12 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Steven K. Strange [12]Steven Keith Strange [1]
  1.  30
    Steven K. Strange (1984). The Tabula of Cebes. Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):106-108.
  2.  50
    Steven K. Strange (1985). The Double Explanation in the Timaeus. Ancient Philosophy 5 (1):25-39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  22
    Steven K. Strange (1988). An Annotated Translation of Plotinus Ennead Iii 7. Ancient Philosophy 8 (2):251-271.
  4.  27
    Steven K. Strange (1992). Plotinus' Account of Participation in Ennead VI.4-5. Journal of the History of Philosophy 30 (4):479-496.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    Steven K. Strange (1985). Der Mittelplatonismus. Idealistic Studies 15 (1):64-65.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  17
    Steven K. Strange (1985). Time, Creation, & the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (4):583-585.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Steven K. Strange (1985). Ronna L. Burger, The Phaedo: A Platonic Labyrinth Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (10):422-424.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Steven K. Strange (1988). Commentary on Long. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):102-112.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Steven K. Strange & Michael Atkinson (1986). Plotinus: Ennead V. 1. On the Three Principal Hypostases; A Commentary with Translation. Philosophical Review 95 (1):99.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  68
    Steven K. Strange & Jack Zupko (eds.) (2004). Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Cambridge University Press.
    Stoicism is now widely recognized as one of the most important philosophical schools of ancient Greece and Rome. But how did it influence Western thought after Greek and Roman antiquity? The contributors recruited for this volume include leading international scholars of Stoicism as well as experts in later periods of philosophy. They trace the impact of Stoicism and Stoic ideas from late antiquity through the medieval and modern periods.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Steven K. Strange & Jack Zupko (eds.) (2010). Stoicism: Traditions and Transformations. Cambridge University Press.
    Stoicism is now widely recognised as one of the most important philosophical schools of ancient Greece and Rome. But how did it influence Western thought after Greek and Roman antiquity? The question is a difficult one to answer because the most important Stoic texts have been lost since the end of the classical period, though not before early Christian thinkers had borrowed their ideas and applied them to discussions ranging from dialectic to moral theology. Later philosophers became familiar with Stoic (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Steven K. Strange (1984). "The Tabula of Cebes", by John T. Fitzgerald and L. Michael White. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 4 (1):106.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography