Search results for 'Stuart A. McLelland' (try it on Scholar)

5 found
  1.  17
    Joseph T. Devlin, Matt H. Davis, Stuart A. McLelland & Richard P. Russell (2000). Efficiency, Information Theory, and Neural Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):475-476.
    We contend that if efficiency and reliability are important factors in neural information processing then distributed, not localist, representations are “evolution's best bet.” We note that distributed codes are the most efficient method for representing information, and that this efficiency minimizes metabolic costs, providing adaptive advantage to an organism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  2. Joseph C. McLelland (1976). God the Anonymous: A Study in Alexandrian Philosophical Theology. [Sole Distributors, Greeno, Hadden].
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  6
    Alison Gopnik, Henry M. Wellman, Susan A. Gelman & Andrew N. Meltzoff (2010). A Computational Foundation for Cognitive Development: Comment on Griffths Et Al. And McLelland Et Al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):342-343.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4. James A. Rushing (2003). Nicola McLelland, Ulrich von Zatzikhoven's “Lanzelet”: Narrative Style and Entertainment. Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell and Brewer, 2000. Pp. Xii, 260; Tables and 1 Map. $75. [REVIEW] Speculum 78 (2):570-572.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  50
    C. A. Hooker (1991). Projection, Physical Intelligibility, Objectivity and Completeness: The Divergent Ideals of Bohr and Einstein. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (4):491-511.
    It is shown how the development of physics has involved making explicit what were homocentric projections which had heretofore been implicit, indeed inexpressible in theory. This is shown to support a particular notion of the invariant as the real. On this basis the divergence in ideals of physical intelligibility between Bohr and Einstein is set out. This in turn leads to divergent, but explicit, conceptions of objectivity and completeness for physical theory. *I am indebted to Dr. G. McLelland. Professor (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   5 citations