Search results for 'Takeo Sugihara' (try it on Scholar)

11 found
Sort by:
  1. Takeo Sugihara (1962). The Number of Modalities in T Supplemented by the Axiom CL2pL3p. Journal of Symbolic Logic 27 (4):407 - 408.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Takeo Sugihara (1970). Temporal Truth-Function. Kagaku Tetsugaku 3:15-26.score: 120.0
  3. W. J. Blok & W. Dziobiak (1986). On the Lattice of Quasivarieties of Sugihara Algebras. Studia Logica 45 (3):275 - 280.score: 12.0
    Let S denote the variety of Sugihara algebras. We prove that the lattice (K) of subquasivarieties of a given quasivariety K S is finite if and only if K is generated by a finite set of finite algebras. This settles a conjecture by Tokarz [6]. We also show that the lattice (S) is not modular.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Chris Mortensen (1982). Model Structures and Set Algebras for Sugihara Matrices. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (1):85-90.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marek Tokarz (1975). Functions Definable in Sugihara Algebras and Their Fragments (I). Studia Logica 34 (4):295 - 304.score: 9.0
  6. Marek Tokarz (1976). Functions Definable in Sugihara Algebras and Their Fragments. II. Studia Logica 35 (3):279 - 283.score: 9.0
  7. Takeo Oku (2005). A Study on Consciousness and Life Energy Based on Quantum Holographic Cosmology. Journal of International Society of Life Information Science 23 (1):133-143.score: 3.0
  8. Takeo Iwasaki (1956). Contemporary Japanese Moral Philosophy. Philosophy East and West 6 (1):69-75.score: 3.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. W. J. Blok & J. G. Raftery (2004). Fragments of R-Mingle. Studia Logica 78 (1-2):59 - 106.score: 3.0
    The logic RM and its basic fragments (always with implication) are considered here as entire consequence relations, rather than as sets of theorems. A new observation made here is that the disjunction of RM is definable in terms of its other positive propositional connectives, unlike that of R. The basic fragments of RM therefore fall naturally into two classes, according to whether disjunction is or is not definable. In the equivalent quasivariety semantics of these fragments, which consist of subreducts of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. Czelakowski & W. Dziobiak (1999). Deduction Theorems Within RM and its Extensions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (1):279-290.score: 3.0
    In [13], M. Tokarz specified some infinite family of consequence operations among all ones associated with the relevant logic RM or with the extensions of RM and proved that each of them admits a deduction theorem scheme. In this paper, we show that the family is complete in a sense that if C is a consequence operation with C RM ≤ C and C admits a deduction theorem scheme, then C is equal to a consequence operation specified in [13]. In (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Marek Tokarz (1979). Deduction Theorems for RM and its Extensions. Studia Logica 38 (2):105 - 111.score: 3.0
    In this paper logics defined by finite Sugihara matrices, as well as RM itself, are discussed both in their matrix (semantical) and in syntactical version. For each such a logic a deduction theorem is proved, and a few applications are given.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation