9 found
Order:
  1.  2
    Szymon Frankowski (2004). P-Consequence Versus Q-Consequence Operations. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 33 (4):197-207.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  5
    Szymon Frankowski (2009). Bisimulations and P-Morphisms. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 38 (3/4):229-235.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  9
    Szymon Frankowski (2011). Partial and Intuitionistic Logic. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 40 (3/4):179-188.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  6
    Szymon Frankowski (2006). Definable Classes of Many Valued Kripke Frames. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 35 (1):27-36.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  7
    Szymon Frankowski (2007). Pure Strict Implication Logics. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 36 (1/2):59-65.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    Szymon Frankowski (2011). Syntactic Properties of P-Consequence. Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (4):285-295.
    p-consequence is intended as a formalization of non-deductive reasoning. So far semantical or general properties have been presented more thoroughly ([2]–[5]). In the present paper we would like to focus on its syntactic properties.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    Szymon Frankowski (2006). General Approach to Many Valued Kripke Models. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 35 (1):11-26.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  7
    Szymon Frankowski (2008). Plausible Reasoning Expressed by P-Consequence. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 37 (3-4):161-170.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Szymon Frankowski (2010). Biconsequences. Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):353-364.
    p-consequence (plausible consequence; see [2]) allows for a formulation of non-deductive reasonings, i.e., such where the conclusion has weaker justification then assumptions and thus when added to the set of assumptions results in its extension. But theoretical modesty of p-consequence operation does not tell the difference between “good” and “worse” conclusions. Therefore the bisconsequence is introduced.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography