Search results for 'Stewart Lewis' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. B. Lewis, J. S. Stewart & D. L. Mollin (1965). Cc Booth. In Karl W. Linsenmann (ed.), Proceedings. St. Louis, Lutheran Academy for Scholarship 184.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Hywel David Lewis, Stewart R. Sutherland & T. A. Roberts (eds.) (1989). Religion, Reason, and the Self: Essays in Honour of Hywel D. Lewis. University of Wales Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  42
    Jenny Dawkins & Stewart Lewis (2003). CSR in Stakeholder Expectations: And Their Implication for Company Strategy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2-3):185 - 193.
    Recent years have seen dramatic changes in the attitudes and expectations brought to bear on companies. Over ten years of research at MORI has shown the increasing prominence of corporate responsibility for a wide range of stakeholders, from consumers and employees to legislators and investors.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  4. Herbert L. Stewart, Joseph Rickaby, G. Galloway, J. Lewis McIntyre, R. F. Alfred Hoernle, David Morrison & S. C. Haddon (1906). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 15 (60):565-576.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Owen Barfield, C. S. Lewis & G. B. Tennyson (1989). Owen Barfield on C.S. Lewis.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  26
    C. S. Lewis (1991). Letter From Lewis to Mr and Mrs Sheldon Vanauken. The Chesterton Review 17 (3/4):538-539.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    D. W. Hamlyn, Clarence Irving Lewis, John D. Goheen & John L. Mothershead (1972). Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis. Philosophical Quarterly 22 (86):68.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8.  24
    C. S. Lewis (1991). Lewis Explains His Reasons for Distrusting the so-Called. The Chesterton Review 17 (3/4):541-542.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  34
    David Lewis (1974). Spielman and Lewis on Inductive Immodesty. Philosophy of Science 41 (1):84-85.
  10.  12
    D. M. Lewis (1973). Naphtali Lewis: Greek Historical Documents: The Fifth Century B.C. Pp. Xii+125. Toronto: Hakkert, 1971. Paper, $2.25. The Classical Review 23 (02):283-284.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  4
    Paul Cartledge, W. M. Calder Iii, R. S. Smith, J. Vaio & George Cornewall Lewis (2003). Teaching the English Wissenschaft. The Letters of Sir George Cornewall Lewis to Karl Otfried MüllerTeaching the English Wissenschaft. The Letters of Sir George Cornewall Lewis to Karl Otfried Muller. Journal of Hellenic Studies 123:262.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  1
    H. A. Lewis (1973). Modal Logic: The Lewis‐Modal Systems. Philosophical Books 14 (3):33-34.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Harry R. Lewis & Christos H. Papadimitriou (1998). Elements of the Theory of Computation Harry R. Lewis, Christos H. Papadimitriou.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Mark Lewis & Karen Allen (eds.) (2006). Mark Lewis. Liverpool University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. David K. Lewis (1991). Parts of Classes with an Appendix by John P. Burgess, A.P. Hazen, and David Lewis.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Hywel D. Lewis (1983). Solitude in Philosophy and Literature: The H. B. Acton Memorial Lecture: Hywel D. Lewis. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 16:1-13.
    ‘I understand that the world was nothing, a mechanical chaos of casual, brute enmity on which we stupidly impose our hopes and fears. I understand that, finally and absolutely, I alone exist. All the rest, I saw, is merely what pushes me, or what I push against, blindly—as blindly as all that is not myself pushes back. I create the whole universe, blink by blink. —An ugly god pitifully dying in a tree.’.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Clarence Irving Lewis & Paul Arthur Schilpp (eds.) (1968). The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. John Stewart (1806). The Conquest of the Moral World [by J. Stewart].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Dugald Stewart, William Hamilton & John Veitch (1854). The Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, Ed. By Sir W. Hamilton, [Concluded by J. Veitch].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. John Stewart (1807). The Revelation of Reason and Nature, as Exhibited in the ... Opus Maximum [by J. Stewart].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Murdith McLean (1991). Stewart R. Sutherland and RA Roberts, Eds., Religion, Reason and the Self Essays in Honour of Hywel D. Lewis Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 11 (5):367-369.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Christopher Toner (2016). A Philosophical Walking Tour With C. S. Lewis: Why It Did Not Include Rome. By Stewart Goetz. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 90 (1):154-157.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Stuart Brown (1990). Religion, Reason and the Self: Essays in Honour of Hywel D. Lewis Edited by Stewart R. Sutherland and T. A. Roberts University of Wales Press, 1989, Xiv + 173 Pp., £20. [REVIEW] Philosophy 65 (253):379-.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Stuart Brown (1990). SUTHERLAND, STEWART R. And T. A. ROBERTS Religion, Reason and the Self: Essays in Honour of Hywel D. Lewis. [REVIEW] Philosophy 65:379.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  8
    Stewart Caldecott (2007). The Crisis of Islam: Holy War and Unholy Terror, by Bernard Lewis; The Shade of Swords: Jihad and the Conflict Between Islam and Christianity, by M. J. Akbar. The Chesterton Review 33 (1-2):220-224.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  2
    Stewart R. Sutherland (1993). Obituary: Hywel David Lewis 1910-1992. Philosophy 68 (264):263 - 264.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Jessica M. Wilson (2015). Hume's Dictum and Metaphysical Modality: Lewis's Combinatorialism. In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to David Lewis. Blackwell 138-158.
    Many contemporary philosophers accept Hume's Dictum, according to which there are no metaphysically necessary connections between distinct, intrinsically typed entities. Tacit in Lewis 's work is a potential motivation for HD, according to which one should accept HD as presupposed by the best account of the range of metaphysical possibilities---namely, a combinatorial account, applied to spatiotemporal fundamentalia. Here I elucidate and assess this Ludovician motivation for HD. After refining HD and surveying its key, recurrent role in Lewis ’s (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  59
    Katherine Hawley (forthcoming). David Lewis on Persistence. In Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds.), A Companion to David Lewis. Wiley-Blackwell 237-49.
    This paper provides an overview on David Lewis's writings about persistence. I focus on two issues. First, what is the relationship between the doctrine of Humean Supervenience and the rejection of endurantism? Second, why did Lewis not adopt a stage theory of persistence, given that he advocated a counterpart theory of modality?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Adán Salinas (1999). La imagen narrativa de Dios en C. S. Lewis, una lectura de “Las crónicas de Narnia”. Boletín de Filosofía (10):261-278.
    El artículo propone una interpretación de la obra literaria "Las Crónicas de Narnia" del autor ingles C. S Lewis. Tal interpretación posibilita considerar la alegoría religiosa que esta obra literaria realiza sobre la experiencia de la divinidad a través de la figura del León.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  71
    Wayne A. Davis (2004). Are Knowledge Claims Indexical? Erkenntnis 61 (2-3):257-281.
    David Lewis, Stewart Cohen, and Keith DeRose have proposed that sentences of the form S knows P are indexical, and therefore differ in truth value from one context to another.1 On their indexical contextualism, the truth value of S knows P is determined by whether S meets the epistemic standards of the speakers context. I will not be concerned with relational forms of contextualism, according to which the truth value of S knows P is determined by the standards (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31.  98
    Ernest Sosa (2004). Relevant Alternatives, Contextualism Included. Philosophical Studies 119 (1-2):35-65.
    Since this paper is for a conference on “Contextualism in Epistemology and Beyond,” I have opted to sketch a retrospective of contextualism in epistemology, including highlights of the “relevant alternatives” approach, given how relevantism and contextualism have developed in tandem. We focus on externalist forms of contextualism, bypassing internalist forms such as Cohen 1988 and Lewis 1996, but much of our discussion will be applicable to contextualism generally. Internalist contextualism is helpfully discussed in papers by Stewart Cohen, Richard (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  32.  13
    Brian Garrett (2016). Tim, Tom, Time and Fate: Lewis on Time Travel. Analytic Philosophy 57 (3):247-252.
    In his well-known time travel story, David Lewis claims that there is a sense in which Tim can go back in time and kill his Grandfather and a (more inclusive) sense in which he cannot. Lewis describes Tim’s predicament as semi-fatalist, but holds that this does not compromise Tim’s freedom or his ability to kill Grandfather. I argue that if semi-fatalism is true of Tim, it is true of everyone, and that this is a troubling conclusion.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  46
    Benj Hellie (forthcoming). David Lewis and the Kangaroo: Graphing Philosophical Progress. In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick (eds.), Philosophy's Future: The Problem of Philosophical Progress. Blackwell
    Data-driven historiography of philosophy looks to objective modeling tools for illumination of the propagation of influence. While the system of David Lewis, the most influential philosopher of our time, raises historiographic puzzles to stymie conventional analytic methods, it proves amenable to data-driven analysis. A striking result is that Lewis only becomes the metaphysician of current legend following the midpoint of his career: his initial project is to frame a descriptive science of mind and meaning; the transition to metaphysics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  36
    Daniel Nolan (forthcoming). It's a Kind of Magic: Lewis, Magic and Properties. Synthese:1-25.
    David Lewis’s arguments against magical ersatzism are notoriously puzzling. Untangling different strands in those arguments is useful for bringing out what he thought was wrong with not just one style of theory about possible worlds, but with much of the contemporary metaphysics of abstract objects. After setting out what I take Lewis’s arguments to be and how best to resist them, I consider the application of those arguments to general theories of properties and relations. The constraints Lewis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  34
    Duncan Pritchard (2001). Contextualism, Scepticism, and the Problem of Epistemic Descent. Dialectica 55 (4):327–349.
    Perhaps the most dominant anti‐sceptical proposal in recent literature –advanced by such figures as Stewart Cohen, Keith DeRose and David Lewis –is the contextualist response to radical scepticism. Central to the contextualist thesis is the claim that, unlike other non‐contextualist anti‐sceptical theories, contextualism offers a dissolution of the sceptical paradox that respects our common sense epistemological intuitions. Taking DeRose's view as representative of the contextualist position, it is argued that instead of offering us an intuitive response to scepticism, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  36.  7
    Fraser MacBride (2005). Lewis's Animadversions on the Truthmaker Principle. In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon 117-40.
    The early David Lewis was a staunch critic of the Truthmaker Principle. To endorse the principle, he argued, is to accept that states of affairs are truthmakers for contingent predications. But states of affairs violate Hume's prohibition of necessary connections between distinct existences. So Lewis offered to replace the Truthmaker Principle with the weaker principle that ‘truth supervenes upon being’. This chapter argues that even this principle violates Hume's prohibition. Later Lewis came to ‘withdraw’ his doubts about (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  37. Charles Pigden (2007). Desiring to Desire: Russell, Lewis and G.E.Moore. In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Themes from G.E.Moore. Oxford University Press 244-260.
    I have two aims in this paper. In §§2-4 I contend that Moore has two arguments (not one) for the view that that ‘good’ denotes a non-natural property not to be identified with the naturalistic properties of science and common sense (or, for that matter, the more exotic properties posited by metaphysicians and theologians). The first argument, the Barren Tautology Argument (or the BTA), is derived, via Sidgwick, from a long tradition of anti-naturalist polemic. But the second argument, the Open (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Phillip Bricker (2006). David Lewis: On the Plurality of Worlds. In John Shand (ed.), Central Works of Philosophy, Vol. 5: The Twentieth Century: Quine and After. Acumen Publishing
    David Lewis's book 'On the Plurality of Worlds' mounts an extended defense of the thesis of modal realism, that the world we inhabit the entire cosmos of which we are a part is but one of a vast plurality of worlds, or cosmoi, all causally and spatiotemporally isolated from one another. The purpose of this article is to provide an accessible summary of the main positions and arguments in Lewis's book.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Robert Stalnaker (2004). Lewis on Intentionality. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):199 – 212.
    David Lewis's account of intentionality is a version of what he calls 'global descriptivism'. The rough idea is that the correct interpretation of one's total theory is the one (among the admissible interpretations) that come closest to making it true. I give an exposition of this account, as I understand it, and try to bring out some of its consequences. I argue that there is a tension between Lewis's global descriptivism and his rejection of a linguistic account of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40. Peter Menzies (1989). Probabilistic Causation and Causal Processes: A Critique of Lewis. Philosophy of Science 56 (4):642-663.
    This paper examines a promising probabilistic theory of singular causation developed by David Lewis. I argue that Lewis' theory must be made more sophisticated to deal with certain counterexamples involving pre-emption. These counterexamples appear to show that in the usual case singular causation requires an unbroken causal process to link cause with effect. I propose a new probabilistic account of singular causation, within the framework developed by Lewis, which captures this intuition.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  41.  81
    A. R. J. Fisher (forthcoming). On Lewis Against Magic: A Study of Method in Metaphysics. Synthese:1-19.
    David Lewis objected to theories that posit necessary connections between distinct entities and to theories that involve a magical grasping of their primitives. In On the Plurality of Worlds, Lewis objected to nondescript ersatzism on these grounds. The literature contains several reconstructions of Lewis ’ critique of nondescript ersatzism but none of these interpretations adequately address his main argument because they fail to see that Lewis ’ critique is based on broader methodological considerations. I argue that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  49
    Ryan Wasserman (2015). Lewis on Backward Causation. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (3):141-150.
    David Lewis famously defends a counterfactual theory of causation and a non-causal, similarity-based theory of counterfactuals. Lewis also famously defends the possibility of backward causation. I argue that this combination of views is untenable—given the possibility of backward causation, one ought to reject Lewis's theories of causation and counterfactuals.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Joseph A. Baltimore (2011). Lewis' Modal Realism and Absence Causation. Metaphysica 12 (2):117-124.
    A major criticism of David Lewis’ counterfactual theory of causation is that it allows too many things to count as causes, especially since Lewis allows, in addition to events, absences to be causes as well. Peter Menzies has advanced this concern under the title “the problem of profligate causation.” In this paper, I argue that the problem of profligate causation provides resources for exposing a tension between Lewis’ acceptance of absence causation and his modal realism. The result (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Eric Margolis & Stephen Laurence (2002). Lewis' Strawman. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (206):55-65.
    In a survey of his views in the philosophy of mind, David Lewis criticizes much recent work in the field by attacking an imaginary opponent, Strawman. His case against Strawman focuses on four central theses which Lewis takes to be widely accepted among contemporary philosophers of mind. These theses concerns (1) the language of thought hypothesis and its relation to folk psychology, (2) narrow content, (3) de se content, and (4) rationality. We respond to Lewis, arguing (among (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  12
    Vincenzo Fano & Giovanni Macchia (forthcoming). A Physical Interpretation of Lewis’ Discrepancy Between Personal and External Time in Time Travels. Synthese:1-20.
    This paper deals with those time travels mostly considered by physics, namely those in the form of the so-called closed timelike curves. Some authoritative scholars have raised doubts about the status of these journeys as proper time travels. By using David Lewis’ famous definition of time travels proposed in 1976, we show that this proper status may actually be recovered, at least in some cosmological contexts containing spacetime regions, such as those concerning black holes described by the Kerr–Newman metric, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  83
    Carla Merino-Rajme (2015). Why Lewis’ Appeal to Natural Properties Fails to Kripke’s Rule-Following Paradox. Philosophical Studies 172 (1):163-175.
    I consider Lewis’ appeal to naturalness to solve Kripke ’s rule - following paradox. I then present a different interpretation of this paradox and offer reasons for thinking that this is what Kripke had in mind. I argue that Lewis’ proposal cannot provide a solution to this version of paradox.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  39
    Louis Derosset (2011). On the Plurality of Worlds: David Lewis. [REVIEW] Humana.Mente 19.
    A commentary on David Lewis's /On the Plurality of Worlds/.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  25
    Bernhard Salow (2016). Lewis on Iterated Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 173 (6):1571-1590.
    The status of the knowledge iteration principles in the account provided by Lewis in “Elusive Knowledge” is disputed. By distinguishing carefully between what in the account describes the contribution of the attributor’s context and what describes the contribution of the subject’s situation, we can resolve this dispute in favour of Holliday’s claim that the iteration principles are rendered invalid. However, that is not the end of the story. For Lewis’s account still predicts that counterexamples to the negative iteration (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Charles Pigden & Rebecca E. B. Entwisle (2012). Spread Worlds, Plenitude and Modal Realism: A Problem for David Lewis. In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor.
    In his metaphysical summa of 1986, The Plurality of Worlds, David Lewis famously defends a doctrine he calls ‘modal realism’, the idea that to account for the fact that some things are possible and some things are necessary we must postulate an infinity possible worlds, concrete entities like our own universe, but cut off from us in space and time. Possible worlds are required to account for the facts of modality without assuming that modality is primitive – that there (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  7
    Mario Alai (2016). Lewis, Change and Temporary Intrinsics. Axiomathes 26 (4):467-487.
    This is an attempt to sort out what is it that makes many of us uncomfortable with the perdurantist solution to the problem of change. Lewis argues that only perdurantism can reconcile change with persistence over time, while neither presentism nor endurantism can. So, first, I defend the endurantist solution to the problem of change, by arguing that what is relative to time are not properties, but their possession. Second, I explore the anti-perdurantist strategy of arguing that Lewis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000