185 found
Order:
  1.  66
    Susan Haack (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge University Press.
    The first systematic exposition of all the central topics in the philosophy of logic, Susan Haack's book has established an international reputation (translated into five languages) for its accessibility, clarity, conciseness, orderliness, and range as well as for its thorough scholarship and careful analyses. Haack discusses the scope and purpose of logic, validity, truth-functions, quantification and ontology, names, descriptions, truth, truth-bearers, the set-theoretical and semantic paradoxes, and modality. She also explores the motivations for a whole range of nonclassical systems of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   84 citations  
  2.  12
    Susan Haack (1995). Evidence and Inquiry: Towards Reconstruction in Epistemology. Wiley-Blackwell.
    In this important new work, Haack develops an original theory of empirical evidence or justification, and argues its appropriateness to the goals of inquiry. In so doing, Haack provides detailed critical case studies of Lewis's foundationalism; Davidson's and Bonjour's coherentism; Popper's 'epistemology without a knowing subject'; Quine's naturalism; Goldman's reliabilism; and Rorty's, Stich's, and the Churchlands' recent obituaries of epistemology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   45 citations  
  3.  29
    Susan Haack (1974). Deviant Logic: Some Philosophical Issues. Cambridge University Press.
    PART ONE I 'Alternative' in 'Alternative logic There are many systems of logic — many-valued systems and modal systems for instance - which are non-standard ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   69 citations  
  4.  73
    Susan Haack (2010). Defending Science - Within Reason. Principia 3 (2):187-212.
    We need to find a middle way between the exaggerated deference towards science characteristic of scientism, and the exaggerated suspicion characteristic of anti-scientific attitudes — to acknowledge that science is neither sacred nor a confidence trick. The Critical Commonsensist account of scientific evidence and scientific method offered here corrects the narrowly logical approach of the Old Deferentialists without succumbing to the New Cynics' sociologism or their factitious despair of the epistemic credentials of science.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  5. Susan Haack (1998). Evidence and Enquiry. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):409-412.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  6.  60
    Susan Haack (1996). Deviant Logic, Fuzzy Logic: Beyond the Formalism. University of Chicago Press.
    Initially proposed as rivals of classical logic, alternative logics have become increasingly important in areas such as computer science and artificial intelligence. Fuzzy logic, in particular, has motivated major technological developments in recent years. Susan Haack's Deviant Logic provided the first extended examination of the philosophical consequences of alternative logics. In this new volume, Haack includes the complete text of Deviant Logic , as well as five additional papers that expand and update it. Two of these essays critique fuzzy logic, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  7.  9
    Susan Haack (2014). Do Not Block the Way of Inquiry. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (3):319.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Susan Haack (1976). The Justification of Deduction. Mind 85 (337):112-119.
    It is often taken for granted by writers who propose--and, for that matter, by writers who oppose--'justifications' of inductions, that deduction either does not need, or can readily be provided with, justification. The purpose of this paper is to argue that, contrary to this common opinion, problems analogous to those which, notoriously, arise in the attempt to justify induction, also arise in the attempt to justify deduction.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  9.  27
    Susan Haack (2000). Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate. University of Chicago Press.
    Forthright and wryly humorous, philosopher Susan Haack deploys her penetrating analytic skills on some of the most highly charged cultural and social debates of recent years. Relativism, multiculturalism, feminism, affirmative action, pragmatisms old and new, science, literature, the future of the academy and of philosophy itself—all come under her keen scrutiny in Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  10.  49
    Susan Haack (2007). On Logic in the Law: "Something, but Not All". Ratio Juris 20 (1):1-31.
    In 1880, when Oliver Wendell Holmes (later to be a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) criticized the logical theology of law articulated by Christopher Columbus Langdell (the first Dean of Harvard Law School), neither Holmes nor Langdell was aware of the revolution in logic that had begun, the year before, with Frege's Begriffsschrift. But there is an important element of truth in Holmes's insistence that a legal system cannot be adequately understood as a system of axioms and corollaries; and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  11. Susan Haack (1993). Double-Aspect Foundherentism: A New Theory of Empirical Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):113-128.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  33
    Susan Haack (2004). Realism. In M. Sintonen, J. Wolenski & I. Niiniluoto (eds.), Synthese. Kluwer 415--436.
    'Realism' is multiply ambiguous. The central concern of Part 1 of this paper is to distinguish several of its many senses -- four in which it refers to theses about the status of scientific theories, and five in which it refers to theses about the nature of truth or truth-bearers. Because 'Realism' has these several, largely independent, senses, the conventional wisdom that Tarski's theory of truth supports realism, and that the Meaning-Variance thesis undermines it, needs re-evaluation. The concern of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  57
    Susan Haack (2009). Irreconcilable Differences? The Troubled Marriage of Science and Law. Law and Contemporary Problems 72 (1).
    Because its business is to resolve disputed issues, the law very often calls on those fields of science where the pressure of commercial interests is most severe. Because the legal system aspires to handle disputes promptly, the scientific questions to which it seeks answers will often be those for which all the evidence is not yet in. Because of its case-specificity, the legal system often demands answers of a kind science is not well-equipped to supply; and, for related reasons, constitutes (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  25
    Susan Haack & Robert Lane (eds.) (2006). Pragmatism Old & New: Selected Writings. Prometheus Books.
    “The most likely use for Haack’s volume will be in introductory pragmatism courses and it is eminently appropriate for this task. However, others who would wish to speak out about pragmatism authoritatively would do well to go through the book from cover to cover. Outside of philosophy, the volume provides an introduction to a vital aspect of what philosophy has to offer to other disciplines, psychology among them....it is hard to think what could have been done to improve upon the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  15.  46
    Susan Haack (2008). Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert. Journal of Health and Biomedical Law 4:253-289.
    In many toxic-tort cases - notably in Oxendine v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and in Joiner v. G.E., - plaintiffs argue that the expert testimony they wish to present, though no part of it is sufficient by itself to establish causation "by a preponderance of the evidence," is jointly sufficient to meet this standard of proof; and defendants sometimes argue in response that it is a mistake to imagine that a collection of pieces of weak evidence can be any stronger (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  16.  43
    Susan Haack, Gerard Radnitzky & Gunnar Andersson (1980). Progress and Rationality in Science. Philosophical Quarterly 30 (119):174.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  17.  84
    Susan Haack (2004). Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law. Ratio Juris 17 (1):15-26.
  18. Susan Haack (1993). The Two Faces of Quine's Naturalism. Synthese 94 (3):335 - 356.
    Quine's naturalized epistemology is ambivalent between a modest naturalism according to which epistemology is an a posteriori discipline, an integral part of the web of empirical belief, and a scientistic naturalism according to which epistemology is to be conducted wholly within the natural sciences. This ambivalence is encouraged by Quine's ambiguous use of science, to mean sometimes, broadly, our presumed empirical knowledge and sometimes, narrowly, the natural sciences. Quine's modest naturalism is reformist, tackling the traditional epistemological problems in a novel (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  19. Susan Haack (1999). Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate: Unfashionable Essays. University of Chicago Press.
    Forthright and wryly humorous, philosopher Susan Haack deploys her penetrating analytic skills on some of the most highly charged cultural and social debates of recent years. Relativism, multiculturalism, feminism, affirmative action, pragmatisms old and new, science, literature, the future of the academy and of philosophy itself—all come under her keen scrutiny in _Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate_. "The virtue of Haack's book, and I mean _virtue_ in the ethical sense, is that it embodies the attitude that it exalts... Haack's voice (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20.  91
    Susan Haack (2009). Evidence and Inquiry: A Pragmatist Reconstruction of Epistemology. Prometheus Books.
    Introduction -- Foundationalism versus coherentism : a dichotomy disclaimed -- Foundationalism undermined -- Coherentism discomposed -- Foundherentism articulated -- The evidence of the senses : refutations and conjectures -- Naturalism disambiguated -- The evidence against reliabilism -- Revolutionary scientism subverted -- Vulgar pragmatism : an unedifying prospect -- Foundherentism ratified -- Selected essays -- "Know" is just a four-letter word -- Knowledge and propaganda : reflections of an old feminist -- "The ethics of belief" reconsidered -- Epistemology legalized : or, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21. R. J. Haack & Susan Haack (1970). Token-Sentences, Translation and Truth-Value. Mind 79 (313):40-57.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  16
    Susan Haack (2005). The Unity of Truth and the Plurality of Truths. Principia 9 (1-2):87-109.
    There is one truth, but many truths: i.e., one unambiguous, non-relative truth-concept, but many and various propositions that are true. One truth-concept: to say that a proposition is true is to say (not that anyone, or everyone, believes it, but) that things are as it says; but many truths: particular empirical claims, scientific theories, historical propositions, mathematical theorems, logical principles, textual interpretations, statements about what a person wants or believes or intends, about grammatical and legal rules, etc., etc. But, as (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  23.  93
    Susan Haack (2008). The Whole Truth and Nothing but the Truth. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):20-35.
    "Much truth is spoken, that more may be concealed," wrote Mr. Justice Darling in 1879. Opening with an articulation of the distinction between truth (the concept) and truths (particular true propositions), this paper is largely devoted to: -/- (1) developing an account of the dual meaning of "partially true" - "true-in-part" vs. "part of the truth"; and -/- (2) understanding the reasons for, and the dangers of, the very common tendency to tell only part of the relevant truth.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24. Susan Haack (1976). The Pragmatist Theory of Truth. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (3):231-249.
  25. Susan Haack (1975). On "on Theological Fatalism Again" Again. Philosophical Quarterly 25 (99):159-161.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  64
    Susan Haack (2005). On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does 'the Path of the Law' Lead Us? American Journal of Jurisprudence 50 (1):71-105.
    What is called legal pragmatism today is very different from the older style of legal pragmatism traditionally associated with Oliver Wendell Holmes; and there is much that is worthwhile on the conception of the law revealed by reading Holmes's The Path of the Law in the light of the classical pragmatist tradition of Peirce, James, and Dewey. Here, reflections on the varieties of pragmatism - philosophical and legal, old and new - will be wrapped around an exploration of Holmes's legal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27.  84
    Susan Haack (2007). The Integrity of Science: What It Means, Why It Matters. Contrastes: Revista Interdisciplinar de Filosofía:5-26.
    The many meanings of integrity are distinguished. This paper focuses specifically on how the concept of integrity in the sense of firm adherence to values applies to science qua institution. The most relevant values - the epistemological values of evidence-sharing and respect for evidence - are articulated, and shown to be rooted in the character of the scientific enterprise. This paves the way for an exploration of the circumstances that presently threaten to erode commitment to these core values: an exploration (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  67
    Susan Haack (2008). Of Truth, in Science and in Law. Brooklyn Law Review 73 (2).
    Abstract: This paper responds to the question posed in the announcement of the conference at Brooklyn Law School at which it was presented: if and how [the inquiry into the reliability of proffered scientific testimony mandated by Daubert] relates to 'truth,' and whose view of the truth should prevail. The first step is to sketch the legal history leading up to Daubert, and to explore some of the difficulties Daubert brought in its wake; the next, to develop an account of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  12
    Susan Haack (2009). The Growth of Meaning and the Limits of Formalism: In Science, in Law. Análisis Filosófico 29 (1):5-29.
    A natural language is an organic living thing; and meanings change as words take on new, and shed old, connotations. Recent philosophy of language has paid little attention to the growth of meaning; radical philosophers like Feyerabend and Rorty have suggested that meaning-change undermines the pretensions of science to be a rational enterprise. Thinkers in the classical pragmatist tradition, however -Peirce in philosophy of science and, more implicitly, Holmes in legal theory- both recognized the significance of growth of meaning, and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30.  32
    Susan Haack (2012). The Embedded Epistemologist: Dispatches From the Legal Front. Ratio Juris 25 (2):206-235.
    In ordinary circumstances, we can assess the worth of evidence well enough without benefit of any theory; but when evidence is especially complex, ambiguous, or emotionally disturbing—as it often is in legal contexts—epistemological theory may be helpful. A legal fact-finder is asked to determine whether the proposition that the defendant is guilty, or is liable, is established to the required degree of proof by the [admissible] evidence presented; i.e., to make an epistemological appraisal. The foundherentist theory developed in Evidence and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Susan Haack (1982). Dummett's Justification of Deduction. Mind 91 (362):216-239.
  32.  20
    Susan Haack (2010). Meaning Grows. The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):56-57.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  17
    Susan Haack (1996). Science as Social?-Yes and No. In Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers 79--93.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  34.  38
    Susan Haack (2008). What's Wrong with Litigation-Driven Science? An Essay in Legal Epistemology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 32:20-35.
    Rehearing Daubert on remand from the Supreme Court, Judge Kozinski introduced a fifth "Daubert factor" of his own: that expert testimony is based on "litigation-driven science" is an indication that it is unreliable. This article explores the role this factor has played in courts' handling of scientific testimony, clears up an ambiguity in "litigation-driven" and some uncertainties in "reliable," and assesses the reasons courts have given for reading such research with suspicion. This analysis reveals that research that is litigation-driven in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  35.  33
    Susan Haack (2004). Epistemology Legalized: Or, Truth, Justice, and the American Way. American Journal of Jurisprudence 49 (1):43-61.
    Jeremy Bentham's powerful metaphor of Injustice, and her handmaid Falsehood reminds us, if we need reminding, that justice requires not only just laws, and just administration of those laws, but also factual truth - objective factual truth; and that in consequence the very possibility of a just legal system requires that there be objective indications of truth, i.e., objective standards of better or worse evidence... My plan [in this Olin Lecture in Jurisprudence, presented at Notre Dame law School, in October (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36. Susan Haack (1974). On a Theological Argument for Fatalism. Philosophical Quarterly 24 (95):156-159.
    It is the aim of this paper to show that [the theological argument from Divine omniscience] is not more than a needlessly (and confusingly) elaborate version of the argument for fatalism discussed by Aristotle in de Interpretatione 9, which, since its sole premise is the Principle of Bivalence, may conveniently be called the logical argument for fatalism. If this is right, if the theological premisses of the theological argument can be shown to be strictly irrelevant to the fatalist conclusion, then (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    Susan Haack (2014). Credulity and Circumspection. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 88:27-47.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Susan Haack (2005). Formal Philosophy? A Plea for Pluralism. In John Symonds Vincent Henricks (ed.), Formal Philosophy. 77--98.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  11
    Susan Haack (2005). Scientific Secrecy and 'Spin': The Sad, Sleazy Saga of the Trials of Remune. Social Science Research Network.
    The story I shall be exploring is certainly a disturbing one: a drug company funds a large-scale trial of its new AIDS therapy; when the results are unfavorable, the company tries to prevent their being published; when the researchers go ahead with publication anyway, the company seeks millions of dollars in damages; eventually, newspaper headlines tell us it gets zilch, but the arbitration proceedings are private, so beyond that we know - well, zilch; the same year, an action is filed (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40. Susan Haack (1992). Science 'From a Feminist Perspective'. Philosophy 67 (259):5 - 18.
    Women themselves, for the most part, think of themselves as the sensible sex, whose business it is to undo the harm that comes of men's impetuous follies. For my part, I distrust all generalizations about women, favourable and unfavourable, masculine and feminine, ancient and modern; all alike, I should say, result from paucity of experience.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  91
    Susan Haack (1996). Reflections on Relativism: From Momentous Tautology to Seductive Contradiction. Philosophical Perspectives 10:297--315.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42.  31
    Susan Haack (2007). Peer Review and Publication: Lessons for Lawyers. Stetson Law Review 36 (3).
    Peer review and publication is one of the factors proposed in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as indicia of the reliability of scientific testimony. This Article traces the origins of the peer-review system, the process by which it became standard at scientific and medical journals, and the many roles it now plays. Additionally, the Author articulates the epistemological rationale for pre-publication peer-review and the inherent limitations of the system as a scientific quality-control mechanism. The Article explores recent changes in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  9
    Susan Haack (2001). uThe Ethics of Belief 'Reconsidered'. In Matthias Steup (ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. Oxford University Press 21.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  83
    Susan Haack (1987). Realism. Synthese 73 (2):275 - 299.
    Realism is multiply ambiguous. The central concern of Part 1 of this paper is to distinguish several of its many senses — four (Theoretical Realism, Cumulative Realism, Progressive Realism and Optimistic Realism) in which it refers to theses about the status of scientific theories, and five (Minimal Realism, Ambitious Absolutism, Transcendentalism, Nidealism, Scholastic Realism) in which it refers to theses about the nature of truth or truth-bearers. Because Realism has these several, largely independent, senses, the conventional wisdom that Tarski's theory (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45.  56
    Susan Haack (1982). Theories of Knowledge: An Analytic Framework. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:143 - 157.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  46.  19
    Susan Haack (2010). Clues to the Puzzle of Scientific Evidence. Principia 5 (1-2):253-281.
    The evidence with respect to scientific claims is like empirical eviderwe generally — only more so: more complex, more dependent on instruments, etc., and usually a shared resource. Warranted scientific claims are always warranted by somebody's, or somebodies', experience, and somebody's or, somebodies', reasoning; so a theory of warrant must begin with the personal and then move to the social before it can get to grips with the impersonal sense in which we speak of a well-warranted claim or ill-founded conjecture.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  15
    Susan Haack (1985). Reviewed Work: Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology and Philosophy of Science by S. Harding, M. B. Hintikka. [REVIEW] Philosophy 60:265.
  48.  9
    Susan Haack (2004). Pragmatism, Old and New. Contemporary Pragmatism 1 (1):3-41.
    The reformist philosophy of the classical pragmatist tradition has gradually evolved into the now-fashionable revolutionary styles of pragmatism, some scientistic, some literary. This evolution is traced from Peirce, James, Dewey, and Mead, through Schiller, Lewis, Hook,and Quine, to Rorty’s literary-political neo-pragmatism. Rather than get hung up on the question of which variants qualify as authentic pragmatism, it is better — more fruitful, and appropriately forward looking— to ask what we can learn from the older tradition, and what we can salvage (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  15
    Susan Haack (1990). Recent Obituaries of Epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (3):199 - 212.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  50.  81
    Susan Haack (2008). The Legitimacy of Metaphysics. Philosophical Topics 36 (1):97-110.
    Part of Kant’s legacy to Peirce was a lasting conviction that metaphysics is not irredeemable, but can and should be set “on the secure path of a science”. However, Peirce’s “scientific metaphysics”, unlike Kant’s, uses the method of science, i.e., of experience and reasoning; but requires close attention to experience of the most familiar kind rather than the recherché experience needed by the special sciences. This distinctively plausible reconception of what a genuinely scientific metaphysics would be is part of Peirce’s (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 185