Search results for 'Understanding others' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Anna Wierzbicka (2012). Understanding Others Requires Shared Concepts. Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):356-379.score: 60.0
    “It is a noble task to try to understand others, and to have them understand you (…) but it is never an easy one“, says Everett (p. 327). This paper argues that a basic prerequisite for understanding others (and also for having them understand you) is to have some shared concepts on which this understanding can build. If speakers of different languages didn't share some concepts to begin with then cross-cultural understanding would not be possible (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Shaun Gallagher & Daniel D. Hutto (2008). Understanding Others Through Primary Interaction and Narrative Practice. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. John Benjamins. 17–38.score: 57.0
    We argue that theory-of-mind (ToM) approaches, such as “theory theory” and “simulation theory”, are both problematic and not needed. They account for neither our primary and pervasive way of engaging with others nor the true basis of our folk psychological understanding, even when narrowly construed. Developmental evidence shows that young infants are capable of grasping the purposeful intentions of others through the perception of bodily movements, gestures, facial expressions etc. Trevarthen’s notion of primary intersubjectivity can provide a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Giacomo Rizzolatti & Maddalena Fabbri-Destro (2013). The Mirror Mechanism: Understanding Others From the Inside. In Simon Baron-Cohen, Michael Lombardo & Helen Tager-Flusberg (eds.), Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives From Developmental Social Neuroscience. Oup Oxford. 264.score: 52.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Guiseppina D'Oro (2013). Understanding Others: Cultural Anthropology with Collingwood and Quine. Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):326-345.score: 45.0
  5. Daniel L. Everett (2012). Understanding Others Requires Adaptive Thinking: Response to Wierzbicka. Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (2):417-428.score: 45.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Rizzolatti Giacomo (2010). The Mirror Mechanism: A Mechanism for Understanding Others. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4.score: 45.0
  7. Douglas Hollan (2008). Being There: On the Imaginative Aspects of Understanding Others and Being Understood. Ethos 36 (4):475-489.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Susumu Shimazono (2006). Violence and the Position of Understanding Others: The Transformation of Religious Studies After the Aum Shinrikyo Affair. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 79 (4):966-967.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Shaun Nichols & Stephen P. Stich (2003). Mindreading. An Integrated Account of Pretence, Self-Awareness, and Understanding Other Minds. Oxford University Press.score: 38.0
    The everyday capacity to understand the mind, or 'mindreading', plays an enormous role in our ordinary lives. Shaun Nichols and Stephen Stich provide a detailed and integrated account of the intricate web of mental components underlying this fascinating and multifarious skill. The imagination, they argue, is essential to understanding others, and there are special cognitive mechanisms for understanding oneself. The account that emerges has broad implications for longstanding philosophical debates over the status of folk psychology. Mindreading is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Mary Gauvain (2005). What Are the Consequences of Understanding the Complex Goal-Directed Actions of Others? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):700-701.score: 37.0
    Four issues that build on the ideas offered by Tomasello et al. are discussed: the developmental course of shared intentionality and its relation to other developing abilities and experiences, and the conceptualization of three key features of the process: motivation, plans and the development of planning, and culture.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Albert Newen & Tobias Schlicht (2009). Understanding Other Minds: A Criticism of Goldman's Simulation Theory and an Outline of the Person Model Theory. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):209-242.score: 36.0
    What exactly do we do when we try to make sense of other people e.g. by ascribing mental states like beliefs and desires to them? After a short criticism of Theory-Theory, Interaction Theory and the Narrative Theory of understanding others as well as an extended criticism of the Simulation Theory in Goldman's recent version (2006), we suggest an alternative approach: the Person Model Theory . Person models are the basis for our ability to register and evaluate persons having (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. James Winchester (2000). Understanding Aesthetic Judgments Across Cultural Borders: Bell Hooks, Kant, and Cornel West and the Understanding of Aesthetic Judgments of Others. Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):499-525.score: 36.0
  13. Alex Alvergne (2011). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. By Sarah Blaffer Hrdy. Pp. 422. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2009.) £19.95, ISBN 978-0-674-03299-6, Hardback. [REVIEW] Journal of Biosocial Science 43 (4):509-511.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Luca Bonini, Pier Francesco Ferrari & Leonardo Fogassi (2013). Neurophysiological Bases Underlying the Organization of Intentional Actions and the Understanding of Others' Intention. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):1095-1104.score: 36.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mervis C. (2009). Understanding of Others' Intentions by Young Children with Williams Syndrome. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 3.score: 36.0
  16. Kirsten A. Deconti & Donald J. Dickerson (1994). Preschool Children's Understanding of the Situational Determinants of Others' Emotions. Cognition and Emotion 8 (5):453-472.score: 36.0
  17. Rizzolatti Giacomo (2013). Understanding Actions, Intentions, and Emotions of Others. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 36.0
  18. Alison Gopnik & Andrew N. Meltzoff (1994). Minds, Bodies, and Persons: Young Children's Understanding of the Self and Others as Reflected in Imitation and Theory of Mind Research. In S. T. Parker, R. Mitchell & M. L. Boccia (eds.), Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans: Developmental Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.score: 36.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Bernadette Hannigan (1996). Death Hath ten Thousand Several Doors, Some More Open Than Others.Understanding Ageing (1995). Cambridge University Press. 207pp. �35 (Hardback), �14.95 (Paperback). ISBN 0-521-417880 (Hardback), 0-521-48702-2 (Paperback).The CD4 Molecule. Roles in T-Lymphocytes and in HIV Disease (1996). Edited by D. R. Littman. Spirnger-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg. 182pp. DM177. ISBN 3-540-59344-6. [REVIEW] Bioessays 18 (10):853-853.score: 36.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Petra Hauf & Wolfgang Prinz (2005). The Understanding of Own and Others' Actions During Infancy:“You-Like-Me” or “Me-Like-You”? Interaction Studies 6 (3):429-445.score: 36.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles, G. D. Logan, G. Underwood & V. Batt (1996). ISBN 3 7643 5322 8 Green DW and Others Cognitive Science: An Introduction Blackwell, Oxford, 1996, 416 Pages,£ 15.99 Paper (US $25.58) ISBN 0631 19861X Hampson PJ, Morris PE Understanding Cognition Blackwell, Oxford, 1996, 399 Pages,£ 13.99 Paper (US $22.38) ISBN 0 631157514. [REVIEW] In Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception. Ridgeview. 375-376.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gordon B. Moskowitz (2012). W Hat is a Goal? How Do People Pursue Goals? The Answers to These Questions May Seem Obvious Because People Have a Lifetime of Experience at Setting Goals, Pursuing Goals, Disengaging From Some Goals, and Attaining Others. One's History of Experience with Goals, However, Does Not Mean That One has an Accurate Understanding of Where Goals Come From, How the Mind Represents Them, or How One Goes About Pursuing the Aims That Are so Central to One's Sense of Personal Fulfillment. In Henk Aarts & Andrew J. Elliot (eds.), Goal-Directed Behavior. Psychology Press.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Brian Phillips (2007). Nursing Care and Understanding the Experiences of Others: A Gadamerian Perspective. Nursing Inquiry 14 (1):89-94.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Wilco W. van Dijk, Jaap W. Ouwerkerk, Yoka M. Wesseling & Guido M. van Koningsbruggen (2011). Towards Understanding Pleasure at the Misfortunes of Others: The Impact of Self-Evaluation Threat on Schadenfreude. Cognition and Emotion 25 (2):360-368.score: 36.0
  25. Margaret Whitehead (2010). Physical Literacy, the Sense of Self, Relationships with Others and the Place of Knowledge and Understanding in the Concept. In , Physical Literacy: Throughout the Lifecourse. Routledge.score: 36.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Carol M. Worthman (2010). Mothers and Others: The Evolutionary Origins of Mutual Understanding. Sarah Blaffer Hrdy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 2009. X+422pp. [REVIEW] Ethos 38 (4):1-3.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Kristin Andrews (2000). Our Understanding of Other Minds: Theory of Mind and the Intentional Stance. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (7):12-24.score: 33.0
    Psychologists distinguish between intentional systems which have beliefs and those which are also able to attribute beliefs to others. The ability to do the latter is called having a `theory of mind', and many cognitive ethologists are hoping to find evidence for this ability in animal behaviour. I argue that Dennett's theory entails that any intentional system that interacts with another intentional system (such as vervet monkeys and chess-playing computers) has a theory of mind, which would make the distinction (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Barry C. Smith (2006). Publicity, Externalism and Inner States. In Tomáš Marvan (ed.), What Determines Content?: The Internalism/Externalism Dispute. Cambridge Scholars Press.score: 33.0
    The critic Cyril Connolly once pointed out that diarists don’t make novelists. He went on to describe the problem for the would-be writer. “Writing for oneself: no public. Writing for others: no privacy” (Cyril Connolly, Journal). This paper addresses Connolly's worry about the public ad private: how can we reconcile the inner and conscious dimension of speech with its outer and public dimension? For if what people mean by their words involves, or consists in, what they have in mind (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Corrado Sinigaglia & Giacomo Rizzolatti (2011). Through the Looking Glass: Self and Others. Cosciousness and Cognition 20 (1):64-74.score: 33.0
    In the present article we discuss the relevance of the mirror mechanism for our sense of self and our sense of others. We argue that, by providing us with an understanding from the inside of actions, the mirror mechanism radically challenges the traditional view of the self and of the others. Indeed, this mechanism not only reveals the common ground on the basis of which we become aware of ourselves as selves distinct from other selves, but also (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Clarence W. Joldersma (2011). Education: Understanding, Ethics, and the Call of Justice. Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (5):441-447.score: 33.0
    Education is interpreted as something basic to our humanity. As part of our primordial way of being human, education is intrinsic to the understanding’s functioning. At the same time education involves an originary ethical relation to the other, unsettling the self-directed character of the striving to live. And because of its social setting, the call of many others, education orients one to the social, to the call of justice.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Lisa A. Parr (2001). Understanding Other's Emotions: From Affective Resonance to Empathic Action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):44-45.score: 33.0
    Empathy is a developmental process whereby individuals come to understand the emotional states of others. While the exact nature of this process remains unknown, PAM's utility is that it establishes empathy along a continuum of behavior ranging from emotional contagion to cognitive forms, a very useful distinction for understanding the phylogeny and ontogeny of this important process. The model will undoubtedly fuel future research, especially from comparative domains where data are most problematic.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Dan Zahavi (2007). Self and Other: The Limits of Narrative Understanding. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82 (60):179-.score: 30.0
    If the self – as a popular view has it – is a narrative construction, if it arises out of discursive practices, it is reasonable to assume that the best possible avenue to self-understanding will be provided by those very narratives. If I want to know what it means to be a self, I should look closely at the stories that I and others tell about myself, since these stories constitute who I am. In the following I wish (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jordan Dodd (2014). Realism and Anti-Realism About Experiences of Understanding. Philosophical Studies 168 (3):745-767.score: 30.0
    Strawson (1994) and Peacocke (1992) introduced thought experiments that show that it seems intuitive that there is, in some way, an experiential character to mental events of understanding. Some (e.g., Siewert 1998, 2011; Pitt 2004) try to explain these intuitions by saying that just as we have, say, headache experiences and visual experiences of blueness, so too we have experiences of understanding. Others (e.g., Prinz 2006, 2011; Tye 1996) propose that these intuitions can be explained without positing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Heikki Saari (2005). Wittgenstein on Understanding Other Cultures. Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):139-161.score: 28.0
    In this article I discuss Wittgenstein's view of what is involved in understanding other cultures. I show that he is not committed to cultural relativism, as some of his critics argue. As he sees it, the real differences between cultures do not involve any fundamental conceptual, epistemic or other barriers that would make it impossible for us to understand and criticise other cultures. Shared forms of life and man's natural history provide a foothold for us when we attempt to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter J. Markie (2013). Rational Intuition and Understanding. Philosophical Studies 163 (1):271-290.score: 27.0
