16 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Thomas M. Crisp [16]Thomas Michael Crisp [1]
  1. Thomas M. Crisp (2007). Presentism and the Grounding Objection. Noûs 41 (1):90–109.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   58 citations  
  2. Thomas M. Crisp (2003). Presentism. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   53 citations  
  3.  76
    Thomas M. Crisp (2005). Presentism and "Cross-Time" Relations. American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):5 - 17.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  4. Thomas M. Crisp (forthcoming). 2. Symposium: Defining Presentism. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304–316.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  6. Thomas M. Crisp & Donald P. Smith (2005). 'Wholly Present' Defined. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):318–344.
    Three-dimensionalists , sometimes referred to as endurantists, think that objects persist through time by being “wholly present” at every time they exist. But what is it for something to be wholly present at a time? It is surprisingly difficult to say. The threedimensionalist is free, of course, to take ‘is wholly present at’ as one of her theory’s primitives, but this is problematic for at least one reason: some philosophers claim not to understand her primitive. Clearly the three-dimensionalist would be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  7.  19
    Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Jaegwon Kim, Mind in a Physical World. Noûs 35 (2):304-316.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  8.  22
    Thomas M. Crisp (2013). On Coercion, Love, and Horrors. Religious Studies 49 (2):165-179.
    In this article, I explain and critique J. L. Schellenberg's atheological argument from horrors. I raise an epistemic objection, arguing that no one could be justified in believing its conclusion on the basis of its premises. Then I adumbrate a notion of the divine which is different in various ways from the God of classical theism and argue that Schellenberg's argument makes no trouble for belief in the existence of God so construed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-185.
    Incompatibilism about freedom and causal determinism is commonly supported by appeal to versions of the well known Consequence argument. Critics of theConsequence argument have presented counterexamples to the Consequence argument’s central inference principle. The thesis of this article is that proponents of the Consequence argument can easily bypass even the best of these counterexamples.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10. Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson & David Vander Laan (eds.) (2006). Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Springer.
    This volume comprises essays presented to Alvin Plantinga on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11. Thomas M. Crisp (2005). Hawthorne on Knowledge and Practical Reasoning. Analysis 65 (286):138–140.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. Thomas M. Crisp (2000). Gettier and Plantinga's Revised Account of Warrant. Analysis 60 (265):42–50.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Thomas M. Crisp (2011). An Evolutionary Objection to the Argument From Evil. In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Thomas M. Crisp (2009). On Believing That the Scriptures Are Divinely Inspired. In Oliver D. Crisp & Michael C. Rea (eds.), Analytic Theology: New Essays in the Philosophy of Theology. Oxford Up 187--213.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  12
    Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Review: Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304 - 316.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Michael J. Loux & Thomas M. Crisp (2017). Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, Fourth Edition. Routledge.
    Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction is for students who have already completed an introductory philosophy course and need a fresh look at the central topics in the core subject of metaphysics. It is essential reading for any student of the subject. This _Fourth Edition_ is revised and updated and includes two new chapters on parts and wholes and metaphysical indeterminacy or vagueness. This new edition also keeps the user-friendly format, the chapter overviews summarizing the main topics, concrete examples to clarify difficult (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography