Search results for 'Welfare state' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  66
    Anca Gheaus (2008). Gender Justice and the Welfare State in Post-Communism. Feminist Theory 9 (2):185-206.
    Some Romanian feminist scholars argue that welfare policies of post-communist states are deeply unjust to women and preclude them from reaching economic autonomy. The upshot of this argument is that liberal economic policy would advance feminist goals better than the welfare state. How should we read this dissonance between Western and some Eastern feminist scholarship concerning distributive justice? I identify the problem of dependency at the core of a possible debate about feminism and welfare. Worries about (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  42
    Kees Schuyt (1998). The Sharing of Risks and the Risks of Sharing: Solidarity and Social Justice in the Welfare State. [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):297-311.
    Solidarity as a social phenomenon means a sharing of feelings, interests, risks and responsibilities. The Western-European Welfare State can be seen as an organized system of solidarity, historically grown from group solidarity among workers, later between workers and employers, moving towards solidarity between larger social groups: between healthy people and the sick, between the young and the elderly, between the employed and the unemployed. This sharing of risks at a societal level however, has revealed the risks of sharing. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  58
    Niklas Luhmann (1990). Political Theory in the Welfare State. W. De Gruyter.
    Translator's Introduction Political Theory in the Welfare State [Politische Theorie im Wohl- fahrtsstaat] was originally published (Olzog, Munich) in. ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  1
    Fabien Bottini (2013). The Roots of French Welfare State. Jurisprudence 20 (2):643-662.
    In this article the author tries to answer the difficult question of the roots of the welfare state. The study of the French example shows that if some roots are ideological, at the same time they are sociological, too. In the article the main streams of ideological roots are described and conclusion is drawn that nowadays sociological issues are very important. The popularity of the welfare state shows that dismantlement is impossible in the democratic States. Yet, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  15
    Rob Houtepen (2000). New Types of Solidarity in the European Welfare State. Health Care Analysis 8 (4):329-340.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  6. David Kelley (1998). A Life of One's Own Individual Rights and the Welfare State.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. J. Donald Moon (ed.) (1988). Responsibility, Rights, and Welfare: The Theory of the Welfare State. Westview Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Yūichi Shionoya (2005). Economy and Morality: The Philosophy of the Welfare State. Edward Elgar.
  9.  26
    Kevin Vallier (2015). A Moral and Economic Critique of the New Property-Owning Democrats: On Behalf of a Rawlsian Welfare State. Philosophical Studies 172 (2):283-304.
    Property-owning democracies combine the regulative and redistributive functions of the welfare state with the governmental aim of ensuring that wealth and capital are widely dispersed. John Rawls, political philosophy’s most famous property-owning democrat, argued that property-owning democracy was one of two regime types that best realized his two principles of justice, though he was notoriously vague about how a property-owning democracy’s institutions are meant to realize his principles. To compensate for this deficiency, a number of Rawlsian political philosophers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    Alexander Kaufman (1999). Welfare in the Kantian State. Oxford University Press.
    A traditional interpretation holds that Kant's political theory simply constitutes an account of the constraints which reason places on the state's authority to regulate external action. Alexander Kaufman argues that this traditional interpretation succeeds neither as a faithful reading of Kant's texts nor as a plausible, philosophically sound reconstruction of a `Kantian' political theory. Rather, he argues that Kant's political theory articulates a positive conception of the state's role.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11.  10
    Robert E. Goodin (1988). Reasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State. Princeton University Press.
    Discusses the justification for a minimal welfare state independent of political rhetoric from the right or the left.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  12. Keith Banting & Will Kymlicka (eds.) (2006). Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. OUP Oxford.
    Does the increasing politicization of ethnic and racial diversity of Western societies threaten to undermine the welfare state? This volume is the first systematic attempt to explore this linkage between "the politics of recognition" and "the politics of redistribution".
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  13.  3
    Sandrine Blanc & Ismael Al-Amoudi (2013). Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (4):497-525.
    This paper re-examines the import of Rawls’s theory of justice for private sector institutions in the face of the decline of the welfare state. The argument is based on a Rawlsian conception of justice as the establishment of a basic structure of society that guarantees a fair distribution of primary goods. We propose that the decline of the welfare state witnessed in Western countries over the past forty years prompts a reassessment of the boundaries of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14. Daniel Shapiro (2007). Is the Welfare State Justified? Cambridge University Press.
    In this book, Daniel Shapiro argues that the dominant positions in contemporary political philosophy - egalitarianism, positive rights theory, communitarianism, and many forms of liberalism - should converge in a rejection of central welfare state institutions. He examines how major welfare institutions, such as government-financed and -administered retirement pensions, national health insurance, and programs for the needy, actually work. Comparing them to compulsory private insurance and private charities, Shapiro argues that the dominant perspectives in political philosophy mistakenly (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  17
    Jonathan Wolff (2015). Political Philosophy and the Real World of the Welfare State. Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4):360-372.
    What contribution can political philosophers make to policy questions, such as the best configuration of the welfare state? On one view, political philosophers set out abstract theories of justice that can guide policy makers in their attempt to transform existing institutions. Yet it rarely seems the case that such a model is used in practice, and it therefore becomes unclear how political philosophy can contribute to policy debates. Following a suggestion from Margaret MacDonald, I consider the view that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Will Kymlicka & Keith Banting (2006). Immigration, Multiculturalism, and the Welfare State. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (3):281–304.
    This article gives a review of the welfare state and analyzes whether it is being undermined by the impact of increasing ethnic and racial diversity.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  14
    Jan Narveson (1992). Libertarianism, Postlibertarianism, and the Welfare State: Reply to Friedman. Critical Review 6 (1):45-82.
    Jeffrey Friedman broaches a number of criticisms of Libertarianism as a conceptual basis for opposing the extensive modern welfare state, examining several variants and concluding that they are fundamentally unsupported. He opts for a ?consequentialist? view of foundations. Nevertheless, he thinks that the modem welfare state is subject to effective critique along such lines. But rational contractarian individualism works and does provide foundations for libertarianism, while ?consequentialism? is an ill?defined theory.that is quite unpromising for the proposed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  18. David Miller (2006). Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Theoretical Reflections. In Keith Banting & Will Kymlicka (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  4
    Jeffrey Friedman (1990). The New Consensus: II. The Democratic Welfare State. Critical Review 4 (4):633-708.
    The goal of the left has been predominantly libertarian: the realization of equal individual freedom. But now, with the demise of leftist hope for radical change that has followed the collapse of ?really existing?; socialism, the world is converging on a compromise between capitalism and the leftist impulse. This compromise is the democratic, interventionist welfare state, which has gained new legitimacy by virtue of combining a ?realistic?; acceptance of the unfortunate need for the market with an attempt to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20.  25
    Bo Rothstein (2010). Happiness and the Welfare State. Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):441-468.
    Does a more generous welfare state make people happier and increase their life satisfaction? Available empirical research gives a clear and positive answer to this question. This goes counter to many arguments that the welfare state creates a culture of dependency, leads to heavy-handed bureaucratic intrusions into private life, creates problems concerning personal integrity, is bad for economic growth, implies stigmatization of the poor, and crowds out civil society and voluntarism. This counterintuitive result is explained by (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  43
    Norman P. Barry (1990). The Philosophy of the Welfare State. Critical Review 4 (4):545-568.
    A critical survey of the major philosophical arguments that have been used to justify the institutions and policies of contemporary welfare states considers the claims of rights theory, egalitarianism, and citizenship and communitarian doctrines. It finds that these arguments are both internally confused and inconsistent with conventional welfare policies. It is argued that the welfare state itself has serious ambiguities: it claims to cater for the needy, as part of its ?public good?; obligations, yet in practice (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  6
    Jens Borchert (1996). WelfareState Retrenchment: Playing the National Card. Critical Review 10 (1):63-94.
    Abstract An analysis of welfare?state restructuring under conservative governments during the 1980s undermines the notion that the nation?state is being rendered obsolete by economic globalization. The nation?state is still the principal site of political conflict. Yet this conflict has to be analyzed in light of global economic and cultural pressures. Conservative attempts to restructure the welfare state were parallel events within a larger transition in the world economy, but they had decisively distinct national trajectories.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23.  39
    Tyler Cowen (2002). Does the Welfare State Help the Poor? Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (1):36-54.
    Does the welfare state help the poor? This surprisingly simple question often generates more heat than light. By the welfare state, I mean transfer programs aimed at helping the poor through the direct redistribution of income. Defenders of the welfare state often assume that the poor benefit from it, while critics suggest that the losses outweigh the gains. The most notable of such criticisms is Charles Murray's Losing Ground, which suggests that the welfare (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Christopher Pierson (1991). Beyond the Welfare State?: The New Political Economy of Welfare. Penn State University Press.
    First published in 1991, _Beyond the Welfare State?_ has been thoroughly revised and updated for this new edition, which draws on the latest theoretical developments and empirical evidence. It remains the most comprehensive and sophisticated guide to the condition of the welfare state in a time of rapid and sometimes bewildering change. The opening chapters offer a scholarly but accessible review of competing interpretations of the historical and contemporary roles of the welfare state. This (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  6
    Christian Schemmel (2015). How to Criticise the Welfare State. Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (4):393-409.
    This article assesses John Rawls's case against the welfare state as a means for implementing socio-economic justice, and for a ‘property-owning democracy’, from both a normative and a methodological point of view. It points out several flaws of Rawls's critique of the welfare state, through a focus on an existing variety of it — a Swedish-style universal welfare state — which can be said to be relatively successful, both in terms of normative merits and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  53
    Judith Buber Agassi (1991). The Rise of the Ideas of the Welfare State. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (4):444-457.
    It is customarily assumed that welfare-state thinking can only appear as a product of the sharpening conflict between revolutionary socialists and the defenders of the status quo; the case of Tom Paine proves otherwise. Although he defended private enterprise (to the exclusion of large landed property), he developed a forgotten early version of a comprehensive system of public welfare in the second part of his The Rights of Man and in his Agrarian Justice, where he argued that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  17
    Alan Wolfe & Jytte Klausen (1997). Identity Politics and the Welfare State. Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2):231.
    Motivated by a deep sense that injustice and inequality are wrong, liberals and reformers in the Western political tradition have focused their energies on policies and programs which seek inclusion: extending the suffrage to those without property; seeking to treat women the same as men, and blacks the same as whites; trying to ensure that as few as possible are excluded from economic opportunity due to lack of resources. Under current conditions, such demands for inclusion take two primary forms, especially (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  5
    Claus Offe (2000). The German Welfare State: Principles, Performance and Prospects After Unification. Thesis Eleven 63 (1):11-37.
    This article presents an overview of the institutional architecture and the organizing principles of the German welfare state, which is widely and rightly considered to be the model case of North West European Continental welfare states. The author's ambition is to be both systematic and historical in his presentation, emphasizing the process in which different layers of the historically evolved structure serve certain functions, such as poor relief, the protection of workers at work, the protection of workers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  32
    V. Panitch (2011). Basic Income, Decommodification and the Welfare State. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):935-945.
    According to Philippe Van Parijs, the superiority of an unconditional basic income (UBI) over conventional means-tested liberal welfare state programs lies in its decommodifying potential. In this article I argue that even if a UBI was sustainable at high enough a level to lessen the extent to which an individual is forced to sell his or her labor power in the market, it would nonetheless have the adverse and simultaneous effect of forcing that individual into further market transactions (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  4
    Elliot Yale Neaman (1990). German Collectivism and the Welfare State. Critical Review 4 (4):591-618.
    In contrast to members of other developed, capitalist societies, Germans still attach some positive connotations to collectivism. In particular, they see the welfare state as a guarantor of collective security and social harmony, and as an agent of national interests by means of macroeconomic planning. The combination of collectivist social goals and statist means can be traced back to the Protestant Reformation in Germany, when the political vacuum left by the defeat of Roman internationalism was filled by local, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  5
    Xavier Landes & Nils Holtug (2015). Insurance, Equality and the Welfare State: Political Philosophy and Public Insurance. Res Publica 21 (2):111-118.
    Public insurance is both everywhere and nowhere. It is everywhere in the sense that it is omnipresent in industrialised societies: public health insurance, unemployment benefits and pensions. It is a sizeable part of modern nations’ public budget . It has permeated our understanding of societal institutions to the extent that now access to public insurance coverage is understood as being a struggle for equality and equal citizenship .Public insurance is only one aspect of a broader phenomenon: the transformation of modern (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. John Myles & Sébastien St-Arnaud (2006). Diversity, Multiculturalism, and the Welfare State: Should Welfare State Theory Be Revised? In Keith Banting & Will Kymlicka (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  6
    David L. Prychitko (1990). The Welfare State: What is Left? Critical Review 4 (4):619-632.
    With the demise of socialism in Eastern Europe, the Western welfare state is treated as the unquestionable alternative by most intellectuals. They have yet to come to terms with what Claus Offe, the German sociologist, describes as the contradictions of the welfare state and the persistent crises of crisis management. This paper critically assesses Offe's contribution in light of the recent reforms in ?really existing socialism.?; The author contends that although Offe's neo?Schumpeterian argument goes a long (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  8
    John Keane & David Held (1983). The Welfare State and the Future of Socialism: An Interview with Claus Offe. Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1983 (58):168-184.
    QUESTION: We would like to begin this discussion of the welfare state and the future of socialism by asking you about several substantive aspects of your work on the limitations of the welfare state. To begin with, why do you often say that late capitalist systems can neither live with nor without the welfare state? Do you consider this to be their fundamental contradiction?OFFE: A short-hand defintion of a contradiciton is that it is a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  22
    Daniel Shapiro (2002). Egalitarianism and Welfare-State Redistribution. Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (1):1-35.
    A central idea of contemporary philosophical egalitarianism's theory of justice is that involuntary inequalities or disadvantages—those that arise through no choice or fault of one's own—should be minimized or rectified in some way. Egalitarians believe that the preferred institutional vehicle for fulfilling these obligations of justice is some form of a welfare state. Of course, contemporary egalitarians disagree about the best way to interpret or understand their theory of justice and institutions: Which inequalities are chosen and which are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  17
    Anthony Skillen (1985). Welfare State Versus Welfare Society? Journal of Applied Philosophy 2 (1):3-17.
    ABSTRACT The welfare state is not just a system of personal insurance but an expression of community, of concern for our fellows. It places some things beyond the question of purchasing power. Yet its structures are often criticised as subverting personal and social cares and responsibilities. Arguably there is a ‘dialectic of self‐destruction’ here, a tendency for the institution to undermine its own support. At the same time this problem is inherent in the capitalist state itself, as (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    P. Lindsay (2000). Overcoming False Dichotomies: Mill, Marx and the Welfare State. History of Political Thought 21 (4):657-681.
    There is a strong perception in the social sciences that the welfare state and socialism differ qualitatively rather than by degree. This perception holds that the welfare state is fundamentally incapable, in any incarnation, of realizing the social aspirations of socialism, and that socialism is likewise destructive of welfare state ideals. As a result of such thinking, the marginal, intersectional world that does exist between the welfare state and socialism becomes hidden from (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  4
    Douglas Den Uyl (2001). Individualist Ethics And The Welfare State. [REVIEW] Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (5):109-115.
    DOUGLAS J. DEN UYL expresses agreement with David Kelley's thesis in A Life of One's Own that the welfare state is not a good thing both for moral reasons and for its practical consequences. But the relationship between the moral and the political is more ambiguous than might first be imagined. The main questions explored are twofold: Is Kelley presupposing the truth of his own position in criticizing another and does this alter the presentation from argument to rhetoric?; (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  8
    Anders Molander, Harald Grimen & Erik Oddvar Eriksen (2012). Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (3):214-230.
    The discretionary powers of welfare state professionals are in tension with the requirements of the democratic Rechtsstaat. Extensive use of discretion can threaten the principles of the rule of law and relinquish democratic control over the implementation of laws and policies. These two tensions are in principle ineradicable. But does this also mean that they are impossible to come to grips with? Are there measures that may ease these tensions? We introduce an understanding of discretion that adds an (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    Anselm Schneider (2014). Embracing Ambiguity – Lessons From the Study of Corporate Social Responsibility Throughout the Rise and Decline of the Modern Welfare State. Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (3):293-308.