    Rational intuitions involve a particular form of understanding that gives them a special epistemic status. This form of understanding and its epistemic efficacy are not explained by several current theories of rational intuition, including Phenomenal Conservatism (Huemer, Skepticism and the veil of perception, 2001 ; Ethical intuitionism, 2005 ; Philos Phenomenol Res 74:30–55, 2007 ), Proper Functionalism (Plantinga, Warrant and proper function, 1993 ), the Competency Theory (Bealer Pac Philos Q 81:1–30, 2000 ; Sosa, A virtue epistemology, 2007 (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Steffen Ducheyne (2009). Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40 (2):227 - 258.score: 27.0
    In this essay, I attempt to assess Henk de Regt and Dennis Dieks recent pragmatic and contextual account of scientific understanding on the basis of an important historical case-study: understanding in Newton’s theory of universal gravitation and Huygens’ reception of universal gravitation. It will be shown that de Regt and Dieks’ Criterion for the Intelligibility of a Theory (CIT), which stipulates that the appropriate combination of scientists’ skills and intelligibility-enhancing theoretical virtues is a condition for scientific understanding, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John Michael (2014). Towards a Consensus About the Role of Empathy in Interpersonal Understanding. Topoi 33 (1):157-172.score: 27.0
    In recent years, there has been a great deal of controversy in the philosophy of mind, developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience both about how to conceptualize empathy and about the connections between empathy and interpersonal understanding. Ideally, we would first establish a consensus about how to conceptualize empathy, and then analyze the potential contribution of empathy to interpersonal understanding. However, it is not at all clear that such a consensus will soon be forthcoming, given that different people have (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. G. Rusch (2007). Understanding. The Mutual Regulation of Cognition and Culture. Constructivist Foundations 2 (2-3):118-128.score: 27.0
    Purpose: Demonstrate that cognitive and social approaches towards understanding do not at all oppose but rather they complement each other. Constructivist concepts of understanding paved the way to conceive of understanding as a cognitive-social "mechanism" which mutually regulates processes of social structuration and, at the same time, cognitive constructions and processing. Findings: Constructivist approaches bridge the gap between the cognitive and the social faces of understanding. They demonstrate how comprehension and cultivation, cognition and cultural reproduction are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Karsten R. Stueber (2000). Understanding Other Minds and the Problem of Rationality. In K. R. Stueber & H. H. Kogaler (eds.), Empathy and Agency: The Problem of Understanding in the Human Sciences. Boulder: Westview Press.score: 26.0
  40. John Locke (1990). Drafts for the Essay Concerning Human Understanding, and Other Philosophical Writings. Clarendon Press.score: 25.0
    This volume is the first of three which will contain all of Locke's extant writings on philosophy which relate to An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, other than those contained in volumes of the Clarendon Edition of John Locke such as the Correspondence. The book contains the two earliest known drafts of the Essay, both written in 1671, and provides for the first time an accurate version of Locke's text together with a record of virtually all his changes, in notes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Naoko Saito (2010). Beyond Monolingualism: Philosophy as Translation and the Understanding of Other Cultures. Ethics and Education 4 (2):131-139.score: 25.0
    Beyond a monolingual mentality and beyond the language that is typically observed in the prevalent discourse of education for understanding other cultures, this article tries to present another approach: Stanley Cavell's idea of philosophy as translation . This Cavellian approach shows that understanding foreign cultures involves a relation to other cultures already within one's native culture. Foreshadowing the Cavellian sense of tragedy, Emerson's 'Devil's child' helps us detect the sources of repression and blindness that are hidden behind the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. David Hume (2007). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding and Other Writings. Cambridge University Press.score: 24.0
    David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, first published in 1748, is a concise statement of Hume’s central philosophical positions. It develops an account of human mental functioning which emphasizes the limits of human knowledge and the extent of our reliance on (non-rational) mental habits. It then applies that account to questions of free will and religious knowledge before closing with a defence of moderate scepticism. This volume, which presents a modified version of the definitive 1772 edition of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Michael Tomasello, Malinda Carpenter, Josep Call, Tanya Behne & Henrike Moll (2005). Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):675-691.score: 24.0
    We propose that the crucial difference between human cognition and that of other species is the ability to participate with others in collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions: shared intentionality. Participation in such activities requires not only especially powerful forms of intention reading and cultural learning, but also a unique motivation to share psychological states with others and unique forms of cognitive representation for doing so. The result of participating in these activities is species-unique forms of cultural (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. Peter Hobson (2004). Understanding Self and Other. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):109-110.score: 24.0
    Interpersonal understanding is rooted in social engagement. The question is: How? What features of intersubjective coordination are essential for the growth of concepts about the mind, and how does development proceed on this basis? Carpendale & Lewis (C&L) offer many telling insights, but their account begs questions about the earliest forms of self-other linkage and differentiation, especially as mediated by processes of identification.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Karen Bartsch & David Estes (2004). Articulating the Role of Experience in Mental State Understanding: A Challenge for Theory-Theory and Other Theories. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):99-100.score: 24.0
    Carpendale & Lewis's (C&L's) proposal of a social interaction account makes clear the need for researchers of all theoretical orientations to get specific about how social experience influences children's developing understanding of mind, but it is premature to reject other theories, such as theory-theory, which also attribute a major role to experience.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gregory W. H. Smith (2005). Enacted Others: Specifying Goffman's Phenomenological Omissions and Sociological Accomplishments. [REVIEW] Human Studies 28 (4):397 - 415.score: 23.0
    Erving Goffman's distinctive contribution to an understanding of others was grounded in his information control and ritual models of the interaction process. This contribution centered on the forms of the interaction order rather than self-other relations as traditionally conceived in phenomenology. Goffman came to phenomenology as a sympathetic but critical outsider who sought resources for the sociological mining of the interaction order. His engagement with phenomenological thinkers (principally Gustav Ichheiser, Jean-Paul Sartre and Alfred Schutz) has to be understood (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Machiel Keestra (2011). Understanding Human Action: Integrating Meanings, Mechanisms, Causes, and Contexts. In Repko Allen, Szostak Rick & Newell William (eds.), Interdisciplinary Research: Case Studies of Integrative Understandings of Complex Problems. Sage.score: 23.0
    Humans are capable of understanding an incredible variety of actions performed by other humans. Even though these range from primary biological actions, like eating and fleeing, to acts in parliament or in poetry, humans generally can make sense of each other’s actions. Understanding other people’s actions is called action understanding, and it can transcend differences in race, gender, culture, age, and social and historical circumstances. Action understanding is the cognitive ability to make sense of another person’s (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. L. Aylward (2007). Understanding the Civil War: Causes of Violent Conflict and the Social Construction of Indigenous Identity in Guatemala. Dialogue 5 (1):45-64.score: 23.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jane Heal (2005). Joint Attention and Understanding the Mind. In N. Elian, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Oxford University PressJoint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Oxford University Press. 34--44.score: 22.0
    It is plausible to think, as many developmental psychologists do, that joint attention is important in the development of getting a full grasp on psychological notions. This chapter argues that this role of joint attention is best understood in the context of the simulation theory about the nature of psychological understanding rather than in the context of the theory. Episodes of joint attention can then be seen not as good occasions for learning a theory of mind but rather as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Kyung-Man Kim (2011). Habermas on Understanding: Virtual Participation, Dialogue and the Universality of Truth. [REVIEW] Human Studies 34 (4):393-406.score: 22.0
    Although the success of Habermas’s theory of communicative action depends on his dialogical model of understanding in which a theorist is supposed to participate in the debate with the actors as a ‘virtual participant’ and seek context-transcendent truth through the exchange of speech acts, current literature on the theory of communicative action rarely touches on the difficulties it entails. In the first part of this paper, I will examine Habermas’s argument that understanding other cultural practices requires the interpreter (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000