24 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Thomas J. McKay [13]Thomas McKay [11]
  1. Thomas McKay, Chapter 1 a Formal Language with Non-Distributive Plurals: Preliminary Considerations.
    (1) Arnie, Bob and Carlos are shipmates.1 This is something true of the three of them together. We cannot say Arnie is a shipmate except perhaps as elliptical for something that connects Arnie to others. (Arnie is a..
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Thomas J. McKay (2009). Words Without Objects. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):301-323.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Thomas McKay, Propositional Attitude Reports. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Thomas J. McKay (2008). Critical Notice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):301-323.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas J. McKay (2008). Review of H. Laycock, Words Without Objects: Semantics, Ontology, and Logic for Non-Singularity. [REVIEW] Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (2):pp. 301-323.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Thomas J. McKay (2006). Plural Predication. Oxford University Press.
    Plural predication is a pervasive part of ordinary language. We can say that some people are fifty in number, are surrounding a building, come from many countries, and are classmates. These predicates can be true of some people without being true of any one of them; they are non-distributive predications. However, the apparatus of modern logic does not allow a place for them. Thomas McKay here explores the enrichment of logic with non-distributive plural predication and quantification. His book will be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Thomas McKay & Michael Nelson (2005). The de Re/de Dicto Distinction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 15:2010.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Thomas J. McKay (1997). Analogy and Argument. Teaching Philosophy 20 (1):49-60.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Thomas McKay & David Johnson (1996). A Reconsideration of an Argument Against Compatibilism. Philosophical Topics 24 (2):113-122.
  10. Thomas McKay (1994). Names, Causal Chains, and de Re Beliefs. Philosophical Perspectives 8:293-302.
  11. Thomas J. Mckay (1994). Plural Reference and Unbound Pronouns. In. In Dag Prawitz & Dag Westerståhl (eds.), Logic and Philosophy of Science in Uppsala. Kluwer. 559--582.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Thomas J. McKay (1991). Representingde Re Beliefs. Linguistics and Philosophy 14 (6):711 - 739.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Thomas J. McKay (1988). De Re and De Se Belief. In. In D. F. Austin (ed.), Philosophical Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 207--217.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Thomas McKay (1986). His Burning Pants. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (3):393-400.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Thomas J. McKay (1986). Lowe and Baldwin on Modalities. Mind 95 (380):499-505.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Thomas J. Mckay (1986). Against Constitutional Sufficiency Principles. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):295-304.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thomas McKay (1984). Actions and De Re Beliefs. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):631 - 635.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Thomas J. McKay (1984). On Showing Invalidity. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):97 - 101.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Thomas McKay (1981). On Proper Names in Belief Ascriptions. Philosophical Studies 39 (3):287-303.
  20. Thomas McKay & Cindy Stern (1979). Natural Kind Terms and Standards of Membership. Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (1):27 - 34.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Thomas J. McKay (1978). The Principle of Predication. Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):19 - 26.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thomas McKay & Peter Van Inwagen (1977). Counterfactuals with Disjunctive Antecedents. Philosophical Studies 31 (5):353 - 356.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas Mckay & Peter Van Inwagen (1977). Counterfactuals with Disjunctive Antecedents. Philosophical Studies 31 (5):353 - 356.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Thomas J. McKay (1975). Essentialism in Quantified Modal Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):423 - 438.
    This paper mentions several different sorts of "essentialism," and examines various senses in which quantified modal logic is "committed to" the most troublesome kind of essentialism. It is argued that essentialism is neither provable, Nor entailed by any contingently true non-Modal sentence. But quantified modal logic is committed to the meaningfulness of essentialism. This sort of commitment may be made innocuous by requiring that essentialism simply be made logically false; some of the consequences of taking this line are explored.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation