Search results for 'Thomas L. Beauchamp' (try it on Scholar)

171 found
Sort by:
  1. Tom L. Beauchamp (1994). Principles of Biomedical Ethics / Tom L. Beauchamp, James F. Childress. Oxford University Press.score: 540.0
    This is an extremely thorough revision of the leading textbook of bioethics. The authors have made many improvements in style, organization, argument and content. These changes reflect advances in the bioethics literature over the past five years. The most dramatic expansions of the text are in the comprehensiveness with which the authors treat different currents in ethical theory and the greater breadth and depth of their discussion of public policy and public health issues. In every chapter, readers will find new (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Toml Beauchamp (forthcoming). Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics.score: 450.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John T. Potts, Roger C. Herdman, Thomas L. Beauchamp & John A. Robertson (1998). Commentary: Clear Thinking and Open Discussion Guide IOM's Report on Organ Donation. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (2):166-168.score: 290.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Tom L. Beauchamp & Thomas A. Mappes (1975). Is Hume Really a Sceptic About Induction? American Philosophical Quarterly 12 (2):119 - 129.score: 270.0
  5. Thomas Aquinas, J. E. Aubert, Urs Novartis Baerlocher, Bai Xincai, P. Baldinger, Bao Zonghao, T. L. Beauchamp, G. S. Becker, D. Bell & G. Benston (2006). Engels, F. 71 Esteban, R 79 Etzioni, A. 189,266 Evan, W M. 259 Fastow, A. 167,168. In Xiaohe Lu & Georges Enderle (eds.), Developing Business Ethics in China. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 270.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Tom L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (eds.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press.score: 260.0
    Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp and R.G. Frey.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.) (2006). David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition. Clarendon Press.score: 260.0
    David Hume (1711-1776) is one of the greatest of philosophers. Today he probably ranks highest of all British philosophers in terms of influence and philosophical standing. His philosophical work ranges across morals, the mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics; he had broad interests not only in philosophy as it is now conceived but in history, politics, economics, religion, and the arts. He was a master of English prose. -/- about the Clarendon Hume Edition: -/- The Clarendon Hume will include all of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.) (2006). David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals: A Critical Edition. Clarendon Press.score: 260.0
    About Hume David Hume (1711-1776) is one of the greatest of philosophers. Today he probably ranks highest of all British philosophers in terms of influence and philosophical standing. His philosophical work ranges across morals, the mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics; he had broad interests not only in philosophy as it is now conceived but in history, politics, economics, religion, and the arts. He was a master of English prose. -/- The Clarendon Hume Edition General Editors: Professor T. L. Beauchamp, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stephen Francis Barker & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.) (1976). Thomas Reid: Critical Interpretations. University City Science Center.score: 210.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Tom L. Beauchamp (2010). Standing on Principles: Collected Essays. Oxford University Press.score: 150.0
    This volume will collect Tom Beauchamp's 15 most important published articles in bioethics, most of which were published over the last 25 years, and most of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Tom L. Beauchamp (1987). Problèmes Philosophiques de la Répartition des Ressources Médicales. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 92 (3):293 - 306.score: 150.0
    L'actuel débat sur l'« égalité face aux soins » et le « droit aux soins » est la conséquence directe des progrès techniques réalisés dans le domaine de la santé, mais il reste encore à fonder rationnellement les politiques suivies en la matière et à formuler une théorie adéquate de la justice distributive. Le présent article analyse le rôle et le statut du droit aux soins, ainsi que les considérations tenant à la justice qui vont à rencontre de la rentabilité (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Tom L. Beauchamp (2001). Philosophical Ethics: An Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Mcgraw-Hill.score: 150.0
    This accessible overview of classical and modern moral theory with short readings provides comprehensive coverage of ethics and unique coverage of rights, justice, liberty and law. Real-life cases introduce each chapter. While the book's content is theoretical rather than applied ethics, Beauchamp consistently applies the theories to practical moral problems. Aristotle, Hume, Kant, and Mill are at the book;s core and they are placed in the context of moral philosophical controversies of the last 30 years. In this edition one-third (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ruth Faden & Tom Beauchamp (forthcoming). El Concepto de Consentimiento Informado. Beauchamp T. And Walters L., Contemporary Issues in Bioethics, Dickenson Publishing Company, Usa.score: 150.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Tom L. Beauchamp (1998). In Defense of Affirmative Action. Journal of Ethics 2 (2):143-158.score: 120.0
    Affirmative action refers to positive steps taken to hire persons from groups previously and presently discriminated against. Considerable evidence indicates that this discrimination is intractable and cannot be eliminated by the enforcement of laws. Numerical goals and quotas are justified if and only if they are necessary to overcome the discriminatory effects that could not otherwise be eliminated with reasonable efficiency. Many past as well as present policies are justified in this way.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Tom L. Beauchamp (1997). Opposing Views on Animal Experimentation: Do Animals Have Rights? Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):113 – 121.score: 120.0
    Animals have moral standing; that is, they have properties (including the ability to feel pain) that qualify them for the protections of morality. It follows from this that humans have moral obligations toward animals, and because rights are logically correlative to obligations, animals have rights.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Tom L. Beauchamp (1999). The Failure of Theories of Personhood. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):309-324.score: 120.0
    : The belief persists in philosophy, religion, science, and popular culture that some special cognitive property of persons like self-consciousness confers a unique moral standing. However, no set of cognitive properties confers moral standing, and metaphysical personhood is not sufficient for either moral personhood or moral standing. Cognitive theories all fail to capture the depth of commitments embedded in using the language of "person." It is more assumed than demonstrated in these theories that nonhuman animals lack a relevant form of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Tom L. Beauchamp (2003). A Defense of the Common Morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):259-274.score: 120.0
    : Phenomena of moral conflict and disagreement have led writers in ethics to two antithetical conclusions: Either valid moral distinctions hold universally or they hold relative to a particular and contingent moral framework, and so cannot be applied with universal validly. Responding to three articles in this issue of the Journal that criticize his previously published views on the common morality, the author maintains that one can consistently deny universality to some justified moral norms and claim universality for others. Universality (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Tom L. Beauchamp (1999). Hume on the Nonhuman Animal. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):322 – 335.score: 120.0
    Hume wrote about fundamental similarities and dissimilarities between human and nonhuman animals. His work was centered on the cognitive and emotional lives of animals, rather than their moral or legal standing, but his theories have implications for issues of moral standing. The historical background of these controversies reaches to ancient philosophy and to several prominent figures in early modern philosophy. Hume develops several of the themes in this literature. His underlying method is analogical arg ument and his conclusions are generally (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Tom L. Beauchamp & Yashar Saghai (2012). The Historical Foundations of the Research-Practice Distinction in Bioethics. Heoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):45-56.score: 120.0
    The distinction between clinical research and clinical practice directs how we partition medicine and biomedical science. Reasons for a sharp distinction date historically to the work of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, especially to its analysis of the “boundaries” between research and practice in the Belmont Report (1978). Belmont presents a segregation model of the research-practice distinction, according to which research and practice form conceptually exclusive sets of activities and interventions. This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Tom L. Beauchamp (2006). The Right to Die as the Triumph of Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):643 – 654.score: 120.0
  21. Tom L. Beauchamp (2011). Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):515-523.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Tom L. Beauchamp (1976). An Analysis of Hume's Essay "On Suicide". Review of Metaphysics 30 (1):73 - 95.score: 120.0
  23. Tom L. Beauchamp (2007). History and Theory in "Applied Ethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):55-64.score: 120.0
  24. Tom L. Beauchamp (1984). Manipulative Advertising. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 (3/4):1-22.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. T. L. Beauchamp (1999). The Medical Ethics of Physician-Assisted Suicide. Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (6):437-439.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Tom L. Beauchamp (2000). The Right to Privacy and the Right to Die. Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (02):276-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. T. L. Beauchamp (2006). Review: Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate. [REVIEW] Mind 115 (459):747-750.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Tom L. Beauchamp (2001). Internal and External Standards for Medical Morality. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (6):601 – 619.score: 120.0
    What grounds and justifies conclusions in medical ethics? Is the source external or internal to medicine? Thee influential types of answer have appeared in recent literature: an internal account, an external account, and a mixed internal / external account. The first defends an ethic derived from either the ends of medicine or professional practice standards. The second maintains that precepts in medical ethics rely upon and require justification by external standards such as those of public opinion, law, religious ethics, or (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. George G. Brenkert & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.score: 120.0
    This handbook is a comprehensive treatment of business ethics from a philosophical approach.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Tom L. Beauchamp (2000). Reply to Strong on Principlism and Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):342 – 347.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Tom L. Beauchamp (2011). Making Principlism Practical: A Commentary on Gordon, Rauprich, and Vollmann. Bioethics 25 (6):301-303.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Tom L. Beauchamp (1973). Hume's Two Theories of Causation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 55 (3):281-300.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. T. L. Beauchamp (1973). No “Fact-Value Gap” for Hume?: A Reply to Konrad. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 7 (1):52-59.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Tom L. Beauchamp (1992). The Moral Standing of Animals in Medical Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):7-16.score: 120.0
  35. Tom L. Beauchamp & Ken Witkowski (1973). A Critique of Pure Anarchism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):533 - 539.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Tom L. Beauchamp (1974). Hume on Causal Contiguity and Causal Succession. Dialogue 13 (02):271-282.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Thomas Beauchamp & Stephen Klaidman (1991). A Study in Multiple Forms of Bias. In Larry Gross, John Stuart Katz & Jay Ruby (eds.), Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film, and Television. Oup Usa. 163--87.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Tom L. Beauchamp (2004). Does Ethical Theory Have a Future in Bioethics? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):209-217.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. T. L. Beauchamp (2003). Hume's Reason. Philosophical Review 112 (4):572-575.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Ruth R. Faden, Tom L. Beauchamp & Nancy E. Kass (2011). Learning Health Care Systems and Justice. Hastings Center Report 41 (4):3-3.score: 120.0
    Emily Largent, Steven Joffe, and Franklin Miller offer a stimulating contribution to the literature on integrating medical research and practice. We agree on both the need to move toward what the Institute of Medicine has called a learning health care system and the need for new conceptions for integrating research and practice within it. We also agree with the authors’ view, first advanced by Robert Truog and colleagues in 1999, that it can be ethically acceptable to randomize patients without express (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. T. L. Beauchamp (2003). Methods and Principles in Biomedical Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (5):269-274.score: 120.0
    The four principles approach to medical ethics plus specification is used in this paper. Specification is defined as a process of reducing the indeterminateness of general norms to give them increased action guiding capacity, while retaining the moral commitments in the original norm. Since questions of method are central to the symposium, the paper begins with four observations about method in moral reasoning and case analysis. Three of the four scenarios are dealt with. It is concluded in the “standard” Jehovah’s (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Tom L. Beauchamp (2010). Steinbock, Bonnie , Ed. The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 . Pp. Xviii+747. $150.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 120 (2):409-413.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Tom L. Beauchamp (2005). What Can a Model Professional Code for Bioethics Hope to Achieve? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):42 – 43.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Robert M. Nelson & Tom L. Beauchamp (2011). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Concept of Voluntary Consent”. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):W1-W3.score: 120.0
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 8, Page W1-W3, August 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Tom L. Beauchamp (1996). Looking Back and Judging Our Predecessors. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (3):251-270.score: 120.0
    : The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments has correctly argued that persons and institutions can sometimes be held responsible for actions taken more than a half-century ago, when practices and policies on the use of research subjects were strikingly different. In reaching its conclusions, the Committee did not altogether adhere to the language and commitments of its own ethical framework. In its Final Report, the Committee emphasizes judgments of wrongdoing, to the relative neglect of culpability; it discusses mitigating conditions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Tom L. Beauchamp (2002). Changes of Climate in the Development of Practical Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):131-138.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Tom L. Beauchamp (2005). How Not to Rethink Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):31 – 33.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Tom L. Beauchamp, Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck (2012). Where Are We in the Justification of Research Involving Chimpanzees? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (3):211-242.score: 120.0
    On December 15, 2011, a final report was issued by the Committee on the Use of Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research, which had been convened by the U. S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) in collaboration with National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies. Within a month of its release, this report was designated by Wired Science one of the “top scientific discoveries of 2011” (Wired Science Staff 2011). The ad hoc Committee responsible for this report was formed at (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Tom L. Beauchamp (1996). Refusals of Treatment and Requests for Death. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (4):371-374.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Roger Herdman, Tom L. Beauchamp & John T. Potts (1998). The Institute of Medicine's Report on Non-Heart-Beating Organ Transplantation. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8 (1):83-90.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 171