10 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Vladimír Svoboda & Jaroslav Peregrin (forthcoming). Logical Form and Reflective Equilibrium. Synthese.
    Though, at first sight, logical formalization of natural language sentences and arguments might look like an unproblematic enterprise, the criteria of its success are far from clear and, surprisingly, there have only been a few attempts at making them explicit. This paper provides a picture of the enterprise of logical formalization that does not conceive of it as a kind of translation from one language (a natural one) into another language (a logical one), but rather as a construction of a (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimír Svoboda (2013). Criteria for Logical Formalization. Synthese 190 (14):2897-2924.
    The article addresses two closely related questions: What are the criteria of adequacy of logical formalization of natural language arguments, and what gives logic the authority to decide which arguments are good and which are bad? Our point of departure is the criticism of the conception of logical formalization put forth, in a recent paper, by M. Baumgartner and T. Lampert. We argue that their account of formalization as a kind of semantic analysis brings about more problems than it solves. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimir Svoboda (2012). Which Formula is the Right One?(Criteria of Adequacy of Logical Analysis). Organon F 19 (1).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Vladimír Svoboda (2012). Pravidla, Normy a Analytický Filozofický Diskurz. Organon F 19 (2):143-179.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Vladimir Svoboda (2012). Rules, Norms, and Analytical Philosophical Discourse. Organon F 19 (2):143-179.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Vladimír Svoboda (2012). The Scandal of Semantic Platonism. In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor.
    The paper raises doubts concerning tenability of the platonistic conception of linguistic meaning. It gives examples of some problems that philosophers who employ entities from the realm of platonic objects as a kind of unexplained explainer tend to neglect.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Vladimír Svoboda (2010). Miscellanea logica (VIII). In Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.), Foundations of Logic. Charles University in Prague/Karolinum Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Tim Crane & Vladimír Svoboda (2004). Causation, Omniscience and Interpretation: A Note on Davidson's Epistemology. Organon F, Filozoficky Casopis:117-127.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Timothy Childers & Vladimir Svoboda (2003). On the Meaning of Prescriptions. In Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.), Meaning: The Dynamic Turn. Elsevier Science. 185--200.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Vladimír Svoboda (2003). Forms of Norms and Validity. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):223-247.
    Finland is internationally known as one of the leading centers of twentieth century analytic philosophy. This volume offers for the first time an overall survey of the Finnish analytic school. The rise of this trend is illustrated by original articles of Edward Westermarck, Eino Kaila, Georg Henrik von Wright, and Jaakko Hintikka. Contributions of Finnish philosophers are then systematically discussed in the fields of logic, philosophy of language, philosophy of science, history of philosophy, ethics and social philosophy. Metaphilosophical reflections on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation