26 found
Sort by:
  1. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (forthcoming). On the Offense Principle: Some New Challenges. Criminal Law and Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Petersen (forthcoming). Surgical Castration, Coercion and Ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics:2013-101508.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2014). Being Worse Off: But in Comparison with What? On the Baseline Problem of Harm and the Harm Principle. Res Publica 20 (2):199-214.
    Several liberal philosophers and penal theorists have argued that the state has a reason to prohibit acts that harm individuals. But what is harm? According to one specification of harm, a person P is harmed by an act (or an event) a iff, as a result of a, P is made worse off in terms of well-being. One central question here involves the baseline against which we assess whether someone is ‘worse off’. In other words, when a person is harmed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2014). (Neuro)Predictions, Dangerousness, and Retributivism. Journal of Ethics 18 (2):137-151.
    Through the criminal justice system so-called dangerous offenders are, besides the offence that they are being convicted of and sentenced to, also punished for acts that they have not done but that they are believe to be likely to commit in the future. The aim of this paper is to critically discuss whether some adherents of retributivism give a plausible rationale for punishing offenders more harshly if they, all else being equal, by means of predictions are believed to be more (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jesper Ryberg & Thomas S. Petersen (2013). Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment of Criminal Offenders—A Comment on Bomann-Larsen. Neuroethics 6 (1):79-83.
    Whether it is morally acceptable to offer rehabilitation by CNS-intervention to criminals as a condition for early release constitutes an important neuroethical question. Bomann-Larsen has recently suggested that such interventions are unacceptable if the offered treatment is not narrowly targeted at the behaviour for which the criminal is convicted. In this article it is argued that Bomann-Larsen’s analysis of the morality of offers does not provide a solid base for this conclusion and that, even if the analysis is assumed to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Søren Sofus Wichmann & Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2013). Poverty Relief: Philanthropy Versus Changing the System: A Critical Discussion of Some Objections to the 'Singer Solution'. Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1):1-9.
    The aim of this paper is to present and evaluate a specific critical discussion of Peter Singer's view on philanthropy. This critique of Singer's position takes several forms, and here we focus on only two of these. First of all, it is claimed that philanthropy (based upon the giving up of luxury goods) should be avoided, because it harms the poor. As we shall see this is a view defended by Andrew Kuper. However, philanthropy is also accused of harming the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Thomas Sobirk Petersen (2012). Environmental Ethics. In Jan Kyrre Berg Olsen Friis, Stig Andur Pedersen & Vincent F. Hendricks (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Wiley-Blackwell.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Thomas Søbirk Petersen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2012). Ethics, Organ Donation and Tax: A Proposal. Jounal of Medical Ethics 38 (8):451-457.
    Next SectionFive arguments are presented in favour of the proposal that people who opt in as organ donors should receive a tax break. These arguments appeal to welfare, autonomy, fairness, distributive justice and self-ownership, respectively. Eight worries about the proposal are considered in this paper. These objections focus upon no-effect and counter-productiveness, the Titmuss concern about social meaning, exploitation of the poor, commodification, inequality and unequal status, the notion that there are better alternatives, unacceptable expense, and concerns about the veto (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Peter Asp, Christopher Bennett, Peter Cave, J. Angelo Corlett, Richard Dagger, Michael Davis, Anthony Ellis, Thomas S. Petersen, Julian V. Roberts & Torbjörn Tännsjö (2011). Recidivist Punishments: The Philosopher's View. Lexington Books.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2011). What is Legal Moralism? SATS 12 (1):80-88.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2010). Good Athlete - Bad Athlete? On the 'Role-Model Argument' for Banning Performance-Enhancing Drugs. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4 (3):332-340.
    The paper critically discusses a role-model argument (RMA) in favour of banning performance-enhancing drugs in sport. The argument concludes that athletes should be banned from using performance-enhancing drugs because if they are allowed to use such drugs they will encourage, or cause, youngsters who look up to them to use drugs in a way that would be harmful. In Section 2 the structure of the argument and some versions of it are presented. In Section 3 a critical discussion of RMA (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2010). New Legal Moralism: Some Strengths and Challenges. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (2):215-232.
    The aim of this paper is to critically discuss the plausibility of legal moralism with an emphasis on some central and recent versions. First, this paper puts forward and defends the thesis that recently developed varieties of legal moralism promoted by Robert P. George, John Kekes and Michael Moore are more plausible than Lord Devlin's traditional account. The main argument for this thesis is that in its more modern versions legal moralism is immune to some of the forceful challenges made (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2010). What is a Good Sports Parent? Nordic Journal for Applied Ethics - Etikk I Praksis 4 (1):215-232.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Thomas S. Petersen (2009). What is It for a Life to Go Well (or Badly)?: Some Critical Comment of Waynes Sumner's Theory of Welfare. Journal of Happiness Studies 10:449-458.
    In an effort to construct a plausible theory of experience-based welfare, Wayne Sumner imposes two requirements on the relevant kind of experience: the information requirement and the autonomy requirement. I argue that both requirements are problematic.First, I argue (very briefly) that a well-know case like ‘the deceived businessman’ need not support the information requirement as Sumner believes. Second, I introduce a case designed to cast further doubt on the information requirement. Third, I attend to a shortcoming in Sumner’s theory of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Thomas S. Petersen & Johannes K. Kristensen (2009). Should Athletes Be Allowed to Use All Kinds of Performance-Enhancing Drugs?—A Critical Note on Claudio M. Tamburrini. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 36 (1):88-98.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jesper Ryberg, Thomas S. Petersen & Clark Wolf (eds.) (2007). New Waves in Applied Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan.
    This volume contains work by the very best young scholars working in Applied Ethics, gathering a range of new perspectives and thoughts on highly relevant topics, such as the environment, animals, computers, freedom of speech, human enhancement, war and poverty. For researchers and students working in or around this fascinating area of the discipline, the volume will provide a unique snapshot of where the cutting-edge work in the field is currently engaged and where it's headed.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2006). On the Repugnance of the Repugnant Conclusion. Theoria 72 (2):126-137.
    The aim of this paper is to discuss the plausibility of a certain position in the philosophical literature within which the Repugnant Conclusion is treated, not as repugnant, but as an acceptable implication of the total welfare principle. I will confine myself to focus primarily on Törbjörn Tännsjö’s presentation. First, I reconstruct Tännsjö’s view concerning the repugnance of the RC in two arguments. The first argument is criticized for (a) addressing the wrong comparison, (b) relying on the controversial claim that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Thomas S. Petersen (2005). Just Diagnosis? Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Injustices to Disabled People. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (4):231-234.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2005). Tuomela, Raimo, The Philosophy of Social Practices – A Collective Acceptance View, Cambridge University Press, 2002, 274 Pp. + Xi. [REVIEW] SATS 6 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2004). A Woman's Choice? On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):81 - 90.
    This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion. Having clarified this argument, I conclude that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2003). Egalitarianism and Repugnant Conclusions. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 38:115-125.
    Most philosophers discuss the Repugnant Conclusion as an objection to total utilitarianism. But this focus on total utilitarianism seems to be one-sided. It conceals the important fact that other competing moral theories are also subject to the Repugnant Conclusion. The primary aim of this paper is to demonstrate that versions of egalitarianism are subject to the Repugnant Conclusion and other repugnant conclusions.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2002). The Claim From Adoption. Bioethics 16 (4):353–375.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas S. Petersen (2001). Generocentrism: A Critical Discussion of David Heyd. Philosophia 28 (1-4):411-423.
  24. Thomas S. Petersen (2000). David Heyd on the Distinction Between Actual and Possible People. SATS 1 (1):105-116.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (1999). Brave New Children. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 34:91-117.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (1999). Brave New Children-Assisted Reproduction and Our Concern for the Child. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 34:77-98.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation