review of David Sobel and Steven Wall, Reasons for Action. [REVIEW] Analysis 71 (1):200-202.score: 15.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Thomas Hurka (2001). Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. Steven Wall. Mind 110 (439):878-881.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jonathan M. Weinberg (2008). Naturalism and Intuitions: Commentary on Steven Hales, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2):263 – 270.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Francis Cheneval (2000). Steven V. Hicks, International Law and the Possibility of a Just World Order. An Essay on Hegel's Universalism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (4):457-459.score: 15.0
  45. Nate Zuckerman (2010). Steven Crowell and Jeff Malpas (Eds): Transcendental Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (4):575-578.score: 15.0
  46. Kevin Corrigan, Richard Patterson, Garth Tissol, Peter Wakefield & Jack Zupko (2010). Steven K. Strange 1950-2009. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):1-3.score: 15.0
  47. Kurt Smith (2012). Occasionalism: Causation Among the Cartesians. By Steven Nadler. (Oxford UP, 2011. Pp. Xii + 207. Price £37.00.). Philosophical Quarterly 62 (248):643-643.score: 15.0
  48. W. Glannon (2011). The Philosophy of Death * by Steven Luper. Analysis 71 (3):601-603.score: 15.0
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Guy Lancaster (2010). Against Perfectionism: Defending Liberal Neutrality. By Steven Lecce. Heythrop Journal 51 (4):702-703.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John Dupre (1999). Book Review:How the Mind Works Steven Pinker. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 66 (3):489-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000