7 found
Sort by:
  1. Thomas J. Nenon (2013). Martin Heidegger and Grounding of Ethics. In Lester Embree & Thomas Nenon (eds.), Husserl’s Ideen. Springer. 177--193.
  2. Thomas J. Nenon (2008). Some Differences Between Kant's and Husserl's Conceptions of Transcendental Philosophy. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):427-439.
    This article compares the differences between Kant’s and Husserl’s conceptions of the “transcendental.” It argues that, for Kant, the term “transcendental” stands for what is otherwise called “metaphysical,” i.e. non-empirical knowledge. As opposed to his predecessors, who had believed that such non-empirical knowledge was possible for meta-physical, i.e. transcendent objects, Kant’s contribution was to show how there can be non-empirical (a priori) knowledge not about transcendent objects, but about the necessary conditions for the experience of natural, non-transcendent objects. Hence the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Thomas J. Nenon (1994). Connectionism and Phenomenology. In Mano Daniel & Lester E. Embree (eds.), Phenomenology of the Cultural Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 115--133.
  4. Thomas J. Nenon (1994). Phenomenology of the Cultural Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas J. Nenon (1990). Spindel Conference 1989 Heidegger and Praxis. Dept. Of Philosophy, Memphis State University.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas J. Nenon (1990). Which Beings Are Exemplary? Comments on Charles Guignon's “Truth as Disclosure: Art, Language, History”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (S1):121-126.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Thomas J. Nenon (1990). Which Beings Are Exemplary? Southern Journal of Philosophy 28:121-126.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation