Search results for 'Structuralism History' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  11
    Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.) (1987). Post-Structuralism and the Question of History. Cambridge University Press.
    Recent developments in literary theory, such as structuralism and deconstruction, have come under attack for neglecting history, while historically-based approaches have been criticized for failing to take account of the problems inherent in their methodological foundations. This collection of essays is unique in that it focuses on the relation between post-structuralism and historical (especially Marxist) literary theory and criticism. The volume includes a deconstructive reading of Marx, essays that relate history to the philosophical and institutional context, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  79
    G. Salemohamed (1991). Reviews : Thomas G. Pavel, The Feud of Language: A History of Structuralist Thought, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990, £25.50, Viii + 178 Pp. [REVIEW] History of the Human Sciences 4 (2):312-315.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  3
    Elisabeth List (1977). Structuralism. Ideology and History of its Tenets. Philosophy and History 10 (1):17-19.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  20
    John H. Geerken (1979). Pocock and Machiavelli: Structuralist Explanation in History. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (3):309-318.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  18
    Nick Crossley (2004). Phenomenology, Structuralism and History. Theoria 51 (103):88-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    R. D. Ackerman (1988). Post-Structuralism and the Question of History (Review). Philosophy and Literature 12 (2):307-308.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Philip J. Kain (1983). Alfred Schmidt, History and Structure: An Essay on Hegelian, Marxist and Structuralist Themes Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 3 (5):249-250.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    George Sefler (1980). Structuralism: Comparative Studies Within the History of Philosophy. Metaphilosophy 11 (3-4):256-258.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Robin Cohen, Althusser Meets Anancy : Structuralism and Popular Protest in Ken Post’s History of Jamaica.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    Colin Lyas (1992). The Feud of Language: A History of Structuralist Thought. Philosophical Books 33 (4):222-223.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Andreas Bieler & Adam David Morton (2010). 14 Post-Structuralism and the Randomisation of History. In Cerwyn Moore & Chris Farrands (eds.), International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues. Routledge 157.
  12. Robert D'amico (1974). Consciousness and History: Phenomenological and Structuralist Philosophies of the Human Sciences. Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Francois Dosse (1998). History of Structuralism: Volume 2: The Sign Sets, 1967-Present. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Francois Dosse (1998). History of Structuralism: Volume 1: The Rising Sign, 1945-1966. Univ of Minnesota Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  72
    Simone Aurora (2015). A Forgotten Source in the History of Linguistics: Husserl's Logical Investigations. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique 11 (5).
    In appearance, Husserl’s writings seem not to have had any influence on linguistic research, nor does what the German philosopher wrote about language seem to be worth a place in the history of linguistics. The purpose of the paper is exactly to contrast this view, by reassessing both the position and the role of Husserl’s early masterpiece — the Logical Investigations — within the history of linguistics. To this end, I will focus mainly on the third (On (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  52
    Richard Harland (1987). Superstructuralism: The Philosophy of Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. Methuen.
    Introduction 'Superstructuralism'. I coin the term to cover the whole field of Structuralists, Semioticians, Althusserian Marxists, ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  17. José Guilherme Merquior (1986). From Prague to Paris: A Critique of Structuralist and Post-Structuralist Thought. Verso.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18. Edith Kurzweil (1980). The Age of Structuralism: Lévi-Strauss to Foucault. Columbia University Press.
  19. Andoni Ibarra & Thomas Mormann (2010). Appropriating Kuhn’s Philosophical Legacy. Three Attempts: Logical Empiricism, Structuralism, and Neokantianism. Cadernos de Filosofia Das Ciencias 8:65 - 102.
    In this paper we discuss three examples of the appropriation of Kuhn’s ideas in philosophy of science. First we deal with classical logical empiricism. Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, the arch-logical empiricist Carnap considered Kuhn’s socio-historical account as a useful complementation, and not as a threat of the philosophy of science of logical empiricism. As a second example we consider the attempt of the so-called struc- turalist philosophy of science to provide a “rational reconstruction” of Kuhn’s approach. Finally, we will (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  87
    Paul M. Livingston (2004). Philosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
    The problem of explaining consciousness today depends on the meaning of language: the ordinary language of consciousness in which we define and express our sensations, thoughts, dreams and memories. Paul Livingston argues that this contemporary problem arises from a quest that developed over the twentieth century, and that historical analysis provides new resources for understanding and resolving it. Accordingly, Livingston traces the application of characteristic practices of analytic philosophy to problems about the relationship of experience to linguistic meaning.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21. Mark Poster (1997). Cultural History and Postmodernity Disciplinary Readings and Challenges. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  6
    Thorsten Botz-Bornstein (2012). The Conscious and the Unconscious in History:Lévi-Strauss, Collingwood, Bally, Barthes. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (2):151-172.
    Claude Lévi-Strauss holds that history and anthropology differ in their choice of complementary perspectives: history organizes its data in relation to conscious expressions of social life, while anthropology proceeds by examining its unconscious foundations. For R. G. Collingwood historical science discovers not only pure facts but considers a whole series of thoughts constituting historical life. Also Lévi-Strauss sees this: “To understand history it is necessary to know not only how things are, but how they have come to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  37
    Teresa Brennan (1993). History After Lacan. Routledge.
    In History After Lacan, Teresa Brennan argues that Jacques Lacan was not an ahistorical post-structuralist. She tells the story of a social psychosis, beginning with a discussion of Lacan's neglected theory of history which argued that we are in the grip of a psychotic's era which began in the seventeenth century and climaxes in the present. By extending and elaborating on Lacan's theory, Brennan develops a general theory of modernity. Contrary to postmodern assumptions, she argues, we need a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  24.  24
    John Lechte (ed.) (1994). Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers: From Structuralism to Postmodernity. Routledge.
    Fifty Key Contemporary Thinkers surveys the most important figures who have influenced post-war thought. The reader is guided through structuralism, semiotics, post-Marxism and Annales history, on to modernity and postmodernity. With its comprehensive biographical and bibliographical information, this book provides a vital reference work of the last fifty years.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  3
    Martin Bunzl (1997). Real History: Reflections on Historical Practice. Routledge.
    In Real History , Martin Bunzl brilliantly succeeds in bringing together two schools of thought at the forefront of the philosophy of history: that of realism and objectivity. He shows us how the realism debate is inhabited by philosophers, whereas the objectivity argument lies in the hands of historians. In his lucid and direct style, Bunzl proposes a synthesis between these two parallel traditions. We see that what historians say they are doing is not necessarily what they are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Alan Barnard (2000). History and Theory in Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
    Anthropology is a discipline very conscious of its history. Alan Barnard has written a clear, detailed overview of anthropological theory that brings out the historical contexts of the great debates, tracing the genealogies of theories and schools of thought. His book covers the precursors of anthropology; evolutionism in all its guises; diffusionism and culture area theories, functionalism and structural-functionalism; action-centered theories; processual and Marxist perspectives; the many faces of relativism, structuralism and poststructuralism; and recent interpretive and postmodernist viewpoints. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Roman Murawski (ed.) (2010). Essays in the Philosophy and History of Logic and Mathematics. Rodopi.
    The book is a collection of the author’s selected works in the philosophy and history of logic and mathematics. Papers in Part I include both general surveys of contemporary philosophy of mathematics as well as studies devoted to specialized topics, like Cantor's philosophy of set theory, the Church thesis and its epistemological status, the history of the philosophical background of the concept of number, the structuralist epistemology of mathematics and the phenomenological philosophy of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  10
    Christopher Lloyd (1991). The Methodologies of Social History: A Critical Survey and Defense of Structurism. History and Theory 30 (2):180-219.
    There should not be a material/mental methodological division in the frameworks used by social historians, but rather, a structure/action heuristic division. A survey of methodological approaches to social history becomes possible after clearing confusion between philosophical questions, methodological questions, and theories, as well as presenting a preliminary discussion of philosophical issues pertaining to the study of social history. The five general categories of approaches according to their philosophical foundations are: the empiricist and individualist, the systemic- functionalist, the interpretist, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  2
    Gary Browning (2010). Agency and Influence in the History of Political Thought: The Agency of Influence and the Influence of Agency. History of Political Thought 31 (2):345-366.
    The use of the category of influence in the history of ideas has been criticized by Skinner for its failure to provide explanatory links between the ideas and theorists it purports to connect and by Condren for its failure to respect the agency of thinkers. Bevir and Collingwood support the notion of influence and argue that it does accommodate the agency of thinkers. The arguments of Condren and Skinner point to significant issues and problems in the practice of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Laura L. Frader (1995). Dissent Over Discourse: Labor History, Gender, and the Linguistic Turn. History and Theory 34 (3):213-30.
    Historians influenced by post-structuralism and the linguistic turn and feminist historians concerned to incorporate the category of gender into historical analysis have recently challenged the categories, methodologies, and questions of labor history as it has been practiced in the United States for the past thirty years. Those operating under the influence of the linguistic turn have challenged labor history's foundational assumption of class as both a category of analysis and as a social formation constituted primarily by material (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Markus Wilczek (2012). Das Artikulierte Und Das Inartikulierte: Eine Archäologie Strukturalistischen Denkens. De Gruyter.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Anjan Chakravartty (2004). Structuralism as a Form of Scientific Realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):151 – 171.
    Structural realism has recently re-entered mainstream discussions in the philosophy of science. The central notion of structure, however, is contested by both advocates and critics. This paper briefly reviews currently prominent structuralist accounts en route to proposing a metaphysics of structure that is capable of supporting the epistemic aspirations of realists, and that is immune to the charge most commonly levelled against structuralism. This account provides an alternative to the existing epistemic and ontic forms of the position, incorporating elements (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  33. Ian Hunter (2009). Spirituality and Philosophy in Post-Structuralist Theory. History of European Ideas 35 (1):265-275.
    This paper discusses the role of a particular form of philosophical spirituality in the emergence of post-structuralist theory. Initially elaborated in the post-Kantian metaphysics of Husserl and Heidegger, and focused in recondite acts of intellectual self-transformation, this form of spirituality was transposed into a literary hermeneutics that permitted its wider dissemination in the Anglo-american humanities academy. Post-structuralist theory is the result of this historical transformation.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  17
    Valter Alnis Bezerra, Networks in Contemporary Philosophy of Science: Tracking the History of a Theme Between Metaphor and Structure.
    Our purpose in the present work is to survey some of the formulations that the theme of networks has received in contemporary philosophy of science over a period spanning twelve decades, from the end of the 19th century up to the present time. The proposal advanced herein is to interpret the evolution of this theme in four stages: first, one that goes from a metaphor or expressive image to a notion aspiring at implementation, but still having a virtual character, in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  35
    Ron Amundson (1998). Typology Reconsidered: Two Doctrines on the History of Evolutionary Biology. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (2):153-177.
    Recent historiography of 19th century biology supports the revision of two traditional doctrines about the history of biology. First, the most important and widespread biological debate around the time of Darwin was not evolution versus creation, but biological functionalism versus structuralism. Second, the idealist and typological structuralist theories of the time were not particularly anti-evolutionary. Typological theories provided argumentation and evidence that was crucial to the refutation of Natural Theological creationism. The contrast between functionalist and structuralist approaches to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  36. Teresa Brennan (2002). History After Lacan. Routledge.
    Lacan was not an ahistorical post-structuralist. Starting from this controversial premiss, Teresa Brennan tells the story of a social psychosis. She begins by recovering Lacan's neglected theory of history which argued that we are in the grip of a psychotic's era which began in the seventeenth century and climaxes in the present. By extending and elaborating Lacan's theory, Brennan develops a general theory of modernity. Contrary to postmodern assumptions, she argues, we need general historical explanation. An understanding of historical (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  13
    Pablo Lorenzano (2013). The Semantic Conception and the Structuralist View of Theories: A Critique of Suppe’s Criticisms. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):600-607.
    Different conceptions of scientific theories, such as the state spaces approach of Bas van Fraassen, the phase spaces approach of Frederick Suppe, the set-theoretical approach of Patrick Suppes, and the structuralist view of Joseph Sneed et al. are usually put together into one big family. In addition, the definite article is normally used, and thus we speak of the semantic conception of theories and of its different approaches . However, in The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism , starting (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  10
    Jane Tompkins (1986). "Indians": Textualism, Morality, and the Problem of History. Critical Inquiry 13 (1):101-119.
    This essay enacts a particular instance of the challenge post-structuralism poses to the study of history. In simpler, language, it concerns the difference that point of view makes when people are giving account of events, whether at first or second hand. The problem is that if all accounts of events are determined through and through by the observer’s frame of reference, then one will never know, in any given case, what really happened.I encountered this problem in concrete terms (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  34
    Bruce M. Psaty & Thomas S. Inui (1991). The Place of Human Values in the Language of Science: Kuhn, Saussure, and Structuralism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
    The current paradigm in medicine generally distinguishes between genetic and environmental causes of disease. Although the word paradigm has become a commonplace, the theories of Thomas Kuhn have not received much attention in the journals of medicine. Kuhn's structuralist method differs radically from the daily activities of the scientific method itself. Using linguistic theory, this essay offers a structuralist reading of Thomas Kuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Our purpose is to highlight the similarities between these structuralist models of science (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  12
    Keith Percival (2011). Roman Jakobson and the Birth of Linguistic Structuralism. Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):236-260.
    The term “structuralism” was introduced into linguistics by Roman Jakobson in the early days of the Linguistic Circle of Prague, founded in 1926. The cluster of ideas defended by Jakobson and his colleagues can be specified but differ considerably from the concept of structuralism as it has come to be understood more recently. That took place because from the 1930s on it became customary to equate structuralism with the ideas of Ferdinand de Saussure, as expounded in his (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  6
    Erlend Rogne (2009). The Aim of Interpretation is to Create Perplexity in the Face of the Real: Hayden White in Conversation with Erlend Rogne1. History and Theory 48 (1):63-75.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  16
    Jacob Rump (2012). Levi-Strauss, Barthes, and the "Structuralist Activity" of Sartre's Dialectical Reason. Sartre Studies International 17 (2):1-15.
    The paper examines Lévi-Strauss' criticisms of Sartre's conception of dialectical reason and history as presented in the last chapter of La Pensée Sauvage , suggesting that these criticisms are misplaced. Sartre's notion of reason and history in the Critique is much closer to structuralist accounts than Lévi-Strauss seems to recognize, but it differs in placing a strong emphasis on activity and praxis in place of the latter's passive conception of reason. The active role of the inquirer in structuralist (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  22
    Patrick Baert (1998). Foucault's History of the Present as Self-Referential Knowledge Acquisition. Philosophy and Social Criticism 24 (6):111-126.
    Underlying this article is the conviction that social scientists typically take on board a too restrictive concept of knowledge acquisition. The paper propounds a new concept of knowledge acquisition, one which is self-referential (i.e. which affects one's presuppositions) and which draws upon the unfamiliar to reveal and undercut the familiar. The aim of this paper is twofold. First, it is to show that this concept of knowledge acqui sition is already anticipated by Foucault, that it is a major concern of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. H. Kellner (1995). Narrativity in History-Poststructuralism and Since. Filozofski Vestnik 16 (1):21-52.
    Two new ways of looking at forms of knowledge were practiced in France roughly between 1965 and 1985. The postwar Annales school of history broke from "narrative" historical accounts to "nonnarrative" accountssynchronic, quantitative accounts not in story form. At the same time, the structuralists made history a special target as they began questioning the primacy and security of meaning and the strategies for constructing meaning in narratives. If structuralism and its aftermath is to be said to have (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45. Marian Hobson (1987). History Traces. In Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.), Post-Structuralism and the Question of History. Cambridge University Press 105--115.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  3
    M. Poster (1984). Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1984 (60):224-226.
    This book, which Foucault himself has judged accurate, is the first to provide a sustained, coherent analysis of Foucault's work as a whole. To demonstrate the sense in which Foucault's work is beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, the authors unfold a careful, analytical exposition of his oeuvre. They argue that during the of Foucault's work became a sustained and largely successful effort to develop a new method"interpretative analytics"capable fo explaining both the logic of structuralism's claim to be an objective (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Cesare Segre & Rebecca West (1976). Narrative Structures and Literary History. Critical Inquiry 3 (2):271-279.
    In this article, I am starting with a question which many years ago was at the center of the debate on structuralism. Are structures to be found in the object or in the subject ? If we take one of the famous analyses by Jakobson, we ascertain that as long as attention is brought to bear on the graphemic or phonological elements, or on rhymes and accents, then the objectivity of the examination is incontestable. The absolute or relative computation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Robert D'Amico (1973). The Contours and Coupures of Structuralist Theory. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1973 (17):70-97.
    Foucault has spoken recently of the profound disruption in the domain of knowledge at every level of contemporary theory. “From the beginning of this century psychoanalytic, linguistic and ethnographic research has ousted the subject from the laws of his desires, from the forms of his speech, from the rules of his actions and from the systems of his mythical discourses.” It has become increasingly more important to deal with the thrust of these developments at the level of theory, not under (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Derek Attridge (1987). Language as History/History as Language: Saussure and the Romance of Etymology. In Derek Attridge, Geoffrey Bennington & Robert Young (eds.), Post-Structuralism and the Question of History. Cambridge University Press 183--211.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. John Bickle (2012). Structuralist Contributions – and Limitations? – to the Study of Scientific Reduction. Metatheoria 2 (2):1-23.
    Structuralism provides useful resources for advancing our understanding of the intertheoretic reduction relation and its place in the history of science. This paper begins by surveying these resources and assessing their metascientific significance. Nevertheless, important challenges remain. I close by arguing that the reductionism implicit in current scientific practice in a paradigmatic reductionistic scientific field –“molecular and cellular cognition”– is better understood on an “intervene and track” model rather than as any kind of intertheoretic relation. I illustrate my (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000