Search results for 'Tpeter Kemp' (try it on Scholar)

546 found
Order:
  1.  91
    Tpeter Kemp (1989). Heidegger's Greatness and His Blindness. Philosophy and Social Criticism 15 (2):107-124.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  29
    Tpeter Kemp & Craig Dilworth (1988). Toward a Narrative on Ethics: A Bridge Between Ethics and the Narrative Reflection of Ricoeur. Philosophy and Social Criticism 14 (2):179-201.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    J. Kemp (1971). T. H. Green and the Ethics of Self-Realisation: J. Kemp. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 5:222-240.
    It would be an exaggeration to say that the Victorian age in England was philosophically barren; but it would not be a great exaggeration. By this somewhat uncomplimentary opening, I do not mean to imply that Victorian England contained no competent philosophers at all. Indeed, if one considers thinkers of the second and lower ranks only, their literary productivity was probably greater than those of any previous period in English, or even British, history, even if in sheer numbers they can (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  1
    Constance I. Smith & J. Kemp (1959). Mr. J. Kemp and Æsthetic Judgments. Philosophy 34 (128):47 - 49.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Søen Holm & Peter Kemp (1971). Festskrift Til Søen Holm På 70-Årsdagen den 4. Marts 1971. Red. Af Peter Kemp. Nyt Nordisk Forlag.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Assimina Kaniari, Marina Wallace & Martin Kemp (eds.) (2009). Acts of Seeing: Artists, Scientists and the History of the Visual: A Volume Dedicated to Martin Kemp. Artakt & Zidane Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  20
    Gary Kemp (2013). What is This Thing Called Philosophy of Language? Routledge.
    In this clear and carefully structured introduction to the subject Gary Kemp explains the following key topics: the basic nature of philosophy of language and its historical development early arguments concerning the role of meaning, ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Martin Kemp (2006). Seen | Unseen: Art, Science, and Intuition From Leonardo to the Hubble Telescope. OUP Oxford.
    Seen | Unseen is a deep analysis of the interconnections between science and the visual arts, in which Martin Kemp takes the reader on richly illustrated journey from the Renaissance masters to the imagery of cutting-edge science. From Leonardo, Durer, and Galileo to the early photographers, and from Darwin to Stephen J. Gould, this book considers the way in which artists and scientists have deceived the world and responded to its patterns.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  53
    Gary Kemp (2012). Quine Versus Davidson: Truth, Reference, and Meaning. OUP Oxford.
    Gary Kemp presents a penetrating investigation of key issues in the philosophy of language, by means of a comparative study of two great figures of late twentieth-century philosophy. He reveals unexplored tensions between the views of Quine and Davidson, and presents a powerful argument in favour of Quine and methodological naturalism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Anthony Kemp (1991). The Estrangement of the Past: A Study in the Origins of Modern Historical Consciousness. Oxford University Press.
    In this strikingly bold and original work, Kemp argues that the Western idea of time reversed itself between the fourteenth and the eighteenth century from a static and syncretic image of a temporal world in which all time is uniform, the past is the arbiter of truth and all inherited knowledge is eternally viable, and no secrets lie hidden in time waiting to be revealed to a future age; to a dynamic and supersessive model of history in which the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  8
    Sandra Kemp & Paola Bono (eds.) (1993). The Lonely Mirror: Italian Perspectives on Feminist Theory. Routledge.
    Introduction Without a leg to stand on Sandra Kemp and Paola Bono The project that became The Lonely Mirror had been to edit an international collection of ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  16
    Thomas L. Griffiths, Nick Chater, Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2010). Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Exploring Representations and Inductive Biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):357-364.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   46 citations  
  13. Alan Jern & Charles Kemp (2009). Category Generation. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  18
    Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths & Charles Kemp (2006). Theory-Based Bayesian Models of Inductive Learning and Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (7):309-318.
  15.  6
    Ryan Kemp (2015). The Self-Transformation Puzzle: On the Possibility of Radical Self-Transformation. Res Philosophica 92 (2):389-417.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  34
    Charles Kemp, Noah D. Goodman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2010). Learning to Learn Causal Models. Cognitive Science 34 (7):1185-1243.
    Learning to understand a single causal system can be an achievement, but humans must learn about multiple causal systems over the course of a lifetime. We present a hierarchical Bayesian framework that helps to explain how learning about several causal systems can accelerate learning about systems that are subsequently encountered. Given experience with a set of objects, our framework learns a causal model for each object and a causal schema that captures commonalities among these causal models. The schema organizes the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  17. Cathy Kemp (2005). Feminist Interpretations of David Hume (Review). Hypatia 20 (1):206-209.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  11
    Charles Kemp, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Sourabh Niyogi & Thomas L. Griffiths (2010). A Probabilistic Model of Theory Formation. Cognition 114 (2):165-196.
  19.  3
    Nick Chater, Noah Goodman, Thomas L. Griffiths, Charles Kemp, Mike Oaksford & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2011). The Imaginary Fundamentalists: The Unshocking Truth About Bayesian Cognitive Science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):194-196.
    If Bayesian Fundamentalism existed, Jones & Love's (J&L's) arguments would provide a necessary corrective. But it does not. Bayesian cognitive science is deeply concerned with characterizing algorithms and representations, and, ultimately, implementations in neural circuits; it pays close attention to environmental structure and the constraints of behavioral data, when available; and it rigorously compares multiple models, both within and across papers. J&L's recommendation of Bayesian Enlightenment corresponds to past, present, and, we hope, future practice in Bayesian cognitive science.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20.  2
    Deanna Kemp, John R. Owen, Nora Gotzmann & Carol J. Bond (2011). Just Relations and Company—Community Conflict in Mining. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (1):93 - 109.
    This research engages with the problem of company-community conflict in mining. The inequitable distributions of risks, impacts, and benefits are key drivers of resource conflicts and are likely to remain at the forefront of mining-related research and advocacy. Procedural and interactional forms of justice therefore lie at the very heart of some of the real and ongoing challenges in mining, including: intractable local-level conflict; emerging global norms and performance standards; and ever-increasing expectations for the industry to translate (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  21. Stephen Kemp (2003). Rethinking Social Criticism: Rules, Logic and Internal Critique. History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):61-84.
    The ‘cultural turn’ in social thought, and the rise of interpretive modes of social analysis, have raised the issue of how social criticism can legitimately be undertaken given the central role of actors’ understandings in constituting social reality. In this article I examine this issue by exploring debates around Winch’s interpretive approach. I suggest that Winch’s arguments usefully identify problems with external criticism, that is, criticism that attempts to contrast actors’ beliefs with the social world as it really is. However, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  10
    Taylor Martin, Karen Rayne, Nate J. Kemp, Jack Hart & Kenneth R. Diller (2005). Teaching for Adaptive Expertise in Biomedical Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):257-276.
    This paper considers an approach to teaching ethics in bioengineering based on the How People Learn (HPL) framework. Curricula based on this framework have been effective in mathematics and science instruction from the kindergarten to the college levels. This framework is well suited to teaching bioengineering ethics because it helps learners develop “adaptive expertise”. Adaptive expertise refers to the ability to use knowledge and experience in a domain to learn in unanticipated situations. It differs from routine expertise, which requires using (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  23.  6
    Patrick Shafto, Charles Kemp, Vikash Mansinghka & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2011). A Probabilistic Model of Cross-Categorization. Cognition 120 (1):1-25.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  24.  28
    Robert W. Copper, Garry L. Frank & Robert A. Kemp (2000). A Multinational Comparison of Key Ethical Issues, Helps and Challenges in the Purchasing and Supply Management Profession: The Key Implciations for Business and the Professions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):83 - 100.
    This paper presents the findings of a study of purchasing and supply management professionals in India conducted to identify the key ethical issues they face in carrying out their work related responsibilities as well as to determine the extent to which various factors appear to be helpful or to present challenges to their efforts to act ethically in the course of their work. The Indian findings are then compared to those for studies conducted among purchasing and supply management professionals in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  25.  14
    Charles Kemp, Noah D. Goodman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2007). Learning Causal Schemata. In McNamara D. S. & Trafton J. G. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society 389--394.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  26. Gary Kemp (2003). Autonomy and Privacy in Wittgenstein and Beckett. Philosophy and Literature 27 (1):164-187.
  27.  21
    Martin Kemp, Erwin Panofsky & Christopher S. Wood (1994). The Science of Art: Optical Themes in Western Art From Brunelleschi to Seurat. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (2):243-245.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  28.  86
    Stephen Kemp (2003). Response to My Critics. History of the Human Sciences 16 (4):101-105.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  32
    Kenneth W. Kemp (2012). “With Friends Like Those, Who Needs Enemies”: How Aggressive Atheism Impedes the Acceptance of Evolutionary Biology. Roczniki Filozoficzne:29-39.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  4
    Patrick Shafto, Charles Kemp, Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, John D. Coley & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2008). Inductive Reasoning About Causally Transmitted Properties. Cognition 109 (2):175-192.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31. Cathy Kemp (2002). Experience Matters: Indifference and Determination in Humes's. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16 (4):243-255.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. J. Starobinski & W. S. Kemp (1966). The Idea of Nostalgia. Diogenes 14 (54):81-103.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. G. Kemp (2005). Review: Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. [REVIEW] Mind 114 (453):154-159.
  34.  9
    Stephen Kemp (2005). Saving the Strong Programme? A Critique of David Bloor's Recent Work. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (4):707-720.
    This article critically appraises David Bloor’s recent attempts to refute criticisms levelled at the Strong Programme’s social constructionist approach to scientific knowledge. Bloor has tried to argue, contrary to some critics, that the Strong Programme is not idealist in character, and it does not involve a challenge to the credibility of scientific knowledge. I argue that Bloor’s attempt to deflect the charge of idealism, which calls on the self-referential theory of social institutions, is partially successful. However, I suggest that although (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  35.  14
    Stephen Kemp & John Holmwood (2003). Realism, Regularity and Social Explanation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 33 (2):165–187.
    This article explores the difficulties raised for social scientific investigation by the absence of experiment, critically reviewing realist responses to the problem such as those offered by Bhaskar, Collier and Sayer. It suggests that realist arguments for a shift from prediction to explanation, the use of abstraction, and reliance upon interpretive forms of investigation fail to demonstrate that these approaches compensate for the lack of experimental control. Instead, it is argued that the search for regularities, when suitably conceived, provides the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36.  31
    Gary Kemp (2006). Quine: A Guide for the Perplexed. Continuum International Pub. Group.
    Willard Van Orman Quine is one of the most influential analytic philosophers of the latter half of the twentieth century.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37.  20
    Charles Kemp & Alan Jern (2009). A Taxonomy of Inductive Problems. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 255--260.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Peter Kemp, Pascale Perraudin & Stephen Findley (1997). Another Language for the Other: From Kierkegaard to Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (6):5-28.
  39.  40
    Gary Kemp (1998). Meaning and Truth-Conditions. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (193):483-493.
  40.  89
    Peter Kemp & Paula Hostrup-Jessen (1984). Death and the Machine: From Jules Verne to Derrida and Beyond: A Critique of Jules Vernian Reason. Philosophy and Social Criticism 10 (2):75-96.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Peter Kemp (2010). Citizen of the World: A Cosmopolitan Ideal for the 21st Century. Humanity Books.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  33
    P. Kemp (1997). Introduction. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (6):1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  7
    Stephen Kemp & John Holmwood (2012). Questioning Contingency in Social Life: Roles, Agreement and Agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (4):403-424.
    Structure/agency theories presuppose that there is a unity to structure that distinguishes it from the (potential) diversity of agents' responses. In doing so they formally divide the robust social processes shaping the social world (structure) from contingent agential variation (agency). In this article we question this division by critically evaluating its application to the concept of role in critical realism and structural functionalism. We argue that Archer, Elder-Vass and Parsons all mistakenly understand a role to have a singular structural definition (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  3
    Martin Kemp (2012). “The Testimony of My Own Eyes”: The Strange Case of the Mammal with a Beak. Spontaneous Generations 6 (1):43-49.
    There has always been a significant element of trust when we look at an image of something we have not seen, above all when it looks naturalistic and convincing. Illustrators often employ naturalistic tricks in the service of the “rhetoric of reality.” The case study is the Australian Duck-Billed Platypus, which stretched credibility when it was first discovered, resembling an artificially confected monster. The first scientific account, by George Shaw in T he Naturalist’s Miscellany in 1799, is a masterpiece of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  15
    Stephen Kemp (2003). Toward a Monistic Theory of Science: The `Strong Programme' Reconsidered. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):311-338.
    This article considers the `Strong Programme' account of scientific knowledge from a fresh perspective. It argues that insufficient attention has been paid to the Strong Programme's monistic intent, that is, its aim to unify considerations of instrumental adequacy and social interests in explanations of the development of scientific knowledge. Although sharing the judgment of many critics that the Strong Programme approach is flawed, the article diverges from standard criticisms by suggesting that the best alternative is not a dualistic framework but (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  46.  13
    Kenneth W. Kemp (1988). Just-War Theory: A Reconceptualization. Public Affairs Quarterly 2 (2):57-74.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47. J. Kemp (1958). Kant's Examples of the Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Quarterly 8 (30):63-71.
  48.  5
    J. Kemp & Mary J. Gregor (1965). Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. Philosophical Quarterly 15 (59):182.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  49.  4
    Yungchen Cheng & Paula Kemp (1992). Representation of Posets. Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 38 (1):269-276.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  4
    G. N. Kemp (1991). Metaphor and Aspect-Perception. Analysis 51 (2):84-90.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 546