21 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Vladimír Svoboda & Jaroslav Peregrin (forthcoming). Logical Form and Reflective Equilibrium. Synthese.
    Though, at first sight, logical formalization of natural language sentences and arguments might look like an unproblematic enterprise, the criteria of its success are far from clear and, surprisingly, there have only been a few attempts at making them explicit. This paper provides a picture of the enterprise of logical formalization that does not conceive of it as a kind of translation from one language (a natural one) into another language (a logical one), but rather as a construction of a (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimír Svoboda (2013). Criteria for Logical Formalization. Synthese 190 (14):2897-2924.
    The article addresses two closely related questions: What are the criteria of adequacy of logical formalization of natural language arguments, and what gives logic the authority to decide which arguments are good and which are bad? Our point of departure is the criticism of the conception of logical formalization put forth, in a recent paper, by M. Baumgartner and T. Lampert. We argue that their account of formalization as a kind of semantic analysis brings about more problems than it solves. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jaroslav Peregrin & Vladimir Svoboda (2012). Which Formula is the Right One?(Criteria of Adequacy of Logical Analysis). Organon F 19 (1).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Vladimír Svoboda (2012). Pravidla, Normy a Analytický Filozofický Diskurz. Organon F 19 (2):143-179.
    This article strives to provide an original conceptual frame- work that should open a way to clarification of general philosophical debates on rules and norms . It makes a clear distinction between rules understood as social facts grounded on specific relation- ships between social subjects and rules understood as linguistic entities. Norms are taken as specific social rules and divided into three different types: social constitutive norms, particular constitutive norms, and institutional norms . Attention is also devoted to relation between (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Vladimir Svoboda (2012). Rules, Norms, and Analytical Philosophical Discourse. Organon F 19 (2):143-179.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Vladimír Svoboda (2012). The Scandal of Semantic Platonism. In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor.
    The paper raises doubts concerning tenability of the platonistic conception of linguistic meaning. It gives examples of some problems that philosophers who employ entities from the realm of platonic objects as a kind of unexplained explainer tend to neglect.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Vladimír Svoboda (2010). Miscellanea logica (VIII). In Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.), Foundations of Logic. Charles University in Prague/Karolinum Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Vladimír Svoboda & Jaroslav Peregrin (2010). Od jazyka k logice. : [From language to logic]. Filosoficky Casopis 58:281-287.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Vladimír Svoboda (2008). Ještě jednou o objektivnosti. Filosoficky Casopis 56:121-122.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Vladimír Svoboda (2008). Nevyzpytatelnost jazyka a objektivnosti. Filosoficky Casopis 56:577-579.
    [The inscrutability of language and objectivity].
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Vladimír Svoboda (2007). O Objektivním A Ještě Objektivnějším. Filosoficky Casopis 55:573-576.
    [On the objective and the still more objective].
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Vladimír Svoboda (2006). Logická analýza a jazyk jako kód. Filosoficky Casopis 54:449-453.
    [Logical analysis and language as a code].
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Vladimír Svoboda (2005). Logická Analýza a Přirozený Jazyk. Filosoficky Casopis 53:625-633.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Tim Crane & Vladimír Svoboda (2004). Causation, Omniscience and Interpretation: A Note on Davidson's Epistemology. Organon F, Filozoficky Casopis:117-127.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Vladimír Svoboda & Tim Crane (2004). Causation, Interpretation and Omniscience: A Note on Davidsonś Epistemology. Organon F: Filozoficky Casopis 11 (2):117-127.
    V článku ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’ se Donald Davidson snaží ukázat, že v celku našich přesvědčení se nemůžeme zásadně mýlit. Jeho argumentace je založená na možnosti vševědoucí bytosti, která používá metodu radikální interpretace, aby připsala přesvědčení ostatním uživatelům jazyka, a nutně tak pojímá ty, které interpretuje jako bytosti, jejich přesvědčení jsou z velké části pravdivá. V tomto článku zkoumáme některé předpoklady Davidsonovy argumentace a ukazujeme, že jsou neslučitelné s Davidsonovým názorem, že předmět přesvědčení je jeho příčina. Pokud (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Timothy Childers & Vladimir Svoboda (2003). On the Meaning of Prescriptions. In Jaroslav Peregrin (ed.), Meaning: The Dynamic Turn. Elsevier Science. 185--200.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Vladimír Svoboda (2003). Forms of Norms and Validity. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 80 (1):223-247.
    Finland is internationally known as one of the leading centers of twentieth century analytic philosophy. This volume offers for the first time an overall survey of the Finnish analytic school. The rise of this trend is illustrated by original articles of Edward Westermarck, Eino Kaila, Georg Henrik von Wright, and Jaakko Hintikka. Contributions of Finnish philosophers are then systematically discussed in the fields of logic, philosophy of language, philosophy of science, history of philosophy, ethics and social philosophy. Metaphilosophical reflections on (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Vladimír Svoboda (2002). Graham Priest, Logic. A Very Short Introduction. Organon F: Filozoficky Casopis 9 (1):116-118.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Vladimír Svoboda (2001). Individua Na Odpočinku. Filosoficky Casopis 49:415-424.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Vladimír Svoboda (1999). Význam: věc, iluze, nebo obojí? Filosoficky Casopis 47:901-913.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Timothy Childers, Petr Kolft & Vladimir Svoboda (eds.) (1997). Logica '96: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium. Filosofia.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation