52 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Ted A. Warfield [52]Ted Alan Warfield [1]
  1.  80
    Ted A. Warfield (2005). Knowledge From Falsehood. Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):405–416.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  2. Alicia Finch & Ted A. Warfield (1998). The Mind Argument and Libertarianism. Mind 107 (427):515-28.
    Many critics of libertarian freedom have charged that freedom is incompatible with indeterminism. We show that the strongest argument that has been provided for this claim is invalid. The invalidity of the argument in question, however, implies the invalidity of the standard Consequence argument for the incompatibility of freedom and determinism. We show how to repair the Consequence argument and argue that no similar improvement will revive the worry about the compatibility of indeterminism and freedom.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  3.  69
    Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield (1994). What Price Coherence? Analysis 54 (3):129 - 132.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  4. Marian David & Ted A. Warfield (2008). Knowledge-Closure and Skepticism. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press
  5.  77
    Ted A. Warfield (2000). Causal Determinism and Human Freedom Are Incompatible: A New Argument for Incompatibilism. Philosophical Perspectives 14 (s14):167-180.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  6. Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (1999). Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. Oxford University Press.
    Recently, new life has been breathed into the ancient philosophical topic of skepticism. The subject of some of the best and most provocative work in contemporary philosophy, skepticism has been addressed not only by top epistemologists but also by several of the world's finest philosophers who are most known for their work in other areas of the discipline. Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader brings together the most important recent contributions to the discussion of skepticism. Covering major approaches to the skeptical problem, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  7. Ted A. Warfield (2004). When Epistemic Closure Does and Does Not Fail: A Lesson From the History of Epistemology. Analysis 64 (281):35–41.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  8. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304–316.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  9.  83
    Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield (1996). No Help for the Coherentist. Analysis 56 (2):118–121.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  10.  86
    E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield (2005). Deliberation and Metaphysical Freedom. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):25-44.
  11.  43
    Ted A. Warfield (1992). Privileged Self-Knowledge and Externalism Are Compatible. Analysis 52 (4):232-37.
    I argue that externalism about mental content is consistent with the thesis that individuals need not investigate their environment to come to know the contents of their thoughts. In particular, externalism is consistent with the thesis that we come to know the contents of our thoughts on the basis of introspection.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  12.  17
    Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Jaegwon Kim, Mind in a Physical World. Noûs 35 (2):304-316.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13.  77
    Ted A. Warfield (1997). Externalism, Privileged Self-Knowledge, and the Irrelevance of Slow Switching. Analysis 57 (4):282-84.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  14. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-185.
    Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of theConsequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument’s central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  19
    Ted A. Warfield (1996). Determinism and Moral Responsiblity Are Incompatible. Philosophical Topics 24 (2):215-26.
  16.  41
    E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield (2007). Alfred Mele's Metaphysical Freedom? Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):185 – 194.
    In this paper we raise three questions of clarification about Alfred Mele's fine recent book, Free Will and Luck. Our questions concern the following topics: (i) Mele's combination of 'luck' and 'Frankfurt-style' objections to libertarianism, (ii) Mele's stipulations about 'compatibilism' and the relation between questions about free action and questions about moral responsibility, and (iii) Mele's treatment of the Consequence Argument.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  95
    Ted A. Warfield (1993). On a Semantic Argument Against Conceptual Role Semantics. Analysis 53 (4):298-304.
  18.  31
    Ted A. Warfield (forthcoming). Deductive Closure and Relevant Alternatives. Southwest Philosophical Studies.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  17
    Ted A. Warfield (1999). Against Representational Theories of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (1):66-69.
    In recent years, the primary focus of many philosophers of mind has shifted to consciousness. And a growing number of philosophers, attempting to exploit some of the advances of the previous decade's work on intentionality, are advocating representational theories of consciousness. Representationalists have spent much time defending their characteristic thesis and have devoted much effort to some of the peculiar problems facing theories of consciousness . They have expended precious little energy answering more basic questions like ‘What makes a conscious (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  20
    Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173 - 184.
    Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of theConsequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument’s central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  40
    Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (1995). Reply to Clark and Smolensky: Do Connectionist Minds Have Beliefs? In C. Macdonald & Graham F. Macdonald (eds.), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Blackwell
  22.  94
    Ted A. Warfield (2005). Tyler Burge's Self-Knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):169-178.
    The question of whether externalism about mental content is compatible with privileged access is a question of ongoing concern within philosophy of mind. Some philosophers think that Tyler Burge's early work on what he calls "basic self-knowledge" shows that externalism and privileged access are compatible. I critically assess this claim, arguing that Burge's work does not establish the compatbility thesis.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  71
    Ted A. Warfield (1993). Folk-Psychological Ceteris-Paribus Laws. Philosophical Studies 71 (1):99-112.
  24.  22
    Ted A. Warfield (1998). A Priori Knowledge of the World: Knowing the World by Knowing Our Minds. Philosophical Studies 92 (1/2):127 - 147.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  77
    Ted A. Warfield (1997). Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom Are Compatible. Noûs 31 (1):80-86.
  26.  67
    Ted A. Warfield (1999). Searle's Causal Powers. Analysis 59 (1):29-32.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2003). Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  20
    Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2003). The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
  29. Ted A. Warfield & Stephen P. Stich (eds.) (2003). Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  33
    Ted A. Warfield (1994). Fodorian Semantics: A Reply to Adams and Aizawa. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 4 (2):205-14.
    In a recent article in this journal (Adams and Aizawa 1992), Fred Adams and Ken Aizawa argued that Jerry Fodor's proposed naturalistic sufficient condition for meaning is unsatisfactory. In this paper, I respond to Adams and Aizawa, noting that (1) they have overestimated the importance of their “pathologies” objection, perhaps as a consequence of misunderstanding Fodor's asymmetric dependency condition, (2) they have misunderstood Fodor's asymmetric dependency condition in formulating their Twin Earth objection, and (3) they have, in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  31
    Ted A. Warfield (1995). Knowing the World and Knowing Our Minds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):525-545.
  32. Ted A. Warfield (2007). I. Two Debates and the Freedom/Responsibility Argument. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 3:283.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  11
    Ted A. Warfield (2007). 10. Metaphysical Compatibilism's Appropriation of Frankfurt. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 3:283.
  34.  23
    Ted A. Warfield & Alicia Finch (1999). Fatalism: Logical and Theological. Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):233-238.
    The logical fatalist holds that the past truth of future tense propositions is incompatible with libertarian freedom. The theological fatalist holds that the combination of God’s past beliefs with His essential omniscience is incompatible with libertarian freedom. There is an ongoing dispute over the relation between these two kinds of fatalism: some philosophers believe that the problems are equivalent while others believe that the theological problem is more difficult. We offer a diagnosis of this dispute showing that one’s view of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  7
    Ted A. Warfield (1999). Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky, Eds., Readings in Language and Mind. Minds and Machines 9 (2):290-293.
  36.  17
    Ted A. Warfield (2000). On Freedom and Foreknowledge. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
    William Hasker and Anthony Brueckner have critically discussed my argument for the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. I reply to their commentaries.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  14
    Ted A. Warfield (2000). ``On Freedom and Foreknowledge: A Reply to Two Critics&Quot. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
    William Hasker and Anthony Brueckner have critically discussed my argument for the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. I reply to their commentaries.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  11
    Ted A. Warfield (1997). The Metaphysics of Free Will. Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):261-265.
  39.  12
    Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Review: Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304 - 316.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  12
    Eric A. Weiss, Justin Leiber, Judith Felson Duchan, Mallory Selfridge, Eric Dietrich, Peter A. Facione, Timothy Joseph Day, Johan M. Lammens, Andrew Feenberg, Deborah G. Johnson, Daniel S. Levine & Ted A. Warfield (1995). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 5 (1):109-155.
  41. Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2010). Disputing About Taste. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2002). Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
  43. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (2008). The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (2008). The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (2003). The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (2003). The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Ted A. Warfield (2000). Causal Determinism and Human Freedom Are Incompatible: A New Argument for Incompatibilism. Noûs 34 (s14):167-180.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Ted A. Warfield (2006). Kompatybilizm i inkompatybilizm: wybrane argumenty. Roczniki Filozoficzne 54 (1):217-240.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Ted A. Warfield (2009). Ockhamism and Molinism -- Foreknowledge and Prophecy. In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 2. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Ted A. Warfield (2013). Ockhamizm a molinizm: przedwiedza i proroctwo. Roczniki Filozoficzne 61 (1).
    przeł. Małgorzata Polanowska i Marcin Iwanicki.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 52