Search results for 'Vernon W. Grant' (try it on Scholar)

128 found
Sort by:
  1. Vernon W. Grant (1974). The Roots of Religious Doubt and the Search for Security. New York,Seabury Press.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael Grant (1955). Augustan History and Numismatics H. R. W. Smith: Problems Historical and Numismatic in the Reign of Augustus. (Publications in Classical Archaeology, Vol. 2, No. 4.) Pp. X + 98; 6 Plates, 2 Figs. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1951. Paper, $ 1. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (02):187-189.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. L. B. Grant (1958). Ciba Foundation Symposium on Extrasensory Perception. Editors G. E. W. Wolstenholme and Elaine C. P. Millar. With 3 Illustrations. (London: J. And A. Churchill Ltd. 1956. Pp. Ix + 240. Price 27s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 33 (126):279-.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. George Grant (1962). Thought — From the Learned Societies of Canada. 1960. Toronto, W. J. Gage. 1961. Pp. 250. $5.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 1 (01):100-101.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David A. Grant (1975). W. J. Brogden: The Experimentalist. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (3):238-244.score: 360.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ruth Weissbourd Grant (1997). Hypocrisy and Integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the Ethics of Politics. University of Chicago Press.score: 340.0
    Questioning the usual judgements of political ethics, Ruth W. Grant argues that hypocrisy can actually be constructive while strictly principled behavior can be destructive. Hypocrisy and Integrity offers a new conceptual framework that clarifies the differences between idealism and fanaticism while it uncovers the moral limits of compromise. "Exciting and provocative. . . . Grant's work is to be highly recommended, offering a fresh reading of Rousseau and Machiavelli as well as presenting a penetrating analysis of hypocrisy and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Isaiah Berlin, P. F. Strawson, R. Rhees, F. E. Sparshott, Michael Scriven, R. F. Holland, Jonathan Harrison, H. G. Alexander, C. A. Mace, J. L. Evans, D. A. Rees, W. Mays, C. K. Grant, Basil Mitchell & G. C. J. Midgley (1952). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 61 (243):405-439.score: 280.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Harold W. Hake, David A. Grant & John P. Hornseth (1951). Resistance to Extinction and the Pattern of Reinforcement: III. The Effect of Trial Patterning in Verbal "Conditioning.". Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):221.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Harold W. Hake & David A. Grant (1951). Resistance to Extinction and the Pattern of Reinforcement: II. Effect of Successive Alternation of Blocks of Reinforced and Unreinforced Trials Upon the Conditioned Eyelid Response to Light. Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (3):216.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ruth W. Grant (2002). Political Theory, Political Science, and Politics. Political Theory 30 (4):577-595.score: 240.0
  11. W. Matthews Grant (2003). Aquinas, Divine Simplicity, and Divine Freedom. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 77:129-144.score: 240.0
    Aquinas maintains that, although God created the universe, he could have created another or simply refrained from creating altogether. That Aquinas believesin divine free choice is uncontroversial. Yet doubts have been raised as to whether Thomas is entitled to this belief, given his claims concerning divine simplicity.According to simplicity, there is no potentiality in God, nor is there a distinction in God between God’s willing, His essence, and His necessary being. On the surface, it appears that these claims leave no (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ruth W. Grant (2002). The Ethics of Incentives: Historical Origins and Contemporary Understandings. Economics and Philosophy 18 (1):111-139.score: 240.0
    Increasingly in the modern world, incentives are becoming the tool we reach for when we wish to bring about change. In government, in education, in health care, between and within institutions of all sorts, incentives are offered to steer people's choices in certain directions. But despite the increasing interest in ethics and economics, the ethics of the use of incentives has raised very little concern. From a certain point of view, this is not surprising. When incentives are viewed from the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. W. Matthews Grant (2010). Can a Libertarian Hold That Our Free Acts Are Caused by God? Faith and Philosophy 27 (1):22-44.score: 240.0
    According to prevailing opinion, if a creaturely act is caused by God, then it cannot be free in the libertarian sense. I argue to the contrary. I distinguish intrinsic and extrinsic models of divine causal agency. I then show that, given the extrinsic model, there is no reason one holding that our free acts are caused by God could not also hold a libertarian account of human freedom. It follows that a libertarian account of human freedom is consistent with God’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ruth W. Grant & Jeremy Sugarman (2004). Ethics in Human Subjects Research: Do Incentives Matter? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (6):717 – 738.score: 240.0
    There is considerable confusion regarding the ethical appropriateness of using incentives in research with human subjects. Previous work on determining whether incentives are unethical considers them as a form of undue influence or coercive offer. We understand the ethical issue of undue influence as an issue, not of coercion, but of corruption of judgment. By doing so we find that, for the most part, the use of incentives to recruit and retain research subjects is innocuous. But there are some instances (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. W. Matthews Grant (2007). Must a Cause Be Really Related to its Effect? The Analogy Between Divine and Libertarian Agent Causality. Religious Studies 43 (1):1-23.score: 240.0
    According to a classical teaching, God is not really related to creatures even by virtue of creating them. Some have objected that this teaching makes unintelligible the claim that God causally accounts for the universe, since God would be the same whether the universe existed or not. I defend the classical teaching, showing how the doctrine is implied by a popular cosmological argument, showing that the objection to it would also rule out libertarian agent causality, and showing that the objection (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. Gosling, Alan R. White, John Arthur Passmore, William Kneale, Don Locke, C. K. Grant, Thomas McPherson, Peter Nidditch, Martha Kneale, A. C. Ewing & W. F. Hicken (1965). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 74 (293):126-153.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Ruth W. Grant (1994). Integrity and Politics: An Alternative Reading of Rousseau. Political Theory 22 (3):414-443.score: 240.0
  18. W. Matthews Grant (2014). Hugh J. McCann: Creation and the Sovereignty of God. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 75 (2):179-182.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. C. D. Broad, Richard Robinson, H. B. Acton, George E. Hughes, T. D. Weldon, Mario M. Rossi, A. C. Ewing, C. J. Holloway, J. P. Corbett, C. W. K. Mundle, W. B. Gallie, W. Mays, A. H. Armstrong, C. K. Grant & I. M. Cromble (1949). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 58 (229):101-130.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. W. Matthews Grant (2001). Aquinas Among Libertarians and Compatibilists. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 75:221-235.score: 240.0
    Aquinas teaches that human acts are caused by God. Assuming that such causation entails theological determinism, philosophers with libertarian intuitions tend either to read around Aquinas’s teaching on the relation of divine causality and human action, or to reject that teaching altogether. Unfortunately, the arguments most often used by Aquinas and his contemporary defenders to show that his teaching is compatible with human freedom fail to address thelibertarian’s main concerns. In part one of this essay, I consider these arguments and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. W. Charlton, Aurel Kolnai, C. K. Grant, Martin Hollis, J. M. Hinton, P. L. Mott, K. K. Baublys, Y. N. Chopra, G. R. Grice, R. F. Atkinson, Christine Atkinson & Stuart C. Brown (1973). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 82 (327):452-479.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Eugene W. Grant & Lowell S. Broom (1988). Attitudes Toward Ethics: A View of the College Student. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):617 - 619.score: 240.0
    This study investigated the differences in responses of undergraduate business students to an ethical dilemma. Demographic characteristics were collected on the respondents and profiled as a means of examining common bases for decision. The authors found that certain demographic characteristics appear to be predictors of ethical decision behavior of future businessmen.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. W. Matthews Grant (2004). Atheism, Morality, and Meaning. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (1):128-130.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. C. H. Whiteley, C. K. Grant, Alan Montefiore, Ronald W. Hepburn, H. J. Paton, P. H. Nowell-Smith, A. D. Woozley & J. A. Faris (1959). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 68 (272):556-574.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. W. Leonard Grant (1951). Cicero, Pro Milone, 98. The Classical Review 1 (01):9-.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. W. Matthews Grant (2012). Divine Simplicity, Contingent Truths, and Extrinsic Models of Divine Knowing. Faith and Philosophy 29 (3):254-274.score: 240.0
    A well-known objection to divine simplicity holds that the doctrine is incompatible with God’s contingent knowledge. I set out the objection and reject two problematic solutions. I then argue that the objection is best answered by adopting an “extrinsic model of divine knowing” according to which God’s contingent knowledge, which varies across worlds, does not involve any intrinsic variation in God. Solutions along these lines have been suggested by others. This paper advances the discussion by developing and offering partial defenses (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. W. Matthews Grant (2000). Counterfactuals of Freedom, Future Contingents, and the Grounding Objection to Middle Knowledge. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 74:307-323.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. W. Matthews Grant (2000). Providence and the Problem of Evil. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):115-117.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David A. Grant, John P. Hornseth & Harold W. Hake (1950). The Influence of the Inter-Trial Interval on the Humphreys' 'Random Reinforcement' Effect During the Extinction of a Verbal Response. Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (5):609.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. David A. Grant, Harold W. Hake & John P. Hornseth (1951). Acquisition and Extinction of a Verbal Conditioned Response with Differing Percentages of Reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (1):1.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ken W. Grant (1999). Books Etcetera-Hearing by Eye II: Advances in the Psychology of Speechreading and Auditory-Visual Speech. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (8):318.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. C. C. Grant, R. Bengis, D. Balfour, M. Peel, W. Davies-Mostert, H. Killian, R. Little, I. Smit, M. Garai & M. Henley (2008). Controlling the Distribution of Elephants. In R. J. Scholes & K. G. Mennell (eds.), Elephant Management: A Scientific Assessment for South Africa. Wits University Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David A. Grant, Arthur J. Riopelle & Harold W. Hake (1950). Resistance to Extinction and the Pattern of Reinforcement. I. Alternation of Reinforcement and the Conditioned Eyelid Response. [REVIEW] Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (1):53.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ruth W. Grant (2000). Response to NASSP Book Award Panel. Social Philosophy Today 15:445-452.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David A. Grant, John P. Hornseth & Harold W. Hake (1949). Sensitization of the Beta-Response as a Function of the Wavelength of the Stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (2):195.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Philip W. Grant (1977). Strict-Π11 Predicates on Countable and Cofinality Ω Transitive Sets. Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):161 - 173.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Philip W. Grant (1978). The Completeness of L Ω 1, Ω (P). Mathematical Logic Quarterly 24 (19‐24):357-364.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. I. T. Ramsey, Everett W. Hall, H. H. Price, D. R. Cousin & C. K. Grant (1955). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 64 (253):110-122.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. W. Gordon East & M. Grant (1970). The Ancient Mediterranean. Journal of Hellenic Studies 90:243.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Carmela Vircillo Franklin, Paul Meyvaert, Jan M. Ziolkowski, Giles Constable, Edward Grant, John E. Murdoch, Robert W. Hanning, Anne Middleton, Roberta Frank & Larry D. Benson (2007). Memoirs of Fellows and Corresponding Fellows of the Medieval Academy of America. Speculum 82 (3):808-829.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. V. W. Grant (1942). Accommodation and Convergence in Visual Space Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 31 (2):89.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Ruth W. Grant & Nathan Tareov (1997). A/V Libraries; $39.95 Seeondary Edueation, Town Libraries, Reli Gious Organizations. Teaching Philosophy 20 (2):233.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. W. Matthews Grant (2009). Aquinas on How God Causes the Act of Sin Without Causing Sin Itself. The Thomist 73 (3):455-496.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. W. Grant (2005). Book Review: Margaret Maynard, Dress and Globalisation (Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2004). [REVIEW] Dialogue 3 (1):212-215.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. W. Leonard Grant (1947). Correspondence. The Classical Review 61 (3-4):133-.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. W. Leonard Grant (1947). Cicero, Ad Fam. Viii. 8. 9. The Classical Review 61 (01):10-11.score: 240.0
  47. David A. Grant & Harold W. Hake (1951). Dark Adaptation and the Humphreys Random Reinforcement Phenomenon in Human Eyelid Conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 42 (6):417.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Ruth W. Grant (2011). Generous to a Fault: Moral Goodness and Psychic Health. In Ruth Weissbourd Grant (ed.), In Search of Goodness. University of Chicago Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Ken W. Grant (1999). Hearing by Eye II: Advances in the Psychology of Speechreading and Auditory–Visual Speech, Edited by Ruth Campbell, Barbara Dodd, and Denis Burnham. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (8):319-320.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 128