    In the work of Karl Polanyi, the negative effects of a self-regulating market economy are described as being limited by societal forces such as the policies of the welfare state. With the decline of the modern welfare state since the late 1970s, social activities of business firms are increasingly regarded as an important complement to or even as a substitute for welfare state policies by a part of the literature. However, and controversially, another stream (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  7
    Theodore R. Marmor (1993). Understanding the Welfare State: Crisis, Critics, and Countercritics. Critical Review 7 (4):461-477.
    We are now seeing a new wave of literature about the “crisis” of the welfare state. In the earlier wave, some critics charged that social spending significantly detracted from macro‐ or microeconomic performance, while others challenged the legitimacy or efficacy of welfare programs; a third group worried about the effect of macroeconomic problems on the viability of the welfare state. None of these criticisms can be said to have been satisfactory, and continued reiterations of them (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    Howard Husock (1997). Standards Versus Struggle: The Failure of Public Housing and the Welfare-State Impulse. Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2):69.
    In considering the development and course of the American welfare state, there are some places which are better starting points than others. One such place is the State Street corridor, the series of high-rise Chicago Housing Authority public-housing projects which loom over Lake Michigan. Most Chicagoans, like their counterparts in other cities, have become inured to conditions there: a murder rate far in excess of that of the city as a whole, a society of unemployed single mothers, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Douglas J. Den Uyl (2001). Individualist Ethics and the Welfare State. [REVIEW] Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 3 (1):109 - 115.
    Douglas J. Den Uyl expresses agreement with David Kelley's thesis in A Life of One's Own that the welfare state is not a good thing both for moral reasons and for its practical consequences. But the relationship between the moral and the political is more ambiguous than might first be imagined. The main questions explored are twofold: Is Kelley presupposing the truth of his own position in criticizing another—and does this alter the presentation from argument to rhetoric?; and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  4
    Richard A. Epstein (1997). The Problem of Forfeiture in the Welfare State. Social Philosophy and Policy 14 (2):256.
    Political theory has a good deal to say both for and against the establishment of the modern welfare state. As one might expect, most of that discussion is directed toward the expanded set of basic rights that the state confers on its members. In its most canonical form, the welfare state represents a switch in vision from the regime of negative rights in the nineteenth century to the regime of positive rights so much in vogue (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Joseph Agassi, The Theory and Practice of the Welfare State.
    Criticism of the welfare state is mostly economic and administrative, relating to the resultant national debt and state bureaucracy. Budget cuts and privatization may help but not eliminate the difficulty. Yet, the primary concern of the welfare system is neither economic nor administrative; so, the force of this criticism is limited. To restrict the discussion to the defunct free-markets and centralized economies is to distort and to obstruct clear thinking on national priorities. Criticism of any (...) system should not aim at the revival of these extremist solutions, but raise cost-effectiveness. All this holds for the medical sector in particular. (shrink)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Keith Banting, Richard Johnston, Will Kymlicka & Stuart Soroka (2006). Do Multiculturalism Policies Erode the Welfare State? An Empirical Analysis. In Keith Banting & Will Kymlicka (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Markus Crepaz (2006). 'If You Are My Brother, I May Give You a Dime!' Public Opinion on Multiculturalism, Trust, and the Welfare State. In Keith Banting & Will Kymlicka (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Daniel Engster (2015). Justice, Care, and the Welfare State. OUP Oxford.
    This book explores contemporary welfare state reform from a moral and philosophical perspective.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Han Entzinger (2006). The Parallel Decline of Multiculturalism and the Welfare State in the Netherlands. In Keith Banting & Will Kymlicka (eds.), Multiculturalism and the Welfare State: Recognition and Redistribution in Contemporary Democracies. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  10
    Amy Gutmann (ed.) (1988). Democracy and the Welfare State. Princeton University Press.
    The essays in this volume explore the moral foundations and the political prospects of the welfare state in the United States. Among the questions addressed are the following: Has public support for the welfare state faded?
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000