Search results for 'Steven Mulhall' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Steven Mulhall (1998). The Givenness of Grammar: A Reply to Steven Affeltd. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):32–44.score: 600.0
    The article contests Affeldt's critique of Mulhall's "Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary," by asking how deep the conflict between what Affeldt proposes as Cavell's account of Wittgenstein's notion of grammar and that of Baker and Hacker really goes. It argues that Affeldt's critique is successful against one interpretation of the claims that grammar consists of a framework of rules and that criteria function as a basis for judgment, but that other interpretations of these claims are available and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephen Mulhall (2008). On Film. Routledge.score: 300.0
    In this significantly expanded new edition of his acclaimed exploration of the four Alien movies, Stephen Mulhall adds several new chapters on Steven Spielberg’s Mission: Impossible trilogy and Minority Report . The first part of the book discusses the four Alien movies. Mulhall argues that the sexual significance of the aliens themselves, and of Ripley’s resistance to them, takes us deep into the question of what it is to be human. At the heart of the book is (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen Mulhall (2007). Wittgenstein's Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, Sections 243-315. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Stephen Mulhall offers a new way of interpreting one of the most famous and contested texts in modern philosophy: remarks on "private language" in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. He sheds new light on a central controversy concerning Wittgenstein's early work by showing its relevance to a proper understanding of the later work.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen Mulhall (2001). Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    What does it mean to think of philosophy in the condition of modernism, in which its relation to its past and future has become a relevant problem? This book argues that the writings of Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and Kierkegaard are best understood as responsive (each in their own way) to such questions. Through detailed analysis of these authors' most influential texts, Stephen Mulhall reorients our sense of the philosophical work each text aims to accomplish, engendering a critical dialogue between them (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen Mulhall (2010). The Cat and the Camel a Hesitant Response to “Morality or Moralism?”. Common Knowledge 16 (2):331-338.score: 60.0
    This response to “Morality or Moralism?” by Émilie Hache and Bruno Latour, while accepting the plausibility and importance of their critique of moralism in the name of morality, identifies a number of questionable steps and assumptions in their development of it. Mulhall's response questions an ambiguity in their specifications of what morality and moralism are—an unexplained tendency on their part to occlude distinctively nonhuman animal life in favor of the inanimate when advocating a concern for the nonhuman, and what (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephen Mulhall (1999). Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary. Clarendon Press.score: 60.0
    Stephen Mulhall presents the first full-length philosophical study of the work of Stanley Cavell, best known for his highly influential contributions to the fields of film studies, Shakespearian literary criticism, and the confluence of psychoanalysis and literary theory. It is not properly appreciated that Cavell's project originated in his interpretation of Austin's and Wittgenstein's philosophical interest in the criteria governing ordinary language, and is given unity by an abiding concern with the nature and the varying cultural manifestations of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen Mulhall (2013). The Self and its Shadows: A Book of Essays on Individuality as Negation in Philosophy and the Arts. Oup Oxford.score: 60.0
    Stephen Mulhall presents a series of multiply interrelated essays which explore the idea of selfhood as a matter of non-self-identity: for example, as becoming or self-overcoming, or as being doubled or divided. He draws on Nietzsche, Sartre, and Wittgenstein, but also on works of opera, cinema, and fiction.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Stephen Mulhall (2003). Ways of Thinking: A Response to Andersen and Baggin. Film-Philosophy 7 (3).score: 60.0
    Nathan Andersen 'Is Film the Alien Other to Philosophy?: Philosophy *as* Film in Mulhall's _On Film_' _Film-Philosophy_, vol. 7 no. 23, August 2003 Julian Baggini 'Alien Ways of Thinking: Mulhall's _On Film_' _Film-Philosophy_, vol. 7 no. 24, August 2003.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen Mulhall (2013). The Routledge Guidebook to Heidegger's Being and Time. Routledge.score: 60.0
    The Routledge Guidebook to Heidegger’s Being and Time examines the work of one of the most controversial thinkers of the twentieth century. Heidegger’s writings are notoriously difficult, requiring careful reading. This book analyses his first major publication, Being and Time , which to this day remains his most influential work. The Routledge Guidebook to Heidegger’s Being and Time explores: The context of Heidegger’s work and the background to his writing Each separate part of the text in relation to its goals, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Steven G. Affeldt (1998). The Ground of Mutuality: Criteria, Judgment and Intelligibility in Stephen Mulhall and Stanley Cavell. European Journal of Philosophy 6 (1):1–31.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Steven Hall (2008). Review of Stephen Mulhall, Wittgenstein's Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations §§243–315. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 31 (3):272–280.score: 36.0
  12. Stephen Mulhall (1995). Book Review: Stanley Cavell: Philosophy's Recounting of the Ordinary. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (2).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Stephen Mulhall (1993). Consciousness, Cognition and the Phenomenal--II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67 (67):75-89.score: 30.0
  14. Denis McManus (ed.) (2014). Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self: Division Two of Being and Time. Routledge.score: 24.0
    Heidegger’s Being and Time is often cited as one of the most important philosophical works of the last century. This outstanding collection examines the major themes of Division Two of Being and Time , which has received relatively little attention compared to Division One. Leading philosophers examine important topics such as authenticity, death, guilt and time, the influence of Kierkegaard, and the relationship between Heidegger’s work and ancient and medieval philosophy. Essential reading for scholars and students of Heidegger’s thought and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Denis McManus (ed.) (2014). Heidegger, Authenticity, and the Self: Themes From Division Two of Being and Time. Routledge.score: 24.0
    Though Heidegger’s Being and Time is often cited as one of the most important philosophical works of the last hundred years, its Division Two has received relatively little attention. This outstanding collection corrects that, examining some of the central themes of Division Two and their wide-ranging and challenging implications. An international team of leading philosophers explore the crucial notions that articulate Heidegger’s concept of authenticity, including death, anxiety, conscience, guilt, resolution and temporality. In doing so, they clarify the bearing of (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David Robjant (forthcoming). How Miserable We Are, How Wicked; Into the ‘Void’ with Murdoch, Mulhall, and Antonaccio. Heythrop Journal.score: 21.0
    Discussion of Iris Murdoch recalls Socrates' plea that he be allowed a crabwise approach to the Good. What his audience want of a direct approach is an explanation of precisely what sort of thing the Good is, where the demand for precision carries the force of: Tell me now, in which of the categories of thing I already allow to exist is the Good to be found? This is just what academia has done with the obscure singularity of Murdoch – (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Don Howard, Are Elementary Particles Individuals? A Critical Appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis.score: 18.0
    Steven French and Décio Krause have written what bids fair to be, for years to come, the definitive philosophical treatment of the problem of the individuality of elementary particles in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. The book begins with a long and dense argument for the view that elementary particles are most helpfully regarded as non-individuals, and it concludes with an earnest attempt to develop a formal apparatus for describing such non-individual entities better suited to the task than (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Timothy Krahn, Andrew Fenton & Letitia Meynell (2010). Novel Neurotechnologies in Film—a Reading of Steven Spielberg's Minority Report. Neuroethics 3 (1):73-88.score: 18.0
    The portrayal of novel neurotechnologies in Steven Spielberg’s Minority Report serves to inoculate viewers from important moral considerations that are displaced by the film’s somewhat singular emphasis on the question of how to reintroduce freedom of choice into an otherwise technology driven world. This sets up a crisis mentality and presents a false dilemma regarding the appropriate use, and regulation, of neurotechnologies. On the one hand, it seems that centralized power is required to both control and effectively implement such (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Steven Pinker, There Will Always Be an English by Steven Pinker.score: 18.0
    CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- What will English be like a hundred years from now? No one has ever observed what happens when a language is used for a century in a global village. Will MTV and CNN infiltrate every yurt and houseboat and drive out all other languages? Will regional accents go extinct, leaving everyone sounding like a Midwestern newscaster? Some language lovers worry that e-mail and chat rooms will influence writing & F2F (face-to-face) lang. & leadd it 2 loose it's (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Steven Gerrard (1999). How Old Are These Bones? Putnam, Wittgenstein and Verification: Steven Gerrard. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):135–150.score: 18.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Keith Gunderson (2003). Steven Lehar's Gestalt Bubble Model of Visual Experience: The Embodied Percipient, Emergent Holism, and the Ultimate Question of Consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):413-414.score: 18.0
    Aspects of an example of simulated shared subjectivity can be used both to support Steven Lehar's remarks on embodied percipients and to triangulate in a novel way the so-called “hard problem” of consciousness which Lehar wishes to “sidestep,” but which, given his other contentions regarding emergent holism, raises questions about whether he has been able or willing to do so.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Selmer Bringsjord (2001). Are We Evolved Computers?: A Critical Review of Steven Pinker's How the Mind Works. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 14 (2):227 – 243.score: 18.0
    Steven Pinker's How the mind works (HTMW) marks in my opinion an historic point in the history of humankind's attempt to understand itself. Socrates delivered his "know thyself" imperative rather long ago, and now, finally, in this behemoth of a book, published at the dawn of a new millennium, Pinker steps up to have psychology tell us what we are: computers crafted by evolution - end of story; mystery solved; and the poor philosophers, having never managed to obey Socrates' (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Steven Gross, Steven Gross.score: 18.0
    Should a theory of meaning state what sentences mean, and can a Davidsonian theory of meaning in particular do so? Max Ko¨lbel answers both questions affirmatively. I argue, however, that the phenomena of non-homophony, non-truth-conditional aspects of meaning, semantic mood, and context-sensitivity provide prima facie obstacles for extending Davidsonian truth-theories to yield meaning-stating theorems. Assessing some natural moves in reply requires a more fully developed conception of the task of such theories than Ko¨lbel provides. A more developed conception is also (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch & Jeffrey R. Botkin (2009). Virginia Moyer, Steven M. Teutsch, and Jeffrey R. Botkin Reply. Hastings Center Report 39 (1):7-8.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Howard Sankey (2014). On Relativism and Pluralism: Response to Steven Bland. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 47:98-103.score: 18.0
    This paper responds to criticism presented by Steven Bland of my naturalistic approach to epistemic relativism. In my view, the central argument for epistemic relativism derives from the Pyrrhonian problem of the criterion. This opens relativism to an anti-sceptical response. I combine Roderick Chisholm’s particularist response to the problem of the criterion with a reliabilist conception of epistemic warrant. A distinction is made between epistemic norms which provide genuine warrant and those which do not. On the basis of this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David Robjant (2013). Symposium on Iris Murdoch. How Miserable We Are, How Wicked; Into the ‘Void’ with Murdoch, Mulhall, and Antonaccio. Heythrop Journal 54 (6):999-1006.score: 18.0
    Murdoch brings together the darkness of misery and the darkness of wickedness under the observation that ‘goodness is not acontinuously active organic part of our purposes and wishes’. This looks like an empirically minded correction of Socrates. But besides correcting Socrates, is Murdoch also offering, as Stephen Mulhall suggests, ‘a fundamental counter-example’ to her own ‘moral vision’? This depends on what one takes Murdoch’s moral vision to be. I trace Mulhall's mistake to Maria Antonaccio's misidentification of the good (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Sarnecki & Matthew Sponheimer (2002). Why Neanderthals Hate Poetry: A Critical Notice of Steven Mithen's the Prehistory of Mind. Philosophical Psychology 15 (2):173 – 184.score: 18.0
    The significance of historical advances in human development has been widely debated within cognitive science. Steven Mithen's recent book, The prehistory of mind (London: Thames & Hudson, 1996), presents an archeologist's attempt to explain the details of cognitive development within the framework of modern anthropology and cognitive psychology. We argue that Mithen's attempt fails for a number of different reasons. The relationship between the archeological evidence he considers and his conclusions is problematic. We maintain that it is difficult to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Vlastimil Zuska (2011). Steven Shaviro, Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics. Estetika 48 (2):254-261.score: 18.0
    A review of Steven Shaviro´s Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009, xvi + 174 pp. ISBN 978-0-262-19576-8).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Nathan Andersen (2003). Is Film the Alien Other to Philosophy?, on Stephen Mulhall On Film. Film-Philosophy 7 (3).score: 18.0
    Stephen Mulhall _On Film_ London and New York: Routledge, 2002 ISBN 0-415-24796-9 142 pp.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Steven Joffe & Franklin G. Miller (2008). Steven Joffe and Franklin G. Miller Reply. Hastings Center Report 38 (5):7-7.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Julian Baggini (2003). Alien Ways of Thinking, on Stephen Mulhall On Film. Film-Philosophy 7 (3).score: 18.0
    Stephen Mulhall _On Film_ London and New York: Routledge, 2002 ISBN 0-415-24796-9 142 pp.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Stephen C. Maxson (1999). Some Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations About Sociobiology and Behavior Genetics in Lifelines by Steven Rose. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):898-899.score: 18.0
    Lifelines by Steven Rose is supposed to present a new perspective on biology replacing an emphasis on genes with one on organisms. However, much of the book is a highly biased critique of sociobiology and behavior genetics. Some of the flaws in Rose's description and depiction of these fields are presented and refuted. Also, it would appear that these aspects of the book and many others are, in fact, related more to Rose's perennial concern for the ideology, social origins (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Inga Römer (2014). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Husserl Studies 30 (3):283-291.score: 18.0
    In seinem neuen Buch vertieft Steven Crowell seine Auffassung der Phänomenologie als Transzendentalphilosophie, die es mit dem normativen Raum des Sinnes (space of meaning) zu tun habe (vgl. Crowell 2001). Sowohl Husserl als auch Heidegger führen aus seiner Sicht innerhalb der Phänomenologie die kantische Tradition der Transzendentalphilosophie weiter, indem sie der Frage nach den „transzendentalen Bedingungen der Konstitution oder Enthüllung des Sinnes“ (S. 1) nachgehen.Vgl. auch den von Steven Crowell mit herausgegebenen Band Transcendental Heidegger (2007). Da der Sinn (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jacob Rump (forthcoming). Steven Crowell: Normativity and Phenomenology in Husserl and Heidegger. Continental Philosophy Review:1-7.score: 18.0
    Steven Crowell’s book is a welcome addition to the literature in phenomenology as well as a demonstration of the importance of phenomenology for those working in other areas of contemporary philosophy, especially those areas of Anglo-American philosophy concerned with normativity, meaning and the philosophy of action. Through a series of thirteen independent but thematically linked essays, he offers a novel account of the importance of normativity to phenomenology, a carefully argued re-thinking of the Husserlian and early Heideggerian accounts of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Steven Bartlett (1977). "Philosophy and Language," by Steven Davis. Modern Schoolman 54 (4):406-406.score: 18.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Irene Comins Mingol (2013). PINKER, Steven, Los ángeles que llevamos dentro. El declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones, Barcelona: Paidós, 2012. Daimon 59:209-210.score: 18.0
    Reseña del libro: Steven Pinker (2012): Los ángeles que llevamos dentro, el declive de la violencia y sus implicaciones , Barcelona, Paidós.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Michael Cournoyea (2010). Steven Shapin. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):273-275.score: 18.0
    In The Scientific Life, Steven Shapin argues that people and their virtues matter in late modern science. While scientists struggle to remain objective and impersonal, it is the personal, familiar, and charismatic—the traits once swept aside as vices by the scientifically virtuous—that have come to embody the “truth-speakers” of late modernity. With an enormous and sometimes daunting wealth of primary sources (from technical commentaries to his own sociological fieldwork), Steven Shapin breathes life back into these quotidian virtues. The (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Steven Rybin (2011). Frederick Wasser (2010) Steven Spielberg's America. Film-Philosophy 15 (1):247-254.score: 18.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Steven Miller (1992). Steven Miller. Social Epistemology 6 (1):23-33.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Robert B. Talisse, Maureen Eckert, Norman Bowie, Steven M. Cahn, Randall Curren, Alan Goldman, Tziporah Kasachkoff, Peter Markie, John O'Connor, David Rosenthal, Robert Simon, David Shatz, George Sher, Douglas Stalker & Christine Vitrano (2009). A Teacher's Life: Essays for Steven M. Cahn. Lexington Books.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Daniel H. Cohen (1988). A Reply to Steven M Cahn. Analysis 48.score: 18.0
    Steven m cahn, In the june 1987 issue of "analysis", Asks how a principled divesture of stocks is possible. Selling stock requires a buyer, So no net reduction of objectionable economic behavior results. Is divestiture merely self-Righteous cleansing of one's own hands? not necessarily. It is argued that divesture as a means to influence corporate behavior, And not just as a means to a clean portfolio, Can be justified.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Steven E. Hyman (2012). Interview with Steven E. Hyman. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):3-5.score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Otasio Bueno, Henry Jackman, Jonathan M. Weinberg & Steven D. Hales (2008). Book Symposium: Steven D. Hales, Relativism and the Foundations of Philosophy (Mit Press, 2006). International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (2).score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Steven Jensen (2003). A Long Discussion Regarding Steven A. Long's Interpretation of the Moral Species. The Thomist 67 (4):623-643.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Steven Pinker (2002). Steven Pinker. Cognitive Science 1991 (1996).score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. A. Reply to Steven Rappaport (1997). Relativism and Truth: A Reply to Steven Rappaport Michael P. Lynch. Philosophia 25:417.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jerry A. Fodor (2005). Reply to Steven Pinker So How Does the Mind Work?. Mind and Language 20 (1):25-32.score: 15.0
  48. Gaverick Matheny (2003). Least Harm: A Defense of Vegetarianism From Steven Davis's Omnivorous Proposal. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16 (5):505-511.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Charles Crittenden (2007). Review of Stephen Mulhall, Wittgenstein's Private Language: Grammar, Nonsense, and Imagination in Philosophical Investigations, ##243-315. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (5).score: 15.0
  50. Desmond M. Clarke (1995). Malebranche and Occasionalism: A Reply to Steven Nadler. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33 (3):499-504.score: 15.0
    In Malebranche's account of occasional causality, God exercises his general will with respect to every event that merits a causal explanation. Nadler distinguishes two pictures of God's involvement; (1) there are as many distinct acts of God's will as there are causal events to be explained; (2) God's will is exercised once only, when the natural order of causes is created. I argue that Malebranche's concept of God is inconsistent with a real distinction between God and acts of his will, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000