105 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Tom Beauchamp (Georgetown University)
  1. Tom L. Beauchamp (forthcoming). Walters. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Tom L. Beauchamp & Ruth R. Faden (forthcoming). History of Informed Consent. Encyclopedia of Bioethics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Tom L. Beauchamp, Walters LeRoy & American Hospital Association (forthcoming). A Patient's Bill of Rights. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics (Belmont, Ca: Wadsworth Publishing Company,) 5th.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Tom L. Beauchamp & L. Walters (forthcoming). Euthanasia and the Prolongation of Life. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Tom L. Beauchamp & L. Walters (forthcoming). Ethical Theory and Bioethics. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Robert Baker, Tom L. Beauchamp, Michael Boylan, Bernard Gert, Lawrence O. Gostin, Akiko Ito, Peter Tan & Rosemarie Tong (2014). Global Bioethics and Human Rights: Contemporary Issues. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Tom L. Beauchamp (2014). On Common Morality as Embodied Practice. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1):86-93.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Tom L. Beauchamp (2014). Thieves of Virtue: When Bioethics Stole Medicine by Tom Koch (Review). Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (3):11-14.
    The principal thesis in this book is that bioethics emerged—in the 1960s through the 1980s—under the influence of philosophers who claimed to have universally valid principles that could steer medicine and research to the solution of ethical problems, including even those arising at the bedside of patients. Tom Koch contends that these philosophers and their allied bioethicists “stole medicine” and its traditional values, substituting a philosophical discourse generally inaccessible to the average person. Philosophers thereby refashioned medical ethics in accordance with (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Tom L. Beauchamp, Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck (2014). Rethinking the Ethics of Research Involving Nonhuman Animals: Introduction. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):91-96.
    In the relatively short time since 2006—when Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics published an issue on moral issues relevant to the use of nonhuman animals in research [1]—significant changes have occurred for nonhuman animals in many quarters. Public sentiment, new policy initiatives, and scientific studies of nonhuman animals’ capacities have all influenced the ways in which nonhuman animals are perceived and treated in research. Today, a large body of information is available for use in decision making about the acceptability of using (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Tom L. Beauchamp & Victoria Wobber (2014). Autonomy in Chimpanzees. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (2):117-132.
    Literature on the mental capacities and cognitive mechanisms of the great apes has been silent about whether they can act autonomously. This paper provides a philosophical theory of autonomy supported by psychological studies of the cognitive mechanisms that underlie chimpanzee behavior to argue that chimpanzees can act autonomously even though their psychological mechanisms differ from those of humans. Chimpanzees satisfy the two basic conditions of autonomy: (1) liberty (the absence of controlling influences) and (2) agency (self-initiated intentional action), each of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Tom L. Beauchamp (2013). A Doctor May Withhold. In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Bioethics. John Wiley & Sons. 25--409.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Tom L. Beauchamp (2013). Reply to Eb Erl. In Arthur L. Caplan & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Bioethics. John Wiley & Sons. 25--428.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ruth R. Faden, Nancy E. Kass, Steven N. Goodman, Peter Pronovost, Sean Tunis & Tom L. Beauchamp (2013). An Ethics Framework for a Learning Health Care System: A Departure From Traditional Research Ethics and Clinical Ethics. Hastings Center Report 43 (s1):16-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Hope R. Ferdowsian & Tom L. Beauchamp (2013). Animal Experimentation. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Nancy E. Kass, Ruth R. Faden, Steven N. Goodman, Peter Pronovost, Sean Tunis & Tom L. Beauchamp (2013). The Research‐Treatment Distinction: A Problematic Approach for Determining Which Activities Should Have Ethical Oversight. Hastings Center Report 43 (s1):4-15.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Tom L. Beauchamp, Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck (2012). Where Are We in the Justification of Research Involving Chimpanzees? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (3):211-242.
    On December 15, 2011, a final report was issued by the Committee on the Use of Chimpanzees in Biomedical and Behavioral Research, which had been convened by the U. S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) in collaboration with National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies. Within a month of its release, this report was designated by Wired Science one of the “top scientific discoveries of 2011” (Wired Science Staff 2011). The ad hoc Committee responsible for this report was formed at (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Tom L. Beauchamp & Yashar Saghai (2012). The Historical Foundations of the Research-Practice Distinction in Bioethics. Heoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (1):45-56.
    The distinction between clinical research and clinical practice directs how we partition medicine and biomedical science. Reasons for a sharp distinction date historically to the work of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, especially to its analysis of the “boundaries” between research and practice in the Belmont Report (1978). Belmont presents a segregation model of the research-practice distinction, according to which research and practice form conceptually exclusive sets of activities and interventions. This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Tom L. Beauchamp (2011). Informed Consent: Its History, Meaning, and Present Challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):515-523.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Tom L. Beauchamp (2011). Making Principlism Practical: A Commentary on Gordon, Rauprich, and Vollmann. Bioethics 25 (6):301-303.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Tom L. Beauchamp & R. G. Frey (eds.) (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp and R.G. Frey.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ruth R. Faden, Tom L. Beauchamp & Nancy E. Kass (2011). Learning Health Care Systems and Justice. Hastings Center Report 41 (4):3-3.
    Emily Largent, Steven Joffe, and Franklin Miller offer a stimulating contribution to the literature on integrating medical research and practice. We agree on both the need to move toward what the Institute of Medicine has called a learning health care system and the need for new conceptions for integrating research and practice within it. We also agree with the authors’ view, first advanced by Robert Truog and colleagues in 1999, that it can be ethically acceptable to randomize patients without express (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Robert M. Nelson & Tom L. Beauchamp (2011). Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Concept of Voluntary Consent”. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):W1-W3.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 8, Page W1-W3, August 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Tom L. Beauchamp (2010). Relativism, Multiculturalism, and Universal Norms : Their Role in Business Ethics. In George G. Brenkert & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.
  24. Tom L. Beauchamp (2010). Steinbock, Bonnie , Ed. The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 . Pp. Xviii+747. $150.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 120 (2):409-413.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Tom L. Beauchamp (2010). Standing on Principles: Collected Essays. Oxford University Press.
    This volume will collect Tom Beauchamp's 15 most important published articles in bioethics, most of which were published over the last 25 years, and most of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. George G. Brenkert & Tom L. Beauchamp (eds.) (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    This handbook is a comprehensive treatment of business ethics from a philosophical approach.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Tom L. Beauchamp (2009). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    This edition represents a thorough-going revision of what has become a classic text in biomedical ethics. Major structural changes mark the revision. The authors have added a new concluding chapter on methods that, along with its companion chapter on moral theory, emphasizes convergence across theories, coherence in moral justification, and the common morality. They have simplified the opening chapter on moral norms which introduces the framework of prima facie moral principles and ways to specify and balance them. Together with the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Tom L. Beauchamp (2009). The Concept of Paternalism in Biomedical Ethics. Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft Und Ethik 14 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Tom L. Beauchamp (2009). The Exploitation of the Economically Disadvantaged in Pharmaceutical Research. In Denis Gordon Arnold (ed.), Ethics and the Business of Biomedicine. Cambridge University Press. 83.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Tom L. Beauchamp (2008). Affirmative Action Goals in Hiring and Promotion. In Tom L. Beauchamp, Norman E. Bowie & Denis Gordon Arnold (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Pearson/Prentice Hall. 194.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Tom L. Beauchamp (2008). The Belmont Report. In Ezekiel J. Emanuel (ed.), The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics. Oxford University Press. 149--55.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Tom L. Beauchamp (2008). The Philosophical Basis of Psychiatric Ethics. In Sidney Bloch & Stephen A. Green (eds.), Psychiatric Ethics. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Tom L. Beauchamp, Norman E. Bowie & Denis Gordon Arnold (eds.) (2008). Ethical Theory and Business. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Tom L. Beauchamp (2007). History and Theory in "Applied Ethics". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):55-64.
  35. Tom L. Beauchamp, Baruch Brody, Marion Danis, Samia A. See Hurst, David Degrazia, Must We Have, Alber W. Dzur, Daniel Levin, Daniel M. Fox & Diane Gianelli (2007). By Author. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (4):405-407.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.) (2006). David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals: A Critical Edition. Clarendon Press.
    About Hume David Hume (1711-1776) is one of the greatest of philosophers. Today he probably ranks highest of all British philosophers in terms of influence and philosophical standing. His philosophical work ranges across morals, the mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics; he had broad interests not only in philosophy as it is now conceived but in history, politics, economics, religion, and the arts. He was a master of English prose. -/- The Clarendon Hume Edition General Editors: Professor T. L. Beauchamp, Georgetown (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.) (2006). David Hume: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding: A Critical Edition. Clarendon Press.
    David Hume (1711-1776) is one of the greatest of philosophers. Today he probably ranks highest of all British philosophers in terms of influence and philosophical standing. His philosophical work ranges across morals, the mind, metaphysics, epistemology, and aesthetics; he had broad interests not only in philosophy as it is now conceived but in history, politics, economics, religion, and the arts. He was a master of English prose. -/- about the Clarendon Hume Edition: -/- The Clarendon Hume will include all of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Tom L. Beauchamp (2006). The Right to Die as the Triumph of Autonomy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):643 – 654.
  39. Tom L. Beauchamp (2005). How Not to Rethink Research Ethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (1):31 – 33.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Tom L. Beauchamp (2005). What Can a Model Professional Code for Bioethics Hope to Achieve? American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):42 – 43.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Tom L. Beauchamp (2005). Who Deserves Autonomy, and Whose Autonomy Deserves Respect. In J. Stacey Taylor (ed.), Personal Autonomy: New Essays on Personal Autonomy and its Role in Contemporary Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 310--329.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Richard M. Zaner & Tom L. Beauchamp (2005). Reflections on the Appointment of Dr. Edmund Pellegrino to the President's Council on Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 5 (6):W8-W9.
    (2005). Reflections on the Appointment of Dr. Edmund Pellegrino to the President's Council on Bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. W8-W9. doi: 10.1080/15265160500388640.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Tom L. Beauchamp (2004). Does Ethical Theory Have a Future in Bioethics? Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (2):209-217.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Kate Abramson, Donald Ainslie, Donald L. M. Baxter, Tom L. Beauchamp, Martin Bell, Richard Bett, John Bricke, Philip Bricker, Justin Broackes & Stephen Buckle (2003). Hume Studies Referees, 2002–2003. Hume Studies 29 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Tom L. Beauchamp (2003). A Defense of the Common Morality. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (3):259-274.
    : Phenomena of moral conflict and disagreement have led writers in ethics to two antithetical conclusions: Either valid moral distinctions hold universally or they hold relative to a particular and contingent moral framework, and so cannot be applied with universal validly. Responding to three articles in this issue of the Journal that criticize his previously published views on the common morality, the author maintains that one can consistently deny universality to some justified moral norms and claim universality for others. Universality (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Tom L. Beauchamp, Philip Bricker, Stephen Buckle, Michael J. Costa, Philip Cummins, Paul Draper, Daniel Flage, Beryl Logan, Peter Lopston & Alison McIntyre (2003). Hume Studies Referees, 2002-2003. Hume Studies 29 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Tom L. Beauchamp, Howard Brody, Franklin G. Miller, Alexander S. Curtis, Martina Darragh, Patricia Milmoe, Ronald M. U. S. Green, Sharona Hoffman, Edmund G. Howe & Jeffrey P. Kahn (2003). By Author BAGHERI, Alireza. Criticism of “Brain. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):407-09.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Tom L. Beauchamp (2002). Changes of Climate in the Development of Practical Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2):131-138.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Tom L. Beauchamp (2002). Report of the IOM Committee on Assessing the System for Protecting Human Research Participants. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (4):389-390.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Tom L. Beauchamp, Bruce Jennings, Eleanor D. Kinney & Robert J. Levine (2002). Pharmaceutical Research Involving the Homeless. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):547 – 564.
    Discussions of research involving vulnerable populations have left the homeless comparatively ignored. Participation by these subjects in drug studies has the potential to be upsetting, inconvenient, or unpleasant. Participation occasionally produces injury, health emergencies, and chronic health problems. Nonetheless, no ethical justification exists for the categorical exclusion of homeless persons from research. The appropriate framework for informed consent for these subjects of pharmaceutical research is not a single event of oral or written consent, but a multi-staged arrangement of disclosure, dialogue, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 105