20 found
Order:
See also:
  1. Timothy E. Eastman (2007). Cosmic Agnosticism. Process Studies 36 (2):181-197.
    This paper surveys some scientific issues in physical cosmology and concludes that no current model in cosmology adequately meets all key observations. Scholars in process thought are making important contributions in both metaphysics and philosophical cosmology, independent of the outcome of debates in physical cosmology. Such scholars are advised to be very cautious when using hypotheses currently arising from contemporary cosmology.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Farzad Mahootian & Timothy E. Eastman (2009). Complementary Frameworks of Scientific Inquiry: Hypothetico-Deductive, Hypothetico-Inductive, and Observational-Inductive. World Futures 65 (1):61 – 75.
    The 20th century philosophy of science began on a positivistic note. Its focal point was scientific explanation and the hypothetico-deductive (HD) framework of explanation was proposed as the standard of what is meant by “science.” HD framework, its inductive and statistical variants, and other logic-based approaches to modeling scientific explanation were developed long before the dawn of the information age. Since that time, the volume of observational data and power of high performance computing have increased by several orders of magnitude (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  12
    Timothy E. Eastman (1989). The Reenchantment of Science. Process Studies 18 (1):69-75.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  16
    Franz G. Riffert & Timothy E. Eastman (2008). Introduction: The Role of Process Metaphysics in Our World of Science. World Futures 64 (2):73 – 83.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  9
    Timothy E. Eastman (2009). Researching with Whitehead. Chromatikon: Annales de la Philosophie En Procès / Yearbook of Philosophy in Process 5:251-254.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  32
    Timothy E. Eastman (2005). Quantum Mechanics and the Philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead. Process Studies 34 (2):300-303.
  7.  49
    Timothy E. Eastman (2008). Our Cosmos, From Substance to Process. World Futures 64 (2):84 – 93.
    Philosophies of nature over the past three centuries have gone through three distinct phases, beginning with classical views and now evolving into a process view at the dawn of the 21st century. These phases derive from a complex weaving of two frameworks of physics since Newton's time [classical, modern] with two principal metaphysical frameworks[substance, event]. Problematic fin de sicle claims at the end of both the 19th and 20th centuries appear to have a common root in substance metaphysics and part/whole (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  4
    Timothy E. Eastman (2007). Process Physics. Process Studies 36 (1):131-133.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  15
    Timothy E. Eastman & Franz G. Riffert (2009). Introduction: Process Thought, Science, and Philosophy. World Futures 65 (1):1 – 6.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    Timothy E. Eastman (1998). Special Focus Introduction. Process Studies 27 (3/4):237-240.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    Timothy E. Eastman (1998). The Large, the Small and the Human Mind. Process Studies 27 (3/4):360-361.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    Timothy E. Eastman (1998). Process Thought and Natural Science, II. Process Studies 27 (3-4):237-240.
    The ongoing research program of process thought meets some of its most crucial tests in efforts towards a comprehensive philosophy of nature. Contributors to the two special focus issues on natural science for the Process Studies journal provide many examples of such tests and commentary that reflect contemporary scientific thought. A core element of modern scientific methodology is the search for invariant, physical relationships that simplify our understanding of complex systems. In addition to a preference for some form of critical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Timothy E. Eastman (2016). Limitations, Approximations And Reality. In David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (eds.), Physics and Speculative Philosophy: Potentiality in Modern Science. De Gruyter 233-242.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Timothy E. Eastman (2016). On “Process Physics”. In David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (eds.), Physics and Speculative Philosophy: Potentiality in Modern Science. De Gruyter 221-230.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Timothy E. Eastman & Ronny Desmet (2008). Physics and Relativity. In Michel Weber (ed.), Handbook of Whiteheadian Process Thought. De Gruyter 235-258.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Timothy E. Eastman & Hank Keeton (eds.) (2009). Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, Process, and Experience. State University of New York Press.
    _Leading scholars explore the connections between quantum physics and process philosophy._.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (2016). Contents. In David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (eds.), Physics and Speculative Philosophy: Potentiality in Modern Science. De Gruyter
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (2016). Frontmatter. In David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (eds.), Physics and Speculative Philosophy: Potentiality in Modern Science. De Gruyter
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (2016). Index. In David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman (eds.), Physics and Speculative Philosophy: Potentiality in Modern Science. De Gruyter 267-276.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. David Ray Griffin, Michael Epperson & Timothy E. Eastman, Physics and Speculative Philosophy: Potentiality in Modern Science.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography