16 found
Sort by:
  1. Steven Hendley (2010). Answerable to the World: Experience and Practical Intentionality in Brandom's and McDowell's "Intramural" Debate. Theoria 76 (2):129-151.
    Robert Brandom and John McDowell pursue similar, yet strikingly different approaches to a shared problem: that of how we can be answerable to the world in our beliefs about it in the wake of Sellars' critique of the myth of the given. While McDowell attempts to rehabilitate the idea that experience is capable of providing justifications for our beliefs, Brandom constructs a sophisticated social-pragmatist account of the objectivity of our conceptual commitments in which experience is, as he says, not one (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Elaborating A. Viable Sartrean & Steven Hendley (2010). Realism and Contingency. In Adrian Mirvish & Adrian van den Hoven (eds.), New Perspectives on Sartre. Cambridge Scholars. 161.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Steven Hendley (2009). Reassuring Ourselves of the Reality of Ethical Reasons: What McDowell Should Take From Foot's Ethical Naturalism. Dialogue 48 (03):513-.
    ABSTRACT: In this paper I argue that John McDowells ethical naturalism do not justify a rejection of her views, but only clarifies what we can defensibly take from her position. Moreover, his comments suggest a way in which Foots naturalism can reassure us of the reality of ethical reasons, we can understand how McDowell needs something like Foot’s naturalism in order to redeem his own realist aspirations for ethics.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Steven Hendley (2007). Response to Robert Gibb's “Après Vous: Theory and Asymmetry”. Modern Schoolman 84 (2-3):235-243.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Steven Hendley (2006). Habermas Between Metaphysical and Natural Realism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (4):521 – 537.
    Habermas's recent work in epistemology has been marked by a decisive rejection of his earlier epistemic conception of truth in which he understood truth as 'what may be accepted as rational under ideal conditions'. Arguing that no 'idealization of justificatory conditions' can do justice to both human fallibility and the unconditional nature of truth, he has attempted to develop a realistic conception of truth that severs any conceptual link between truth and justification while respecting the epistemic relevance of justification for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Steven Hendley (2005). Autonomy and Alterity. In Claire Elise Katz & Lara Trout (eds.), Emmanuel Levinas. Routledge. 2--3.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Steven Hendley (2005). From the Second to the Third Person and Back Again. Journal of Philosophical Research 30:169-188.
    Habermas and Brandom remain divided on a key point in their theories of language concerning the priority of a participant vs. a third-person, observational perspective onto language. I examine this dispute as it has played out in a recent exchange between them, attempting to explicate and defend a qualified version of Habermas’s claim in the light of his more developed treatment of this issue elsewhere. Once the defensible content of Habermas’s claim is clarified, I argue that Habermas’s critique of Brandom (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Steven Hendley (2004). Speech and Sensibility: Levinas and Habermas on the Constitution of the Moral Point of View. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):153-173.
    For Habermas, a moral point of view is based in the procedural requirements of our linguistic competence. For Levinas, it is the way in which we find ourselves related in speech to the face of the other that we find ourselves obliged to the other. But these differing conceptions of the moral significance of language need not be seen as opposed to each other. Rather, they can be conceptualized as complimentary accounts of the ways in which a moral point of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Steven Hendley (2000). From Communicative Action to the Face of the Other: Levinas and Habermas on Language, Obligation, and Community. Lexington Books.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Steven Hendley (2000). Sartre and the Idea of Socialism. Philosophy Today 44 (1):60-72.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Steven Hendley (1997). James L. Marsh: Critique, Action, and Liberation. [REVIEW] Man and World 30 (1):122-126.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Steven Hendley (1996). From Communicative Action to the Face of the Other. Philosophy Today 40 (4):504-530.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Steven Hendley (1995). Putting Ourselves Up for Question: A Postmodern Critique of Richard Rorty's Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (2):241-253.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Steven Hendley (1993). Modernity and Its Discontents. International Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1):130-131.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Steven Hendley (1993). Truth and Existence. Radical Philosophy Review of Books 8 (8):30-36.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Steven Hendley (1991). Judgment and Rationality in Lyotard's Discursive Archipelago. Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):227-244.