9 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Thomas Adajian [5]Tom Adajian [2]T. Adajian [2]
See also:
Profile: Thomas Adajian (James Madison University)
Profile: Thomas Adajian
  1. T. Adajian (2011). Artistic Judgment: A Framework for Philosophical Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):453-456.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage (2009). Examining the Exam. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. T. Adajian (2008). Subjects and Objects: Art, Essentialism, and Abstraction. British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (3):356-357.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Thomas Adajian, The Definition of Art. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas Adajian (2006). Visual Music: Synaesthesia in Art and Music Since 1900 Edited by Brougher, Kerry, Olivia Mattis, Jeremy Strick, Ari Wiseman and Judith Zilczer. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4):488–489.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas Adajian (2005). On the Prototype Theory of Concepts and the Definition of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (3):231–236.
  7. Thomas Adajian (2003). On the Cluster Account of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
    The cluster account of art is a purportedly non-definitional account of art, inspired by Wittgenstein's notion of family resemblance, and recently defended by Berys Gaut. Gaut does not provide good reasons to think that art is not definable, and his approach to possible counterexamples to the cluster account would, applied consistently, preclude this. The cluster account's theory of error, its resources for accounting for borderline cases, and its heuristic usefulness are not impressive. Reasons strong enough to warrant accepting the cluster (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel (2001). Examining the Exam. Inquiry 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam (1980). Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Thomas Adajian (1999). Arabella Lyon, Intentions: Negotiated, Contested, and Ignored Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 19 (6):432-434.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation