12 found
Order:
  1.  3
    Mark P. Holden, Nora S. Newcombe & Thomas F. Shipley (2013). Location Memory in the Real World: Category Adjustment Effects in 3-Dimensional Space. Cognition 128 (1):45-55.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  1
    Evan M. Palmer, Philip J. Kellman & Thomas F. Shipley (2006). A Theory of Dynamic Occluded and Illusory Object Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (4):513-541.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  2
    Ilyse Resnick, Nora S. Newcombe & Thomas F. Shipley (2016). Dealing with Big Numbers: Representation and Understanding of Magnitudes Outside of Human Experience. Cognitive Science 40 (8).
    Being able to estimate quantity is important in everyday life and for success in the STEM disciplines. However, people have difficulty reasoning about magnitudes outside of human perception. This study examines patterns of estimation errors across temporal and spatial magnitudes at large scales. We evaluated the effectiveness of hierarchical alignment in improving estimations, and transfer across dimensions. The activity was successful in increasing accuracy for temporal and spatial magnitudes, and learning transferred to the estimation of numeric magnitudes associated with events (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Thomas F. Shipley & Philip J. Kellman (1994). Spatiotemporal Boundary Formation: Boundary, Form, and Motion Perception From Transformations of Surface Elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123 (1):3-20.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  5
    Mark P. Holden, Nora S. Newcombe, Ilyse Resnick & Thomas F. Shipley (2016). Seeing Like a Geologist: Bayesian Use of Expert Categories in Location Memory. Cognitive Science 40 (2):440-454.
    Memory for spatial location is typically biased, with errors trending toward the center of a surrounding region. According to the category adjustment model, this bias reflects the optimal, Bayesian combination of fine-grained and categorical representations of a location. However, there is disagreement about whether categories are malleable. For instance, can categories be redefined based on expert-level conceptual knowledge? Furthermore, if expert knowledge is used, does it dominate other information sources, or is it used adaptively so as to minimize overall error, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Thomas F. Shipley (1998). Spatiotemporal Unit Formation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):772-772.
    Findings in dynamic unit formation suggest that completion processes reflect the optics of our world. Dynamic unit formation may depend on patterns of motion signals that are consistent with the causes of optical changes. In addition, dynamic completion conforms to a local curvature minimization constraint. Such relational aspects of vision are important to consider in linking perceptual experience and neural activity.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Nora S. Newcombe, Steven M. Weisberg, Kinnari Atit, Matthew E. Jacovina, Carol J. Ormand & Thomas F. Shipley (2015). The Lay of the Land: Sensing and Representing Topography. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 10 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Kristin M. Gagnier, Kinnari Atit, Carol J. Ormand & Thomas F. Shipley (2016). Comprehending 3D Diagrams: Sketching to Support Spatial Reasoning. Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (3).
    Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines commonly illustrate 3D relationships in diagrams, yet these are often challenging for students. Failing to understand diagrams can hinder success in STEM because scientific practice requires understanding and creating diagrammatic representations. We explore a new approach to improving student understanding of diagrams that convey 3D relations that is based on students generating their own predictive diagrams. Participants' comprehension of 3D spatial diagrams was measured in a pre- and post-design where students selected the correct 2D (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Philip J. Kellman, Patrick Garrigan, Thomas F. Shipley & Brian P. Keane (2007). Interpolation Processes in Object Perception: Reply to Anderson. Psychological Review 114 (2):488-502.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Philip J. Kellman, Patrick Garrigan & Thomas F. Shipley (2005). Object Interpolation in Three Dimensions. Psychological Review 112 (3):586-609.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Philip J. Kellman, Patrick Garrigan, Thomas F. Shipley & Brian P. Keane (2007). Postscript: Identity and Constraints in Models of Object Formation. Psychological Review 114 (2):502-508.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Thomas F. Shipley & Jeff Zacks (eds.) (2008). Understanding Events: From Perception to Action. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography