Search results for 'T. M. Scanlon Jr' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  44
    Ralph Wedgwood (forthcoming). Review of Being Realistic About Reasons, by T. M. Scanlon. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly.
    This is a review of T. M. Scanlon's book "Being Realistic about Reasons", which is based on the Locke Lectures that Scanlon gave in Oxford in 2009.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Jussi Suikkanen (2011). Intentions, Blame, and Contractualism: A Review of T.M. Scanlon, Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. [REVIEW] Jurisprudence 2 (2):561-573.
    This is a longer critical notice of T.M. Scanlon's book Moral Dimensions. The main crux of the article is to investigate how Scanlon's claims about the moral significance of intentions and reactive attitudes in this book fit with the earlier contractualist ethical theory which he presented in What We Owe to Each Other.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  93
    Jussi Suikkanen (2007). T. M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other. [REVIEW] Utilitas 19 (4):524-526.
    This paper is a short review of T.M. Scanlon's book What We Owe to Each Other. The book itself is already a philosophical classic. It defends a contractualist ethical theory but also has many interesting things to say about reasons, value, well-being, promises, relativism, and so on.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Freeman (eds.) (2011). Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T.M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press Usa.
    For close to forty years now T.M. Scanlon has been one of the most important contributors to moral and political philosophy in the Anglo-American world. Through both his writing and his teaching, he has played a central role in shaping the questions with which research in moral and political philosophy now grapples. Reasons and Recognition brings together fourteen new papers on an array of topics from the many areas to which Scanlon has made path-breaking contributions, each of which (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  59
    R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Richard Freeman (eds.) (2011). Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press.
    Reasons and Recognition brings together fourteen new papers on an array of topics from the many areas to which Scanlon has made path-breaking contributions, ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. Mark Schroeder (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons, by T.M. Scanlon. [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (1):195-198.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. S. Matthew Liao, What We Owe to Each Other by T. M. Scanlon.
    Scanlon’s book aims to offer us a moral theory of right and wrong and of our obligations to one another. The theory is called contractualism and its central claim is that an act is right or wrong if and only if it could or could not be justified to others on grounds that they could not reasonably reject (p. 4). Scanlon recognizes that so stated, his contractualism might seem empty in the sense that one might think that the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  10
    Laura Schroeter & François Schroeter (2015). Review: T. M. Scanlon, Being Realistic About Reasons. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1225-1230.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  6
    James Lenman (2016). Being Realistic About Reasons, T. M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press, 2014, Vii +132 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 32 (1):143-149.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Robert Merrihew Adams (2001). Scanlon's Contractualism: Critical Notice of T. M. Scanlon, "What We Owe to Each Other". Philosophical Review 110 (4):563-586.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  6
    John Skorupski (2015). Being Realistic About Reasons, by T. M. Scanlon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, Vii + 132 Pp. ISBN: 978-0-19-967848-8 Hb £18.99. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 23:e8-e12.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    Review by: Laura Schroeter and François Schroeter (2015). Review: T. M. Scanlon, Being Realistic About Reasons. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1225-1230,.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  43
    Travis Rieder (2010). T. M. Scanlon, Moral Dimensions: Meaning, Permissibility and Blame. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (4):529-533.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  47
    David Copp & David Sobel (2000). What We Owe to Each Other, T. M. Scanlon, the Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998, IX + 420 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):333-378.
  15.  12
    Anton Markoč (2013). Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon, Edited by R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar, and Samuel Freeman. [REVIEW] Mind 122 (488):1208-1213.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  35
    David Sosa (2004). A Big, Good Thing: T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998). Noûs 38 (2):359–377.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  14
    David Sosa (2004). T.M. Scanlon, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1998) A Big, Good Thing. Noûs 38 (2):359-377.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  18
    Nicholas Southwood (2005). The Difficulty of Tolerance, by T. M. Scanlon. Cambridge University Press, 2003, IX + 273 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 21 (2):326-333.
  19.  13
    Paul Weithman (2004). T. M. Scanlon, The Difficulty of Tolerance:The Difficulty of Tolerance. Ethics 114 (4):836-842.
  20.  3
    Martin O'Neill (2013). Symposium on the Political Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon Introduction. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):371-374.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  8
    Laura Schroeter & François Schroeter (2015). Scanlon, T. M.Being Realistic About Reasons.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Pp. 132. $29.92. Ethics 125 (4):1225-1230.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  14
    Erica K. Rangel (2008). Innovation and the Pharmaceutical Industry: Critical Reflections on the Vitures of Profit , H.T. Engelhardt, Jr. And J.R. Garrett (Eds.) (Salem: M & M Scrivener Press, 2008). [REVIEW] HEC Forum 20 (4):375-378.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  8
    D. S. Colman (1948). School Books Alston Hurd Chase and Henry Phillips Jr.: A New Introduction to Greek. Pp. 128. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press (London: Oxford University Press), 1946. Paper, 10s. F. Kinchin Smith and T. W. Melluish: Teach Yourself Greek. Pp. 331. London: Hodder and Stoughton (for the English Universities Press), 1947. Cloth, 4s. 6d. K. C. Masterman: A Latin Word-List. Pp. 3. Melbourne: Macmillan, 1945. Paper, 2s. 6d. K. D. Robinson and R. L. Chambers: The Latin Way. Pp. Xxviii+380 (Many Drawings by Hilary M. Crosse). London: Christophers, 1947. Cloth, 6s. 6d. O. N. Jones: Faciliora Reddenda. Pp. 96. London and Glasgow: Blackie, 1947. Cloth, 2s. I. Williamson: The Friday Afternoon Latin Book. Pp. 79 (Illustrated by Drawings). London and Glasgow: Blackie, 1947. Cloth, 2s. 3d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (3-4):158-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  2
    Maria Letizia Zanier (2001). P.M. Sniderman, P. Peri, R.J.P. De Figueiredo, Jr. E T. Piazza, "The Outsider". Polis 15 (1):158-160.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  84
    Hon-Lam Li (2013). Engelhardt on the Family. International Journal of Chinese and Comparative Philosophy of Medicine (153-160).
    Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. offers erudite and compelling arguments for the view that all families should try to realize the traditional family. Although I tend to agree with him from my personal standpoint, I doubt that this view can be justified to those with whom we are in reasonable disagreement about the family. I make three critical points. First, though Engelhardt stops short of saying that the state should encourage people to form traditonal families, or discourage those who do not, some (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Carina Fourie (2012). What is Social Equality? An Analysis of Status Equality as a Strongly Egalitarian Ideal. Res Publica 18 (2):107-126.
    What kind of equality should we value and why? Current debate centres around whether distributive equality is valuable. However, it is not the only (potentially) morally significant form of equality. David Miller and T. M. Scanlon have emphasised the importance of social equality—a strongly egalitarian notion distinct from distributive equality, and which cannot be reduced to a concern for overall welfare or the welfare of the worst-off. However, as debate tends to focus on distribution, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  27.  64
    Hannah Altehenger, Simon Gaus & Andreas Leonhard Menges (2015). Being Realistic About Reflective Equilibrium. Analysis (3):1-10.
    In Being Realistic About Reasons,T.M. Scanlon develops a non-naturalistic realist account of normative reasons. A crucial part of that account is Scanlon’s contention that there is no deep epistemological problem for non-naturalistic realists, and that the method of reflective equilibrium suffices to explain the possibility of normative knowledge. In this critical notice we argue that this is not so: on a realist picture, normative knowledge presupposes a significant correlation between distinct entities, namely between normative beliefs and normative facts. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  12
    Hon-Lam Li (2015). Contractualism and Punishment. Criminal Justice Ethics 34 (2):177-209.
    T. M. Scanlon’s contractualism is a meta-ethical theory that explains moral motivation and also provides a conception of how to carry out moral deliberation. It supports non-consequentialism – the theory that both consequences and deontological considerations are morally significant in moral deliberation. Regarding the issue of punishment, non-consequentialism allows us to take account of the need for deterrence as well as principles of fairness, justice, and even desert. Moreover, Scanlonian contractualism accounts for permissibility in terms of justifiability: An act (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  32
    Michael Cholbi (2014). Luck, Blame, and Desert. Philosophical Studies 169 (2):313-332.
    T.M. Scanlon has recently proposed what I term a ‘double attitude’ account of blame, wherein blame is the revision of one’s attitudes in light of another person’s conduct, conduct that we believe reveals that the individual lacks the normative attitudes we judge essential to our relationship with her. Scanlon proposes that this account justifies differences in blame that in turn reflect differences in outcome luck. Here I argue that although the double attitude account can justify blame’s being sensitive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  92
    S. Matthew Liao (2010). The Buck-Passing Account of Value: Lessons From Crisp. Philosophical Studies 151 (3):421 - 432.
    T. M. Scanlon's buck-passing account of value (BPA) has been subjected to a barrage of criticisms. Recently, to be helpful to BPA, Roger Crisp has suggested that a number of these criticisms can be met if one makes some revisions to BPA. In this paper, I argue that if advocates of the buck-passing account accepted these revisions, they would effectively be giving up the buck-passing account as it is typically understood, that is, as an account concerned with the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Hon-Lam Li (2013). Engelhardt on the Family. International Journal of Chinese and Comparative Philosophy of Medicine (153-160).
    Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. offers erudite and compelling arguments for the view that all families should try to realize the traditional family. Although I tend to agree with him from my personal standpoint, I doubt that this view can be justified to those with whom we are in reasonable disagreement about the family. I make three critical points. First, though Engelhardt stops short of saying that the state should encourage people to form traditonal families, or discourage those who do not, some (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  45
    T. M. Scanlon (2014). Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford University Press.
    Is what we have reason to do a matter of fact? If so, what kind of truth is involved, how can we know it, and how do reasons motivate and explain action? In this concise and lucid book T. M. Scanlon offers answers, with a qualified defense of normative cognitivism--the view that there are normative truths about reasons for action.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   24 citations  
  33. Michael Otsuka (2000). Scanlon and the Claims of the Many Versus the One. Analysis 60 (3):288–293.
    In "What We Owe to Each Other", T. M. Scanlon argues that one should save the greater number when faced with the choice between saving one life and two or more different lives. It is, Scanlon claims, a virtue of this argument that it does not appeal to the claims of groups of individuals but only to the claims of individuals. I demonstrate that this argument for saving the greater number, indeed, depends, contrary to what Scanlon says, (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  34. T. M. Scanlon Jr (1986). Equality of Resources and Equality of Welfare: A Forced Marriage? Ethics 97 (1):111-118.
  35. Pamela Hieronymi (2011). Of Metaethics and Motivation: The Appeal of Contractualism. In R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Richard Freeman (eds.), Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press
    In 1982, when T. M. Scanlon published “Contractualism and Utilitarianism,” he noted that, despite the widespread attention to Rawls’ A Theory of Justice, the appeal of contractualism as a moral theory had been under appreciated. In particular, the appeal of contractualism’s account of what he then called “moral motivation” had been under appreciated.1 It seems to me that, in the intervening quarter century, despite the widespread discussion of Scanlon’s work, the appeal of contractualism, in precisely this regard, has (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. T. M. Scanlon (2016). Being Realistic About Reasons. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Is what we have reason to do a matter of fact? If so, what kind of truth is involved, how can we know it, and how do reasons motivate and explain action? In this concise and lucid book T. M. Scanlon offers answers, with a qualified defense of normative cognitivism--the view that there are normative truths about reasons for action.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Margaret Gilbert, Andrew Mason, Elizabeth S. Anderson, J. David Velleman, Matthew H. Kramer, Michele M. Moody‐Adams & Martha C. Nussbaum (1999). 10. Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr., On Race and Philosophy Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr., On Race and Philosophy (Pp. 454-456). Ethics 109 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  38.  2
    R. M. Byrn (1978). The Antelope. By John T. Noonan, Jr. Berkeley: University of California Press. American Journal of Jurisprudence 23 (1):237-242.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. George T. Dennis (1985). Walter Emil Kaegi Jr., Byzantine Military Unrest, 471–843: An Interpretation. Amsterdam: Adolf M. Hakkert, 1981. Paper. Pp. Xii, 373. [REVIEW] Speculum 60 (1):164-165.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  31
    S. Matthew Liao (2012). Intentions and Moral Permissibility: The Case of Acting Permissibly with Bad Intentions. Law and Philosophy 31 (6):703-724.
    Many people believe in the intention principle, according to which an agent’s intention in performing an act can sometimes make an act that would otherwise have been permissible impermissible, other things being equal. Judith Jarvis Thomson, Frances Kamm and Thomas Scanlon have offered cases that seem to show that it can be permissible for an agent to act even when the agent has bad intentions. If valid, these cases would seem to cast doubt on the intention principle. In this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. T. M. P. Mahadevan & Hywel David Lewis (eds.) (1976). Philosophy, East and West: Essays in Honour of Dr. T. M. P. Mahadevan. Blackie & Son (India).
    Bhattacharyya, K. The Advaita concept of subjectivity.--Deutsch, E. Reflections on some aspects of the theory of rasa.--Nakamura, H. The dawn of modern thought in the East.--Organ, T. Causality, Indian and Greek.--Chatterjee, M. On types of classification.--Lacombe, O. Transcendental imagination.--Bahm, A. J. Standards for comparative philosophy.--Herring, H. Appearance, its significance and meaning in the history of philosophy.--Chang Chung-yuan. Pre-rational harmony in Heidegger's essential thinking and Chʼan thought.--Staal, J. F. Making sense of the Buddhist tetralemma.--Enomiya-Lassalle, H. M. The mysticism of Carl Albrecht (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  58
    T. M. Scanlon, The Diversity of Objections to Inequality.
    This is the text of The Lindley Lecture for 1996, given by T.M. Scanlon, an American philosopher.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  43. John Martin Fischer (2008). Responsibility and the Kinds of Freedom. Journal of Ethics 12 (3/4):203 - 228.
    In this paper I seek to identify different sorts of freedom putatively linked to moral responsibility; I then explore the relationship between such notions of freedom and the Consequence Argument, on the one hand, and the Frankfurt-examples, on the other. I focus (in part) on a dilemma: if a compatibilist adopts a broadly speaking "conditional" understanding of freedom in reply to the Consequence Argument, such a theorist becomes vulnerable in a salient way to the Frankfurt-examples.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44. T. M. Scanlon (2003). The Difficulty of Tolerance Essays in Political Philosophy. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    These essays in political philosophy by T. M. Scanlon, written between 1969 and 1999, examine the standards by which social and political institutions should be justified and appraised. Scanlon explains how the powers of just institutions are limited by rights such as freedom of expression, and considers why these limits should be respected even when it seems that better results could be achieved by violating them. Other topics which are explored include voluntariness and consent, freedom of expression, tolerance, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  45.  85
    T. M. Scanlon (2000). Intention and Permissibility, I. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (1):301–317.
    [T. M. Scanlon] It is clearly impermissible to kill one person because his organs can be used to save five others who are in need of transplants. It has seemed to many that the explanation for this lies in the fact that in such cases we would be intending the death of the person whom we killed, or failed to save. What makes these actions impermissible, however, is not the agent's intention but rather the fact that the benefit envisaged (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  46.  56
    Pamela Bjorklund (2004). 'There but for the Grace of God': Moral Responsibility and Mental Illness. Nursing Philosophy 5 (3):188-200.
  47.  1
    J. van Oosterhout, Ben Wempe & Theo van Willigenburg (2004). Rethinking Organizational Ethics: A Plea for Pluralism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):385-393.
    This paper challenges a pervasive, if not always explicit assumption of the present state of theorising in business ethics. This is the idea that a workable theory of organizational ethics must provide a unified perspective on its subject matter. In this paper we will sketch the broad outlines of an alternative understanding of business ethics, which focuses on constraints on corporate conduct that cannot reasonably be rejected. These constraints stem from at least three different levels or spheres of social reality, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. T. M. Scanlon (2003). The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    These essays in political philosophy by T. M. Scanlon, written between 1969 and 1999, examine the standards by which social and political institutions should be justified and appraised. Scanlon explains how the powers of just institutions are limited by rights such as freedom of expression, and considers why these limits should be respected even when it seems that better results could be achieved by violating them. Other topics which are explored include voluntariness and consent, freedom of expression, tolerance, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  6
    T. M. Scanlon (2013). Responsibility and the Value of Choice. Think 12 (33):9-16.
    Research Articles T. M. Scanlon, Think, FirstView Article.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  36
    T. M. Scanlon (2013). Responsibility and the Value of Choice. Think 12 (33):9-16.
    Research Articles T. M. Scanlon, Think, FirstView Article.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000