Search results for 'Uffe Judl Jensen' (try it on Scholar)

584 found
Sort by:
  1. Uffe Judl Jensen (1972). Conceptual Epiphenomenalism. The Monist 56 (2):250-275.score: 870.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Uffe Juul Jensen & Rom Harré (eds.) (1981). The Philosophy of Evolution. St. Martin's Press.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Keld Thorgaard & Uffe Juul Jensen (2011). Evidence and the End of Medicine. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (3):273-280.score: 240.0
    Fifty years ago, in 1961, Feinstein published his first path-breaking articles leading to his seminal work Clinical Judgement and to the establishment of clinical epidemiology. Feinstein had an Aristotelian approach to scientific method: methods must be adapted to the material examined. Feinstein died 10 years ago and few years before his death he concluded that efforts to promote a person-oriented medicine had failed. He criticised medicine for not having recognized that only persons can suitably observe, evaluate and rate their own (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Michael Ruse (1984). The Philosophy of Evolution Uffe J. Jensen and Rom Harre, Editors Brighton: Harvester, 1981. Pp. Vii, 299. £22.50. Dialogue 23 (01):171-172.score: 84.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. R. W. I. Kessel (1992). Uffe Juul Jensen and Gavin Mooney (Editors): 1990, Changing Values in Medical and Health Care Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, 195 Pp., Chichester, 21.50; New York, $57.50. [REVIEW] Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17 (4):479-480.score: 84.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jeppe Sinding Jensen (2012). Wesley Wildman: Religious Philosophy as Multidisciplinary Comparative Inquiry: Envisioning a Future for the Philosophy of Religion. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (3):247-250.score: 60.0
    Wesley Wildman: Religious philosophy as multidisciplinary comparative inquiry: envisioning a future for the philosophy of religion Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9339-4 Authors Jeppe Sinding Jensen, Department of Culture and Society, Faculty of Arts, Aarhus University, Tasingegade 3, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Journal International Journal for Philosophy of Religion Online ISSN 1572-8684 Print ISSN 0020-7047.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Derrick Jensen (2008). How Shall I Live My Life?: On Liberating the Earth From Civilization. Pm Press.score: 60.0
    In this collection of interviews, Derrick Jensen discusses the destructive dominant culture with ten people who have devoted their lives to undermining it. Whether it is Carolyn Raffensperger and her radical approach to public health, or Thomas Berry on perceiving the sacred; be it Kathleen Dean Moore reminding us that our bodies are made of mountains, rivers, and sunlight; or Vine Deloria asserting that our dreams tell us more about the world than science ever can, the activists and philosophers (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Lionel M. Jensen (1997). Manufacturing Confucianism: Chinese Traditions & Universal Civilization. Duke University Press.score: 60.0
    Based on specific documentary evidence, historian Lionel Jensen reveals how 16th- and 17th-century Western missionaries used translations of the ancient RU ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Larry Jensen & Steve Chatterley (1979). Facilitating Development of Moral Reasoning in Children. Journal of Moral Education 9 (1):53-54.score: 60.0
    Numerous studies provide evidence that brief training programmes have been successful in quickly advancing moral reasoning in specific areas. In most of these studies children are asked to respond to moral dilemmas that are presented while in a highly structured laboratory setting (Bandura and McDonald, 1963; Jensen and Hafen, 1973; Jensen and Hughston, 1972; Jensen and Rytting, 1972; Jensen and Vance, 1972). At the present time it is uncertain if such training approaches are effective outside the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Casper Bruun Jensen, Barbara Herrnstein Smith, G. E. R. Lloyd, Martin Holbraad, Andreas Roepstorff, Isabelle Stengers, Helen Verran, Steven D. Brown, Brit Ross Winthereik, Marilyn Strathern, Bruce Kapferer, Annemarie Mol, Morten Axel Pedersen, Eduardo Viveiros de Castro, Matei Candea, Debbora Battaglia & Roy Wagner (2011). Introduction: Contexts for a Comparative Relativism. Common Knowledge 17 (1):1-12.score: 60.0
    This introduction to the Common Knowledge symposium titled “Comparative Relativism” outlines a variety of intellectual contexts where placing the unlikely companion terms comparison and relativism in conjunction offers analytical purchase. If comparison, in the most general sense, involves the investigation of discrete contexts in order to elucidate their similarities and differences, then relativism, as a tendency, stance, or working method, usually involves the assumption that contexts exhibit, or may exhibit, radically different, incomparable, or incommensurable traits. Comparative studies are required to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Mark Jensen (2011). Civil Society in Liberal Democracy. Routledge.score: 60.0
    In this contribution to contemporary political philosophy, Jensen aims to develop a model of civil society for deliberative democracy. In the course of developing the model, he also provides a thorough account of the meaning and use of "civil society" in contemporary scholarship as well as a critical review of rival models, including those found in the work of scholars such as John Rawls, Jurgen Habermas, Michael Walzer, Benjamin Barber, and Nancy Rosenblum. Jensen's own ideal treats civil society (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. R. B. Jensen & K. Schlechta (1990). Results on the Generic Kurepa Hypothesis. Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (1):13-27.score: 60.0
    K.J. Devlin has extended Jensen's construction of a model ofZFC andCH without Souslin trees to a model without Kurepa trees either. We modify the construction again to obtain a model with these properties, but in addition, without Kurepa trees inccc-generic extensions. We use a partially defined ◊-sequence, given by a fine structure lemma. We also show that the usual collapse ofκ Mahlo toω 2 will give a model without Kurepa trees not only in the model itself, but also inccc-extensions.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Rasmus Thybo Jensen (2009). Motor Intentionality and the Case of Schneider. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (3):371-388.score: 30.0
    I argue that Merleau-Ponty’s use of the case of Schneider in his arguments for the existence of non-conconceptual and non-representational motor intentionality contains a problematic methodological ambiguity. Motor intentionality is both to be revealed by its perspicuous preservation and by its contrastive impairment in one and the same case. To resolve the resulting contradiction I suggest we emphasize the second of Merleau-Ponty’s two lines of argument. I argue that this interpretation is the one in best accordance both with Merleau-Ponty’s general (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Karsten Klint Jensen (2003). What is the Difference Between (Moderate) Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism? Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):89-109.score: 30.0
    It is common to define egalitarianism in terms of an inequality ordering, which is supposed to have some weight in overall evaluations of outcomes. Egalitarianism, thus defined, implies that levelling down makes the outcome better in respect of reducing inequality; however, the levelling down objection claims there can be nothing good about levelling down. The priority view, on the other hand, does not have this implication. This paper challenges the common view. The standard definition of egalitarianism implicitly assumes a context. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David A. Jensen (2008). Abortion, Embryonic Stem Cell Research, and Waste. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (1):27-41.score: 30.0
    Can one consistently deny the permissibility of abortion while endorsing the killing of human embryos for the sake of stem cell research? The question is not trivial; for even if one accepts that abortion is prima facie wrong in all cases, there are significant differences with many of the embryos used for stem cell research from those involved in abortion—most prominently, many have been abandoned in vitro, and appear to have no reasonably likely meaningful future. On these grounds one might (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Karsten Klint Jensen (2007). Corporate Responsibility: The Stakeholder Paradox Reconsidered. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (6):515-532.score: 30.0
    Is it legitimate for a business to concentrate on profits under respect for the law and ethical custom? On the one hand, there seems to be good reasons for claiming that a corporation has a duty to act for the benefit of all its stakeholders. On the other hand, this seems to dissolve the notion of a private business; but then again, a private business would appear to be exempted from ethical responsibility. This is what Kenneth Goodpaster has called the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Casper Bruun Jensen (2006). Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences Into Democracy. [REVIEW] Human Studies 29 (1):107-122.score: 30.0
  18. James R. Beebe & Mark Jensen (2012). Surprising Connections Between Knowledge and Action: The Robustness of the Epistemic Side-Effect Effect. Philosophical Psychology 25 (5):689 - 715.score: 30.0
    A number of researchers have begun to demonstrate that the widely discussed ?Knobe effect? (wherein participants are more likely to think that actions with bad side-effects are brought about intentionally than actions with good or neutral side-effects) can be found in theory of mind judgments that do not involve the concept of intentional action. In this article we report experimental results that show that attributions of knowledge can be influenced by the kinds of (non-epistemic) concerns that drive the Knobe effect. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Morten Overgaard & Mads Jensen (eds.) (2012). Consciousness and Neural Plasticity. Frontiers Books.score: 30.0
  20. Henning Jensen (1976). Gilbert Harman's Defense of Moral Relativism. Philosophical Studies 30 (6):401 - 407.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. J. Vernon Jensen (1987). Ethical Tension Points in Whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics 6 (4):321 - 328.score: 30.0
    This paper analyzes the number of procedural and substantive tension points with which a conscientious whistleblower struggles. Included in the former are such questions as: (1) Am I properly depicting the seriousness of the problem? (2) Have I secured the information properly, analyzed it appropriately, and presented it fairly? (3) Are my motives appropriate? (4) Have I tried fully enough to have the problem corrected within the organization? (5) Should I blow the whistle while still a member of the organization (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ronald Jensen (1995). Inner Models and Large Cardinals. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 1 (4):393-407.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Karsten Jensen, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, Christian Gamborg, Kate Millar & Peter Sandøe (2011). Facilitating Ethical Reflection Among Scientists Using the Ethical Matrix. Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (3):425-445.score: 30.0
    Several studies have indicated that scientists are likely to have an outlook on both facts and values that are different to that of lay people in important ways. This is one significant reason it is currently believed that in order for scientists to exercise a reliable ethical reflection about their research it is necessary for them to engage in dialogue with other stakeholders. This paper reports on an exercise to encourage a group of scientists to reflect on ethical issues without (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Anthony K. Jensen (2009). Kant and the Scandal of Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (2):pp. 317-318.score: 30.0
  25. Mark Jensen (2009). The Limits of Practical Possibility. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2):168-184.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Karsten Klint Jensen & Peter Sandøe (2002). Food Safety and Ethics: The Interplay Between Science and Values. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (3):245-253.score: 30.0
    The general public in Europe seems tohave lost its confidence in food safety. Theremedy for this, as proposed by the Commissionof the EU, is a scientific rearmament. Thequestion, however, is whether more science willbe able to overturn the public distrust.Present experience seems to suggest thecontrary, because there is widespread distrustin the science-based governmental controlsystems. The answer to this problem is thecreation of an independent scientificFood Authority. However, we argue thatindependent scientific advice alone is unlikelyto re-establish public confidence. It is muchmore (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael C. Jensen (2002). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12 (2):235-256.score: 30.0
    Abstract: In this article, I offer a proposal to clarify what I believe is the proper relation between value maximization and stakeholder theory, which I call enlightened value maximization. Enlightened value maximization utilizes much of the structure of stakeholder theory but accepts maximization of the long-run value of the firm as the criterion for making the requisite tradeoffs among its stakeholders, and specifies long-term value maximization or value seeking as the firm’s objective. This proposal therefore solves the problems that arise (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Anthony K. Jensen, The Rogue of All Rogues: Nietzsche's Presentation of Eduard Von Hartmann's.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Henning Jensen (1984). Morality and Luck. Philosophy 59 (229):323 - 330.score: 30.0
    Thomas Nagel recognizes that it is commonly believed that people can neither be held morally responsible nor morally assessed for what is beyond their control. Yet he is convinced that although such a belief may be intuitively plausible, upon reflection we find that we do make moral assessments of persons in a large number of cases in which such assessments depend on factors not under their control. Of such factors he says: (p. 26).
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Rasmus Thybo Jensen & Dermot Moran (2012). Introduction: Intersubjectivity and Empathy. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 11 (2):125-133.score: 30.0
  31. Anthony K. Jensen (2009). Nietzsche's Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1):222 – 225.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Kasper Lippert-rasmussen & Karsten Klint Jensen (2002). Does Particularism Solve the Moral Problem? Philosophical Explorations 5 (2):125 – 140.score: 30.0
    Moral cognitivism, internalism about moral judgements, and Humeanism about motivating reasons all possess attractions.Yet they cannot all be true.This is the so-called moral problem. Dancy offers an interesting particularist response to the moral problem. However, we argue that this response, first, provides an inadequate basis for the distinction between motivating states and states necessary for motivation although not themselves motivators; second, draws no support from considerations about weakness of the will; and third, involves an implausible account of desire.We conclude that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Steven J. Jensen (2010). Good and Evil Actions: A Journey Through Saint Thomas Aquinas. Catholic University of America Press.score: 30.0
    *Tackles the Thomistic debate surrounding the inherent good and evil of human actions*.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Kipton E. Jensen (2009). Shadow of Virtue: On a Painful If Not Principled Compromise Inherent in Business Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):99 - 107.score: 30.0
    From a certain philosophical perspective, one that is at least as old as Plato but which is addressed also by Aristotle and Kant, business ethics – to the extent that it is marketed as form of enlightened self-interest — constitutes a Thrasymachean compromise: to argue that it is to our advantage to conduct business ethically, perhaps even advantageous to the bottom-line, comes curiously close to endorsing what Plato called the 'shadow of virtue' — i.e., of becoming temperate for the sake (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Karsten Klint Jensen (2002). The Moral Foundation of the Precautionary Principle. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (1):39-55.score: 30.0
    The Commission's recentinterpretation of the Precautionary Principleis used as starting point for an analysis ofthe moral foundation of this principle. ThePrecautionary Principle is shown to have theethical status of an amendment to a liberalprinciple to the effect that a state only mayrestrict a person's actions in order to preventunacceptable harm to others. The amendmentallows for restrictions being justified even incases where there is no conclusive scientificevidence for the risk of harmful effects.However, the liberal tradition has seriousproblems in determining when a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Ronald Björn Jensen (1968). On the Consistency of a Slight (?) Modification of Quine'smew Foundations. Synthese 19 (1-2):250 - 264.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Henning Jensen (1989). Kant and Moral Integrity. Philosophical Studies 57 (2):193 - 205.score: 30.0
    A main objection – perhaps the foremost – to Kant's theory of moral worth is that whereas he claims that only actions performed from the motive of duty have moral worth, most people are convinced that right actions performed out of.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bernard Eric Jensen (1978). The Recent Trend in the Interpretation of Dilthey. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (4):419-438.score: 30.0
  39. Kipton E. Jensen (2009). The Theological Foundations of the Hegelian System: Beyond the Corpse of Faith and Reason. Heythrop Journal 50 (2):215-227.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Mark N. Jensen (2011). Review of Bryan T. McGraw, Faith in Politics: Religion and Liberal Democracy. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anthony K. Jensen (2008). Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 631-632.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Robert Jensen (1994). Banning 'Redskins' From the Sports Page: The Ethics and Politics of Native American Nicknames. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (1):16 – 25.score: 30.0
    In February 1992, The (Portland) Oregonian announced it would no longer use sports team names that readers may find offensive, such as Redskins, Redmen, Indians, and Braves. Many journalists have criticized The Oregonian's decision, calling it an abandonment of the journalistic principles of objectivity and neutrality. This article addresses the ethical/political issues involved in the controversy through an examination of commentaries by journalists published in newspapers and public comments made by journalists critical of The Oregonian. After evaluating the explicit and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Henning Jensen (1977). Hume on Moral Agreement. Mind 86 (344):497-513.score: 30.0
  44. Karsten Klint Jensen (2008). Millian Superiorities and the Repugnant Conclusion. Utilitas 20 (3):279-300.score: 30.0
    James Griffin has considered a form of superiority in value that is weaker than lexical priority as a possible remedy to the Repugnant Conclusion. In this article, I demonstrate that, in a context where value is additive, this weaker form collapses into the stronger form of superiority. And in a context where value is non-additive, weak superiority does not amount to a radical value difference at all. These results are applied on one of Larry Temkin's cases against transitivity. I demonstrate (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Karsten Klint Jensen & Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen (2005). Understanding Particularism. Theoria 71 (2):118-137.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Karsten Klint Jensen (2012). Unacceptable Risks and the Continuity Axiom. Economics and Philosophy 28 (1):31-42.score: 30.0
    Consider a sequence of outcomes of descending value, A > B > C > . . . > Z. According to Larry Temkin, there are reasons to deny the continuity axiom in certain cases, i.e. cases of triplets of outcomes A, B and Z, where A and B differ little in value, but B and Z differ greatly. But, Temkin argues, if we assume continuity for cases, i.e. cases where the loss is small, we can derive continuity for the case (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Henning Jensen (1973). Exemplification in Nelson Goodman's Aesthetic Theory. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32 (1):47-51.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. David Jensen (2012). Kant and a Problem of Motivation. Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (1):83-96.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Anthony K. Jensen (2010). Nietzsche's Interpretation of Heraclitus in Its Historical Context. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):335-362.score: 30.0
    This paper aims to reexamine Nietzsche’s early interpretation of Heraclitus in an attempt to resolve some longstanding scholarly misconceptions. Rather than articulate similarities or delineate the lines of influence, this study engages Nietzsche’s interpretation itself in its historical setting, for the first time acknowledging the contextual framework in which he was working. This framework necessarily combines Nietzsche’s reading in philology, post-Kantian scientific naturalism, and of the romantic worldviews of Schopenhauer and Wagner. What emerges is not the acceptance of the metaphysical-flux (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen (1998). Self-Organized Criticality: Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems. Cambridge University Press.score: 30.0
    Self-organized criticality (SOC) is based upon the idea that complex behavior can develop spontaneously in certain multi-body systems whose dynamics vary abruptly. This book is a clear and concise introduction to the field of self-organized criticality, and contains an overview of the main research results. The author begins with an examination of what is meant by SOC, and the systems in which it can occur. He then presents and analyzes computer models to describe a number of systems, and he explains (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 584