6 found
Sort by:
  1. Thomas J. Nenon (2013). Martin Heidegger and Grounding of Ethics. In Lester Embree & Thomas Nenon (eds.), Husserl’s Ideen. Springer. 177--193.
  2. Thomas J. Nenon (2008). Some Differences Between Kant's and Husserl's Conceptions of Transcendental Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):427-439.
    This article compares the differences between Kant’s and Husserl’s conceptions of the “transcendental.” It argues that, for Kant, the term “transcendental” stands for what is otherwise called “metaphysical,” i.e. non-empirical knowledge. As opposed to his predecessors, who had believed that such non-empirical knowledge was possible for meta-physical, i.e. transcendent objects, Kant’s contribution was to show how there can be non-empirical (a priori) knowledge not about transcendent objects, but about the necessary conditions for the experience of natural, non-transcendent objects. Hence the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Thomas J. Nenon (1994). Connectionism and Phenomenology. In Mano Daniel & Lester E. Embree (eds.), Phenomenology of the Cultural Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 115--133.
  4. Thomas J. Nenon (1994). Phenomenology of the Cultural Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas J. Nenon (1990). Which Beings Are Exemplary? Comments on Charles Guignon's “Truth as Disclosure: Art, Language, History”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1):121-126.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas J. Nenon (1990). Which Beings Are Exemplary? Southern Journal of Philosophy 28:121-126.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation