1. Ulrich Pardey (2002). Unscharfe Grenzen.Über Die Haufen-Paradoxie, den Darwinismus Und Die Rekursive Grammatik. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (2):323-348.
    Inexact limits. On the heap-paradox, Darwinism and recursive grammar. The heap-paradox can be reinforced by a combination with the basic idea of Achilles . The logical pattern of the reinforced heap-paradox will be analysed in a new manner by distinguishing between limited and unlimited transitivity. This analysis makes explicit the constructive character of the paradox. Finally it is shown that the logical pattern of the heap-paradox is applied in popular presentations of Darwinism , in the debate about abortion and in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ulrich Pardey (2000). Verneinen als Absprechen bei Aristoteles oder: Muß man Aristoteles durch die Russellsche Brille lesen? Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 5 (1):17-17.
    Two counter-examples stand against the Aristotelian thesis of De interpretatione 6 that negation principally means denial: Neither can the negation of general propositions be understood as denial, nor is this possible in the case of propositions whose grammatical subject is an empty singular term. While the first counter-example can be ea­sily refuted through the analysis which Aristotle gives of general propositions in De interpretatione 7, the second counter-example seems to be able to invoke Categoriae 10. According to the usual view (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ulrich Pardey (1999). Über Kants. ‚Widerlegung des Mendelssohnschen Beweises der Beharrlichkeit der Seele'. Kant-Studien 90 (3):257-284.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation