54 found
Sort by:
  1. Ted A. Warfield (forthcoming). Deductive Closure and Relevant Alternatives. Southwest Philosophical Studies.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2010). Disputing About Taste. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard Feldman & Ted Warfield (eds.) (2009). Disagreement. Oup.
    Disagreement is common: even informed, intelligent, and generally reasonable people often come to different conclusions when confronted with what seems to be the same evidence. Can the competing conclusions be reasonable? If not, what can we reasonably think about the situation? This volume examines the epistemology of disagreement. Philosophical questions about disagreement arise in various areas, notably politics, ethics, aesthetics, and the philosophy of religion: but this will be the first book focusing on the general epistemic issues arising from informed (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ted A. Warfield (2009). Ockhamism and Molinism -- Foreknowledge and Prophecy. In Jonathan L. Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion: Volume 2. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Marian David & Ted A. Warfield (2008). Knowledge-Closure and Skepticism. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
  6. G. Moore, I. Newton, N. Salmon, B. Spinoza, P. Van Inwagen, T. Warfield, M. Williams & S. Yablo (2008). 330/Name Index Mill, J. 326. In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield (2007). Alfred Mele's Metaphysical Freedom? Philosophical Explorations 10 (2):185 – 194.
    In this paper we raise three questions of clarification about Alfred Mele's fine recent book, Free Will and Luck. Our questions concern the following topics: (i) Mele's combination of 'luck' and 'Frankfurt-style' objections to libertarianism, (ii) Mele's stipulations about 'compatibilism' and the relation between questions about free action and questions about moral responsibility, and (iii) Mele's treatment of the Consequence Argument.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ted A. Warfield (2007). I. Two Debates and the Freedom/Responsibility Argument. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 3:283.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ted A. Warfield (2007). 10. Metaphysical Compatibilism's Appropriation of Frankfurt. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 3:283.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ted A. Warfield (2006). Kompatybilizm i inkompatybilizm: wybrane argumenty. Roczniki Filozoficzne 54 (1):217-240.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. E. J. Coffman & Ted A. Warfield (2005). Deliberation and Metaphysical Freedom. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):25-44.
  12. Ted Warfield (2005). Compatibilism. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ted A. Warfield (2005). Knowledge From Falsehood. Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):405–416.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ted A. Warfield (2005). Tyler Burge's Self-Knowledge. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):169-178.
    The question of whether externalism about mental content is compatible with privileged access is a question of ongoing concern within philosophy of mind. Some philosophers think that Tyler Burge's early work on what he calls "basic self-knowledge" shows that externalism and privileged access are compatible. I critically assess this claim, arguing that Burge's work does not establish the compatbility thesis.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ted A. Warfield (2004). When Epistemic Closure Does and Does Not Fail: A Lesson From the History of Epistemology. Analysis 64 (281):35–41.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2003). Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2003). The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
    "The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind "leads the reader through a broad range of topics, including Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, Dualism, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ted Warfield (2003). Compatibilism and Incompatibilism : Some Arguments. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ted A. Warfield & Stephen P. Stich (eds.) (2003). Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Stephen Warfield, Ted, Stich (ed.) (2003). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
    "The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind "leads the reader through a broad range of topics, including Artificial Intelligence, Consciousness, Dualism, ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (2002). Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.
  22. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304–316.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Review: Kim's Master Argument. [REVIEW] Noûs 35 (2):304 - 316.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2001). Jaegwon Kim, Mind in a Physical World. Noûs 35 (2):304-316.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. T. A. Warfield (2001). Putting Skeptics in Their Place: The Nature of Skeptical Arguments and Their Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Philosophical Review 110 (4):642-644.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Thomas M. Crisp & Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173-185.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ted A. Warfield (2000). Causal Determinism and Human Freedom Are Incompatible: A New Argument for Incompatibilism. Philosopical Perspectives 14 (s14):167-180.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ted A. Warfield (2000). ``On Freedom and Foreknowledge: A Reply to Two Critics&Quot. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
    William Hasker and Anthony Brueckner have critically discussed my argument for the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. I reply to their commentaries.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ted A. Warfield (2000). On Freedom and Foreknowledge. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):255-259.
    William Hasker and Anthony Brueckner have critically discussed my argument for the compatibility of divine foreknowledge and human freedom. I reply to their commentaries.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ted A. Warfield (2000). The Irrelevance of Indeterministic Counterexamples to Principle Beta. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):173 - 184.
