See also:
Profile: T.L. Brink
  1. T. L. Brink (1995). Quantitative and/or Qualitative Methods in the Scientific Study of Religion. Zygon 30 (3):461-475.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. T. L. Brink (1993). Belief Vs. Commitment, Validity Vs. Value: A Response to Ward Goodenough. Zygon 28 (2):283-286.
    . This paper is on Ward Goodenough's recent article , suggesting that his points can be clarified by reiterating the distinction between the realms of meaning and relevance. Religion's “truth” is in the form of its ualue; the “proof” which it requires is uindication; and the resulting “faith” must be understood as commitment.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. T. L. Brink (1984). Elliot S. Valenstein (Ed.): 1980, The Psychosurgery Debate: Scientific, Legal and Ethical Perspectives, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 594 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (3):327-328.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation