156 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
William P. Alston [138]William Alston [18]
  1. William Alston, Alston.
    [Alethic Realism] 1. The sense of ‘true’ and ‘false’ in which such items as beliefs, statements, and propositions can be evaluated as true or false. 2. It is important to determine the truth-value of such items in this sense.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. William Alston, PHIL 470: Seminar: Metaphysics & Epistemology Truth and Reality.
    Professor JeeLoo Liu § Metaphysical Realism ___ The view that large stretches of reality do not depend on our conceptual and theoretical choices for existing and being what they are. Or: ___ The view that vast stretches of reality are what they are absolutely, not in any way relative to certain conceptual-theoretical choices that have equally viable alternatives. ___ It is sensible because it recognizes that some stretches of reality do conform to the account anti-realism gives of the whole of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. William P. Alston (2009). 2. The Perception of God. Philosophical Topics 16 (2):23-52.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. William P. Alston (2007). L Illocutionary Acts and Truth. In Geo Siegwart & Dirk Griemann (eds.), Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Routledge. 5--9.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. William Alston (2005). Beyond Justification: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    " In a book that seeks to shift the ground of debate within theory of knowledge, William P. Alston finds that the century-lo.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. William Alston (2005). Two Cheers for Mystery! In Andrew Dole & Andrew Chignell (eds.), God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge University Press.
  7. William P. Alston (2005). Perception and Representation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):253-289.
    I oppose the popular view that the phenomenal character of perceptual experience consists in the subject's representing the (putative) perceived object as being so-and-so. The account of perceptual experience I favor instead is a version of the "Theory of Appearing" that takes it to be a matter of the perceived object's appearing to one as so-and-so, where this does not mean that the subject takes or believes it to be so-and-so. This plays no part in my criticisms of Representationalism. I (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. William P. Alston (2005). Religious Language. In William J. Wainwright (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. 234--242.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. William P. Alston, Laurence Bonjour, Carl Ginet, Alvin I. Goldman, John Greco, George I. Mavrodes, Philip L. Quinn, Alessandra Tanesini, Nicholas Wolterstorff & Linda Zagzebski (2005). Perspectives on the Philosophy of William P. Alston. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. William P. Alston (2004). Mysticism and Perceptual Awareness of God. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
  11. William P. Alston (2004). Religious Experience Justifies Religious Belief. In Michael L. Peterson & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub.. 135--45.
  12. William P. Alston (2002). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Dialogue 41 (3):589-590.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. William P. Alston (ed.) (2002). Realism & Antirealism. Cornell University Press.
  14. William P. Alston (ed.) (2002). Realism and Antirealism. Cornell Up.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. William P. Alston (2002). Sellars and the "Myth of the Given&Quot;. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):69-86.
  16. William P. Alston (2002). What Euthyphro Should Have Said. In William Lane Craig (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Reader and Guide. Edinburgh University Press. 283-298.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. William P. Alston (2002). What Metaphysical Realism Is Not. In Realism and Antirealism. Cornell Up. 97-115.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. William Alston (2001). Almeder, Robert," Dretske's Dreadful Question," Philosophia, 24 (1995), 449-57. Almeder, Robert," Externalism and Justification," Philosophia, 24 (1995), 465-69. Almeder, Robert, Harmless Naturalism: The IJmits of Science and the Nature of Philosophy, Open Court, 1998. Alston, William," Two Types of Foundationalism," Journal of Philosophy, LXXXII. [REVIEW] In Hilary Kornblith (ed.), Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Blackwell Publishers. 2--261.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. William Alston (2001). A Sensible Metaphysical Realism. Marquette University Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. William P. Alston (2001). Doing Epistemology Without Justification. Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2):1-18.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. William P. Alston (2001). Religious Belief and Values. Faith and Philosophy 18 (1):36-49.
    Receptivity to Christian or other religious proclamations is powerfully influenced by one’s value orientations. I distinguish five contrasts in such orientations that illustrate this point. 1. Finding “worldly” values most deeply satisfying vs. a sense that something that transcends those would be most fulfilling. 2. Extreme stress on human autonomy vs. a positive evaluation of deference to God, if such there be. 3. A sense of thorough sinfulness vs. a thoroughly positive self image. 4. A willingness to accept outside help (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. William P. Alston (2000). Virtue and Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):185-189.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. William P. Alston (2000). Why Should There Not Be Experience of God? In Brian Davies (ed.), Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. William Alston (1999). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University Press.
    William P. Alston. difference in the scope of the rule reflects the fact that I-rules exist for the sake of making communication possible. Whereas their cousins are enacted and enforced for other reasons. We could distinguish I-rules just by this ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. William Alston (1999). Perceptual Knowledge. In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Blackwell. 223--42.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. William P. Alston (1999). Back to the Theory of Appearing. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):181--203.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. William P. Alston (1999). The Distinctiveness of the Epistemology of Religious Belief. In. In G. Bruntrup & R. K. Tacelli (eds.), The Rationality of Theism. Kluwer. 237--254.
  28. William P. Alston (1999). What Is Distinctive About the Epistemology of Religious Belief? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1999:91-102.
    In what follows, I discuss the extent to which the epistemology of religious belief differs from the epistemology of other areas of our belief, as well as the extent to which it is similar. There will be important similarities: for example, the standards for the application of terms of epistemic assessment like ‘justified’, ‘warranted’,and ‘rational’. But in this essay, I concentrate on delineating some important differences between religious and non-religious epistemology.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. William P. Alston (1998). Perception and Conception. In Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms: A Realistic Assessment. New York: Fordham University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. William P. Alston (1998). Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms: A Realistic Assessment. New York: Fordham University Press.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. William P. Alston (1998). Some Reflections on the Early Days of the Society of Christian Philosophers. Faith and Philosophy 15 (2):141-143.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. William P. Alston (1997). Biblical Criticism and the Resurrection. In Stephen Davis, Kendall T., O.’Collins Daniel & Gerald (eds.), The Resurrection. Oxford Up. 148-183.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. William P. Alston (1997). Chisholm on the Epistemology of Perception. In The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
  34. William P. Alston (1997). Faith and Criticism. Faith and Philosophy 14 (2):255-259.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. William P. Alston (1997). Review: Swinburne and Christian Theology. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41 (1):35 - 57.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. William P. Alston (1997). Response to Hick. Faith and Philosophy 14 (3):287-288.
    This is a response to Hick’s comments on my approach to the problem of religious diversity in Perceiving God. Before unearthing the bones I have to pick with him, let me fully acknowledge that I have not provided a fully satisfactory solution to the problem. At most I have done the best that can be done given the constraints within which I was working. But this best, if such it be, is not as bad as Hick makes it appear. To (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. William P. Alston (1997). Swinburne and Christian Theology. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 41 (1):35-57.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. William P. Alston (1997). The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. William P. Alston, Roderick M. Chisholm, Donald Davidson, Gilbert Harman, Richard Rorty & John R. Searle (1997). Realism/Antirealism and Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. William P. Alston (1996). A Realist Conception of Truth. Cornell University Press.
    William P. Alston formulates and defends a realist conception of truth, which he calls alethic realism (from "aletheia", Greek for "truth").
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. William P. Alston (1996). Some (Temporarily) Final Thoughts on Evidential. In Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.), The Evidential Argument From Evil. Indiana University Press. 311.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. William P. Alston (1996). The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (1):235-238.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. William Alston (1995). Epistemic Warrant as Proper Function. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):397-402.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. William Alston (1995). Review: Epistemic Warrant as Proper Function. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):397 - 402.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. William P. Alston (1995). How to Think About Reliability. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):1-29.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. William P. Alston (1995). Realism and the Christian Faith. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 38 (1/3):37 - 60.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. William P. Alston (1995). Reply to Critics. Journal of Philosophical Research 20:67-81.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. William P. Alston (1995). Theism as Theory and the Problem of Evil. Topoi 14 (2):135-148.
    Theism is a metaphysical theory. But the typical adherent of a theistic religion does not hold theism as a theory, even though she is committed to various propositions that could enter into such a theory. Attention is given to the kind of theory theism is, when it is a theory. As far as religion is concerned, the main importance of the question as to whether theism is a theory concerns the issue as to whether the success of theism as a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. William Alston (1994). Response to Critics. Religious Studies 30 (2):171 - 180.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. William P. Alston (1994). Divine Action: Shadow or Substance? In Thomas F. Tracy (ed.), The God Who Acts: Philosophical and Theological Explorations. Pennsylvania State University Press. 41-62.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 156