Search results for 'Subhradipta Sarkar' (try it on Scholar)

282 found
Order:
  1. Subhradipta Sarkar, Archana Sarma, K. Mathiharan & Henri Tiphagne (eds.) (2006). Resource Materials for Doctors and Psychiatrists. People's Watch--Tamil Nadu.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. S. Sarkar & D. S. Thaler (1996). Introductory Note to the Contributions by Sarkar and Thaler. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 183:185-186.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Sahotra Sarkar (1998). Genetics and Reductionism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    With the advent of the Human Genome Project there have been many claims for the genetic origins of complex human behavior including insanity, criminality, and intelligence. But what does it really mean to call something 'genetic'? This is the fundamental question that Sahotra Sarkar's book addresses. The author analyses the nature of reductionism in classical and molecular genetics. He shows that there are two radically different kinds of reductionist explanation: genetic reduction and physical reduction . This important book clarifies (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  4.  33
    Sahotra Sarkar (2004). Molecular Models of Life: Philosophical Papers on Molecular Biology. A Bradford Book.
    Despite the transformation in biological practice and theory brought about by discoveries in molecular biology, until recently philosophy of biology continued to focus on evolutionary biology. When the Human Genome Project got underway in the late 1980s and early 1990s, philosophers of biology -- unlike historians and social scientists -- had little to add to the debate. In this landmark collection of essays, Sahotra Sarkar broadens the scope of current discussions of the philosophy of biology, viewing molecular biology as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  5.  25
    Sahotra Sarkar (2012). Flights of Fancy. Metascience 21 (2):425-426.
    Flights of fancy Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-2 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9572-y Authors Sahotra Sarkar, Section of Integrative Biology, Department of Philosophy, University of Texas at Austin, Waggener Hall 316, Austin, TX 78712-1180, USA Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Déborah Cohen, Urs Lindner & Sumit Sarkar (2011). Subalternité et histoire globale. Actuel Marx 2 (2):207-217.
    Sumit Sarkar, one of the leading Indian historians of his generation, participated in the Indian-British Subaltern Studies Collective that established new standards in the historiography of colonialism in the 1980’s. In this Interview, Déborah Cohen and Urs Lindner ask him about the achievements and oversights of the Subaltern Studies project, the prospects of global history, Marx’s eurocentrism and the problem of religion.
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  33
    Sahotra Sarkar (2005). Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
    This book explores the epistemological and ethical issues at the foundations of environmental philosophy, emphasising the conservation of biodiversity. Sahota Sarkar criticises attempts to attribute intrinsic value to nature and defends an anthropocentric position on biodiversity conservation based on an untraditional concept of transformative value. Unlike other studies in the field of environmental philosophy, this book is as much concerned with epistemological issues as with environmental ethics. It covers a broad range of topics, including problems of explanation and prediction (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  31
    Husain Sarkar (2003). Descartes' Cogito: Saved From the Great Shipwreck. Cambridge University Press.
    Perhaps the most famous proposition in the history of philosophy is Descartes' cogito 'I think, therefore I am'. Husain Sarkar claims in this provocative interpretation of Descartes that the ancient tradition of reading the cogito as an argument is mistaken. It should, he says, be read as an intuition. Through this interpretative lens, the author reconsiders key Cartesian topics: the ideal inquirer, the role of clear and distinct ideas, the relation of these to the will, memory, the nature of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Husain Sarkar (2007). Descartes' Cogito: Saved From the Great Shipwreck. Cambridge University Press.
    Perhaps the most famous proposition in the history of philosophy is Descartes' cogito 'I think, therefore I am'. Husain Sarkar claims in this provocative interpretation of Descartes that the ancient tradition of reading the cogito as an argument is mistaken. It should, he says, be read as an intuition. Through this interpretative lens, the author reconsiders key Cartesian topics: the ideal inquirer, the role of clear and distinct ideas, the relation of these to the will, memory, the nature of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Sahotra Sarkar (2012). Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge University Press.
    With the advent of the Human Genome Project there have been many claims for the genetic origins of complex human behavior including insanity, criminality, and intelligence. But what does it really mean to call something 'genetic'? This is the fundamental question that Sahotra Sarkar's book addresses. The author analyses the nature of reductionism in classical and molecular genetics. He shows that there are two radically different kinds of reductionist explanation: genetic reduction and physical reduction. This important book clarifies the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Husain Sarkar (2007). Group Rationality in Scientific Research. Cambridge University Press.
    Under what conditions is a group of scientists rational? How would rational scientists collectively agree to make their group more effective? What sorts of negotiations would occur among them and under what conditions? What effect would their final agreement have on science and society? These questions have been central to the philosophy of science for the last two decades. In this 2007 book, Husain Sarkar proposes answers to them by building on classical solutions - the skeptical view, two versions (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Husain Sarkar (2011). Group Rationality in Scientific Research. Cambridge University Press.
    Under what conditions is a group of scientists rational? How would rational scientists collectively agree to make their group more effective? What sorts of negotiations would occur among them and under what conditions? What effect would their final agreement have on science and society? These questions have been central to the philosophy of science for the last two decades. In this 2007 book, Husain Sarkar proposes answers to them by building on classical solutions - the skeptical view, two versions (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  2
    Sahotra Sarkar (2007). Molecular Models of Life: Philosophical Papers on Molecular Biology. A Bradford Book.
    Despite the transformation in biological practice and theory brought about by discoveries in molecular biology, until recently philosophy of biology continued to focus on evolutionary biology. When the Human Genome Project got underway in the late 1980s and early 1990s, philosophers of biology -- unlike historians and social scientists -- had little to add to the debate. In this landmark collection of essays, Sahotra Sarkar broadens the scope of current discussions of the philosophy of biology, viewing molecular biology as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  61
    Sahotra Sarkar (2000). Information in Genetics and Developmental Biology: Comments on Maynard Smith. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):208-213.
  15.  6
    Sahotra Sarkar (2011). Habitat Reconstruction: Moving Beyond Historical Fidelity. In Kevin deLaplante, Bryson Brown & Kent A. Peacock (eds.), Philosophy of Ecology. North-Holland 11--327.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  16.  11
    Sahotra Sarkar (2014). Environmental Philosophy: From Theory to Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):89-91.
    Environmental philosophy is a hybrid discipline drawing extensively from epistemology, ethics, and philosophy of science and analyzing disciplines such as conservation biology, restoration ecology, sustainability studies, and political ecology. The book being discussed both provides an overview of environmental philosophy and develops an anthropocentric framework for it. That framework treats natural values as deep cultural values. Tradeoffs between natural values are analyzed using decision theory to the extent possible, leaving many interesting question for philosophical deliberation. This framework is supposed to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  12
    Sahotra Sarkar (2014). Formal Darwinism. Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):249-257.
    Two questions are raised for Grafen’s formal darwinism project of aligning evolutionary dynamics under natural selection with the optimization of phenotypes for individuals of a population. The first question concerns mean fitness maximization during frequency-dependent selection; in such selection regimes, not only is mean fitness typically not maximized but it is implausible that any parameter closely related to fitness is being maximized. The second question concerns whether natural selection on inclusive fitness differences can be regarded as individual selection or whether (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18. D. Passigli, R. Sarkar, S. Paul, Pamela S. Saha & Subrata Saha (2011). Ethics of End-of-Life Care: The Need for Improved Communication Among Physicians, Patients, and Families. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 2 (1):45-69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Sahotra Sarkar (1992). Models of Reduction and Categories of Reductionism. Synthese 91 (3):167-94.
    A classification of models of reduction into three categories — theory reductionism, explanatory reductionism, and constitutive reductionism — is presented. It is shown that this classification helps clarify the relations between various explications of reduction that have been offered in the past, especially if a distinction is maintained between the various epistemological and ontological issues that arise. A relatively new model of explanatory reduction, one that emphasizes that reduction is the explanation of a whole in terms of its parts is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  20.  22
    Sahotra Sarkar (2013). Carnap and the Compulsions of Interpretation: Reining in the Liberalization of Empiricism. [REVIEW] European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (3):353-372.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21. Sahotra Sarkar (ed.) (1996). The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives. Kluwer Academic.
  22. Sahotra Sarkar (2002). Defining “Biodiversity”; Assessing Biodiversity. The Monist 85 (1):131-155.
    This paper analyzes the concept of biodiversity in conservation biology and assesses potential methods for its measurement.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  23.  27
    Sahotra Sarkar (1999). From the reaktionsNorm to the Adaptive Norm: The Norm of Reaction, 1909–1960. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 14 (2):235-252.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  24. Sahotra Sarkar (2011). Sober on Intelligent Design. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):683-691.
    This response to Sober's (2008) Evidence and Evolution draws out and criticizes some consequences of his analysis because of its reliance on a likelihood framework for adjucating the dispute between (Intelligent Design) creationism and evolution. In particular, Sober's analysis does not allow it to be formally claimed that evolutionary theory better explains living phenomena than Intelligent Design and makes irrelevant the contribution of the theory of evolution by natural selection to assessments of the status of the argument from design. Finally, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  14
    Husain Sarkar (1982). A Theory of Group Rationality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (1):55-72.
  26. Nabanita Gupta, Supratik Sarkar & Kurt J. Marfurt (2013). Seismic Attribute Driven Integrated Characterization of the Woodford Shale in West-Central Oklahoma. Interpretation 1 (2):SB85-SB96.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27. Proyash Sarkar (2003). Placing Nyāya Epistemology Properly in the Western Tradition. In Srilekha Datta & Amita Chatterjee (eds.), Some Philosophical Issues in Indian Logic. Centre of Advanced Study in Philosophy, Jadavpur University in Collaboration with Allied Publishers, New Delhi
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Sahotra Sarkar (2011). The Science Question in Intelligent Design. Synthese 178 (2):291 - 305.
    Intelligent Design creationism is often criticized for failing to be science because it falls afoul of some demarcation criterion between science and non-science. This paper argues that this objection to Intelligent Design is misplaced because it assumes that a consistent non-theological characterization of Intelligent Design is possible. In contrast, it argues that, if Intelligent Design is taken to be non-theological doctrine, it is not intelligible. Consequently, a demarcation criterion cannot be used to judge its status. This position has the added (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  24
    Husain Sarkar (2007). Group Rationality in Scientific Research. Cambridge University Press.
    Group Rationality in Scientific Research.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  27
    Sahotra Sarkar (2008). A Note on Frequency Dependence and the Levels/Units of Selection. Biology and Philosophy 23 (2):217-228.
    On the basis of distinctions between those properties of entities that can be defined without reference to other entities and those that (in different ways) cannot, this note argues that non-trivial forms of frequency-dependent selection of entities should be interpreted as selection occurring at a level higher than that of those entities. It points out that, except in degenerately simple cases, evolutionary game-theoretic models of selection are not models of individual selection. Similarly, models of genotypic selection such as heterosis cannot (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  31.  36
    Sahotra Sarkar (1982). Hierarchy Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  32. Sahotra Sarkar (2007). From Ecological Diversity to Biodiversity. In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  33.  29
    Sahotra Sarkar & Anya Plutynski (eds.) (2008). A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Blackwell Pub..
    Comprised of essays by top scholars in the field, this volume offers concise overviews of philosophical issues raised by biology. Brings together a team of eminent scholars to explore the philosophical issues raised by biology Addresses traditional and emerging topics, spanning molecular biology and genetics, evolution, developmental biology, immunology, ecology, mind and behaviour, neuroscience, and experimentation Begins with a thorough introduction to the field Goes beyond previous treatments that focused only on evolution to give equal attention to other areas, such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34. Sahotra Sarkar (2012). Environmental Philosophy: From Theory to Practice. Wiley-Blackwell.
    The first comprehensive treatment of environmental philosophy, going beyond ethics to address the philosophical concepts that underlie environmental thinking and policy-making today Encompasses all of environmental philosophy, including conservation biology, restoration ecology, sustainability, environmental justice, and more Offers the first treatment of decision theory in an environmental philosophy text Explores the conceptions of nature and ethical presuppositions that underlie contemporary environmental debates, and, moving from theory to practice, shows how decision theory translates to public policy Addresses both hot-button issues, including (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  42
    Sahotra Sarkar & John Stachel (1999). Did Malament Prove the Non-Conventionality of Simultaneity in the Special Theory of Relativity? Philosophy of Science 66 (2):208-220.
    David Malament's (1977) well-known result, which is often taken to show the uniqueness of the Poincare-Einstein convention for defining simultaneity, involves an unwarranted physical assumption: that any simultaneity relation must remain invariant under temporal reflections. Once that assumption is removed, his other criteria for defining simultaneity are also satisfied by membership in the same backward (forward) null cone of the family of such cones with vertices on an inertial path. What is then unique about the Poincare-Einstein convention is that it (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  36.  7
    Sahotra Sarkar (2014). Does “Information” Provide a Compelling Framework for a Theory of Natural Selection? Grounds for Caution. Philosophy of Science 81 (1):22-30.
    Frank has recently argued for an information-theoretic interpretation of natural selection. This interpretation is based on the identification of a measure related to the Malthusian parameter (for population change) with the Jeffreys divergence between the present allelic distribution of the population and that distribution in the next generation. It is pointed out in this analysis that this identification only holds if the mean fitness of the population is a constant, that is, there is no selection. This problem is used to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  3
    Sahotra Sarkar (2014). Environmental Philosophy: Response to Critics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 45 (1):105-109.
    The following piece is a response to the critiques from Frank, Garson, and Odenbaugh. The issues at stake are: the definition of biodiversity and its normativity, historical fidelity in ecological restoration, naturalism in environmental ethics, and the role of decision theory. The normativity of the concept of biodiversity in conservation biology is defended. Historical fidelity is criticized as an operative goal for ecological restoration. It is pointed out that the analysis requires only minimal assumptions about ethics. Decision theory is presented (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  3
    Shruti Sarkar & Dipankar Sarkar (2010). Social Factors in Clinical Complexity: Reflections From a Paediatric Unit. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):427-430.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39. Husain Sarkar (1985). A Theory of Method. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):228-230.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  40.  36
    Justin Garson, Linton Wang & Sahotra Sarkar (2003). How Development May Direct Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):353-370.
    A framework is presented in which the role ofdevelopmental rules in phenotypic evolution canbe studied for some simple situations. Usingtwo different implicit models of development,characterized by different developmental mapsfrom genotypes to phenotypes, it is shown bysimulation that developmental rules and driftcan result in directional phenotypic evolutionwithout selection. For both models thesimulations show that the critical parameterthat drives the final phenotypic distributionis the cardinality of the set of genotypes thatmap to each phenotype. Details of thedevelopmental map do not matter. If phenotypesare (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  82
    Husain Sarkar (1998). A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Journal of Philosophy 95 (4):204-209.
  42.  31
    Gregg Jaeger & Sahotra Sarkar (2003). Coherence, Entanglement, and Reductionist Explanation in Quantum Physics,". In A. Ashtekar (ed.), Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. D. Reidel 523--542.
    The scope and nature of reductionist explanation in quantum physics is analyzed, with special attention being paid to the situation in quantum physics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  45
    Sahotra Sarkar (2004). Evolutionary Theory in the 1920s: The Nature of the “Synthesis”. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1215-1226.
    This paper analyzes the development of evolutionary theory in the period from 1918 to 1932. It argues that: (i) Fisher's work in 1918 constituted a not fully satisfactory reduction of biometry to Mendelism; (ii) there was a synthesis in the 1920s but that this synthesis was mainly one of classical genetics with population genetics, with Haldane's The Causes of Evolution being its founding document; (iii) the most important achievement of the models of theoretical population genetics was to show that natural (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44. Sahotra Sarkar & James Justus, The Principle of Complementarity in the Design of Reserve Networks to Conserve Biodiversity: A Preliminary History.
    Explicit, quantitative procedures for identifying biodiversity priority areas are replacing the often ad hoc procedures used in the past to design networks of reserves to conserve biodiversity. This change facilitates more informed choices by policy makers, and thereby makes possible greater satisfaction of conservation goals with increased efficiency. A key feature of these procedures is the use of the principle of complementarity, which ensures that areas chosen for inclusion in a reserve network complement those already selected. This paper sketches the (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  22
    Sahotra Sarkar (2004). Evolutionary Theory in the 1920s: The Nature of the "Synthesis". Philosophy of Science 71 (5):1215-1226.
    This paper analyzes the development of evolutionary theory in the period from 1918 to 1932. It argues that: (i) Fisher’s work in 1918 constitutes a not fully satisfactory reduction of biometry to Mendelism; (ii) that there was a synthesis in the 1920s but that this synthesis was mainly one of classical genetics with population genetics, with Haldane’s Causes of Evolution being its founding document; (iii) the most important achievement of the models of theoretical population genetics was to show that natural (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46. Sahotra Sarkar (2011). Drift and the Causes of Evolution. In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press 445.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  20
    R. Sarkar, E. W. Grandin, B. P. Gladstone, J. Muliyil & G. Kang (2009). Comprehension and Recall of Informed Consent Among Participating Families in a Birth Cohort Study on Diarrhoeal Disease. Public Health Ethics 2 (1):37-44.
    Comprehension and recall of informed consent was assessed after the study closure in the parents/guardians of a birth cohort of children participating in an intensive three-year diarrhoeal surveillance. A structured questionnaire was administered by field workers who had not participated in the study's follow-up protocol. Of 368 respondents, 329 (89.4 per cent) stated that the study was adequately explained during enrolment, but only 159 (43.2 per cent) could recall that it was on diarrhoea. Nearly half (45.9 per cent) of the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  1
    Alfred I. Tauber & Sahotra Sarkar (1992). The Human Genome Project: Has Blind Reductionism Gone Too Far? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 35 (2):220-235.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49.  29
    Raphael Falk & Sahotra Sarkar (1991). The Real Objective of Mendel's Paper: A Response to Monaghan and Corcos. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):447-451.
    Mendel's work in hybridization is ipso facto a study in inheritance. He is explicit in his interest to formulate universal generalizations, and at least in the case of the independent segregation of traits, he formulated his conclusions in the form of a law. Mendel did not discern, however, the inheritance of traits from that of the potential for traits. Choosing to study discrete non-overlapping traits, this did not hamper his efforts.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  50.  15
    Sahotra Sarkar & Trevon Fuller, Generalized Norms of Reaction for Ecological Developmental Biology.
    A standard norm of reaction (NoR) is a graphical depiction of the phenotypic value of some trait of an individual genotype in a population as a function of an environmental parameter. NoRs thus depict the phenotypic plasticity of a trait. The topological properties of NoRs for sets of different genotypes can be used to infer the presence of (non-linear) genotype-environment interactions. While it is clear that many NoRs are adaptive, it is not yet settled whether their evolutionary etiology should be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 282