1. Weidong Cao (2008). A Critique of Social Radicalism: The Debate Between the Neo-Left and Liberalism. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):139-150.
    Compared with another founder of philosophical anthropology Max Scheler, Plessner is desolated by Chinese academe. His works have not been translated into Chinese systematically, and there are few articles about his life and thoughts. The reasons for this are complicated, but the most important point of these is that Plessner has paid most of his attention to the German problems. However, Plessner’s thought, especially his critique of social radicalism, enlightens us a lot. Plessner’s critique of modernity stimulates us to think (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Weidong Cao (2006). The Historical Effect of Habermas in the Chinese Context: A Case Study of the Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):41-50.
    The main purpose of this essay is not to give a full-scale and systematic exploration of the historical process concerning the acceptance of Habermas' works in the Chinese-spoken world but to examine the historical effect of Habermas in the Chinese-spoken context and try to find a proper way to establish a good relationship between Habermas and the Chinese-spoken world by discussing the introduction, study, and application of Habermas' most famous work, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, by Chinese scholars (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Weidong Cao (2001). Communicative Rationality and Inter-Culturality: A Symposium with Jürgen Habermas. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1 (1):73-79.