40 found
Sort by:
  1. W. G. Runciman (2012). Strong Reciprocity is Not Uncommon in the “Wild”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):38-39.
    Guala is right to draw attention to the difficulty of extrapolating from the experimental evidence for weak or strong reciprocity to what is observed in the However, there may be more strong reciprocity in real-world communities than he allows for, as strikingly illustrated in the example of the Mafia.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. W. G. Runciman (2010). Contents. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. W. G. Runciman (2010). 5. Conclusion. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press. 111-127.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. W. G. Runciman (2010). Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press.
    In this lively and provocative book, W. G. Runciman shows where and why they fail, even after due allowance has been made for the different historical contexts in which they wrote.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. W. G. Runciman (2010). Hobbes Got It Wrong. The Philosophers' Magazine 51 (51):74-79.
    I was prompted to write a book by re-reading Republic, Leviathan, and The Communist Manifesto for the first time in half a century and wondering how well they would stand up in the light of what present-day sociologists can fairly claim to know that Plato, Hobbes, and Marx did not. None of them were doing social science as that term is nowadays understood. But all three advance conclusions derived from evidence for how human beings do, or would, or might, behave (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. W. G. Runciman (2010). 1. Introduction. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press. 1-16.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. W. G. Runciman (2010). 3. Leviathan. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press. 54-86.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. W. G. Runciman (2010). Preface. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. W. G. Runciman (2010). 2. Republic. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press. 17-53.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. W. G. Runciman (2010). 4. The Communist Manifesto. In , Great Books, Bad Arguments: "Republic, Leviathan", and "the Communist Manifesto". Princeton University Press. 87-110.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. W. G. Runciman (2005). Culture Does Evolve. History and Theory 44 (1):1–13.
    Neo-Darwinian theories of cultural evolution are apt to be criticized on the grounds that they merely borrow from the theory of natural selection concepts that are then metaphorically applied to conventional historical narratives to which they add no more, if anything, than an implicit presupposition of progress from one predetermined stage to the next. Such criticisms, of which a particularly forceful example is a recent article in this journal by Fracchia and Lewontin, can however be shown to be seriously misconceived. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. W. G. Runciman (2005). Rejoinder to Fracchia and Lewontin. History and Theory 44 (1):30–41.
    In their response to my article, Fracchia and Lewontin have not refuted any of my three principal objections to theirs; they have ignored altogether my suggestion that evolutionary game theory illustrates particularly clearly the benefits that neo-Darwinian concepts and methods can bring to the human behavioral sciences; and they have attributed to me a version of “methodological individualism” to which I do not subscribe. It is, as is usual at this stage of a Kuhnian paradigm shift, too soon to say (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. W. G. Runciman (2003). What People Say. In Eric Dunning & Stephen Mennell (eds.), Norbert Elias. Sage. 4--16.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Charles Taylor, Peter Laslett & W. G. Runciman (2003). Neutrality in Political Science.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Quentin Skinner, Partha Dasgupta, Raymond Geuss, Melissa Lane, Peter Laslett, Onora O'Neill, W. G. Runciman & Andrew Kuper (2002). Political Philosophy: The View From Cambridge. Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (1):1–19.
    This article reports on a conversation convened by Quentin Skinner at the invitation of the Editors of The Journal of Political Philosophy and held in Cambridge on 13 February 2001.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. W. G. Runciman (2001). The Origin of Human Social Institutions. Proceedings of the British Academy 110.
    Notes on Contributors Preface Ofer Bar-Yosef, From Sedentary Foragers to Village Hierarchies: The Emergence of Social Institutions Alasdair Whittle, Different Kinds of History: On the Nature of Lives and Change in Central Europe, c. 6000 to the Second Millennium BC Richard Bradley, The Birth of Architecture Colin Renfrew, Commodification and Institution in Group-Oriented and Individualizing Societies Jerome H Barkow et al., Social Competition, Social Intelligence, and Why the Bugis Know More about Cooking than about Nutrition Ken Binmore, How and Why (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. W. G. Runciman, John Smith & R. I. M. Dunbar (1996). Evolution of Social Behaviour Patterns in Primates and Man: A Joint Discussion Meeting of the Royal Society and the British Academy. Proceedings of the British Academy 88.
    Introduction, W G Runciman Social Evolution in Primates: The Role of Ecological Factors and Male Behaviour, Carel P van Schaik Determinants of Group Size in Primates: A General Model, R I M Dunbar Function and Intention in the Calls of Non-Human Primates, Dorothy L Cheney & Robert M Seyfarth Why Culture is Common, but Cultural Evolution is Rare, Robert Boyd & Peter J Richerson An Evolutionary and Chronological Framework for Human Social Behaviour, Robert A Foley Friendship and the Banker?s Paradox: (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. W. G. Runciman (1989). Confessions of a Reluctant Theorist Selected Essays of W.G. Runciman.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. W. G. Runciman (1984). A Treatise on Social Theory, Volume I: The Methodology of Social Theory. Philosophy 59 (229):406-408.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. W. G. Runciman (1983). A Treatise on Social Theory. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  21. W. G. Runciman (1978). Processes, End-States and Social Justice. Philosophical Quarterly 28 (110):37-45.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. W. G. Runciman (1977). Weber's Understanding: A Reply to J. Donald Moon. Political Theory 5 (2):199-204.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Steven Lukes & W. G. Runciman (1974). Relativism: Cognitive and Moral. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 48:165 - 208.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. W. G. Runciman & Amartya Sen (1974). Prisoner's Dilemma and Social Justice: A Reply. Mind 83 (332):582.
  25. W. G. Runciman (1973). "Concèpts and Society" by I. C. Jarvie. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3 (1):91.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. W. G. Runciman (1973). Book Reviews : Concepts and Society. I. C. Jarvie. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, I972. Pp. Xiv+I93. 2.50. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 3 (1):91-92.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. W. G. Runciman (1972). A Critique of Max Weber's Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.
    This essay is written in the belief that it is possible to say both where Max Weber's philosophy of social science is mistaken and how these mistakes can be put right. Runciman argues that Weber's analysis breaks down at three decisive points: the difference between theoretical pre-suppositions and implicit value-judgements; the manner in which 'idiographic' explanations are to be subsumed under causal laws; and the relation of explanation to description in sociology. The arguments which Weber put forward are fundamental to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. W. G. Runciman (1972). Describing. Mind 81 (323):372-388.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. D. D. Raphael, Peter Laslett & W. G. Runciman (1969). Philosophy, Politics and Society: Third Series. Philosophical Quarterly 19 (75):185.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. W. G. Runciman (1969). False Consciousness. Philosophy 44 (170):303 - 313.
    It may be as well to begin from the locus classicus , Engels to Mehring, July 14th, 1893: “Ideology is a process accomplished by the so-called thinker consciously, it is true, but with a false consciousness. The real motive forces impelling him remain unknown to him; otherwise it simply would not be an ideological process”.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. W. G. Runciman (1968). Misdescribing Misdescriptions. Analysis 28 (5):175 - 176.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. W. G. Runciman (1967). Misdescribing Institutions. Analysis 27 (3):107 - 110.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. W. G. Runciman (1967). "Social" Equality. Philosophical Quarterly 17 (68):221-230.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. W. G. Runciman & R. W. Baldwin (1967). Social Justice. Philosophical Quarterly 17 (68):280.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. W. G. Runciman & Brian Barry (1967). Political Argument. Philosophical Quarterly 17 (66):87.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. W. G. Runciman (1966). Anatol Rapoport and Albert M. Chammah, "Prisoner's Dilemma". Synthese 16 (3/4):394.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. W. G. Runciman & Gabriël Nuchelmans (1966). Reviews. [REVIEW] Synthese 16 (3-4):394-399.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. M. Oakeshott, Peter Laslett & W. G. Runciman (1965). Philosophy, Politics and Society (Second Series). Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):281.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. W. G. Runciman & Amartya K. Sen (1965). Games, Justice and the General Will. Mind 74 (296):554-562.
  40. W. G. Runciman (1962). Plato's Later Epistemology. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.