Search results for 'Stoics' (try it on Scholar)

802 found
Sort by:
  1. R. W. Sharples (1996). Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy. Routledge.score: 18.0
    The Hellenistic philosophers and schools of philosophy are emerging from the shadow of Plato and Aristotle and are increasingly studied for their intrinsic philosophical value. They are not only interesting in their own right, but also form the intellectual background of the late Roman Republic. This study gives a comprehensive and readable account of the principal doctrines of the Stoics, Epicureans and various sceptical traditions from the death of Alexander the Great in 323 B.C. to around 200 A.D. Discussions (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Catherine Atherton (1993). The Stoics on Ambiguity. Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    Stoic work on ambiguity represents one of the most innovative, sophisticated, and rigorous contributions to philosophy and the study of language in western antiquity. This book is both the first comprehensive survey of the often difficult and scattered sources, and the first attempt to locate Stoic material in the rich array of contexts, ancient and modern, which alone can guarantee full appreciation of its subtlety, scope and complexity. The comparisons and contrasts which this book constructs will intrigue not just classical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Brad Inwood & Lloyd P. Gerson (eds.) (2008). The Stoics Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Hackett Pub. Co., Inc..score: 18.0
    Lives of the stoics (Zeno, Aristo, Herillus, Cleanthes, Sphaerus, Chrysippus) on philosophy -- Logic and theory of knowledge -- Perception, knowledge, and sceptical attack -- The stoic-academic debate and Cicero's testimony -- Conceptions and rationality -- Physics -- Theology -- Bodily and non-bodily realities -- Structures and powers -- The soul -- Fate -- Ethics -- The general account in Diogenes Lartius -- The account preserved by Stobaeus -- The account in Cicero on goals -- Other evidence for stoic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andreas Graeser (1972). Plotinus and the Stoics. Leiden,Brill.score: 18.0
    Among those in question, Aristotle 6 and the Peripatetics, the Stoics and also the Epicureans,7 were the main opponents 8 to For a good account of the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gretchen J. Reydams-Schils (2005). The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. University of Chicago Press.score: 18.0
    Roman Stoic thinkers in the imperial period adapted Greek doctrine to create a model of the self that served to connect philosophical ideals with traditional societal values. The Roman Stoics-the most prominent being Marcus Aurelius-engaged in rigorous self-examination that enabled them to integrate philosophy into the practice of living. Gretchen Reydams-Schils's innovative new book shows how these Romans applied their distinct brand of social ethics to everyday relations and responsibilities. The Roman Stoics reexamines the philosophical basis that instructed (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Brad Inwood (ed.) (2003). The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    This unique volume offers an odyssey through the ideas of the Stoics in three particular ways: first, through the historical trajectory of the school itself and its influence; second, through the recovery of the history of Stoic thought; third, through the ongoing confrontation with Stoicism, showing how it refines philosophical traditions, challenges the imagination, and ultimately defines the kind of life one chooses to lead. A distinguished roster of specialists have written an authoritative guide to the entire philosophical tradition. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. G. R. Boys-Stones (2001). Post-Hellenistic Philosophy: A Study of its Development From the Stoics to Origen. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    This book traces, for the first time, a revolution in philosophy which took place during the early centuries of our era. It reconstructs the philosophical basis of the Stoics' theory that fragments of an ancient and divine wisdom could be reconstructed from mythological traditions, and shows that Platonism was founded on an argument that Plato had himself achieved a full reconstruction of this wisdom, and that subsequent philosophies had only regressed once again in their attempts to "improve" on his (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ricardo Salles (2005). The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Ashgate Pub..score: 16.0
    The basis of stoic determinism (a) : everything has a cause -- The basis of stoic determinism (b) : causation is necessitating -- The threat of external determination -- Reflection and responsibility -- The three compatibilist theories of Chrysippus -- Epictetus on responsibility for unreflective action.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. John Sellars (2003). The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy. Ashgate.score: 15.0
    Questioning the premise that philosophy can only be conceived as a rational discourse, Sellars presents it instead as an art (techne) that combines both 'logos' ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jeffrey Barnouw (2002). Propositional Perception: Phantasia, Predication, and Sign in Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. University Press of America.score: 15.0
  11. Edwyn Robert Bevan (1979). Stoics and Sceptics. Arno Press.score: 15.0
  12. Firmin DeBrabander (2007/2008). Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions. Continuum.score: 15.0
  13. Christoph Jedan (2002). Modalities by Perspective: Aristotle, the Stoics and a Modern Reconstruction. Academia.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. A. A. Long (1986). Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. University of California Press.score: 15.0
  15. Samuel Sambursky (1959/1987). Physics of the Stoics. Princeton University Press.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. F. H. Sandbach (1985). Aristotle and the Stoics. Cambridge Philological Society.score: 15.0
  17. F. H. Sandbach (1994). The Stoics. Hackett Pub. Co..score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Eduard Zeller (1962). The Stoics, Epicureans, and Sceptics. New York, Russell & Russell.score: 15.0
  19. Susanne Bobzien (2006). The Stoics on Fallacies of Equivocation. In D. Frede & B. Inwood (eds.), Language and Learning, Proceedings of the 9th Symposium Hellenisticum. Cambridge University Press.score: 14.0
    ABSTRACT: This paper discusses the Stoic treatment of fallacies that are based on lexical ambiguities. It provides a detailed analysis of the relevant passages, lays bare textual and interpretative difficulties, explores what the Stoic view on the matter implies for their theory of language, and compares their view with Aristotle’s. In the paper I aim to show that, for the Stoics, fallacies of ambiguity are complexes of propositions and sentences and thus straddle the realms of meaning (which is the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Tad Brennan (2005). The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. Oxford University Press.score: 12.0
    Tad Brennan explains how to live the Stoic life--and why we might want to. Stoicism has been one of the main currents of thought in Western civilization for two thousand years: Brennan offers a fascinating guide through the ethical ideas of the original Stoic philosophers, and shows how valuable these ideas remain today, both intellectually and in practice. He writes in a lively informal style which will bring Stoicism to life for readers who are new to ancient philosophy. The Stoic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Susanne Bobzien (1998). Determinism and Freedom in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 12.0
    Bobzien presents the definitive study of one of the most interesting intellectual legacies of the ancient Greeks: the Stoic theory of causal determinism. She explains what it was, how the Stoics justified it, and how it relates to their views on possibility, action, freedom, moral responsibility, moral character, fatalism, logical determinism and many other topics. She demonstrates the considerable philosophical richness and power that these ideas retain today.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. A. A. Long (1996/2001). Stoic Studies. University of California Press.score: 12.0
    For the past three decades A. A. Long has been at the forefront of research in Hellenistic philosophy. In this book he assembles a dozen articles on Stoicism previously published in journals and conference proceedings. The collection is biased in favour of Professor Long's more recent studies of Stoicism and is focused on three themes: the Stoics' interpretation of their intellectual tradition, their ethics and their psychology. The contents of the book reflect the peculiarly holistic and systematic features of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Katja Maria Vogt (2009). Sons of the Earth: Are the Stoics Metaphysical Brutes? Phronesis 54 (2):136-154.score: 12.0
    In this paper, it is argued the Stoics develop an account of corporeals that allows their theory of bodies to be, at the same time, a theory of causation, agency, and reason. The paper aims to shed new light on the Stoics' engagement with Plato's Sophist . It is argued that the Stoics are Sons of the Earth insofar as, for them, the study of corporeals - rather than the study of being - is the most fundamental (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Susanne Bobzien (1997). The Stoics on Hypotheses and Hypothetical Arguments. Phronesis 42 (3):299-312.score: 12.0
    ABSTRACT: In this paper I argue (i) that the hypothetical arguments about which the Stoic Chrysippus wrote numerous books (DL 7.196) are not to be confused with the so-called "hypothetical syllogisms", but are the same hypothetical arguments as those mentioned five times in Epictetus (e.g. Diss. 1.25.11-12); and (ii) that these hypothetical arguments are formed by replacing in a non-hypothetical argument one (or more) of the premisses by a Stoic "hypothesis" or supposition. Such "hypotheses" or suppositions differ from propositions in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Stoics (Part Two). In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. CUP.score: 12.0
    ABSTRACT: A detailed presentation of Stoic theory of arguments, including truth-value changes of arguments, Stoic syllogistic, Stoic indemonstrable arguments, Stoic inference rules (themata), including cut rules and antilogism, argumental deduction, elements of relevance logic in Stoic syllogistic, the question of completeness of Stoic logic, Stoic arguments valid in the specific sense, e.g. "Dio says it is day. But Dio speaks truly. Therefore it is day." A more formal and more detailed account of the Stoic theory of deduction can be found (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Sarah Wright (2012). How Boots Befooled the King: Wisdom, Truth, and the Stoics. Acta Analytica 27 (2):113-126.score: 12.0
    Abstract Can the wise person be fooled? The Stoics take a very strong view on this question, holding that the wise person (or sage) is never deceived and never believes anything that is false. This seems to be an implausibly strong claim, but it follows directly from some basic tenets of the Stoic cognitive and psychological world-view. In developing an account of what wisdom really requires, I will explore the tenets of the Stoic view that lead to this infallibilism (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Stoics (Part One). In Keimpe Algra & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 12.0
    ABSTRACT: A detailed presentation of Stoic logic, part one, including their theories of propositions (or assertibles, Greek: axiomata), demonstratives, temporal truth, simple propositions, non-simple propositions(conjunction, disjunction, conditional), quantified propositions, logical truths, modal logic, and general theory of arguments (including definition, validity, soundness, classification of invalid arguments).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard Sorabji (2000/2002). Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford University Press.score: 12.0
    Richard Sorabji presents a ground-breaking study of ancient Greek views of the emotions and their influence on subsequent theories and attitudes, Pagan and Christian. While the central focus of the book is the Stoics, Sorabji draws on a vast range of texts to give a rich historical survey of how Western thinking about this central aspect of human nature developed.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Malcolm Schofield (1991/1999). The Stoic Idea of the City. University of Chicago Press.score: 12.0
    The Stoic Idea of the City offers the first systematic analysis of the Stoic school, concentrating on Zeno's Republic . Renowned classical scholar Malcolm Schofield brings together scattered and underused textual evidence, examining the Stoic ideals that initiated the natural law tradition of Western political thought. A new foreword by Martha Nussbaum and a new epilogue written by the author further secure this text as the standard work on Presocratic Stoics. "The account emerges from a jigsaw-puzzle of items from (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Mark A. Kulstad (2008). Newton, Spinoza, Stoics and Others. The Leibniz Review 18:81-121.score: 12.0
    Starting from Leibniz’s complaint that Newton’s views seem to make God the soul of the world, this paper examines Leibniz’s critical stance more generally towards God as the soul of the world and related theses. A preliminary task is determining what the related theses are. There are more of these than might have been thought. Once the relations are established, it becomes clear how pervasive the various guises of the issue of God as the soul of the world are in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John Sellars (2012). Stoics Against Stoics In Cudworth's A Treatise of Freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (5):935-952.score: 10.0
    In his A Treatise of Freewill, Ralph Cudworth argues against Stoic determinism by drawing on what he takes to be other concepts found in Stoicism, notably the claim that some things are ?up to us? and that these things are the product of our choice. These concepts are central to the late Stoic Epictetus and it appears at first glance as if Cudworth is opposing late Stoic voluntarism against early Stoic determinism. This paper argues that in fact, despite his claim (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Katerina Ierodiakonou (ed.) (1998). Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 10.0
    This book collects a series of important new studies on one of the richest and most influential intellectual traditions of antiquity. Leading scholars combine careful analytical attention to the original texts with historical sensitivity and philosophical acuity to point the way to a better understanding of Stoic ethics, political theory, logic, and science.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Anthony Speca (2001). Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Brill.score: 10.0
    This book uncovers and examines the confusion in antiquity between Aristotle's hypothetical syllogistic and Stoic logic, and offers a fresh perspective on the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Margaret J. Osler (ed.) (1991). Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought. Cambridge University Press.score: 10.0
    This volume examines the influence that Epicureanism and Stoicism, two philosophies of nature and human nature articulated during classical times, exerted on the development of European thought to the Enlightenment. Although the influence of these philosophies has often been noted in certain areas, such as the influence of Stoicism on the development of Christian thought and the influence of Epicureanism on modern materialism, the chapters in this volume forward a new awareness of the degree to which these philosophies and their (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Christopher Gill (2007). Galen and the Stoics: Mortal Enemies or Blood Brothers? Phronesis 52 (1):88-120.score: 10.0
    Galen is well known as a critic of Stoicism, mainly for his massive attack on Stoic (or at least, Chrysippean) psychology in On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (PHP) 2-5. Galen attacks both Chrysippus' location of the ruling part of the psyche in the heart and his unified or monistic picture of human psychology. However, if we consider Galen's thought more broadly, this has a good deal in common with Stoicism, including a (largely) physicalist conception of psychology and a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. P. A. Meijer (2007). Stoic Theology: Proofs for the Existence of the Cosmic God and of the Traditional Gods: Including a Commentary on Cleanthes' Hymn on Zeus. Eburon.score: 10.0
    Zeno's so-called proofs of divine existence -- Zeno and the traditional gods: a serious problem -- Cleanthes' proofs -- Cleanthes and the traditional gods -- Chrysippus' contribution -- Chrysippus and the traditional gods -- Other Stoic proofs -- Other (Stoic?) arguments in Sextus -- Polemics against the arguments pro the existence of God(s) -- Abolishing the gods leads to odd consequence: the atopical arguments pro the existence of the gods -- The counter-arguments -- Carneades and the data of Sextus and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Susanne Bobzien (forthcoming). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle's Theory of the Stoic Indemonstrables. In M. Lee & M. Schiefsky (eds.), From Refutation to Assent: Strategies of Argument in Greek and Roman Philosophy. OUP.score: 10.0
    ABSTRACT: Alexander of Aphrodisias’ commentaries on Aristotle’s Organon are valuable sources for both Stoic and early Peripatetic logic, and have often been used as such – in particular for early Peripatetic hypothetical syllogistic and Stoic propositional logic. By contrast, this paper explores the role Alexander himself played in the development and transmission of those theories. There are three areas in particular where he seems to have made a difference: First, he drew a connection between certain passages from Aristotle’s Topics and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Lois Peters Agnew (2008). Outward, Visible Propriety: Stoic Philosophy and Eighteenth-Century British Rhetorics. University of South Carolina Press.score: 10.0
    Introduction -- Stoic ethics and rhetoric -- Eighteenth-century common sense and sensus communis -- Taste and sensus communis -- Propriety, sympathy, and style fusing individual and social -- Victorian language theories and the decline of sensus communis.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. William Braxton Irvine (2009). A Guide to the Good Life: The Ancient Art of Stoic Joy. Oxford University Press.score: 10.0
    Irvine looks at various Stoic techniques for attaining tranquility and shows how to put these techniques to work in our own life.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Antonia Macaro (2010). What Can the Stoics Do for Us? The Philosopher's Magazine (49):81-88.score: 10.0
    If you started delving into Stoic literature, you might find some of the advice repugnant, even shocking. In Epictetus, for instance, you would find this exhortation: “If you kiss your child, or your wife, say to yourself that it is a human being that you are kissing; and then you will not be disturbed if either of them dies.” So is Stoicism a life-affirming philosophy that can truly help us to live better lives in the modern world or a fiercely (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Nancy Sherman (2005). Stoic Warriors: The Ancient Philosophy Behind the Military Mind. Oxford University Press.score: 10.0
    While few soldiers may have read the works of Epictetus or Marcus Aurelius, it is undoubtedly true that the ancient philosophy known as Stoicism guides the actions of many in the military. Soldiers and seamen learn early in their training "to suck it up," to endure, to put aside their feelings and to get on with the mission. Stoic Warriors is the first book to delve deeply into the ancient legacy of this relationship, exploring what the Stoic philosophy actually is, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Christoph Jedan (2009). Stoic Virtues: Chrysippus and the Theological Foundations of Stoic Ethics. Continuum.score: 10.0
    Introduction -- A religious world-view -- Stoic corporealism -- Stoic theology -- Two pictures of fate -- Virtue and the virtues -- Definitions of virtue -- Chrysippus : characterisation of virtue as perfect state -- Virtue as consistent character -- The virtues as epistmai -- The virtues, different yet inseparable -- The difference between the virtues -- The inseparability of the virtues -- A catalogue of virtues -- Ethical virtues additional (generic) virtues -- The openness of Chrysippus catalogue of virtues (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John M. Rist (1969). Stoic Philosophy. London, Cambridge U.P..score: 10.0
    Literature on the Stoa has recently concentrated on historical accounts of the development of the school and on Stoicism as a social movement. Professor Rist’s approach is to examine in detail a series of philosophical problems discussed by leading members of the Stoic school. He is not concerned with social history or with the influence of Stoicism on popular beliefs in the Ancient world, but with such questions as the relation between Stoicism and the thought of Aristotle, the meaning and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Keith Seddon (2005). Epictetus' Handbook and the Tablet of Cebes: Guides to Stoic Living. Routledge.score: 10.0
    This new translation of Epictetus' Handbook brings his ancient teachings to those who wish to live the philosophic life by finding a way to live happily in the world without being overwhelmed by it. This modern English translation of the complete Handbook is supported by the first thorough commentary since that of Simplicius, 1500 years ago, along with a detailed introduction, extensive glossary, index of key terms, and helpful tables that clarify Stoic ethical doctrines as a glance. Accompanying the Handbook (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. David Forman (2008). Free Will and the Freedom of the Sage in Leibniz and the Stoics. The History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):203-219.score: 9.0
  46. Margaret Graver (2007). Stoicism & Emotion. University of Chicago Press.score: 9.0
    On the surface, stoicism and emotion seem like contradictory terms. Yet the Stoic philosophers of ancient Greece and Rome were deeply interested in the emotions, which they understood as complex judgments about what we regard as valuable in our surroundings. Stoicism and Emotion shows that they did not simply advocate an across-the-board suppression of feeling, as stoicism implies in today’s English, but instead conducted a searching examination of these powerful psychological responses, seeking to understand what attitude toward them expresses the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stephen Engstrom & Jennifer Whiting (eds.) (1996). Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. Cambridge University Press.score: 9.0
    This major collection of essays offers the first serious challenge to the traditional view that ancient and modern ethics are fundamentally opposed.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Richard Sorabji (2009). Did the Stoics Value Emotion and Feeling? Philosophical Quarterly 59 (234):150-162.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John Glucker (2003). Stoics, Para-Stoics and Anti-Stoics: Methods and Sensibilities. Philosophia 31 (1-2):221-324.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Charles Brittain (2006). Review of Gretchen Reydams-Schils, The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (7).score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Robert B. Todd (1976). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Stoic Physics: A Study of the De Mixtione with Preliminary Essays, Text, Translation and Commentary. Brill.score: 9.0
    PART ONE ALEXANDER OF APHRODISIAS— AN INTRODUCTION A study of a work by Alexander of Aphrodisias must be prefaced by some general introduction to the author ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Susanne Bobzien (2012). A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (2):292-293.score: 9.0
    Much of chapters 2 to 6 is in agreement with publications from the last twenty years (including those of the reviewer); so for example Frede’s points that neither Aristotle nor the Stoics had a notion of free-will; that in Epictetus (for the first time) the notions of freedom and will were combined; that an indeterminist notion of free-will occurs first in Alexander. The achievement of these chapters lies in the way Frede carefully joins them together and uses them as (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Josiah Gould (1981). The Stoics. Journal of the History of Philosophy 19 (2):245-247.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Martha Nussbaum (1987). The Stoics on the Extirpation of the Passions. Apeiron 20 (2):129 - 177.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Vladimir Marko (2012). Some Sketchy Notes on the Reaper Argument. Organon F 19 (3):361-387.score: 9.0
    The paper deals with the possible readings of The Reaper Argument premisses. Some conjectures related to the Stoics’ alleged proof of the argument are discussed.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Luca Castagnoli (2011). The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):228-235.score: 9.0
  57. Robert Blair Edlow (1975). The Stoics on Ambiguity. Journal of the History of Philosophy 13 (4):423-435.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Eric Lewis (1995). The Stoics on Identity and Individuation. Phronesis 40 (1):89-108.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. A. A. Long (1985). The Stoics on World-Conflagration and Everlasting Recurrence. Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (S1):13-37.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Mauro Bonazzi & Christoph Helmig (eds.) (2007). Platonic Stoicism, Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue Between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven University Press.score: 9.0
    ... bénAtouïL (Université de nancy, Lphs-archives Henri Poincaré) cet article s' inscrit dans un projet plus large d'étude des rapports entre σχολή et ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. A. A. Long (2006). From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 9.0
    A. A. Long, one of the world's leading writers on ancient philosophy, presents eighteen essays on the philosophers and schools of the Hellenistic and Roman periods--Epicureans, Stoics, and Sceptics. The discussion ranges over four centuries of innovative and challenging thought in ethics and politics, psychology, epistemology, and cosmology.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Theo Verbeek (2007). Review of Firmin DeBrabander, Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (11).score: 9.0
  63. C. Gill (1998). Moral Codes and Social Structure in Ancient Greece: A Sociology of Greek Ethics From Homer to the Epicureans and Stoics. JM Bryant. The Classical Review 48 (1):87-89.score: 9.0
  64. Sten Ebbesen (1995). Catherine Atherton the Stoics on Ambiguity, Cambridge Classical Studies, Cambridge University Press, 1993, XIX + 563 Pp. ISBN 0 521 44139 0 (Hardback). [REVIEW] Vivarium 33 (2):242-246.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Brad Inwood (2004). Review of John Sellars, The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (4).score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. N. M. L. Nathan (2004). Stoics and Sceptics: A Reply to Brueckner. Analysis 64 (283):264–268.score: 9.0
  67. Richard Sorabji (1990). Perceptual Content in the Stoics. Phronesis 35 (1):307-314.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. Keimpe Algra (1988). The Early Stoics on the Immobility and Coherence of the Cosmos. Phronesis 33 (1):155-180.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Richard Bett (2009). The Stoics (M.R.) Graver Stoicism and Emotion. Pp. X + 289. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2007. Cased, US$37.50. ISBN: 978-0-226-30557-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (01):77-.score: 9.0
  70. Ruben Buys (2011). Between Actor and Spectator: Arnout Geulincx and the Stoics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):741-761.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. John Mckie, Stephen Engstrom and Jennifer Whiting (Eds.), Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics : Rethinking Happiness and Duty.score: 9.0
  72. J. Harward (1930). The Early Stoics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 8 (4):271 – 289.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. J. McKie (2001). Stephen Engstrom and Jennifer Whiting (Eds.), Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1998, Pp. IX 310, $33.95 (Paper). [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):140 – 141.score: 9.0
  74. Ilaria Ramelli (2009). Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Brill.score: 9.0
    Introductory essay -- Hierocles, Elements of ethics -- Stobaeus's extracts from Hierocles, On appropriate acts -- Fragments of Hierocles in the Studa.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (2002). Aristotle, Kant and the Stoics. International Studies in Philosophy 34 (4):170-172.score: 9.0
  76. Chaeremon (1984). Chaeremon, Egyptian Priest and Stoic Philosopher: The Fragments Collected and Translated with Explanatory Notes. Brill Academic Pub.score: 9.0
  77. Christopher Gill (1998). A Sociology of Ethics J. M. Bryant: Moral Codes and Social Structure in Ancient Greece: A Sociology of Greek Ethics From Homer to the Epicureans and Stoics (SUNY Series in the Sociology of Culture). Pp. Xvi + 575. Albany: State University of New York, 1996. ISBN: 0-7914-3041-3 (0-7914-3042-1 Pbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 48 (01):87-89.score: 9.0
  78. Lawrence C. Becker (1999). Stephen Engstrom and Jennifer Whiting, Eds., Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty. [REVIEW] Ethics 109 (2):439-442.score: 9.0
  79. Jesse Merriam (2011). The Stoics and Legal Conservatives: Strange Bedfellows or Just Strange Fellows? Law and Philosophy 30 (2):201-251.score: 9.0
  80. Phillip Mitsis (2005). The Stoics on Property and Politics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (S1):230-249.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. David O. Brink (1999). Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics. Philosophical Review 108 (4):576-582.score: 9.0
  82. J. Dybikowski (1999). Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty Stephen Engstrom and Jennifer Whiting, Editors New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996, Ix + 310 Pp., $54.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (01):215-.score: 9.0
  83. Eric Brown (2007). The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):490-491.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. Hud Hudson (1990). A Response to A. A. Long's “the Stoics on World-Conflagration and Everlasting Recurrence”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (1):149-158.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Glenn Lesses (1993). Austere Friends: The Stoics and Friendship. Apeiron 26 (1):57 - 75.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Brayton Polka (2008). Spinoza and the Stoics. The Review of Metaphysics 61 (4):835-837.score: 9.0
  87. John Sellars (2005). Stoics and Cynics M.-O. Goulet-Cazé: Les Kynica du Stoïcisme . ( Hermes Einzelschriften 89.) Pp. 198. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2003. Paper, €44. ISBN: 3-515-08256-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):69-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. R. W. Sharples (2006). Review: The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (460):1171-1174.score: 9.0
  89. F. H. Sandbach (1940). Plutarch on the Stoics. The Classical Quarterly 34 (1-2):20-.score: 9.0
  90. D. W. Hamlyn (1963). The Logic of the Stoics Benson Mates: Stoic Logic. Pp. Viii+148. Berkeley: University of California Press (London: Cambridge University Press), 1961. Paper, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (01):55-57.score: 9.0
  91. Jaap Mansfeld (2005). Essays on Stoicism B. Inwood (Ed.): The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Pp. X + 438. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Paper, £19.95, US$26 (Cased, £50, US$70). ISBN: 0-521-77985-5 (0-521-77005-X Hbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (01):66-.score: 9.0
  92. Michael B. Papazian (2004). Propositional Perception: Phantasia, Predication and Sign in Plato, Aristotle and the Stoics, by Jeffrey Barnouw. Ancient Philosophy 24 (1):235-238.score: 9.0
  93. Geert Roskam (2005). On the Path to Virtue: The Stoic Doctrine of Moral Progress and its Reception in (Middle-)Platonism. Leuven University Press.score: 9.0
    INTRODUCTION "Badness can be got easily and in abundance : the road is smooth, and she dwells very near. But in front of goodness, the immortal gods have ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. John Sellars (2003). Stoics on the Big Screen. Philosophy Now 41:44-45.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. Alexander Dalzell (1989). Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics. Ancient Philosophy 9 (1):131-132.score: 9.0
  96. J. I. Daniel (1999). Hellenistic Philosophy R. W. Sharples: Stoics, Epicureans and Sceptics: An Introduction to Hellenistic Philosophy . Pp. Xiv + 154. London and New York: Routledge, 1996. Cased, £30 (Paper, £10.99). ISBN: 0-415-11034-3 (0-415-11035-1 Pbk). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 49 (01):127-.score: 9.0
  97. Justin Gosling (1987). The Stoics and Ἀκρασία. Apeiron 20 (2):179 - 202.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Jerry Stannard (1961). Book Review:Physics of the Stoics S. Sambursky. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 28 (1):83-.score: 9.0
1 — 100 / 802