25 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Thomas M. Crisp [16]Thomas Crisp [9]Thomas Michael Crisp [1]
  1. Thomas M. Crisp (2007). Presentism and the Grounding Objection. Noûs 41 (1):90–109.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   39 citations  
  2. Thomas M. Crisp (2003). Presentism. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  3.  41
    Thomas Crisp (2004). On Presentism and Triviality. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:15-20.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  4.  98
    Thomas Crisp (2004). Reply to Ludlow. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 1:37-46.
  5.  67
    Thomas M. Crisp (2005). Presentism and "Cross-Time" Relations. American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):5 - 17.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  6. Thomas M. Crisp (forthcoming). 2. Symposium: Defining Presentism. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Thomas M. Crisp (2010). A Dilemma for Internalism? Synthese 174 (3):355 - 366.
    Internalism about epistemic justification (henceforth, ‘internalism’) says that a belief B is epistemically justified for S only if S is aware of some good-making feature of B, some feature that makes for B’s having positive epistemic status: e.g., evidence for B. Externalists with respect to epistemic justification (‘externalists’) deny this awareness requirement. Michael Bergmann has recently put this dilemma against internalism: awareness admits of a strong and a weak construal; given the strong construal, internalism is subject to debilitating regress troubles; (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  8. Thomas M. Crisp & Donald P. Smith (2005). 'Wholly Present' Defined. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):318–344.
    Three-dimensionalists , sometimes referred to as endurantists, think that objects persist through time by being “wholly present” at every time they exist. But what is it for something to be wholly present at a time? It is surprisingly difficult to say. The threedimensionalist is free, of course, to take ‘is wholly present at’ as one of her theory’s primitives, but this is problematic for at least one reason: some philosophers claim not to understand her primitive. Clearly the three-dimensionalist would be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  9. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304–316.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  10.  16
    Thomas M. Crisp (2013). On Coercion, Love, and Horrors. Religious Studies 49 (2):165-179.
    In this article, I explain and critique J. L. Schellenberg's atheological argument from horrors. I raise an epistemic objection, arguing that no one could be justified in believing its conclusion on the basis of its premises. Then I adumbrate a notion of the divine which is different in various ways from the God of classical theism and argue that Schellenberg's argument makes no trouble for belief in the existence of God so construed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  17
    Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Jaegwon Kim, Mind in a Physical World. Noûs 35 (2):304-316.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  12. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-185.
    Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of theConsequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument’s central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13. Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson & David Vander Laan (eds.) (2006). Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Springer.
    This volume comprises essays presented to Alvin Plantinga on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14. St Augustine, John Bigelow, Craig Bourne, William Lane Craig, Thomas Crisp, Matthew Davidson, Rafael De Clercq, M. Oreste Fiocco, Mark Hinchliff, Simon Keller, J. M. E. McTaggart, Trenton Merricks, Ulrich Meyer, Arthur Prior, Hilary Putnam & Dean Zimmerman (2010). Presentism: Essential Readings. Lexington Books.
    Presentism: Essential Readings contains writings—classic and contemporary—that acquaint the reader with different versions of presentism, standard philosophical and scientific objections to presentism, and their attempted solutions. Detailed introductions to each part of the book make the discussions accessible to students and those unfamiliar with this fascinating and controversial philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  67
    Thomas M. Crisp (2005). Hawthorne on Knowledge and Practical Reasoning. Analysis 65 (286):138–140.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  96
    Thomas M. Crisp (2000). Gettier and Plantinga's Revised Account of Warrant. Analysis 60 (265):42–50.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Thomas M. Crisp (2011). An Evolutionary Objection to the Argument From Evil. In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  28
    Thomas Crisp (2005). Review of L. Nathan Oaklander, The Ontology of Time. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Thomas Crisp (1999). On Divine Foreknowledge and Newcomb’s Paradox. Philosophia Christi 1 (2):33-44.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  37
    Thomas Crisp (2006). Review of Kit Fine, Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2006 (8).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Thomas M. Crisp (2009). On Believing That the Scriptures Are Divinely Inspired. In Oliver D. Crisp & Michael C. Rea (eds.), Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford Up 187--213.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  12
    Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Review: Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304 - 316.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Thomas Crisp (1694). Animadversions on George Whitehead's Book, Falsly Stiled Innocency Triumphant. Wherein He, and His Abettors, Are Proved Guilty of Contempt of the Person of Our Blessed Saviour, the Holy Scriptures, and Governours, Perverseness and Falshood. Also George Whitehead's Charge of Sedition, Malice, and Impudence, on F.B. Proved on Himself and Abettors. [REVIEW] Printed for John Dunton, at the Raven in the Poultrey.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Thomas Crisp (2003). Book Review. [REVIEW] Philosophia Christi 5 (1):304-307.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Thomas Crisp (1987). The Men for the Age a Lecture Delivered Before the Halifax Young Men's Christian Association on Tuesday Evening, December 20, 1859.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography