Search results for 'Steven L. Grover' (try it on Scholar)

17 found
Sort by:
  1. Steven L. Grover & Chun Hui (1994). The Influence of Role Conflict and Self-Interest on Lying in Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 13 (4):295 - 303.score: 290.0
    The self-interest paradigm predicts that unethical behavior occurs when such behavior benefits the actor. A recent model of lying behavior, however, predicts that lying behavior results from an individual''s inability to meet conflicting role demands. The need to reconcile the self-interest and role conflict theories prompted the present study, which orthogonally manipulated the benefit from lying and the conflicting role demands. A model integrating the two theories predicts the results, which showed that both elements — self benefit (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Steven L. Grover & Robert Moorman (2009). Challenges to Leader Integrity. In Christina Garsten & Tor Hernes (eds.), Ethical Dilemmas in Management. Routledge.score: 290.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jeffrey S. Kixmiller, Daniel L. Wann, Cathy A. Grover & Stephen F. Davis (1988). Effect of Elaboration Levels on Content Comprehension. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 26 (1):32-33.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dorothy L. Grover, Joseph L. Kamp & Nuel D. Belnap (1975). A Prosentential Theory of Truth. Philosophical Studies 27 (1):73--125.score: 120.0
  5. Dorothy L. Grover (1972). Propositional Quantifiers. Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (2):111 - 136.score: 120.0
    In discussing propositional quantifiers we have considered two kinds of variables: variables occupying the argument places of connectives, and variables occupying the argument places of predicates.We began with languages which contained the first kind of variable, i.e., variables taking sentences as substituends. Our first point was that there appear to be no sentences in English that serve as adequate readings of formulas containing propositional quantifiers. Then we showed how a certain natural and illuminating extension of English by prosentences did provide (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Dorothy L. Grover (1981). Truth. [REVIEW] Philosophia 10 (3-4):225-252.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Dorothy L. Grover (1987). Death, and Life. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):711 - 732.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Dorothy L. Grover (1976). 'This Is False' on the Prosentential Theory. Analysis 36 (2):80 - 83.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen F. Davis, Cathy A. Grover, Cyril J. Sadowski, James L. Tramill & P. Jeannie Kleinhammer-Tramill (1986). The Relationship Between the Type A Behavior Pattern and Process Versus Impact Achievement Motivation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 24 (6):441-443.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. S. L. Grover & C. Hui (1994). The Influence of Role Conflict, Role Strength, and Reward Contingencies on Lying Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 13:295-303.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Dorothy L. Grover (1976). Williams on Truth. Philosophical Books 17 (3):97-101.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Melvin Fitting (1977). Review: Nuel D. Belnap, Dorothy L. Grover, Quantifying in and Out Of' Quotes; Dorothy L. Grover, Propositional Quantification and Quotation Contexts. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):313-313.score: 42.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Nuel Belnap (2006). Presentence, Revision, Truth, and Paradox. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (3):705–712.score: 12.0
    Tim Maudiin’s Truth and Paradox (Maudlin 2004, cited here as T&P), a book that is richly endowed with interesting analyses and original theses, chooses to ignore both the prosentential theory of truth from Grover, Camp and Belnap 1975 and the revision theory in its book form, Gupta and Belnap 1993 (The Revision Theory of Truth, henceforth RTT).1 There is no discussion of either theory, nor even any mention of them in the list of references. I offer a pair of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Pierre Le Morvan (2004). Ramsey on Truth and Truth on Ramsey. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):705 – 718.score: 12.0
    It is widely held, to the point of being the received interpretation, that Frank Ramsey was the first to defend the so-called Redundancy Theory of Truth in his landmark article ‘Facts and Propositions’ (hereafter ‘FP’) of 1927.1 For instance, A.J. Ayer2 cited this article in the context of arguing that saying that p is true is simply a way of asserting p and that truth is not a real quality or relation. Other holders of the received interpretation, such as George (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Fred L. Royer & Grover C. Gilmore (1985). Spatiotemporal Factors and Developmental Changes in Visual Processes. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23 (4):404-406.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Grover Maxwell (1962). Theories, Frameworks, and Ontology. Philosophy of Science 29 (2):132-138.score: 6.0
    Utilizing Carnap's notions of "questions [or assertions] within a framework" and "questions [or assertions] about a framework" and his account of A-truth (analyticity in the broad sense), a theory of the ontological status of entities--in particular, that of theoretical entities--is adumbrated. In addition to the usual L-rules, each conceptual framework considered embodies a set of sentences whose truth value is quickly decidable on other than purely linguistic grounds, a set of A-true formulae, and a set of rules for the confirmation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Emmett L. Holman (1986). Maxwell and Materialism. Synthese 66 (March):505-14.score: 6.0
    In a recent article, Grover Maxwell presents a case for a kind of mind-brain identity theory which he claims precludes materialism. His case is based on some views about meaning which I find plausible. However, I will argue that, by adopting certain assumptions about the nature of sensory experience, and extending some of Maxwell's views about meaning in a plausible way, the issue of a materialistic identity theory is reopened. Ultimately, I will agree that such a theory is not (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation