423 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Tracy B. Strong [86]Carson Strong [55]C. A. Strong [36]D. E. Strong [33]
T. B. Strong [21]C. Strong [17]Edward W. Strong [14]George V. Strong [12]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Tracy Burr Strong (University of Southampton)
Profile: John Garrison Strong
Profile: Skyalr Strong (University of Lethbridge)
Profile: Shelby Strong (Eastern Kentucky University)
Profile: Andrew Strong (University of Manchester)
Profile: Kevin Strong
Profile: Lucy Strong (American College of Prehospital Medicine)
Profile: Molly Strong
Profile: Nathan Strong (Seattle Pacific University)
  1.  11
    Carl Schmitt & Tracy B. Strong (2006). Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. University of Chicago Press.
    Written in the intense political and intellectual tumult of the early years of the Weimar Republic, Political Theology develops the distinctive theory of sovereignty that made Carl Schmitt one of the most significant and controversial ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   54 citations  
  2.  4
    Tracy B. Strong (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   121 citations  
  3.  2
    Gary W. Strong & Bruce A. Whitehead (1989). A Solution to the Tag-Assignment Problem for Neural Networks. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (3):381.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   161 citations  
  4. Edward W. Strong (1947). Fact and Understanding in History. Journal of Philosophy 44 (23):617-625.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Donald Strong & Daniel Simberloff, Ecology.
    Ecology is composed of a remarkably diverse set of scientific disciplines. There are many different sub-fields in ecology—physiological, behavioral, evolutionary, population, community, ecosystem, and landscape ecology. Clearly, no summary will do them all justice. However, for the present context, ecology as a science can be divided into three basic areas—population, community, and ecosystem ecology. This entry will introduce some of the fundamental philosophical issues raised by these three disciplines. The first order of business is to ask what is the science (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Gary W. Strong (1990). Different Regions of Space or Different Spaces Altogether: What Are the Dorsal/Ventral Systems Processing? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):556-557.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  7. Carl Schmitt, Tracy B. Strong & Leo Strauss (2007). The Concept of the Political: Expanded Edition. University of Chicago Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  8.  80
    Tracy B. Strong (2003). Nations and Contexts. European Journal of Political Theory 2 (2):245-254.
  9. C. A. Strong (1904). To the Editor of "Mind". Mind 13 (51):453-456.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. C. Strong (2008). A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
    Don Marquis has put forward a non-religious argument against abortion based on what he claims is a morally relevant similarity between killing adult human beings and killing fetuses. He asserts that killing adults is wrong because it deprives them of their valuable futures. He points out that a fetus’s future includes everything that is in an adult’s future, given that fetuses naturally develop into adults. Thus, according to Marquis, killing a fetus deprives it of the same sort of valuable future (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Carson Strong (2002). Overview: A Framework for Reproductive Ethics. In Donna L. Dickenson (ed.), Ethical Issues in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Cambridge University Press 17--36.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  14
    Kelly C. Strong, Richard C. Ringer & Steven A. Taylor (2001). THE* Rules of Stakeholder Satisfaction (* Timeliness, Honesty, Empathy). Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):219 - 230.
    The results of an exploratory study examining the role of trust in stakeholder satisfaction are reported. Customers, stockholders, and employees of financial institutions were surveyed to identify management behaviors that lead to stakeholder satisfaction. The factors critical to satisfaction across stakeholder groups are the timeliness of communication, the honesty and completeness of the information and the empathy and equity of treatment by management.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  13.  6
    Tracy B. Strong (2016). Lincoln|[Rsquo]|s Political Thought. Contemporary Political Theory 15 (2):e33.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Keith Ansell Pearson, Babette Babich, Eric Blondel, Daniel Conway, Ken Gemes, Jürgen Habermas, Salim Kemal, Paul S. Loeb, Mark Migotti, Wolfgang Müller-Lauter, Alexander Nehamas, David Owen, Robert Pippin, Aaron Ridley, Gary Shapiro, Alan Schrift, Tracy Strong, Christine Swanton & Yirmiyahu Yovel (2006). Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morals: Critical Essays. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In this astonishingly rich volume, experts in ethics, epistemology, philosophy of mind, political theory, aesthetics, history, critical theory, and hermeneutics bring to light the best philosophical scholarship on what is arguably Nietzsche's most rewarding but most challenging text. Including essays that were commissioned specifically for the volume as well as essays revised and edited by their authors, this collection showcases definitive works that have shaped Nietzsche studies alongside new works of interest to students and experts alike. A lengthy introduction, annotated (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  15.  57
    Carson Strong (2000). Specified Principlism: What is It, and Does It Really Resolve Cases Better Than Casuistry? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):323 – 341.
    Principlism has been advocated as an approach to resolving concrete cases and issues in bioethics, but critics have pointed out that a main problem for principlism is its lack of a method for assigning priorities to conflicting ethical principles. A version of principlism referred to as 'specified principlism' has been put forward in an attempt to overcome this problem. However, none of the advocates of specified principlism have attempted to demonstrate that the method actually works in resolving detailed clinical cases. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  16.  11
    Carson Strong (2004). Should We Be Putting a Good Face on Facial Transplantation? American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):13 – 14.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  17.  14
    Joseph Solberg, Kelly C. Strong & Charles McGuire (1995). Living (Not Learning) Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1):71 - 81.
    Much has been written recently about both the urgency and efficacy of teaching business ethics. The results of our survey of AACSB member schools confirm prior reports of similar surveys: The teaching of business ethics is indiscriminate, unorganized, and undisciplined in most North American schools of business. If universities are to be taken seriously in their efforts to create more ethical awareness and better moral decision-making skills among their graduates, they must provide a rigorous and well-developed system in which students (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  18.  20
    Kimberly Strong, Ian Kerridge & Miles Little (2014). Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children. Bioethics 28 (4):187-193.
    Philosophy has long been concerned with ‘moral status’. Discussions about the moral status of children, however, seem often to promote confusion rather than clarity. Using the creation of ‘savior siblings’ as an example, this paper provides a philosophical critique of the moral status of children and the moral relevance of parenting and the role that formative experience, regret and relational autonomy play in parental decisions. We suggest that parents make moral decisions that are guided by the moral significance they attach (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  44
    Carson Strong (2008). Justifying Group-Specific Common Morality. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):1-15.
    Some defenders of the view that there is a common morality have conceived such morality as being universal, in the sense of extending across all cultures and times. Those who deny the existence of such a common morality often argue that the universality claim is implausible. Defense of common morality must take account of the distinction between descriptive and normative claims that there is a common morality. This essay considers these claims separately and identifies the nature of the arguments for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  20. Carson Strong (2010). Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2):123-140.
    Various theories have been put forward in an attempt to explain what makes moral judgments justifiable. One of the main theories currently advocated in bioethics is a form of coherentism known as wide reflective equilibrium. In this paper, I argue that wide reflective equilibrium is not a satisfactory approach for justifying moral beliefs and propositions. A long-standing theoretical problem for reflective equilibrium has not been adequately resolved, and, as a result, the main arguments for wide reflective equilibrium are unsuccessful. Moreover, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21. Jean-Luc Nancy & Tracy B. Strong (1992). La Comparution /the Compearance: From the Existence of "Communism" to the Community of "Existence". Political Theory 20 (3):371-398.
  22. Charles A. Strong (1904). A Deterministic Analysis of Free Will. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 1 (5):125-131.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  16
    Kelly C. Strong & G. Dale Meyer (1992). An Integrative Descriptive Model of Ethical Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):89 - 94.
    This paper presents an integrative, descriptive model of ethical decision making, with special attention given to issues of measurement. After building the model, hypotheses are developed from a portion of it. These hypotheses are tested in an exploratory analysis to determine if further research and testing of this model and the measurement instruments it employs are warranted.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  24.  1
    Tracy B. Strong (1999). Friedrich Nietzsche and the Politics of Transfiguration (Expanded Ed.). University of Illinois Press.
    This book examines both the personal and the political sides of Nietzsche's writings to show how his writings can expand notions of democratic politics and democratic understanding.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  25.  13
    Carson Strong (2011). Moral Status and the Fetus: Continuation of a Dialogue. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):52-54.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  3
    Andy Lock & Tom Strong (eds.) (2012). Discursive Perspectives in Therapeutic Practice. OUP Oxford.
    Psychotherapy is inherently discursive, yet, only recently, has the role that discourse plays in therapy been recognized as a focus in itself for analysis and intervention. Discursive Perspectives in Therapeutic Practice presents a overview of discursive perspectives in therapy, along with an account of their philosophical underpinnings.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Tracy B. Strong (1985). Text and Pretexts: Reflections on Perspectivism in Nietzsche. Political Theory 13 (2):164-182.
  28.  6
    Carson Strong (2008). Do Embryonic “Patients” Have Moral Interests? American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):40 – 42.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  11
    Carson Strong (2005). Harming by Conceiving: A Review of Misconceptions and a New Analysis. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):491 – 516.
    An objection often is raised against the use of reproductive technology to create "nontraditional families," as in ovum donation for postmenopausal women or postmortem artificial insemination. The objection states that conceiving children in such circumstances is harmful to them because of adverse features of these nontraditional families. A similar objection is raised when parents, through negligence or willful disregard of risks, create children with serious genetic diseases or other developmental handicaps. It is claimed that such reproduction harms the children who (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  30.  51
    C. Strong (1997). Response to Khushf. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (5):521-523.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  11
    V. K. Strong & A. N. Hoffman (1990). There is Relevance in the Classroom: Analysis of Present Methods of Teaching Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 9 (7):603 - 607.
    In 1988 the Journal of Business Ethics published a paper by David Mathison entitled Business Ethics Cases and Decision Models: A Call for Relevancy in the Classroom. Mathison argued that the present methods of teaching business ethics may be inappropriate for MBA students. He believes that faculty are teaching at one decision-making level and that students are and will be functioning on another (lower) level. The purpose of this paper is to respond to Mathison's arguments and offer support for the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  32.  55
    Tracy B. Strong (1992). 'What Have We to Do with Morals?' Nietzsche and Weber on History and Ethics. History of the Human Sciences 5 (3):9-18.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  27
    Roy C. Strong (1959). Festivals for the Garter Embassy at the Court of Henri III. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 22 (1/2):60-70.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    Michael Strong (2013). Some Implications of Hayek's Cognitive Theory. Critical Review 25 (3-4):461-472.
    Hayek's oft-neglected cognitive theory, articulated in The Sensory Order, provides a foundation for a theory of innovation that integrates cognition, experience, and the importance of freedom for the creation of entirely new conceptual categories and fundamentally innovative entrepreneurial endeavors. For Hayek, one sees only what one is prepared to see; that is, we can notice sensory and other phenomena only after we have classified the data into often-implicit abstract categories that are mediated to us physiologically. Learning takes places by using (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  17
    Carson Strong (2005). Lost in Translation: Religious Arguments Made Secular. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):29 – 31.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  22
    Carson Strong (1998). Cloning and Infertility. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):279-293.
    Although there are important moral arguments against cloning human beings, it has been suggested that there might be exceptional cases in which cloning humans would be ethically permissible. One type of supposed exceptional case involves infertile couples who want to have children by cloning. This paper explores whether cloning would be ethically permissible in infertility cases and the separate question of whether we should have a policy allowing cloning in such cases. One caveat should be stated at the beginning, however. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  37.  8
    Carson Strong (2007). Conscientious Objection the Morning After. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):32 – 34.
  38.  44
    C. Strong (1991). Fetal Tissue Transplantation: Can It Be Morally Insulated From Abortion? Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (2):70-76.
    Ethical controversy over transplantation of human fetal tissue has arisen because the source of tissue is induced abortions. Opposition to such transplants has been based on various arguments, including the following: rightful informed consent cannot be obtained for use of fetal tissue from induced abortions, and fetal tissue transplantation might result in an increase in the number of abortions. These arguments were not accepted by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Human Fetal Tissue Transplantation Research Panel. The majority opinion of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  39. Too Strong, Knowledge and Reality A: Lecture Two.
    There are situations where we have justified true belief about p but don’t intuitively know that p. Example one: The tennis results. Example two: The stopped clock. Example three: The shepherd and the false sheep addiction. So in each case we have an example of a scenario where the agent believes something true and is..
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  9
    Carson Strong (2011). Why Public Policy on Embryo Research Should Not Be Based on Religion. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):33-35.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  12
    C. Strong (2005). Reproductive Cloning Combined with Genetic Modification. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (11):654-658.
    Although there is widespread opposition to reproductive cloning, some have argued that its use by infertile couples to have genetically related children would be ethically justifiable. Others have suggested that lesbian or gay couples might wish to use cloning to have genetically related children. Most of the main objections to human reproductive cloning are based on the child’s lack of unique nuclear DNA. In the future, it may be possible safely to create children using cloning combined with genetic modifications, so (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42.  47
    Eric Higgs, Andrew Light & David Strong (eds.) (2000). Technology and the Good Life? University of Chicago Press.
    Can we use technology in the pursuit of a good life, or are we doomed to having our lives organized and our priorities set by the demands of machines and systems? How can philosophy help us to make technology a servant rather than a master? Technology and the Good Life? uses a careful collective analysis of Albert Borgmann's controversial and influential ideas as a jumping-off point from which to address questions such as these about the role and significance of technology (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  13
    Tom Strong & Andy Lock (2005). Discursive Therapy. Janus Head 8 (2):585-593.
    We contend that the talk of therapy, like everyday talk, is where and how people construct their understandings and ways of living. This is the fundamental insight of the social constructionist, or discursive, therapies. ‘Meaning’ is not some pre-given ‘thing’ that is communicated more or less successfully from one individual to another. Rather, ‘meanings’ are negotiated or constructed in the process of communication until each party is clear that they have a grasp of what they are ‘talking about’. Similarly, ‘meanings’ (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  11
    E. W. Strong (1983). Donald Phillip Verene, "Vico's Science of Imagination". [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2):273.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  52
    C. A. Strong (1928). "Why the Mind has a Body". Mind 37 (146):262-263.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  8
    Carson Strong (2001). How Should IVF Programs Handle Initial Disclosure of Information to Prospective Ovum Donors? American Journal of Bioethics 1 (4):23 – 25.
    (2001). How Should IVF Programs Handle Initial Disclosure of Information to Prospective Ovum Donors? The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 23-25.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47.  1
    Gary W. Strong (1994). Separability of Reference Frame Distinctions From Motor and Visual Images. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17 (2):224.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  48.  34
    Carson Strong (1999). Critiques of Casuistry and Why They Are Mistaken. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (5):395-411.
    Casuistic methods of reasoning in medical ethics have been criticized by a number of authors. At least five main objections to casuistry have been put forward: (1) it requires a uniformity of views that is not present in contemporary pluralistic society; (2) it cannot achieve consensus on controversial issues; (3) it is unable to examine critically intuitions about cases; (4) it yields different conclusions about cases when alternative paradigms are chosen; and (5) it cannot articulate the grounds of its conclusions. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  10
    E. W. Strong (1955). Newton's Philosophy of Nature; Selections From His Writings. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 52 (8):214-219.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  10
    Michael Allen Gillespie & Tracy B. Strong (eds.) (1988). Nietzsche's New Seas: Explorations in Philosophy, Aesthetics, and Politics. University of Chicago Press.
    Nietzsche's New Seas makes available for the first time in English a representative sample of the best recent Nietzsche scholarship from Germany, France, and the United States. Michael Allen Gillespie and Tracy B. Strong have brought together scholars from a variety of disciplines--philosophy, history, literary criticism, and musicology--and from schools of thought that differ both methodologically and ideologically. The contributors--Karsten Harries, Robert Pippin, Eugen Fink, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Kurt Paul Janz, Sarah Kofman, Jean-Michel Rey, and the editors themselves--take a new approach (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
1 — 50 / 423