  31. Keith DeRose & Ted Warfield (eds.) (1999). Skepticism: Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Keith DeRose & Ted A. Warfield (eds.) (1999). Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader. Oxford University Press.
    Recently, new life has been breathed into the ancient philosophical topic of skepticism. The subject of some of the best and most provocative work in contemporary philosophy, skepticism has been addressed not only by top epistemologists but also by several of the world's finest philosophers who are most known for their work in other areas of the discipline. Skepticism: A Contemporary Reader brings together the most important recent contributions to the discussion of skepticism. Covering major approaches to the skeptical problem, (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ted A. Warfield (1999). Against Representational Theories of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (1):66-69.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ted A. Warfield (1999). Heimir Geirsson and Michael Losonsky, Eds., Readings in Language and Mind. Minds and Machines 9 (2):290-293.
  35. Ted A. Warfield (1999). Searle's Causal Powers. Analysis 59 (1):29-32.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Ted A. Warfield & Alicia Finch (1999). Fatalism: Logical and Theological. Faith and Philosophy 16 (2):233-238.
    The logical fatalist holds that the past truth of future tense propositions is incompatible with libertarian freedom. The theological fatalist holds that the combination of God’s past beliefs with His essential omniscience is incompatible with libertarian freedom. There is an ongoing dispute over the relation between these two kinds of fatalism: some philosophers believe that the problems are equivalent while others believe that the theological problem is more difficult. We offer a diagnosis of this dispute showing that one’s view of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Alicia Finch & Ted A. Warfield (1998). The Mind Argument and Libertarianism. Mind 107 (427):515-28.
    Many critics of libertarian freedom have charged that freedom is incompatible with indeterminism. We show that the strongest argument that has been provided for this claim is invalid. The invalidity of the argument in question, however, implies the invalidity of the standard Consequence argument for the incompatibility of freedom and determinism. We show how to repair the Consequence argument and argue that no similar improvement will revive the worry about the compatibility of indeterminism and freedom.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ted A. Warfield (1998). A Priori Knowledge of the World: Knowing the World by Knowing Our Minds. Philosophical Studies 92 (1/2):127 - 147.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Ted A. Warfield (1997). Divine Foreknowledge and Human Freedom Are Compatible. Noûs 31 (1):80-86.
  40. Ted A. Warfield (1997). Externalism, Privileged Self-Knowledge, and the Irrelevance of Slow Switching. Analysis 57 (4):282-84.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ted A. Warfield (1997). The Metaphysics of Free Will. Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):261-265.
  42. Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield (1996). No Help for the Coherentist. Analysis 56 (2):118–121.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Ted A. Warfield (1996). Determinism and Moral Responsiblity Are Incompatible. Philosophical Topics 24 (2):215-26.
  44. S. Stich & T. Warfield (1995). Do Connectionist Minds Have Beliefs?–A Reply to Clark and Smolensky. In Cynthia Macdonald & Graham Macdonald (eds.), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Blackwell. 2.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Stephen P. Stich & Ted A. Warfield (1995). Reply to Clark and Smolensky: Do Connectionist Minds Have Beliefs? In C. Macdonald & Graham F. Macdonald (eds.), Connectionism: Debates on Psychological Explanation. Blackwell.
  46. Ted A. Warfield (1995). Knowing the World and Knowing Our Minds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (3):525-545.
  47. Eric A. Weiss, Justin Leiber, Judith Felson Duchan, Mallory Selfridge, Eric Dietrich, Peter A. Facione, Timothy Joseph Day, Johan M. Lammens, Andrew Feenberg, Deborah G. Johnson, Daniel S. Levine & Ted A. Warfield (1995). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 5 (1):109-155.
  48. Peter Klein & Ted A. Warfield (1994). What Price Coherence? Analysis 54 (3):129 - 132.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. B. P. McLaughlin & T. A. Warfield (1994). The Allure of Connectionism Reexamined. Synthese 101 (3):365 - 400.
    There is currently a debate over whether cognitive architecture is classical or connectionist in nature. One finds the following three comparisons between classical architecture and connectionist architecture made in the pro-connectionist literature in this debate: (1) connectionist architecture is neurally plausible and classical architecture is not; (2) connectionist architecture is far better suited to model pattern recognition capacities than is classical architecture; and (3) connectionist architecture is far better suited to model the acquisition of pattern recognition capacities by learning than (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Steven Stich & Ted Warfield (eds.) (1994). Mental Representation. Blackwell.
1 — 50 / 54