7 found
Sort by:
  1. Christian Dahlman, Farhan Sarwar, Rasmus Bååth, Lena Wahlberg & Sverker Sikström (forthcoming). Prototype Effect and the Persuasiveness of Generalizations. Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-18.
    An argument that makes use of a generalization activates the prototype for the category used in the generalization. We conducted two experiments that investigated how the activation of the prototype affects the persuasiveness of the argument. The results of the experiments suggest that the features of the prototype overshadow and partly overwrite the actual facts of the case. The case is, to some extent, judged as if it had the features of the prototype instead of the features it actually has. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lars Hall, Petter Johansson, Sverker Sikström, Betty Tärning & Andreas Lind (2006). Reply to Commentary by Moore and Haggard. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):697-699.
  3. Petter Johansson, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikström, Betty Tärning & Andreas Lind (2006). How Something Can Be Said About Telling More Than We Can Know: On Choice Blindness and Introspection. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):673-692.
    The legacy of Nisbett and Wilson’s classic article, Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes , is mixed. It is perhaps the most cited article in the recent history of consciousness studies, yet no empirical research program currently exists that continues the work presented in the article. To remedy this, we have introduced an experimental paradigm we call choice blindness [Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., & Olsson, A. . Failure to detect mismatches between intention and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. James Moore, Patrick Haggard, Lars Hall, Petter Johansson, Sverker SIKSTRÖM, Betty TÄRNING, Andreas Lind, Cd Frith & Hc Lau (2006). How Something Can Be Said About Telling More Than We Can Know: On Choice Blindness and Introspection. Commentary and Authors' Reply. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sverker Sikström (2006). The Isolation, Primacy, and Recency Effects Predicted by an Adaptive LTD/LTP Threshold in Postsynaptic Cells. Cognitive Science 30 (2):243-275.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Petter Johansson, Lars Hall, Sverker Sikstrom & Andreas Olsson (2005). Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task. Science 310:116-119.
    A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches between intention and outcome, adjust our behavior in the face of error, and adapt to changing circumstances. Is this always the case? We investigated the relation between intention, choice, and introspection. Participants made choices between presented face pairs on the basis of attractiveness, while we covertly manipulated the relationship between choice and outcome that they experienced. Participants failed to notice conspicuous mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Shu-Chen Li, Ulman Lindenberger & Sverker Sikström (2001). Aging Cognition: From Neuromodulation to Representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (11):479-486.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation