75 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Timo Airaksinen (2015). In the Upper Room. Philosophy and Theology 27 (2):427-456.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  28
    Timo Airaksinen (1980). On Time Travel. Dialectics and Humanism 7 (1):113-121.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Timo Airaksinen (1987). Berkeley and the Justification of Beliefs. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (2):235-256.
    This paper analyzes berkeley's philosophy in the light of modern epistemology and philosophy of mind. It is shown that our knowledge of spatio-Temporal bodies cannot be certain. Certainty is restricted to the realm of sensory ideas themselves. But there is hardly any reason to be interested in ideas as such. Berkeley is a common sense thinker who wants to know the world and its scientific laws. Bodies are constructed on the basis of both real and imaginary ideas. This topic is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  51
    Timo Airaksinen (2011). Great Books, Bad Arguments: Republic, Leviathan and The Communist Manifesto. Hobbes Studies 24 (2):192-195.
  5.  25
    Timo Airaksinen (2007). Thomas Hobbes's Many States of Nature. Acta Philosophica Fennica 83:21-35.
  6.  43
    Timo Airaksinen (1983). Values in Mackie's Error Theory of Ethics. Inquiry 26 (4):467 – 475.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Timo Airaksinen (1999). The Philosophy of H.P. Lovecraft the Route to Horror.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  31
    Timo Airaksinen (2010). Starting with Hobbes. Hobbes Studies 23 (2):189-192.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  23
    Timo Airaksinen (1989). Insanity, Crime and the Structure of Freedom in Hegel. Social Theory and Practice 15 (2):155-178.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  10
    Timo Airaksinen & Arto Siitonen (2004). Kant on Hobbes, Peace, and Obedience. History of European Ideas 30 (3):315-328.
    Kant's essay ‘On the common saying: “This may be true in theory, but it does not apply in practice”’ contains a chapter ‘On the relationship of theory to practice in political right’ to which he added, in brackets, ‘’. The problem is that Kant leaves his Hobbes-criticism implicit. The main point seems to be the Hobbes's citizens are without any rights. We explore the differences and similarities between Kant's and Hobbes's political views and evaluate the effectiveness of Kant's criticism. We (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    Timo Airaksinen (2010). Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley's Siris. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 135 (1):57.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  14
    Timo Airaksinen (1984). Coercion, Deterrence, and Authority. Theory and Decision 17 (2):105-117.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  9
    William Aiken, Sander Lee, Timo Airaksinen, Owen McLeod, Paul Allen Iii, Marcia Moen, Mahlon W. Barnes, Jan Narveson, Raymond Belliotti & Lisa Newton (1997). The Journal of Value Inquiry Relies on a Raft of Referees to Review Submis-Sions. The Reports of the Referees Call for Considerable Expertise and Careful Judgment. Referees Generally Write Several Reports Annually. Many Referees Have Gone Well Beyond Their Initial Allotments. All Have Done a Sterling Job. We Thank Them and Acknowledge Their Important Work Here. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 31:595-595.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  14
    Timo Airaksinen (1978). Five Types of Knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (4):263 - 274.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Timo Airaksinen (1995). David Boonin-Vail, Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (4):230-232.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Timo Airaksinen & Martin A. Bertman (1989). Hobbes War Among Nations. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  17.  23
    Arto Siitonen & Timo Airaksinen (1988). Kant's Elusive Self: Problems of Paralogisms. Metaphilosophy 19 (3‐4):329-336.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  5
    Timo Airaksinen (2012). Meaning and Knowledge. Dialectics and Humanism 8 (1):113-122.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    Timo Airaksinen (1981). Meaning and Knowledge: The Place of Criteria in Epistemology. Dialectics and Humanism 8 (1):113-122.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Timo Airaksinen (1992). SA Lloyd, Ideals as Interests in Hobbes's Leviathan: The Power of Mind Over Matter Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 12 (5):340-342.
  21.  6
    Timo Airaksinen (1985). Social Time and Place. Man and World 18 (1):99-105.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  13
    Timo Airaksinen (1985). Absolutely Certain Beliefs. Philosophy Research Archives 11:393-406.
    This paper presents a critical review and discussion of three recent major theories of epistemic scepticism. Odegard and Rescher both agree that real knowledge entails certain beliefs. But they both fail to see how beliefs could be absolutely certain. Klein’s book, Certainty: A Refutationof Scepticism, presents the strongest possible view in favor of absolute certainty. I pay attention to its technical details and development by Klein. My conclusion is that Klein’s theory rests on some presupposed ideas that are either counterintuitive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Timo Airaksinen & Arto Siitonen (2005). Kant, acerca de Hobbes, la paz y la obediencia. Philosophica 28:5-21.
    El presente trabajo muestra cómo, a pesar de que Kant y Hobbes parten del supuesto de una natural belicosodad de los seres humanos y una tendencia hacia la desobediencia, cada uno arriba a soluciones radicalmente diferentes. Kant, en el escrito Acerca del dicho: ¿Esto puede ser verdad en teoría pero no en la práctica¿ contiene un capítulo expresamente contra Hobbes y, fundado en las tesis de la Ilustración, intenta salvar el derecho de los subditos frente al monarca, no obstante que (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  10
    Timo Airaksinen (2010). Berkeley and Newton on Gravity in Siris. In Silvia Parigi (ed.), George Berkeley: Religion and Science in the Age of Enlightenment. Springer
  25.  6
    Timo Airaksinen (2010). Active Principles and Trinities in Berkeley's "Siris". Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 200 (1):57 - 70.
    Berkeley's Siris is a chain of arguments which ends in God. First God is a metaphysical principle causally regulating the world or Macrocosm. But in the final paragraphs of Siris, God is treated in a theological perspective. This is to say that Berkeley introduces the idea of the Trinity and relates it to the rest of his chain argument. He says that Father, Son, and Spirit correspond to the philosophical notions of sun, light, and heat. I study the final theological (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  5
    Timo Airaksinen (2011). Rhetoric and Corpuscularism in Berkeley's Siris. History of European Ideas 37 (1):23-34.
    Berkeley's Siris may be an unduly neglected treatise. Yet it reveals and confirms its author's philosophical ambitions and achievements. The greatest of them is his theory of causality. Berkeley tries to show that agents can influence the world by using ethereal corpuscles as their instruments. These particles are both material but also in some sense immaterial or occult because they both follow and do not follow the laws of nature. Siris is a rhetorical text which uses analogy, metaphor, paradox, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  11
    Timo Airaksinen (1993). Hobbes on the Passions and Powerlessness. Hobbes Studies 6 (1):80-104.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  11
    Timo Airaksinen (1990). Justified Coercion. Social Philosophy Today 3:21-40.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  16
    Timo Airaksinen (1982). Moral Education and Democracy in the School. Synthese 51 (1):117 - 134.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  5
    Timo Airaksinen (2011). Against All the Odds: Machiavelli on Fortune in Politics. In Leonidas Donskis (ed.), Niccolò Machiavelli: History, Power, and Virtue. Rodopi 226--3.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  15
    Timo Airaksinen (1980). Problems in Hegel's Dialectic of Feeling. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):1-25.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  13
    Timo Airaksinen, Stewart Shapiro & W. Stephen Croddy (1984). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Philosophia 14 (3-4):427-467.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  6
    Timo Airaksinen (2012). D. M. Gross, The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotles Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006, X+194 Pp. ISBN-13: 978-0-226-30980-4, Paperback ($ 22). [REVIEW] Hobbes Studies 25 (2):233-235.
    This paper discusses sovereignty and examines in detail Hobbes's debates with the two leading legal theorists of his day, Coke and Hale, both Lord Chief Justices of the King's Bench. I argue that Hobbes came to change his mind somewhat about the desirability of divided sovereignty by the time, near the end of his life, that he wrote the Dialogue . But I also argue that Hobbes should have developed more than a very thin conception of the rule of law. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  14
    Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen (1990). In Defence of “Hard” Offers: A Reply to J.P. Day. Philosophia 20 (3):325-327.
    In commenting on our earlier article in IPhilosophiaD, J P Day raises four issues: those concerning (1) the correct interpretation of the concept of "conditional offers," (2) the relationship of hard conditional offers to liberty, (3) the role of preferences in distinguishing offers from threats, and (4) the moral wrongness of some forms of offering. Two of these points, the second and the third, give rise to some further argument.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Timo Airaksinen (1979). On the foundations of rescher's coherence theory of truth. Logique Et Analyse 22 (85):147.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. Timo Airaksinen (2004). Los diversos estados de naturaleza en Thomas Hobbes. Philosophica 27:5-16.
    Hobbes elabora una concepción clave de estado de naturaleza, al que denomino el fundamental; lo complemento al agregar su versión moderada que ilustro con una historia acerca de los antiguos islandeses y sus Sagas. Respetaban sus leyes, a pesar de que no podían exigir su cumplimiento. La vida en dicha sociedad era grosera y embrutecida, pero no pobre o solitaria. Finalmente se instituyó el gobierno del rey noruego. Sin embargo, Hobbes necesita un concepto social adicional que se comprenda en referencia (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  10
    Timo Airaksinen (1981). On Nonfoundationalistic Theories of Epistemic Justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):403-412.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  12
    Timo Airaksinen & Manu J. Vuorio (1988). Medical Ethics in Finland: Some Recent Trends. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (3).
    This paper reviews the research done in Finland on medical ethics in the last three years and published in four leading journals. The general characteristics of this area are discussed and some comments on its most conspicuous representatives are offered. The conclusion reached is that medical ethics in Finland is still in a rather embryonic stage of development, and that more systematic and theoretically sophisticated approaches are required. However, since many physicians have become interested in ethical questions, it can be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  6
    Timo Airaksinen (1988). Original Populations and Environmental Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 5 (1):37-47.
  40. Timo Airaksinen (2010). Reseña Del Libro "Starting with Hobbes". Hobbes Studies 23 (2):189-192.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  5
    Timo Airaksinen (1982). Book Review:Naturalism and Social Science: A Post-Empiricist Philosophy of Social Science David Thomas. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 49 (1):144-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Timo Airaksinen (1992). RE Ewin, Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 12 (2):100-101.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  5
    Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen (1988). Hard and Soft Offers as Constraints. Philosophia 18 (4):385-398.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Timo Airaksinen (2002). Praxiological Efficiency in Hetereogeneous Professional Ethics. In Leo V. Ryan, F. Byron Nahser & Wojciech Gasparski (eds.), Praxiology and Pragmatism. Transaction Publishers 10--71.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  2
    Timo Airaksinen (1983). Book Review:The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher: Discussion and Replies Ernest Sosa. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 50 (1):169-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Timo Airaksinen & Arto Siitonenkant (2005). Acerca de Hobbes, la paz y la obediencia. Philosophica 28:5-21.
    El presente trabajo muestra cómo, a pesar de que Kant y Hobbes parten del supuesto de una natural belicosodad de los seres humanos y una tendencia hacia la desobediencia, cada uno arriba a soluciones radicalmente diferentes. Kant, en el escrito Acerca del dicho: “Esto puede ser verdad en teoría pero no en la práctica’ contiene un capítulo expresamente contra Hobbes y, fundado en las tesis de la Ilustración, intenta salvar el derecho de los subditos frente al monarca, no obstante que (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage (eds.) (2011). Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars Pub..
  48. Timo Airaksinen & Bertil Belfrage Airaksinen (eds.) (2011). Berkeley's Lasting Legacy: 300 Years Later. Cambridge Scholars.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Timo Airaksinen (1995). David Boonin-Vail, Thomas Hobbes and the Science of Moral Virtue. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 15:230-232.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Timo Airaksinen (2012). D. M. Gross, The Secret History of Emotion: From Aristotle’s Rhetoric to Modern Brain Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006, X + 194 Pp. ISBN-13: 978-0-226-30980-4, Paperback. [REVIEW] Hobbes Studies 25 (2):233-235.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 75