14 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Tyler Doggett (University of Vermont)
  1. Shen-yi Liao & Tyler Doggett (2014). The Imagination Box. Journal of Philosophy 111 (5):259-275.
    Imaginative immersion refers to a phenomenon in which one loses oneself in make-believe. Susanna Schellenberg says that the best explanation of imaginative immersion involves a radical revision to cognitive architecture. Instead of there being an attitude of belief and a distinct attitude of imagination, there should only be one attitude that represents a continuum between belief and imagination. -/- We argue otherwise. Although imaginative immersion is a crucial data point for theorizing about the imagination, positing a continuum between belief and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. Tyler Doggett & Andy Egan (2007). Wanting Things You Don't Want: The Case for an Imaginative Analogue of Desire. Philosophers' Imprint 7 (9):1-17.
    You’re imagining, in the course of a different game of make-believe, that you’re a bank robber. You don’t believe that you’re a bank robber. You are moved to point your finger, gun-wise, at the person pretending to be the bank teller and say, “Stick ‘em up! This is a robbery!”.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  3. Tyler Doggett (2013). Saving the Few. Noûs 47 (2):302-315.
  4. Tyler Doggett (2012). Some Questions for Tamar Szabo Gendler. [REVIEW] Analysis 72 (4):764-774.
    Contribution to a symposium on Gendler's Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Tyler Doggett & Andy Egan (2012). How We Feel About Terrible, Non-Existent Mafiosi. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):277-306.
    We argue for an imaginative analog of desire from premises about imaginative engagement with fiction. There's a bit about the paradox of fiction, too.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  47
    Tyler Doggett, What Would Taurek Do?
    A very short, exegetical paper about Taurek's "Should the Numbers Count?," arguing against the view that Taurek requires giving chances.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  47
    Tyler Doggett (2009). What Is Wrong With Kamm's and Scanlon's Arguments Against Taurek. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 3 (3).
    I distinguish several arguments Kamm and Scanlon make against Taurek's claim that it is permissible to save smaller groups of people rather than larger. I then argue that none succeeds. This is a companion to my "Saving the Few.".
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8. Tyler Doggett & Daniel Stoljar (2010). Does Nagel's Footnote Eleven Solve the Mind-Body Problem? Philosophical Issues 20 (1):125-143.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  23
    Tyler Doggett, Moving Cartesian Bodies.
    Argues that Descartes's commitment to mind-body causation leads to a commitment to body-body causation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  71
    Tyler Doggett (2010). Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1 - 18.
    Leibniz believes that if there are corporeal substances, they have substantial forms, believes there are substantial forms, and believes there is a close connection between the first two claims. Why does he believe there is this close connection? This paper answers that question and draws out its bearing on the realism/idealism debate.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  58
    Tyler Doggett (2011). Recent Work on the Ethics of Self-Defense. Philosophy Compass 6 (4):220-233.
  12.  31
    Tyler Doggett (2011). Review of Tamar Szabo Gendler's Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Tyler Doggett (2011). Review of Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (6).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Tyler Doggett (2010). Why Leibniz Thinks Descartes Was Wrong and the Scholastics Were Right. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):1-18.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography