Search results for 'Validity' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Hartry Field (2015). What Is Logical Validity? In Colin R. Caret & Ole T. Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford University Press
    What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range of cases) they are primarily disagreeing about how to regulate their degrees of belief. An analogy is drawn between beliefs about validity and beliefs about chance: both sorts of belief serve primarily to regulate degrees of belief about other matters, but in both cases the concepts have a kind of objectivity nonetheless.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Julien Murzi (2014). The Inexpressibility of Validity. Analysis 74 (1):65-81.
    Tarski's Undefinability of Truth Theorem comes in two versions: that no consistent theory which interprets Robinson's Arithmetic (Q) can prove all instances of the T-Scheme and hence define truth; and that no such theory, if sound, can even express truth. In this note, I prove corresponding limitative results for validity. While Peano Arithmetic already has the resources to define a predicate expressing logical validity, as Jeff Ketland has recently pointed out (2012, Validity as a primitive. Analysis 72: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Hartry Field (forthcoming). Disarming a Paradox of Validity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.
    Abstract. Any theory of truth must find a way around Curry’s paradox, and there are well-known ways to do so. This paper concerns an apparently analogous paradox, about validity rather than truth, which JC Beall and Julien Murzi (“Two Flavor's of Curry's Paradox”) call the v-Curry. They argue that there are reasons to want a common solution to it and the standard Curry paradox, and that this rules out the solutions to the latter offered by most “naive truth theorists”. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  2
    Peter B. M. Vranas (2016). New Foundations for Imperative Logic III: A General Definition of Argument Validity. Synthese 193 (6):1703-1753.
    Besides pure declarative arguments, whose premises and conclusions are declaratives, and pure imperative arguments, whose premises and conclusions are imperatives, there are mixed-premise arguments, whose premises include both imperatives and declaratives, and cross-species arguments, whose premises are declaratives and whose conclusions are imperatives or vice versa. I propose a general definition of argument validity: an argument is valid exactly if, necessarily, every fact that sustains its premises also sustains its conclusion, where a fact sustains an imperative exactly if it (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  40
    Roy T. Cook (2014). There is No Paradox of Logical Validity. Logica Universalis 8 (3-4):447-467.
    A number of authors have argued that Peano Arithmetic supplemented with a logical validity predicate is inconsistent in much the same manner as is PA supplemented with an unrestricted truth predicate. In this paper I show that, on the contrary, there is no genuine paradox of logical validity—a completely general logical validity predicate can be coherently added to PA, and the resulting system is consistent. In addition, this observation lead to a number of novel, and important, insights (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  6. Sinan Dogramaci (2010). Knowledge of Validity. Noûs 44 (3):403-432.
    What accounts for how we know that certain rules of reasoning, such as reasoning by Modus Ponens, are valid? If our knowledge of validity must be based on some reasoning, then we seem to be committed to the legitimacy of rule-circular arguments for validity. This paper raises a new difficulty for the rule-circular account of our knowledge of validity. The source of the problem is that, contrary to traditional wisdom, a universal generalization cannot be inferred just on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  25
    Lionel Shapiro (2013). Validity Curry Strengthened. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):100-107.
    Several authors have argued that a version of Curry's paradox involving validity motivates rejecting the structural rule of contraction. This paper criticizes two recently suggested alternative responses to “validity Curry.” There are three salient stages in a validity Curry derivation. Rejecting contraction blocks the first, while the alternative responses focus on the second and third. I show that a distinguishing feature of validity Curry, as contrasted with more familiar forms of Curry's paradox, is that paradox arises (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8. John Corcoran & Susan Wood (1980). Boole's Criteria for Validity and Invalidity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 21 (4):609-638.
    It is one thing for a given proposition to follow or to not follow from a given set of propositions and it is quite another thing for it to be shown either that the given proposition follows or that it does not follow.* Using a formal deduction to show that a conclusion follows and using a countermodel to show that a conclusion does not follow are both traditional practices recognized by Aristotle and used down through the history of logic. These (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  9.  3
    Ilya M. Goldin, Rosa Lynn Pinkus & Kevin Ashley (2015). Validity and Reliability of an Instrument for Assessing Case Analyses in Bioengineering Ethics Education. Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (3):789-807.
    Assessment in ethics education faces a challenge. From the perspectives of teachers, students, and third-party evaluators like the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology and the National Institutes of Health, assessment of student performance is essential. Because of the complexity of ethical case analysis, however, it is difficult to formulate assessment criteria, and to recognize when students fulfill them. Improvement in students’ moral reasoning skills can serve as the focus of assessment. In previous work, Rosa Lynn Pinkus and Claire Gloeckner (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  27
    Federica Russo (2011). Correlational Data, Causal Hypotheses, and Validity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):85 - 107.
    A shared problem across the sciences is to make sense of correlational data coming from observations and/or from experiments. Arguably, this means establishing when correlations are causal and when they are not. This is an old problem in philosophy. This paper, narrowing down the scope to quantitative causal analysis in social science, reformulates the problem in terms of the validity of statistical models. Two strategies to make sense of correlational data are presented: first, a 'structural strategy', the goal of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  43
    Michael Baumgartner (2013). Exhibiting Interpretational and Representational Validity. Synthese (7):1-25.
    A natural language argument may be valid in at least two nonequivalent senses: it may be interpretationally or representationally valid (Etchemendy in The concept of logical consequence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990). Interpretational and representational validity can both be formally exhibited by classical first-order logic. However, as these two notions of informal validity differ extensionally and first-order logic fixes one determinate extension for the notion of formal validity (or consequence), some arguments must be formalized by unrelated nonequivalent (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  78
    Roberta Ballarin (2005). Validity and Necessity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (3):275 - 303.
    In this paper I argue against the commonly received view that Kripke's formal Possible World Semantics (PWS) reflects the adoption of a metaphysical interpretation of the modal operators. I consider in detail Kripke's three main innovations vis-à-vis Carnap's PWS: a new view of the worlds, variable domains of quantification, and the adoption of a notion of universal validity. I argue that all these changes are driven by the natural technical development of the model theory and its related notion of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  77
    James A. Woodbridge & Bradley Armour-Garb (2008). The Pathology of Validity. Synthese 160 (1):63 - 74.
    Stephen Read has presented an argument for the inconsistency of the concept of validity. We extend Read’s results and show that this inconsistency is but one half of a larger problem. Like the concept of truth, validity is infected with what we call semantic pathology, a condition that actually gives rise to two symptoms: inconsistency and indeterminacy. After sketching the basic ideas behind semantic pathology and explaining how it manifests both symptoms in the concept of truth, we present (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  21
    Stephan Leuenberger (2013). De Jure and De Facto Validity in the Logic of Time and Modality. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):196-205.
    What formulas are tense-logically valid depends on the structure of time, for example on whether it has a beginning. Logicians have investigated what formulas correspond to what physical hypotheses about time. Analogously, we can investigate what formulas of modal logic correspond to what metaphysical hypotheses about necessity. It is widely held that physical hypotheses about time may be contingent. If so, tense-logical validity may be contingent. In contrast, validity in modal logic is typically taken to be non-contingent, as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  88
    Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387-418.
    We investigate the philosophical significance of the existence of different semantic systems with respect to which a given deductive system is sound and complete. Our case study will be Corcoran’s deductive system D for Aristotelian syllogistic and some of the different semantic systems for syllogistic that have been proposed in the literature. We shall prove that they are not equivalent, in spite of D being sound and complete with respect to each of them. Beyond the specific case of syllogistic, the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  22
    Daisuke Kachi (2002). Validity in Simple Partial Logic. Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 10 (4):139-153.
    Firstly I characterize Simple Partial Logic (SPL) as the generalization and extension of a certain two-valued logic. Based on the characterization I present two definitions of validity in SPL. Finally I show that given my characterization these two definitions are more appropriate than other definitions that have been prevalent, since both have some desirable semantic properties that the others lack.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  21
    Andrea Polonioli (2012). Gigerenzer's 'External Validity Argument' Against the Heuristics and Biases Program: An Assessment. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 11 (2):133-148.
    Gigerenzer’s ‘external validity argument’ plays a pivotal role in his critique of the heuristics and biases research program (HB). The basic idea is that (a) the experimental contexts deployed by HB are not representative of the real environment and that (b) the differences between the setting and the real environment are causally relevant, because they result in different performances by the subjects. However, by considering Gigerenzer’s work on frequencies in probability judgments, this essay attempts to show that there are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  5
    Hedwig Boudrez & Dirk De Bacquer (2012). A Dutch Version of the Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale: Factorial Structure, Reliability and Validity. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):799-806.
    Aims : The Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale (MRSS) is a widely accepted scale that measures psychological functions of smoking. The scale has been translated in Dutch and has been validated, in order to be used in clinical smoking cessation practice in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium. This study examined the factorial structure, reliability and validity of the scale in a sample of smokers, who are characterized by a high level of dependence and an explicit motivation to stop smoking. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  13
    Alexandra Zinke (2015). On Exhibiting Representational Validity. Synthese 192 (4):1157-1171.
    We can distinguish two non-equivalent ways in which a natural language argument can be valid: it can be interpretationally or representationally valid. However, there is just one notion of classical first-order validity for formal languages: truth-preservation in all classical first-order models. To ease the tension, Baumgartner suggests that we should understand interpretational and representational validity as imposing different adequacy conditions on formalizations of natural language arguments. I argue against this proposal. To that end, I first show that Baumgartner’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  14
    Jan J. Wilbanks (2010). Defining Deduction, Induction, and Validity. Argumentation 24 (1):107-124.
    In this paper I focus on two contrasting concepts of deduction and induction that have appeared in introductory (formal) logic texts over the past 75 years or so. According to the one, deductive and inductive arguments are defined solely by reference to what arguers claim about the relation between the premises and the conclusions. According to the other, they are defined solely by reference to that relation itself. Arguing that these definitions have defects that are due to their simplicity, I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  24
    Adela Cortina (2000). Civil Ethics and the Validity of Law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):39-55.
    This paper aims to clarify the nature and contents of 'civil ethics' and the source of the binding force of its obligations. This ethics should provide the criteria for evaluating the moral validity of social, legal and morally valid law. The article starts with observing that in morally pluralist Western societies civil ethics already exists, and has gradually started to play the role of guiding the law. It is argued that civil ethics should not be conceived as 'civic morals' (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  15
    Gordon Stobart (2001). The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.
    This paper reviews the validity of National Curriculum assessment in England. It works with the concept of 'consequential validity' (Messick, 1989) which incorporates both conventional 'reliability' issues and the use to which any assessment is put. The review uses the eight stage 'threats to validity' model developed by Crooks, Kane and Cohen (1996). The complexity of National Curriculum assessment makes evaluation difficult. These assessments are used for a variety of purposes so that the 'consequential' aspects are compounded. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  7
    Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387 - 418.
    We investigate the philosophical significance of the existence of different semantic systems with respect to which a given deductive system is sound and complete. Our case study will be Corcoran's deductive system D for Aristotelian syllogistic and some of the different semantic systems for syllogistic that have been proposed in the literature. We shall prove that they are not equivalent, in spite of D being sound and complete with respect to each of them. Beyond the specific case of syllogistic, the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  17
    Nicholas Bardsley (2010). Sociality and External Validity in Experimental Economics. Mind and Society 9 (2):119-138.
    It is sometimes argued that experimental economists do not have to worry about external validity so long as the design sticks closely to a theoretical model. This position mistakes the model for the theory. As a result, applied economics designs often study phenomena distinct from their stated objects of inquiry. Because the implemented models are abstract, they may provide improbable analogues to their stated subject matter. This problem is exacerbated by the relational character of the social world, which also (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  14
    David J. A. Dozois (2000). Influences on Freud's Mourning and Melancholia and its Contextual Validity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):167-195.
    This article critically evaluates S. Freud's Mourning and Melancholia and challenges both the celebratory and reactionary views that treat this essay as an ahistorical and decontextualized "foundation-stone" of depression. Although many biographies have been written on Freud, the possible influences on his thinking in the area grief and depression have not been examined. Moreover, no reviews have investigated Freud's understanding of mourning and melancholia from the perspective of his own experiences with these difficulties. Following a brief overview of Freud's seminal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  68
    Peter B. M. Vranas (2012). New Foundations for Imperative Logic Iii: A General Definition of Argument Validity. Manuscript in Preparation.
    Besides pure declarative arguments, whose premises and conclusions are declaratives (“you sinned shamelessly; so you sinned”), and pure imperative arguments, whose premises and conclusions are imperatives (“repent quickly; so repent”), there are mixed-premise arguments, whose premises include both imperatives and declaratives (“if you sinned, repent; you sinned; so repent”), and cross-species arguments, whose premises are declaratives and whose conclusions are imperatives (“you must repent; so repent”) or vice versa (“repent; so you can repent”). I propose a general definition of argument (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Renée Allvin, Margareta Ehnfors, Narinder Rawal, Elisabeth Svensson & Ewa Idvall (2009). Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Patient‐Reported Postoperative Recovery: Content Validity and Intra‐Patient Reliability. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (3):411-419.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  36
    Lionel Shapiro & Julien Murzi (2015). Validity and Truth-Preservation. In Lionel Shapiro & Julien Murzi (eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth. Springer Netherlands 431-459.
    The revisionary approach to semantic paradox is commonly thought to have a somewhat uncomfortable corollary, viz. that, on pain of triviality, we cannot affirm that all valid arguments preserve truth (Beall2007, Beall2009, Field2008, Field2009). We show that the standard arguments for this conclusion all break down once (i) the structural rule of contraction is restricted and (ii) how the premises can be aggregated---so that they can be said to jointly entail a given conclusion---is appropriately understood. In addition, we briefly rehearse (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  3
    W. R. Garner (1954). Context Effects and the Validity of Loudness Scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (3):218.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   69 citations  
  30.  3
    Arzu Daskapan, Stefan Höfer, Neil Oldridge, Neslihan Alkan, Haldun Muderrisoglu & Emine Handan Tuzun (2008). The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the MacNew Heart Disease Questionnaire in Patients with Angina. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (2):209-213.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31.  43
    David Alm (2007). Non-Cognitivism and Validity. Theoria 73 (2):121-147.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  6
    Michael E. Dawson & Paul Reardon (1973). Construct Validity of Recall and Recognition Postconditioning Measures of Awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):308.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  33.  37
    Kirsten Lomborg & Marit Kirkevold (2003). Truth and Validity in Grounded Theory – a Reconsidered Realist Interpretation of the Criteria: Fit, Work, Relevance and Modifiability. Nursing Philosophy 4 (3):189-200.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  13
    Juan V. Luciano, Jordan Bertsch, Luis Salvador‐Carulla, José M. Tomás, Ana Fernández, Alejandra Pinto‐Meza, Josep M. Haro, Diego J. Palao & Antoni Serrano‐Blanco (2010). Factor Structure, Internal Consistency and Construct Validity of the Sheehan Disability Scale in a Spanish Primary Care Sample. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):895-901.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    Ray Fitzpatrick & Mary Boulton (1996). Qualitative Research in Health Care: I. The Scope and Validity of Methods. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (2):123-130.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  4
    P. H. Gompertz, P. Irwin, R. Morris, D. Lowe MSc Cstat, Z. Rutledge, A. G. Rudd & M. G. Pearson (2001). Reliability and Validity of the Intercollegiate Stroke Audit Package. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (1):1-11.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  37.  2
    Inmaculada Failde, Pilar Medina, Carmen Ramirez & Roque Arana (2010). Construct and Criterion Validity of the SF‐12 Health Questionnaire in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):569-573.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  10
    D. Gwyn Seymour, Anne E. Ball, Elizabeth M. Russell, William R. Primrose, Andrew M. Garratt & John R. Crawford (2001). Problems in Using Health Survey Questionnaires in Older Patients with Physical Disabilities. The Reliability and Validity of the SF‐36 and the Effect of Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (4):411-418.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  9
    I. L. Janis & F. Frick (1943). The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Conclusions and Errors in Judging Logical Validity of Syllogisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (1):73.
  40.  3
    Michael Berk, Felicity Ng, Seetal Dodd, Tom Callaly, Shirley Campbell, Michelle Bernardo & Tom Trauer (2008). The Validity of the CGI Severity and Improvement Scales as Measures of Clinical Effectiveness Suitable for Routine Clinical Use. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (6):979-983.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  8
    Carlos Kh Wong, Cindy Lk Lam, Wai‐Lun Law, Jensen Tc Poon, Pierre Chan, Dora Lw Kwong & Janice Tsang (2012). Validity and Reliability Study on Traditional Chinese FACT‐C in Chinese Patients with Colorectal Neoplasm. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1186-1195.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  11
    Christoph Graf, Rudolf Vetschera & Yingchao Zhang (2013). Parameters of Social Preference Functions: Measurement and External Validity. Theory and Decision 74 (3):357-382.
  43.  12
    T. L. Brink (1993). Belief Vs. Commitment, Validity Vs. Value: A Response to Ward Goodenough. Zygon 28 (2):283-286.
    . This paper is on Ward Goodenough's recent article , suggesting that his points can be clarified by reiterating the distinction between the realms of meaning and relevance. Religion's “truth” is in the form of its ualue; the “proof” which it requires is uindication; and the resulting “faith” must be understood as commitment.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  13
    Pierdaniele Giaretta & Giuseppe Spolaore (2012). Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (3):393-407.
    An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  5
    Yolandi Brink & Quinette A. Louw (2012). Clinical Instruments: Reliability and Validity Critical Appraisal. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1126-1132.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    M. A. Tinker (1936). Reliability and Validity of Eye-Movement Measures of Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (6):732.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  4
    Berndt Brehmer & Lars-AKe Lindberg (1970). Retention of Probabilistic Cue-Criterion Relations as a Function of Cue Validity and Retention Interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):331.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  4
    H. J. Eysenck (1941). The Validity and Reliability of Group Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (5):427-434.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  3
    Berrie Middel, Bieneke H. van der Laan, Albinas Stankus, Klaske Wynia, Frits Jüch, Gerard Jansen & Mathieu de Greef (2011). Construct and Criterion Validity of the DUFS and DEFS4 in Lithuanian Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (3):452-461.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    Berndt Brehmer & Lars A. Lindberg (1973). Retention of Single-Cue Probability Learning Tasks as a Function of Cue Validity, Retention Interval, and Degree of Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):404.
1 — 50 / 1000